




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM receiving &#8216;significant interest&#8217; in asset sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MercMark</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-404019</link>
		<dc:creator>MercMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-404019</guid>
		<description>Why sell when the dollar is weak?
Why spend millions on a brand and sell it cheap?
The Chinese already stole the Hummer design and sell it why would they pay GM for it now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why sell when the dollar is weak?<br />
Why spend millions on a brand and sell it cheap?<br />
The Chinese already stole the Hummer design and sell it why would they pay GM for it now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxcar</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-403944</link>
		<dc:creator>maxcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-403944</guid>
		<description>keep opel, holden, saab, gmc, caddy
sell the rest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep opel, holden, saab, gmc, caddy<br />
sell the rest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-403928</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-403928</guid>
		<description>^make mine teryaki!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^make mine teryaki!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-403893</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-403893</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see. An Indian, Russian or a Chinese Hummer. Do you want your d*ck to smell like curry, vodka or soy sauce?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see. An Indian, Russian or a Chinese Hummer. Do you want your d*ck to smell like curry, vodka or soy sauce?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazdaman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-403862</link>
		<dc:creator>mazdaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-403862</guid>
		<description>Getting rid of Hummer would be a good start. The only other division I could see them selling is Saab, which still holds enough of its own distinct brand identity to be viewed as an asset to other auto companies. 

I honestly think GM could position itself for longevity and future success if they would streamline their U.S. operations down to 5 or 6 brands: Chevrolet, GMC, Opel, Saab (maybe), Buick, and Cadillac. I would combine Chevrolet and GMC to cover the mainstream portion of the market. Chevrolet would carry affordable FWD B-D class cars, affordable FWD/AWD crossovers, the Camaro, the Corvette, and maybe a RWD flagship sedan. GMC would become the corporation&#039;s sole retail truck/SUV division as well as the corporation&#039;s commercial fleet vehicle outlet. Saturn and Pontiac would be folded into Opel and possibly combined with Saab (if it&#039;s not sold) to form a midmarket Euro sourced dealer network. This network would appeal to customers who are generally attracted to imports (although Opel products would be assembled in North America, the advertising would focus on the brand&#039;s Euro origins/style/engineering/driving dynamics and downplay GM&#039;s connection/involvement with the brand). Opel would cover the volume portion of the segment while Saab would cover the luxury portion of the segment. Saab would be the only wildcard in this restructuring project. I am not sure Saab would be needed if GM follows through with its intention of taking Opel upmarket in the future. This would cause Opel to overlap too much with Saab and render Saab totally redundant in GM&#039;s brand hierarchy. Buick and Cadillac would be combined to form a luxury dealer network. Buick would carry FWD luxury cars and FWD/AWD luxury crossovers while Cadillac would focus on well executed RWD luxury cars. This would give GM 6 divisions arranged in 3 dealer networks that target specific portions of the market. This would be a big improvement over the current situation which forces the corporation to waste marketing dollars to target the same market demographics (Chevy, Saturn, and Pontiac) and to spend development money to create competing/overlapping products (too many to mention).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting rid of Hummer would be a good start. The only other division I could see them selling is Saab, which still holds enough of its own distinct brand identity to be viewed as an asset to other auto companies. </p>
<p>I honestly think GM could position itself for longevity and future success if they would streamline their U.S. operations down to 5 or 6 brands: Chevrolet, GMC, Opel, Saab (maybe), Buick, and Cadillac. I would combine Chevrolet and GMC to cover the mainstream portion of the market. Chevrolet would carry affordable FWD B-D class cars, affordable FWD/AWD crossovers, the Camaro, the Corvette, and maybe a RWD flagship sedan. GMC would become the corporation&#8217;s sole retail truck/SUV division as well as the corporation&#8217;s commercial fleet vehicle outlet. Saturn and Pontiac would be folded into Opel and possibly combined with Saab (if it&#8217;s not sold) to form a midmarket Euro sourced dealer network. This network would appeal to customers who are generally attracted to imports (although Opel products would be assembled in North America, the advertising would focus on the brand&#8217;s Euro origins/style/engineering/driving dynamics and downplay GM&#8217;s connection/involvement with the brand). Opel would cover the volume portion of the segment while Saab would cover the luxury portion of the segment. Saab would be the only wildcard in this restructuring project. I am not sure Saab would be needed if GM follows through with its intention of taking Opel upmarket in the future. This would cause Opel to overlap too much with Saab and render Saab totally redundant in GM&#8217;s brand hierarchy. Buick and Cadillac would be combined to form a luxury dealer network. Buick would carry FWD luxury cars and FWD/AWD luxury crossovers while Cadillac would focus on well executed RWD luxury cars. This would give GM 6 divisions arranged in 3 dealer networks that target specific portions of the market. This would be a big improvement over the current situation which forces the corporation to waste marketing dollars to target the same market demographics (Chevy, Saturn, and Pontiac) and to spend development money to create competing/overlapping products (too many to mention).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-403859</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-403859</guid>
		<description>Let the Fire Sale begin!
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the Fire Sale begin!<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acura_el2000</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gm-receiving-significant-interest-in-asset-sales.html#comment-403851</link>
		<dc:creator>acura_el2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8426#comment-403851</guid>
		<description>No comments yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comments yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 232/233 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 18:47:56 -->
