<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford won&#8217;t use Fairlane name for van replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:34:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: V'duv Kux Klan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-197063</link>
		<dc:creator>V'duv Kux Klan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-197063</guid>
		<description>lol not imitations in Toyota or Honda, the one that is rebadging its cars is GM getoever your asian trauma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol not imitations in Toyota or Honda, the one that is rebadging its cars is GM getoever your asian trauma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-194009</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-194009</guid>
		<description>how about make a contest for people suggest the name win this new crossover, but I wonder what name ford decide since its edge is chosen, maybe edgestar/bronco, but really like as a clone from its own company range rover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about make a contest for people suggest the name win this new crossover, but I wonder what name ford decide since its edge is chosen, maybe edgestar/bronco, but really like as a clone from its own company range rover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-193500</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-193500</guid>
		<description>Saturn Relay all the way. Odyssey and Sienna are cheap imitations, and are nor American GM products so they shouldn&#039;t even exist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturn Relay all the way. Odyssey and Sienna are cheap imitations, and are nor American GM products so they shouldn&#8217;t even exist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V'duv Kux Klan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-193164</link>
		<dc:creator>V'duv Kux Klan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-193164</guid>
		<description>Ford has always built shit, i dont care the name as far as i know it will be a pice of shit as all the american cars, buy an Odissey or a Sienna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford has always built ****, i dont care the name as far as i know it will be a pice of **** as all the american cars, buy an Odissey or a Sienna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v2</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-192431</link>
		<dc:creator>v2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-192431</guid>
		<description>#23, sure does.
I could never understand the theory of Lincoln-izing their trucks...No it&#039;s not an Explorer it&#039;s better...it&#039;s an Aviator....No it&#039;s not an Expedition, it&#039;s BETTER, it&#039;s a Navigator.  Paying $15K more for an asthetic package if farkin idiotic.

Some people just love to get rid of cash.

They can call this the &quot;FUC-O&quot;    Ford Utility Cross-Over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23, sure does.<br />
I could never understand the theory of Lincoln-izing their trucks&#8230;No it&#8217;s not an Explorer it&#8217;s better&#8230;it&#8217;s an Aviator&#8230;.No it&#8217;s not an Expedition, it&#8217;s BETTER, it&#8217;s a Navigator.  Paying $15K more for an asthetic package if farkin idiotic.</p>
<p>Some people just love to get rid of cash.</p>
<p>They can call this the &#8220;FUC-O&#8221;    Ford Utility Cross-Over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-192189</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-192189</guid>
		<description>Looks like a Range Rover to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a Range Rover to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMrules</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-191856</link>
		<dc:creator>GMrules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-191856</guid>
		<description>GM will be Fords replacment in a few years once Ford goes out of business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM will be Fords replacment in a few years once Ford goes out of business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomicbri</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-191818</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomicbri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-191818</guid>
		<description>Call it the Fairfield.... Sounds like some kind of country club crap Ford might be aiming for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call it the Fairfield&#8230;. Sounds like some kind of country club crap Ford might be aiming for&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-191483</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-191483</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Ford can hear what people have to say. As for names how about the Ford Lunch Boxster or the Ford Short Bus. I&#039;ll take one in yellow with a flip out stop sign
because this trend of little square SUVs is retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Ford can hear what people have to say. As for names how about the Ford Lunch Boxster or the Ford Short Bus. I&#8217;ll take one in yellow with a flip out stop sign<br />
because this trend of little square SUVs is retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-191469</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-191469</guid>
		<description>I am very glad they aren&#039;t using the Fairlane name and it&#039;s awesome to see this great new product.  That said, they need a good name.  Ford SUVs usually have E names, but I can&#039;t think of a good one, so how about Country Squire II?  What? No Good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very glad they aren&#8217;t using the Fairlane name and it&#8217;s awesome to see this great new product.  That said, they need a good name.  Ford SUVs usually have E names, but I can&#8217;t think of a good one, so how about Country Squire II?  What? No Good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-191252</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-191252</guid>
		<description>Good move Ford.

Now if they can just hire Jill Wagner to replace Mark Fields we&#039;d all be asthetically satisfied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good move Ford.</p>
<p>Now if they can just hire Jill Wagner to replace Mark Fields we&#8217;d all be asthetically satisfied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-191014</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-191014</guid>
		<description>I take the taped-on badges off anyway.  This might be interesting enough to consider a Ford.

j i m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take the taped-on badges off anyway.  This might be interesting enough to consider a Ford.</p>
<p>j i m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous is 40 and lives with his mommie!!</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190964</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous is 40 and lives with his mommie!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190964</guid>
		<description>LOL, ohhh Anonymous..... All GM minivans sales are tanking as we speak.  You know, they have poor doors realiblity cuz they are based on 8 years old platform. Same old GM way!!  Nobody wants to drive a GM minivan with long nose and doors that dont close properly, LOSER!!

I just love it when GM is going down!!  Hope Nissan folds GM!!!

