




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM recalls 90,000 vehicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-372845</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-372845</guid>
		<description>No resale is real just like you are a loser janitor is real Theoretical is you claiming to drive a CIvic that last 91 k when every one else get 300k out of them or more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No resale is real just like you are a loser janitor is real Theoretical is you claiming to drive a CIvic that last 91 k when every one else get 300k out of them or more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-343681</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-343681</guid>
		<description>It is a fluffer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a fluffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342878</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342878</guid>
		<description>First tempo was an &#039;84 model. Is it as cold in North Holywood as it is in North County?  

1115: Resale value is theoretical at best 


Some Japanese cars are indeed superior to some cars made elswhere.I&#039;ve been admitting that since I dated a girl who had a Nissan Stanza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First tempo was an &#8217;84 model. Is it as cold in North Holywood as it is in North County?  </p>
<p>1115: Resale value is theoretical at best </p>
<p>Some Japanese cars are indeed superior to some cars made elswhere.I&#8217;ve been admitting that since I dated a girl who had a Nissan Stanza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342812</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342812</guid>
		<description>Never nailed anything lol funny back in the 8-0 when you owned a Tempo lol 
MSRP argument  is your burden to prove.The # 1 resale car is the Civic for years running no other vehicle has a higher % Your argument is defeated Oh wait its the TSX Either way its Japanese so when Im wrong Im still right 
Look it up. Ricardo came up with some Bs story and you went along with it bc you want GM to be &quot;considered&quot; lol 
I hope you JJT and Lamboz do what you like to talk about on this site You guys seem like you like each other Its sweet lol 
Bottom line GM recalls are a regular occurrence and the &quot;new&quot; GM including the 2007 Rendezvous Ranier and Terazza are all examples of the GM pattern of making unreliable shit 
In 2017 maybe they can be taken seriously but I highly doubt it 
enjoy your night guys 
Japanese car are superior the quicker you admit the easier it will be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never nailed anything lol funny back in the 8-0 when you owned a Tempo lol<br />
MSRP argument  is your burden to prove.The # 1 resale car is the Civic for years running no other vehicle has a higher % Your argument is defeated Oh wait its the TSX Either way its Japanese so when Im wrong Im still right<br />
Look it up. Ricardo came up with some Bs story and you went along with it bc you want GM to be &#8220;considered&#8221; lol<br />
I hope you JJT and Lamboz do what you like to talk about on this site You guys seem like you like each other Its sweet lol<br />
Bottom line GM recalls are a regular occurrence and the &#8220;new&#8221; GM including the 2007 Rendezvous Ranier and Terazza are all examples of the GM pattern of making unreliable shit<br />
In 2017 maybe they can be taken seriously but I highly doubt it<br />
enjoy your night guys<br />
Japanese car are superior the quicker you admit the easier it will be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 79TA</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342809</link>
		<dc:creator>79TA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342809</guid>
		<description>ahh retrospect . . . 90k vs 650k

Japanese build quality?  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahh retrospect . . . 90k vs 650k</p>
<p>Japanese build quality?  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: injunraiv</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342731</link>
		<dc:creator>injunraiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said before, it&#039;s hard not to argue with a fool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said before, it&#8217;s hard not to argue with a fool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342715</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342715</guid>
		<description>I know jackjim. He is such a moron. He cannot understand that they are not part of Buick&#039;s lineup. If they were, they would be on his website!! Idiot. And he ignored all the other things I said because he cannot defend himself there. I mean, he gave up on the MSRP values argument and everything else</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know jackjim. He is such a moron. He cannot understand that they are not part of Buick&#8217;s lineup. If they were, they would be on his website!! Idiot. And he ignored all the other things I said because he cannot defend himself there. I mean, he gave up on the MSRP values argument and everything else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342683</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342683</guid>
		<description>&quot;They are CURRENT models in the lineup.&quot;

Fluffer: feel free to look up the new inventory of any Buick dealer in the nation. They&#039;ll only have Lucerne, Lacrosse and (maybe) Enclave. Check the used inventory. Sure you&#039;ll regularly find one- and two-year old accords and pilots.

Some Japanese cars are better than some cars from elsewhere in the world.

CA36GTP: way to call the Fluffer on its BS at 8:34 p.m. on the 24th.

 The Enclave is MUCH better than both Pilots and both Highlanders. And The Rendezvous is, too. But probably not the Rondo.


Commodore: I do like the way the H-Pilot looks. I ain&#039;t no hypocrite.

CA36GTP: &quot;The Lambdas are much superior to the old GMT-360s, but that&#039;s not to say the GMT-360s were bad.&quot;

That&#039;s real.

&quot;The Highlander is better, but I hate Toyota&#039;s current styling that makes it look like a stretched and bloated Camry.&quot;
It&#039;s Camry-based.

&quot;By that logic, should we still consider the RSX part of Acura&#039;s line-up since dealerships still sell a new one every now and then, compare it to the Astra and Rabbit, and slag Honda off?&quot;

No, it&#039;s wrong to say anything bad about Honda or especially about its faux-luxury division. Liar!

