<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM close to approving massive investment at Zeta plant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:06:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: motorman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-174244</link>
		<dc:creator>motorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-174244</guid>
		<description>6ix GM has a contract with UAW in canada that a car called camaro must be built in a canadian factory that was bulldozed down several years ago. this contract runs till the end of 2007 so it will have to be changed to build a camaro and that will be at least 2008 for the 2009 MY camaro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6ix GM has a contract with UAW in canada that a car called camaro must be built in a canadian factory that was bulldozed down several years ago. this contract runs till the end of 2007 so it will have to be changed to build a camaro and that will be at least 2008 for the 2009 MY camaro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-173113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-173113</guid>
		<description>Hooray, &quot;anonymous&quot;, coming from a monkey, you&#039;ve won the &quot;best post of the day&quot; award ... open up, I&#039;ve got a banana for you. 

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray, &#8220;anonymous&#8221;, coming from a monkey, you&#8217;ve won the &#8220;best post of the day&#8221; award &#8230; open up, I&#8217;ve got a banana for you. </p>
<p>MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-172997</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-172997</guid>
		<description>GM you should be on your second generation Zeta by now.  You&#039;re so friggin stupid.

Just build it and get it on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM you should be on your second generation Zeta by now.  You&#8217;re so friggin stupid.</p>
<p>Just build it and get it on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-172919</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-172919</guid>
		<description>A Zeta Cadilac DTS??  Why wouldn&#039;t it be on Sigma, since it is the Cadillac exclusive RWD platform.  Anyway, I can&#039;t wait to see all these vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Zeta Cadilac DTS??  Why wouldn&#8217;t it be on Sigma, since it is the Cadillac exclusive RWD platform.  Anyway, I can&#8217;t wait to see all these vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-172909</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-172909</guid>
		<description>Dean you&#039;re a dope.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean you&#8217;re a dope&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-172902</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-172902</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re just timing the build so that it matches up with oil hitting $100/barrel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re just timing the build so that it matches up with oil hitting $100/barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouthDriver 24</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-172873</link>
		<dc:creator>YouthDriver 24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-172873</guid>
		<description>Same place where my 2000 Bonneville SSEI was built. That’s probably why my car has had 0 issues in 7 years, unlike the ones built in different locations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same place where my 2000 Bonneville SSEI was built. That’s probably why my car has had 0 issues in 7 years, unlike the ones built in different locations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-168053</link>
		<dc:creator>cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-168053</guid>
		<description>i just hope they make the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just hope they make the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6ix</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant.html/comment-page-1#comment-168044</link>
		<dc:creator>6ix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/15/gm-close-to-approving-massive-investment-at-zeta-plant/#comment-168044</guid>
		<description>Great.  The stupid camaro won&#039;t be in production for another three years.  That means we&#039;ll continue seeing &quot;spy&quot; photos and exclusive tests of the car until fall of 2009.  Jeesh.  Shoot, by then, the 1996 Camaro will be considered retro.  Congress doesn&#039;t take this long to get something done.  Most of the parts on the new Camaro will be stock GM stuff, so why the long time?  I&#039;d think they would be better off using lower-cost, temporary tooling just to get the thing rolling and simply limit production numbers for a few years. That would at least keep the demand high and not fill the market too fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  The stupid camaro won&#8217;t be in production for another three years.  That means we&#8217;ll continue seeing &#8220;spy&#8221; photos and exclusive tests of the car until fall of 2009.  Jeesh.  Shoot, by then, the 1996 Camaro will be considered retro.  Congress doesn&#8217;t take this long to get something done.  Most of the parts on the new Camaro will be stock GM stuff, so why the long time?  I&#8217;d think they would be better off using lower-cost, temporary tooling just to get the thing rolling and simply limit production numbers for a few years. That would at least keep the demand high and not fill the market too fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