Go back and cry on ur mommie&#039;s shoulder, ass-wipe moron Anonymous!! 
Sell your 1985 Chevy pickup and drive a new Mercury Milan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, ohhh Anonymous&#8230;.. All GM minivans sales are tanking as we speak.  You know, they have poor doors realiblity cuz they are based on 8 years old platform. Same old GM way!!  Nobody wants to drive a GM minivan with long nose and doors that dont close properly, LOSER!!</p>
<p>I just love it when GM is going down!!  Hope Nissan folds GM!!!</p>
<p>Go back and cry on ur mommie&#8217;s shoulder, ass-wipe moron Anonymous!!<br />
Sell your 1985 Chevy pickup and drive a new Mercury Milan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190737</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190737</guid>
		<description>How about Ford &quot;Fahgetaboutit&quot; and buy a Saturn Relay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Ford &#8220;Fahgetaboutit&#8221; and buy a Saturn Relay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190592</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190592</guid>
		<description>Thank god they didn&#039;t pi$$ on that name, the auto makers need to understand if they are going to resuse a name that has so much history and nostalga they have to do the previous car justis.

think they have learned? I bet not. I have faith the pi$$ing will continue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god they didn&#8217;t pi$$ on that name, the auto makers need to understand if they are going to resuse a name that has so much history and nostalga they have to do the previous car justis.</p>
<p>think they have learned? I bet not. I have faith the pi$$ing will continue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomicbri</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190411</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomicbri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190411</guid>
		<description>Good thing Ford will not use this name. Made no sense to me since the Fairlane was a sedan. But a Lincoln version? Guess Ford still can&#039;t resist the old badge engineering,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing Ford will not use this name. Made no sense to me since the Fairlane was a sedan. But a Lincoln version? Guess Ford still can&#8217;t resist the old badge engineering,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190326</guid>
		<description>Ford is begining to place itself in a precarius position with the Retro thing...

Mustang, GT, Bronco, Fairlane...

The future does not lead back to the late 1960&#039;s.  The sooner they realize this, the better things will be.  It is OK for a throwback here and there... not the entire lineup though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is begining to place itself in a precarius position with the Retro thing&#8230;</p>
<p>Mustang, GT, Bronco, Fairlane&#8230;</p>
<p>The future does not lead back to the late 1960&#8217;s.  The sooner they realize this, the better things will be.  It is OK for a throwback here and there&#8230; not the entire lineup though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190292</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190292</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU Ford. Use Fairlane for a decent revival of the original classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU Ford. Use Fairlane for a decent revival of the original classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190278</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190278</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if the people posting here are aware of the car with the name Fairlane? Those who don&#039;t like the name can&#039;t argue the fact that these cars were at the top of the game in the early to mid sixties when the horsepower wars were being fought. Yea I agree (being a Fairlane owner myself) that the name doesn&#039;t fit this concept at all. Fairlanes are know as midsized quarter mile drag cars and Nascar race cars using arguably one of the best FE engines made–427 side oiler. So I am very pleased that Ford has decided to change the name. I have to admit though, it got my attention in a hurry as I was anticipating a car (before seeing the actual concept).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if the people posting here are aware of the car with the name Fairlane? Those who don&#8217;t like the name can&#8217;t argue the fact that these cars were at the top of the game in the early to mid sixties when the horsepower wars were being fought. Yea I agree (being a Fairlane owner myself) that the name doesn&#8217;t fit this concept at all. Fairlanes are know as midsized quarter mile drag cars and Nascar race cars using arguably one of the best FE engines made–427 side oiler. So I am very pleased that Ford has decided to change the name. I have to admit though, it got my attention in a hurry as I was anticipating a car (before seeing the actual concept).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190234</link>
		<dc:creator>LC Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190234</guid>
		<description>The report is in error, it should read, the Fairlane was 1956 not 1966.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report is in error, it should read, the Fairlane was 1956 not 1966.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190225</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190225</guid>
		<description>Once again, Ford is going to be late to market.

In toning down the concept to production format, Ford is going to find itself with a near mirror image of the soon-to-be unveiled Dodge Caravan, and especially the Chrysler T&amp;C (hood ribbings and all)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Ford is going to be late to market.</p>
<p>In toning down the concept to production format, Ford is going to find itself with a near mirror image of the soon-to-be unveiled Dodge Caravan, and especially the Chrysler T&amp;C (hood ribbings and all)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190171</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190171</guid>
		<description>ehh.. missed some words in there.  Meant to say

&quot;Can&#039;t they resist the urge to re-badge everything?  Why not keep a model unique to one brand?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ehh.. missed some words in there.  Meant to say</p>
<p>&#8220;Can&#8217;t they resist the urge to re-badge everything?  Why not keep a model unique to one brand?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190169</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190169</guid>
		<description>Fairlane is a good name, just not for that vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairlane is a good name, just not for that vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190167</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190167</guid>
		<description>What family friendly F words are left that don&#039;t sound foolish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What family friendly F words are left that don&#8217;t sound foolish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British_rover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190165</link>
		<dc:creator>British_rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190165</guid>
		<description>I am glad they won&#039;t use the fairlane name. Come up with something original and don&#039;t use an old heritage name that makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad they won&#8217;t use the fairlane name. Come up with something original and don&#8217;t use an old heritage name that makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190164</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190164</guid>
		<description>Needs a name like F7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needs a name like F7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190155</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190155</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  Looks good.  Needs a name... What it does NOT need however, is a Lincoln version.  Can&#039;t they resist the urge to keep a model unique to one brand?  Especially a psuedo-minivan like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Looks good.  Needs a name&#8230; What it does NOT need however, is a Lincoln version.  Can&#8217;t they resist the urge to keep a model unique to one brand?  Especially a psuedo-minivan like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement.html/comment-page-1#comment-190127</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/10/ford-wont-use-fairlane-name-for-van-replacement/#comment-190127</guid>
		<description>This thing looks great.  Needs a good name.  Fairlane was stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thing looks great.  Needs a good name.  Fairlane was stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