This here is pure comedy &quot;the RSX is a great car that is sporty, reliable, has a great resale and excellent build quality.&quot;
I damn near fell off my chair. Glad for the armrests.


So they are not 2007 models like the Buicks. If there is a 2007 RSX available then I agree with you.

Fluffer: &quot;The RSX ... is worth a lot of money.&quot; To whom? And Rosie doesn&#039;t want any of us.


We shall all note that 1115 does not deny his pimple-dick, thereby making it a small and sorry fact of his life, thus explaining his psychotic love of Hondas (which are primarily driven by soccer-moms).


Commodore: Nice try, with your attempt to explain to the Fluffer what a fact is. I&#039;ve whipped out Merriam-Webster on his ass thrice, and he still doesn&#039;t get it. He wouldn’t even admit that the CTS is a better car than the Yaris!

lamboz get a life &quot;The Terraza, Rendezvous, and Rainer are from GM&#039;s old bad way of thinking. Reliable look-a-like waste of dealership space with little to no value.&quot; You have nailed it. Unlike 1115, who&#039;s never nailed anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They are CURRENT models in the lineup.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fluffer: feel free to look up the new inventory of any Buick dealer in the nation. They&#8217;ll only have Lucerne, Lacrosse and (maybe) Enclave. Check the used inventory. Sure you&#8217;ll regularly find one- and two-year old accords and pilots.</p>
<p>Some Japanese cars are better than some cars from elsewhere in the world.</p>
<p>CA36GTP: way to call the Fluffer on its BS at 8:34 p.m. on the 24th.</p>
<p> The Enclave is MUCH better than both Pilots and both Highlanders. And The Rendezvous is, too. But probably not the Rondo.</p>
<p>Commodore: I do like the way the H-Pilot looks. I ain&#8217;t no hypocrite.</p>
<p>CA36GTP: &#8220;The Lambdas are much superior to the old GMT-360s, but that&#8217;s not to say the GMT-360s were bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s real.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Highlander is better, but I hate Toyota&#8217;s current styling that makes it look like a stretched and bloated Camry.&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s Camry-based.</p>
<p>&#8220;By that logic, should we still consider the RSX part of Acura&#8217;s line-up since dealerships still sell a new one every now and then, compare it to the Astra and Rabbit, and slag Honda off?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s wrong to say anything bad about Honda or especially about its faux-luxury division. Liar!</p>
<p>This here is pure comedy &#8220;the RSX is a great car that is sporty, reliable, has a great resale and excellent build quality.&#8221;<br />
I damn near fell off my chair. Glad for the armrests.</p>
<p>So they are not 2007 models like the Buicks. If there is a 2007 RSX available then I agree with you.</p>
<p>Fluffer: &#8220;The RSX &#8230; is worth a lot of money.&#8221; To whom? And Rosie doesn&#8217;t want any of us.</p>
<p>We shall all note that 1115 does not deny his pimple-dick, thereby making it a small and sorry fact of his life, thus explaining his psychotic love of Hondas (which are primarily driven by soccer-moms).</p>
<p>Commodore: Nice try, with your attempt to explain to the Fluffer what a fact is. I&#8217;ve whipped out Merriam-Webster on his ass thrice, and he still doesn&#8217;t get it. He wouldn’t even admit that the CTS is a better car than the Yaris!</p>
<p>lamboz get a life &#8220;The Terraza, Rendezvous, and Rainer are from GM&#8217;s old bad way of thinking. Reliable look-a-like waste of dealership space with little to no value.&#8221; You have nailed it. Unlike 1115, who&#8217;s never nailed anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342607</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342607</guid>
		<description>The Rendevous and Rainier and Terraza are 2007 models that are part of their lineup. I don&#039;t understand what is so difficult about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rendevous and Rainier and Terraza are 2007 models that are part of their lineup. I don&#8217;t understand what is so difficult about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342598</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342598</guid>
		<description>An example of a &quot;FACT&quot;: The shirt is blue

Another example: The Lucerne, Lacrosse, and Enclave are the only models listed on Buick&#039;s website as part of their lineup. That fact proves that the Rendevous and Rainier and Terraza are NOT part of their lineup. I don&#039;t understand what is so difficult about that?

You avoided what I said about MSRP and KBB values never being set in stone. No one goes EXACTLY by those values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An example of a &#8220;FACT&#8221;: The shirt is blue</p>
<p>Another example: The Lucerne, Lacrosse, and Enclave are the only models listed on Buick&#8217;s website as part of their lineup. That fact proves that the Rendevous and Rainier and Terraza are NOT part of their lineup. I don&#8217;t understand what is so difficult about that?</p>
<p>You avoided what I said about MSRP and KBB values never being set in stone. No one goes EXACTLY by those values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342592</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342592</guid>
		<description>If you were Buick would you inclde the Terazza the Rendezvous and the Ranier in your lineup lol ha Even Bucik is ashamed of those vehicles 
Unfortunetely they are 2007 models and you have to live with it 
MSRP PRSM whatever the Accord and Civic have the highest resale % of any car especially some Ford or GM 
I love that you are trying your hardest to dance around the facts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were Buick would you inclde the Terazza the Rendezvous and the Ranier in your lineup lol ha Even Bucik is ashamed of those vehicles<br />
Unfortunetely they are 2007 models and you have to live with it<br />
MSRP PRSM whatever the Accord and Civic have the highest resale % of any car especially some Ford or GM<br />
I love that you are trying your hardest to dance around the facts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342587</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342587</guid>
		<description>Sorry CA! Lol. I&#039;ll just stick to &#039;CA&#039; or &#039;CA36&#039; in the future. Those are pretty easy to confuse

In the automotive world, 2007 is LAST year and 2006 would be two years ago. Also, if you go to Buick&#039;s website, you will see Buick&#039;s lineup and see that it does not include their old cars. Do you understand now?

