




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Management Shakeup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impulsive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307494</link>
		<dc:creator>Impulsive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307494</guid>
		<description>&quot;whoopee&quot;, reading your post was scary ... I was about to post a nearly IDENTICAL view.

CLEAN HOUSE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;whoopee&#8221;, reading your post was scary &#8230; I was about to post a nearly IDENTICAL view.</p>
<p>CLEAN HOUSE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoopee</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307433</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307433</guid>
		<description>gm needs to do more than a reshuffling, they need to CLEAN HOUSE

step one should be to buy tesla motors. first of all, it would be a cheap acquisition and get gm into the game of electric cars. second, it would push a thin-wedge of twenty-first century corporate and manufacturing structure into gm. gm needs to be rebuilt, not altered (as does ford). dump the 80s leftovers in  management, dump all unions, redesign the entire system of how cars are designed and manufactured (hint: look at apple, they only design their computers, they outsource construction)

gm needs to take some big risks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gm needs to do more than a reshuffling, they need to CLEAN HOUSE</p>
<p>step one should be to buy tesla motors. first of all, it would be a cheap acquisition and get gm into the game of electric cars. second, it would push a thin-wedge of twenty-first century corporate and manufacturing structure into gm. gm needs to be rebuilt, not altered (as does ford). dump the 80s leftovers in  management, dump all unions, redesign the entire system of how cars are designed and manufactured (hint: look at apple, they only design their computers, they outsource construction)</p>
<p>gm needs to take some big risks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307385</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307385</guid>
		<description>Cadillac exterior is striking but the interior is bland.

Buick has very nice interiors (among all of GM), but the exterior is still a &#039;88 Taurus soap-bar.

Jay should be in charge of exteriors.
Steve should be in charge in interiors.

Use each person&#039;s strengths to help GM.

But I agree, a guy that blows $3 Billion on cars that sell an average of 7/dealership/month should NOT BE IN CHARGE.  GM is crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cadillac exterior is striking but the interior is bland.</p>
<p>Buick has very nice interiors (among all of GM), but the exterior is still a &#8217;88 Taurus soap-bar.</p>
<p>Jay should be in charge of exteriors.<br />
Steve should be in charge in interiors.</p>
<p>Use each person&#8217;s strengths to help GM.</p>
<p>But I agree, a guy that blows $3 Billion on cars that sell an average of 7/dealership/month should NOT BE IN CHARGE.  GM is crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vertical</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307373</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307373</guid>
		<description>If the article is accurate, Spenchian&#039;s title is a joke; Director of Sales, Service, Marketing, and Revenue Management?  What the hell is revenue management?!!  Don&#039;t Sales and Marketing cover it?  Sounds like excess corporate beauracracy - or am I missing something?  Or are they missing something - like focusing too much on sales and not focusing enough on cars.  Build it (right) and they will buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the article is accurate, Spenchian&#8217;s title is a joke; Director of Sales, Service, Marketing, and Revenue Management?  What the hell is revenue management?!!  Don&#8217;t Sales and Marketing cover it?  Sounds like excess corporate beauracracy &#8211; or am I missing something?  Or are they missing something &#8211; like focusing too much on sales and not focusing enough on cars.  Build it (right) and they will buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wetstuff</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307369</link>
		<dc:creator>wetstuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307369</guid>
		<description>Concrete Shoes like CTS says.  Cull any division that has not made a profit in the last five years.  ...but they&#039;ll have to bankrupt to pull that off with the dealers and UAW chomping at GM&#039;s ankles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concrete Shoes like CTS says.  Cull any division that has not made a profit in the last five years.  &#8230;but they&#8217;ll have to bankrupt to pull that off with the dealers and UAW chomping at GM&#8217;s ankles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307367</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307367</guid>
		<description>Not sure Buick or Mercury have a place in todays market.  It costs a lot of $$$ to axe a brand though.

Buicks are cool because Tiger Woods drive one, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure Buick or Mercury have a place in todays market.  It costs a lot of $$$ to axe a brand though.</p>
<p>Buicks are cool because Tiger Woods drive one, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307325</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307325</guid>
		<description>No, GM, NO! What the hell were you thinking putting ANYONE from Buick in a leadership position? Damn it! This will ruin every effort that GM&#039;s been trying to do to improve its sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, GM, NO! What the hell were you thinking putting ANYONE from Buick in a leadership position? Damn it! This will ruin every effort that GM&#8217;s been trying to do to improve its sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0GSharK6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307323</link>
		<dc:creator>0GSharK6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307323</guid>
		<description>Those Terrazas are butt-ugly. I&#039;m surprised I ever see any on the road. I got to drive a Rendezvous for about 20 miles a couple weeks back, and it just doesn&#039;t feel right driving one of those. I can only imagine the driving feel of the asstack.. errm, Aztec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Terrazas are butt-ugly. I&#8217;m surprised I ever see any on the road. I got to drive a Rendezvous for about 20 miles a couple weeks back, and it just doesn&#8217;t feel right driving one of those. I can only imagine the driving feel of the asstack.. errm, Aztec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307303</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307303</guid>
		<description>Anyone ready for a SAAB Park Avenue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone ready for a SAAB Park Avenue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307292</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307292</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna have to disagree LamborghiniZ. The Terraza is not the worst idea ever. The Pontiac Aztek is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna have to disagree LamborghiniZ. The Terraza is not the worst idea ever. The Pontiac Aztek is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carsarecool</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307282</link>
		<dc:creator>carsarecool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307282</guid>
		<description>LamborghiniZ,

