Comments on: GM cuts arts spending

By: Get Real

Get Real — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:22:01 +0000

Oh yea, no ART from GM either thanks to NASCAR’s crappolla “car of tomorrow” design.

By: Get Real

Get Real — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:19:51 +0000

With wind-tunnel-committee designed cars they don’t NEED any ART in designing any GM car.

By: Need more oil for GM is an idiot

Need more oil for GM is an idiot — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:20:55 +0000

Gm needs to cut their throats …oh wait they already did.

By: Mutant@DCX

Mutant@DCX — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:31:12 +0000

So Nascar and WWF are safe! Southern culture and refinement unabashed.

By: Borat

Borat — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:46:06 +0000

Johnny, I’ll send you bill for destroyed laptop. I spilled coke (as beverage) all over keyboard!

By: Jon Luc

Jon Luc — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:24:54 +0000

Hoosier is correct. Mayer & NMOFGM are queers.

By: johnnycanuck

johnnycanuck — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:52:10 +0000

This comes as a surprise. One might have assumed GM had been funding the porn industry seeing as they spent so many years jerking off their customers.

By: HoosierHero

HoosierHero — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:28:51 +0000

Hmmm, if they’ve long been supporters of the arts, then wouldn’t it make you guys queers by association? I guess the truth hurts. GM should keep sponsoring them because their line-up could use some artistic direction…

By: Need more oil for GM

Need more oil for GM — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:50:17 +0000

Who cares, the artsy fartsy stuff is for queers and losers. VW and Mazda owners for instance

By: mayer_ray_nagin

mayer_ray_nagin — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:40:45 +0000

Good. They should cut arts spending. Artsy types are the type of fruitcakes who hate domestic anything and always drive Smart cars or other euro-trash. Why subsidize their misguided infatuation with useless crap like opera?