Next, when have you ever bought a car (assuming you have one) and actually paid MSRP price for it? MSRP price is a book value, and so is KBB value. It can be negotiated. If you are uneducated and don&#039;t check KBB before you trade your car in to get an idea for what its worth, you could get a lot less for it than you deserve. On the other hand, a dealer can show you KBB value and offer more than that in order to make you a deal so you would buy from him. The point is, KBB and MSRP values are both things that give you AN IDEA for what something is worth. They are not set in stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry CA! Lol. I&#8217;ll just stick to &#8216;CA&#8217; or &#8216;CA36&#8242; in the future. Those are pretty easy to confuse</p>
<p>In the automotive world, 2007 is LAST year and 2006 would be two years ago. Also, if you go to Buick&#8217;s website, you will see Buick&#8217;s lineup and see that it does not include their old cars. Do you understand now?</p>
<p>Next, when have you ever bought a car (assuming you have one) and actually paid MSRP price for it? MSRP price is a book value, and so is KBB value. It can be negotiated. If you are uneducated and don&#8217;t check KBB before you trade your car in to get an idea for what its worth, you could get a lot less for it than you deserve. On the other hand, a dealer can show you KBB value and offer more than that in order to make you a deal so you would buy from him. The point is, KBB and MSRP values are both things that give you AN IDEA for what something is worth. They are not set in stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342581</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342581</guid>
		<description>We shall all note that 1115 does not deny his pimple-dick, thereby making it a small and sorry fact of his life, thus explaining his psychotic love of Hondas (which are primarily driven by soccer-moms).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shall all note that 1115 does not deny his pimple-dick, thereby making it a small and sorry fact of his life, thus explaining his psychotic love of Hondas (which are primarily driven by soccer-moms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342579</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342579</guid>
		<description>LOL
 So you expect me to beleive that you went in the books (KBB I&#039;m guessing) and made your own calculations? Then after that you write a post claiming that I quoted those exact numbers. This is after your bogus story about how some guy offered you more than what your Ford was worth which means he offered you some pocket change lol
 ..on top of that you mentioned that warthog Rosie again. Stop it she turned you down and she doesnt want you so why obesess over her. You my lawn mowing friend are the idiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL<br />
 So you expect me to beleive that you went in the books (KBB I&#8217;m guessing) and made your own calculations? Then after that you write a post claiming that I quoted those exact numbers. This is after your bogus story about how some guy offered you more than what your Ford was worth which means he offered you some pocket change lol<br />
 ..on top of that you mentioned that warthog Rosie again. Stop it she turned you down and she doesnt want you so why obesess over her. You my lawn mowing friend are the idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342578</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342578</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s up above, moron-boy....

Comment by tripleonefive:
..... &quot;Your &quot;actual&quot; numbers dont mean shit! You have to go by the books.&quot;

Your beloved books divide by MSRP, and not actual pice paid.  All I did was apply numbers to your precious book calculations to expose the idiocy of all that you hold dear, other than the 8x10 glossy of Rosie O&#039;Donnell in your left hand and your pimple-dick in your right.  

That&#039;s pretty much the &quot;1115 trifecta:&quot; Honda, Rosie, and 1115&#039;s pimple-dick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s up above, moron-boy&#8230;.</p>
<p>Comment by tripleonefive:<br />
&#8230;.. &#8220;Your &#8220;actual&#8221; numbers dont mean shit! You have to go by the books.&#8221;</p>
<p>Your beloved books divide by MSRP, and not actual pice paid.  All I did was apply numbers to your precious book calculations to expose the idiocy of all that you hold dear, other than the 8&#215;10 glossy of Rosie O&#8217;Donnell in your left hand and your pimple-dick in your right.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much the &#8220;1115 trifecta:&#8221; Honda, Rosie, and 1115&#8242;s pimple-dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342577</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342577</guid>
		<description>Yeah Alejandro , and don&#039;t forget to copy and paste the post where I typed that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Alejandro , and don&#8217;t forget to copy and paste the post where I typed that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342576</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342576</guid>
		<description>Yeah CA36GTP, and don&#039;t forget 1115&#039;s fuzzy resale math fact neglecting reality; namely that ....

....... 27,000 ÷ 40,000 = 90% Resale Value (if you paid 10k over MSRP of 30k)

and

....... 21,000 ÷ 23,000 = 70% Resale Value (if you paid 7k under MSRP of 30k)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah CA36GTP, and don&#8217;t forget 1115&#8242;s fuzzy resale math fact neglecting reality; namely that &#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;. 27,000 ÷ 40,000 = 90% Resale Value (if you paid 10k over MSRP of 30k)</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;. 21,000 ÷ 23,000 = 70% Resale Value (if you paid 7k under MSRP of 30k)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342569</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342569</guid>
		<description>So they are not 2007 models like the Buicks. If there is a 2007 RSX available then I agree with you.