I agree with your assessments of the LaCrosse, Lucerne, and Terreza, but you are way off on the Enclave.  If you have read any review for the GMC Acadia or the Saturn Outlook, you would know that they have been praised for their handling despite their hefty curb weight.  They also get better mileage than the glorious Honda Pilot.  There is no need to be ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LamborghiniZ,</p>
<p>I agree with your assessments of the LaCrosse, Lucerne, and Terreza, but you are way off on the Enclave.  If you have read any review for the GMC Acadia or the Saturn Outlook, you would know that they have been praised for their handling despite their hefty curb weight.  They also get better mileage than the glorious Honda Pilot.  There is no need to be ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307272</guid>
		<description>Should have read it four time I guess (no caddy change)
Still lets take a failing brand and put a failing exec in control of it. Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have read it four time I guess (no caddy change)<br />
Still lets take a failing brand and put a failing exec in control of it. Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307271</guid>
		<description>Did I read that correctly? I read it three times. Shannon- oversaw the plummet of Buick got moved to one of the profitable brands? And we complain about not being able to fire union people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I read that correctly? I read it three times. Shannon- oversaw the plummet of Buick got moved to one of the profitable brands? And we complain about not being able to fire union people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307267</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307267</guid>
		<description>Lacrosse: Boring garbage.
Lucerne: Even more boring garbage.
Terreza: Worst idea EVER.
Enclave: Overweight, ponderous handling, weighs 5000 lbs, awful mileage. 

Buick...officially....SUCKS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lacrosse: Boring garbage.<br />
Lucerne: Even more boring garbage.<br />
Terreza: Worst idea EVER.<br />
Enclave: Overweight, ponderous handling, weighs 5000 lbs, awful mileage. </p>
<p>Buick&#8230;officially&#8230;.SUCKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307262</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307262</guid>
		<description>duuuuh, my bad scott youre rite, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duuuuh, my bad scott youre rite, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharif</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307259</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307259</guid>
		<description>Actually i think they should keep Pontiac, and I agree the sky is just the beginning----I hope!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually i think they should keep Pontiac, and I agree the sky is just the beginning&#8212;-I hope!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kempton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307258</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kempton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307258</guid>
		<description>CTS Driver---Shannon has been moved from Buick to Saab---NOT Cadillac. The only place that Cadillac was mentioned is where it says that the outgoing Saab guy was also the Cadillac marketing guru at one point. According to this report, nothing is changing at Cadillac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CTS Driver&#8212;Shannon has been moved from Buick to Saab&#8212;NOT Cadillac. The only place that Cadillac was mentioned is where it says that the outgoing Saab guy was also the Cadillac marketing guru at one point. According to this report, nothing is changing at Cadillac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307252</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307252</guid>
		<description>saturn brings in no profitsComment by jbird97

the saturns are finally good cars now so i see that changing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saturn brings in no profitsComment by jbird97</p>
<p>the saturns are finally good cars now so i see that changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307251</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307251</guid>
		<description>^^that summed it up well, those are the good ones, the rest are just concrete shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^that summed it up well, those are the good ones, the rest are just concrete shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbird97</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307250</link>
		<dc:creator>jbird97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307250</guid>
		<description>saturn brings in no profits, i could point out more things but ill just leave at that, so much for ur gm breakdown,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saturn brings in no profits, i could point out more things but ill just leave at that, so much for ur gm breakdown,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbb</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307247</link>
		<dc:creator>gbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307247</guid>
		<description>GM should have ditched Buick, GMC, Pontiac and Oldsmobile at the same time. I like GM, but enough is enough. Caddy, Chevy, Saturn and the ones that carry the company. Who needs the rest of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM should have ditched Buick, GMC, Pontiac and Oldsmobile at the same time. I like GM, but enough is enough. Caddy, Chevy, Saturn and the ones that carry the company. Who needs the rest of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307245</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-management-shakeup.html#comment-307245</guid>
		<description>ok gm lets put the moron who killed buick in charge of cadillac, what a great stupid idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok gm lets put the moron who killed buick in charge of cadillac, what a great stupid idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 397/398 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 12:39:34 -->