 The RSX despite how you feel about the engine was an Acura and it is worth a lot of money is always praised in magazines and has a high resale to show for it. If those Buicks can boast the same then so be it but you know they cant and your point is trash 

The RSX is/was a great car unlike the Buicks mentioned and apparently you have a hard time understanding that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they are not 2007 models like the Buicks. If there is a 2007 RSX available then I agree with you.</p>
<p> The RSX despite how you feel about the engine was an Acura and it is worth a lot of money is always praised in magazines and has a high resale to show for it. If those Buicks can boast the same then so be it but you know they cant and your point is trash </p>
<p>The RSX is/was a great car unlike the Buicks mentioned and apparently you have a hard time understanding that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342568</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342568</guid>
		<description>So? There are still some in dealerships, just like Rendevous and Rainier. And don&#039;t you mean the RSX Type-S? The regular RSX was laughable with its pathetic K20A3 engine that could only get good fuel economy by shutting down half its intake valves at low RPMs. By your reasoning, we should compare the base RSX to cars like the current Rabbit or GLI or Astra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So? There are still some in dealerships, just like Rendevous and Rainier. And don&#8217;t you mean the RSX Type-S? The regular RSX was laughable with its pathetic K20A3 engine that could only get good fuel economy by shutting down half its intake valves at low RPMs. By your reasoning, we should compare the base RSX to cars like the current Rabbit or GLI or Astra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342567</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342567</guid>
		<description>Uh......................... no CA
 First the RSX is a great car that is sporty, reliable, has a great resale and excellent build quality  
The last RSX model was a 2006 which was LAST YEAR (your point destroyed) and the RSX was a great car UNLIKE the Ranier and Rendezvous (your point destroyed again ) 
Your attempt was pretty pathetic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. no CA<br />
 First the RSX is a great car that is sporty, reliable, has a great resale and excellent build quality<br />
The last RSX model was a 2006 which was LAST YEAR (your point destroyed) and the RSX was a great car UNLIKE the Ranier and Rendezvous (your point destroyed again )<br />
Your attempt was pretty pathetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342566</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342566</guid>
		<description>By that logic, should we still consider the RSX part of Acura&#039;s line-up since dealerships still sell a new one every now and then, compare it to the Astra and Rabbit, and slag Honda off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By that logic, should we still consider the RSX part of Acura&#8217;s line-up since dealerships still sell a new one every now and then, compare it to the Astra and Rabbit, and slag Honda off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342562</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342562</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a 2007 model, but it&#039;s no longer part of Buick&#039;s current lineup.???? 
What year is it &gt;?
Wait its built in 06 and is an 07 model and this year is 07 but its not a part of the lineup STOP MAKING EXCUSES ! Those POS are part of Buicks lineup and are the future of the Enclave 
GET OVER IT !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a 2007 model, but it&#8217;s no longer part of Buick&#8217;s current lineup.????<br />
What year is it &gt;?<br />
Wait its built in 06 and is an 07 model and this year is 07 but its not a part of the lineup STOP MAKING EXCUSES ! Those POS are part of Buicks lineup and are the future of the Enclave<br />
GET OVER IT !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342544</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342544</guid>
		<description>Commodore, you wound me with your misspelling of my username! I would NEVER represent the laughable GXP series! LOL

As for the old Buicks, the Rendezvous and Rainier weren&#039;t bad cars. But they DID get trapped in the limbo period between SUVs and CUVs. Hence why the Enclave is doing so well in comparison. My mother owns a GMC Envoy, and as much as she loves it and it isn&#039;t a bad car, she wishes she could afford to trade into an Acadia. The Lambdas are much superior to the old GMT-360s, but that&#039;s not to say the GMT-360s were bad. They had their failings, but much of their lack of sales success was that they ran for a year or two too long before the Lambdas hit full production.

One thing I have to say about the Envoy is it had a CRAPLOAD of options built into a decent price. The Acadia is even more impressive, and I imagine the Enclave even one-ups that. The only thing the Envoy lacked was a nav.

As for the Pilot, I don&#039;t know how it would compare except on paper, because you couldn&#039;t get me into something that ugly to try it out.

The Highlander is better, but I hate Toyota&#039;s current styling that makes it look like a stretched and bloated Camry. I find it unusual that 1115 would bring it up as an example of Japanese superiority, as it seems to be littered with the same cheap buttons and knobs that are so criticized on domestic vehicles. I like the seat quality, however. The walk-through ability seems cool on paper as well, though I&#039;m not so sure I would appreciate it as much trying to drive while people are walking around inside my car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commodore, you wound me with your misspelling of my username! I would NEVER represent the laughable GXP series! LOL</p>
<p>As for the old Buicks, the Rendezvous and Rainier weren&#8217;t bad cars. But they DID get trapped in the limbo period between SUVs and CUVs. Hence why the Enclave is doing so well in comparison. My mother owns a GMC Envoy, and as much as she loves it and it isn&#8217;t a bad car, she wishes she could afford to trade into an Acadia. The Lambdas are much superior to the old GMT-360s, but that&#8217;s not to say the GMT-360s were bad. They had their failings, but much of their lack of sales success was that they ran for a year or two too long before the Lambdas hit full production.</p>
<p>One thing I have to say about the Envoy is it had a CRAPLOAD of options built into a decent price. The Acadia is even more impressive, and I imagine the Enclave even one-ups that. The only thing the Envoy lacked was a nav.</p>
<p>As for the Pilot, I don&#8217;t know how it would compare except on paper, because you couldn&#8217;t get me into something that ugly to try it out.</p>
<p>The Highlander is better, but I hate Toyota&#8217;s current styling that makes it look like a stretched and bloated Camry. I find it unusual that 1115 would bring it up as an example of Japanese superiority, as it seems to be littered with the same cheap buttons and knobs that are so criticized on domestic vehicles. I like the seat quality, however. The walk-through ability seems cool on paper as well, though I&#8217;m not so sure I would appreciate it as much trying to drive while people are walking around inside my car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342543</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342543</guid>
		<description>Oh yes. The Buick Rendezvous was also cancelled in the second quarter, this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes. The Buick Rendezvous was also cancelled in the second quarter, this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342542</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342542</guid>
		<description>Commodore, CA36GTP, 1115- The Buick Rainier was cancelled in the second quarter of this year. It&#039;s a 2007 model, but it&#039;s no longer part of Buick&#039;s current lineup.

And who really gives a crap. The Buick Rendezvous was actually a nice vehicle, it handled and rode well, the interior isn&#039;t bad at all, plenty of space (better than a minivan). I don&#039;t know about the Buick Rainier, but I do know it had slow sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commodore, CA36GTP, 1115- The Buick Rainier was cancelled in the second quarter of this year. It&#8217;s a 2007 model, but it&#8217;s no longer part of Buick&#8217;s current lineup.</p>
<p>And who really gives a crap. The Buick Rendezvous was actually a nice vehicle, it handled and rode well, the interior isn&#8217;t bad at all, plenty of space (better than a minivan). I don&#8217;t know about the Buick Rainier, but I do know it had slow sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342536</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342536</guid>
		<description>CA36GXP is absolutely right. You knew that you were spinning the facts so you said &quot;don&#039;t mention model year crap&quot;. The vehicles were killed in 2005 I believe, and were built in 2006 (the last ones were, to fulfill fleet and retail orders). They ARE old cars, but they are labeled 2007 to make them seem newer and easier to sell. I mean, who wants an 05 or 06 car in the second half of the year, and more importantly, who wants those cars? They were just sold until the Enclave came, that&#039;s all.

The Pilot is three years old!! Even the Edge beats it out. Those &quot;car magazines&quot; which you talked about in the other thread -- when have they ever (recently) rated the Pilot highly compared to other crossovers? The CX-7 and GM&#039;s Lambdas always win ALL comparisons.
Gift: http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7095178</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA36GXP is absolutely right. You knew that you were spinning the facts so you said &#8220;don&#8217;t mention model year crap&#8221;. The vehicles were killed in 2005 I believe, and were built in 2006 (the last ones were, to fulfill fleet and retail orders). They ARE old cars, but they are labeled 2007 to make them seem newer and easier to sell. I mean, who wants an 05 or 06 car in the second half of the year, and more importantly, who wants those cars? They were just sold until the Enclave came, that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>The Pilot is three years old!! Even the Edge beats it out. Those &#8220;car magazines&#8221; which you talked about in the other thread &#8212; when have they ever (recently) rated the Pilot highly compared to other crossovers? The CX-7 and GM&#8217;s Lambdas always win ALL comparisons.<br />
Gift: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7095178" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7095178</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342529</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 02:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342529</guid>
		<description>Translation&quot; You are desperately trying to make an excuse for the Buick vehicles that are currently in the lineup lol” 
I look fwd to you coming up with another excuse. The Enclave is nice but in no way better than a Pilot or Highlander. It will end up a rental just like its siblings HA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation&#8221; You are desperately trying to make an excuse for the Buick vehicles that are currently in the lineup lol”<br />
I look fwd to you coming up with another excuse. The Enclave is nice but in no way better than a Pilot or Highlander. It will end up a rental just like its siblings HA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342527</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342527</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Ranier, the Terraza and the Rendezvous are 2007 models. I believe this year is 2007 and don’t give me any model year crap. &quot;

Translation: &quot;I know I&#039;m using the wrong model year to compare &quot;current&quot; cars, but I don&#039;t care because acknowledging that would undermine my biased argument.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Ranier, the Terraza and the Rendezvous are 2007 models. I believe this year is 2007 and don’t give me any model year crap. &#8221;</p>
<p>Translation: &#8220;I know I&#8217;m using the wrong model year to compare &#8220;current&#8221; cars, but I don&#8217;t care because acknowledging that would undermine my biased argument.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342526</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342526</guid>
		<description>But like I said They are CURRENT models in the lineup It hurts to admit it just like it hurts to say the Japanese make superior cars but once again I am correct and you are incorrect like you always are.
You tried to lie and were caught. The Enclave will meet the same fate as its siblings  
Ricardo- you arent even trying anymore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But like I said They are CURRENT models in the lineup It hurts to admit it just like it hurts to say the Japanese make superior cars but once again I am correct and you are incorrect like you always are.<br />
You tried to lie and were caught. The Enclave will meet the same fate as its siblings<br />
Ricardo- you arent even trying anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342521</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342521</guid>
		<description>Yea and the Terraza and Rainier and Rendevous are all gonna be dumped into rental fleets.

Look at the GM sales catalog - the only Buicks are the Lucerne, Lacrosse, and Enclave. I know it would help your argument if the other ones were part of the line-up but......sorry, GM is smarter than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea and the Terraza and Rainier and Rendevous are all gonna be dumped into rental fleets.</p>
<p>Look at the GM sales catalog &#8211; the only Buicks are the Lucerne, Lacrosse, and Enclave. I know it would help your argument if the other ones were part of the line-up but&#8230;&#8230;sorry, GM is smarter than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342520</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342520</guid>
		<description>CA36: I see you checked buick.com, instead of taking 1115&#039;s babble for granted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA36: I see you checked buick.com, instead of taking 1115&#8242;s babble for granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342514</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342514</guid>
		<description>Back to work, 1115.  I&#039;ll take fries with that, and gimme extra onions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to work, 1115.  I&#8217;ll take fries with that, and gimme extra onions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342512</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342512</guid>
		<description>CA you have no clue is correct!
The Ranier, the Terraza and the Rendezvous are 2007 models. I believe this year is 2007 and don’t give me any model year crap. Even in 2008 they will be one year removed from the Buick lineup so it’s in the recent past. 
Commo knows that the Enclave will meet the same fate as Buick’s other truck offerings. He is trying to distance the offerings from the Enclave but it wont work. The Enclave is nice looking but it comes from poor stock and more than likely be unreliable and fail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA you have no clue is correct!<br />
The Ranier, the Terraza and the Rendezvous are 2007 models. I believe this year is 2007 and don’t give me any model year crap. Even in 2008 they will be one year removed from the Buick lineup so it’s in the recent past.<br />
Commo knows that the Enclave will meet the same fate as Buick’s other truck offerings. He is trying to distance the offerings from the Enclave but it wont work. The Enclave is nice looking but it comes from poor stock and more than likely be unreliable and fail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342510</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342510</guid>
		<description>The only current Buick models are the LaCrosse, Lucerne, and Enclave. So I have no clue what you&#039;re talking about, 1115.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only current Buick models are the LaCrosse, Lucerne, and Enclave. So I have no clue what you&#8217;re talking about, 1115.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342508</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342508</guid>
		<description>I have already showed you that GM had MILLIONS of recalls in 2005 and the Cobalt and its big brother lol, The Corvette in 2006along with the current recall and years of them in the 90’s. On top of that you said that in the past GM made crap. 
Toyota has had 20 plus years of excellent performance and 2 ok years with inflated recalls. If you can count you will see that the numbers still favor Toyota. Toyota has a better track record than GM and that wont change unless Toyota has 20 plus years of crap making and recalls similar to the Americans . You don’t want to believe that BC you want people to &quot;consider &quot; GM.
The Rainer and the Rendezvous along with the Teraza are CURRENT Buick Models so your argument that they are Buicks past is a lie just like all that you say.
I don’t care for either company but I know which one builds a more reliable car and its not GM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have already showed you that GM had MILLIONS of recalls in 2005 and the Cobalt and its big brother lol, The Corvette in 2006along with the current recall and years of them in the 90’s. On top of that you said that in the past GM made crap.<br />
Toyota has had 20 plus years of excellent performance and 2 ok years with inflated recalls. If you can count you will see that the numbers still favor Toyota. Toyota has a better track record than GM and that wont change unless Toyota has 20 plus years of crap making and recalls similar to the Americans . You don’t want to believe that BC you want people to &#8220;consider &#8221; GM.<br />
The Rainer and the Rendezvous along with the Teraza are CURRENT Buick Models so your argument that they are Buicks past is a lie just like all that you say.<br />
I don’t care for either company but I know which one builds a more reliable car and its not GM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342505</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342505</guid>
		<description>apples and oranges are two completely different things..as are the Enclave and the Rainier/Rendevous. One is from the old GM, the other is from the new GM. I would never buy a car from the old GM, but unlike you, I am fair and I am able to see what bullshit Toyonda&#039;s quality &quot;reputation&quot; is and that there are other, and much better, choices other than the Japs.

To kill your point about it being one year of recalls for Toyoda: 
QUOTE
&quot;Although we&#039;ve barely passed mid-February, Toyota has already recalled! 533,417 vehicles this year in a mix that, according to www.AutoRecalls.us, includes Tundras Sequoias and Camry’s. That puts Toyota on track to recall more than the over 1.76 million autos they recalled in the U.S. and Japan in 2006, and the 2.2 million they recalled in 2005 when they recalled more cars than they built.&quot;

If you can count, 2005-2007 are THREE years of bad performance. There is your track record for imports. And notice how I cited the past 3 years because they are relevant. After all, I don&#039;t think either of us is interested in buying 80s or 90s cars so let me stop you before you even mention &quot;GM&#039;s track record from 20 years ago is.......blah blah blah&quot;.

.

lol what was that cardesigner5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apples and oranges are two completely different things..as are the Enclave and the Rainier/Rendevous. One is from the old GM, the other is from the new GM. I would never buy a car from the old GM, but unlike you, I am fair and I am able to see what bullshit Toyonda&#8217;s quality &#8220;reputation&#8221; is and that there are other, and much better, choices other than the Japs.</p>
<p>To kill your point about it being one year of recalls for Toyoda:<br />
QUOTE<br />
&#8220;Although we&#8217;ve barely passed mid-February, Toyota has already recalled! 533,417 vehicles this year in a mix that, according to <a href="http://www.AutoRecalls.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.AutoRecalls.us</a>, includes Tundras Sequoias and Camry’s. That puts Toyota on track to recall more than the over 1.76 million autos they recalled in the U.S. and Japan in 2006, and the 2.2 million they recalled in 2005 when they recalled more cars than they built.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you can count, 2005-2007 are THREE years of bad performance. There is your track record for imports. And notice how I cited the past 3 years because they are relevant. After all, I don&#8217;t think either of us is interested in buying 80s or 90s cars so let me stop you before you even mention &#8220;GM&#8217;s track record from 20 years ago is&#8230;&#8230;.blah blah blah&#8221;.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>lol what was that cardesigner5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: injunraiv</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342498</link>
		<dc:creator>injunraiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342498</guid>
		<description>LOL, cardesigner shows his 4th grade writing skills...  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, cardesigner shows his 4th grade writing skills&#8230;  <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardesigner5</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342497</link>
		<dc:creator>cardesigner5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342497</guid>
		<description>this vehicles should have been recalled even before the were released because the are so tragic ; but the would be good fuel for a fire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this vehicles should have been recalled even before the were released because the are so tragic ; but the would be good fuel for a fire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342479</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342479</guid>
		<description>Mach - that was a genius post (look up sarcasm)
so your Accord(I don&#039;t drive an Accord) is much more likely to get recalled than my CimmaronTS. Based one what. Going by GM&#039;s track record and MILLIONS of recalls in just the last 2 years its more likely that your Cimmaron will break down and the Accord will last longer and have a higher resale % 
Comparing the Current Buick truck offerings is irrelevant? Do you know what  the term &quot;apples and oranges &quot;means ? Look at the Ranier and Rendezvous. You don&#039;t like that example bc it proves my point. Try and come up with a reason why Buick products cant be compared ?&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mach &#8211; that was a genius post (look up sarcasm)<br />
so your Accord(I don&#8217;t drive an Accord) is much more likely to get recalled than my CimmaronTS. Based one what. Going by GM&#8217;s track record and MILLIONS of recalls in just the last 2 years its more likely that your Cimmaron will break down and the Accord will last longer and have a higher resale %<br />
Comparing the Current Buick truck offerings is irrelevant? Do you know what  the term &#8220;apples and oranges &#8220;means ? Look at the Ranier and Rendezvous. You don&#8217;t like that example bc it proves my point. Try and come up with a reason why Buick products cant be compared ?&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLISS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342460</link>
		<dc:creator>BLISS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342460</guid>
		<description>get up and continue to proceed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get up and continue to proceed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mach</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342451</guid>
		<description>(1115 quote) The only thing I said is that you dare challenge the Honda Accords resale vs some Ford (1115 quote)

Ya don&#039;t do that, you might make Fords look good. And that&#039;s just not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1115 quote) The only thing I said is that you dare challenge the Honda Accords resale vs some Ford (1115 quote)</p>
<p>Ya don&#8217;t do that, you might make Fords look good. And that&#8217;s just not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342446</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342446</guid>
		<description>Do you even know what &#039;inconsistency&#039; means 1115?

It is like not sticking to your story. And I have stuck to what I am saying - that people should consider all cars, American or not, and buy them based on which is the best rather than believing that cars from Asia are supreme. I have consistently disproven the myths about Japanese cars and how they are reliable when in fact they are THE MOST recalled this year, and so on and so forth (unlike you, I am not going to repeat myself for the 3045943 time).

The Magnum is being killed off my Chrysler. As for the 300, I hope that it is updated because, while it is still a great car, it would not be smart to let it sit there for nearly a decade like Toyoda did with the Corolla (which, after it was redesigned, still didn&#039;t get significant changes). You do have a point though that cars must be constantly updated or else they lose their image (look at the Taurus). But see, you WANT to believe that GM will forget about its products and let them rot when in fact a new Aura is coming in about 2 years (when the current one has been out for ONE year). I am not sure you can do it so... 1 + 2 = 3 years!

You don&#039;t even have a clue how resale value is determined. Do you think KBB sits there are is like &quot;um, this car is Japanese so it will have good resale, and this car is domestic (ew!) so it will have bad resale&quot;. That is not how it works. There are things that determine resale and so far all of them point to the fact that the Enclave will have GREAT resale, probably better than the current Pilot. Comparing the Rainier/Rendevous with the Enclave is like comparing apples and oranges. It IS, however, a great indicator of old GM vs the NEW gm.

&quot;Good luck with your boat&quot;? Who is that directed at? And more importantly, what century do you live in??! And again, current recall numbers are in the domestics&#039; favor, so your Accord is much more likely to get recalled than my CTS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you even know what &#8216;inconsistency&#8217; means 1115?</p>
<p>It is like not sticking to your story. And I have stuck to what I am saying &#8211; that people should consider all cars, American or not, and buy them based on which is the best rather than believing that cars from Asia are supreme. I have consistently disproven the myths about Japanese cars and how they are reliable when in fact they are THE MOST recalled this year, and so on and so forth (unlike you, I am not going to repeat myself for the 3045943 time).</p>
<p>The Magnum is being killed off my Chrysler. As for the 300, I hope that it is updated because, while it is still a great car, it would not be smart to let it sit there for nearly a decade like Toyoda did with the Corolla (which, after it was redesigned, still didn&#8217;t get significant changes). You do have a point though that cars must be constantly updated or else they lose their image (look at the Taurus). But see, you WANT to believe that GM will forget about its products and let them rot when in fact a new Aura is coming in about 2 years (when the current one has been out for ONE year). I am not sure you can do it so&#8230; 1 + 2 = 3 years!</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t even have a clue how resale value is determined. Do you think KBB sits there are is like &#8220;um, this car is Japanese so it will have good resale, and this car is domestic (ew!) so it will have bad resale&#8221;. That is not how it works. There are things that determine resale and so far all of them point to the fact that the Enclave will have GREAT resale, probably better than the current Pilot. Comparing the Rainier/Rendevous with the Enclave is like comparing apples and oranges. It IS, however, a great indicator of old GM vs the NEW gm.</p>
<p>&#8220;Good luck with your boat&#8221;? Who is that directed at? And more importantly, what century do you live in??! And again, current recall numbers are in the domestics&#8217; favor, so your Accord is much more likely to get recalled than my CTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342445</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342445</guid>
		<description>correct form</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correct form</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342444</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342444</guid>
		<description>Why do you say Pilot OR &quot;MDX?&quot;
Correctfor would be Pilot/&quot;MDX&quot;, like Corsica/Beretta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say Pilot OR &#8220;MDX?&#8221;<br />
Correctfor would be Pilot/&#8221;MDX&#8221;, like Corsica/Beretta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342419</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-recalls-90000-vehicles.html#comment-342419</guid>
		<description>You are inconsistent bc you are basing these statistics on cars that are brand new and unproven. Theydont have good track records yet you are saying that based on first year sales they are going to have a good resale and are reliable. 
Speaking of Chrylser the 300 and Magnums rolled off the line when they came out and look at them now. The same will happen to GM. It is HIGHLY doubtful that the Enclave will have the same resale % as the Pilot or MDX. Look at the Rainer and the Rendevous.

Good luck with your boat and if you like it then more power to you but dont try and say that it will be worth more than the Japanese competition when it has no track record to prove that.
It had a small recall already and based on GMs history it will be recalled again and again and they will  try and avoid recalling it then GM will be forced to bc someone will get hurt .  

What real numbers are you talking about?  One sale of a Ford truck in where? California ? Please, the books are the guideline. Lets say you did have that offer and you didnt&#039; take it You wont get that offer again. Someone is going to look at the book value and offer you less bc its a Ford and its a truck lol You are fool if you didn&#039;t get rid of that POS Ford when you had the chance 
When did I say someone who paid 40 k for a car sold it for 30k ? When did I say that you lost 7k off a car ?
You are reaching far this time The only thing I said is that you dare challenge the Honda Accords resale vs some Ford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are inconsistent bc you are basing these statistics on cars that are brand new and unproven. Theydont have good track records yet you are saying that based on first year sales they are going to have a good resale and are reliable.<br />
Speaking of Chrylser the 300 and Magnums rolled off the line when they came out and look at them now. The same will happen to GM. It is HIGHLY doubtful that the Enclave will have the same resale % as the Pilot or MDX. Look at the Rainer and the Rendevous.</p>
<p>Good luck with your boat and if you like it then more power to you but dont try and say that it will be worth more than the Japanese competition when it has no track record to prove that.<br />
It had a small recall already and based on GMs history it will be recalled again and again and they will  try and avoid recalling it then GM will be forced to bc someone will get hurt .  </p>
<p>What real numbers are you talking about?  One sale of a Ford truck in where? California ? Please, the books are the guideline. Lets say you did have that offer and you didnt&#8217; take it You wont get that offer again. Someone is going to look at the book value and offer you less bc its a Ford and its a truck lol You are fool if you didn&#8217;t get rid of that POS Ford when you had the chance<br />
When did I say someone who paid 40 k for a car sold it for 30k ? When did I say that you lost 7k off a car ?<br />
You are reaching far this time The only thing I said is that you dare challenge the Honda Accords resale vs some Ford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 654/655 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 15:01:56 -->
