General Motors Chief Executive Rick Wagoner is the keynote speaker at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, and is expected to make quite an announcement when he takes the stage tomorrow. According to a new report, Wagoner will announce that GM will begin testing driverless vehicles in 2015, with hopes of having them on the road by 2018.
The biggest hurdle in the transition to driverless vehicles could actually be the human factor, not the technology. Systems such as radar-based cruise control, motion sensors, lane-change warning devices, electronic stability control and satellite-based digital mapping are already in place, but government regulations and liability laws could slow the technology’s progression to reality. “This is not science fiction,” Larry Burns, GM’s vice president for research and development, said.
Carnegie Mellon’s GM sponsored Chevrolet Tahoe took first prize at this year’s DARPA Grand Challenge, an event for driverless cars.
The key advantage of driverless cars would be the elimination of human mistakes — a factor believed to be responsible for 95% of the 42,000 U.S. traffic deaths that occur annually. “We might be able to cut those numbers down by a factor of 50 percent,” Sebastian Thrun, a professor of computer science and electrical engineering, told CNN. “Just imagine all the funerals that won’t take place.”
It remains to be seen if the 10-year goal is actually attainable.



01/07, 12:20 PM
posted by:
RicardoHead
Honda has been building driverless Accords since the early 90s.
01/07, 12:41 PM
posted by:
johnnycanuck
LOL. We are quick today RHead! I would have said Toyota and Camrys but whatever floats your boat.
01/07, 12:42 PM
posted by:
A4
yeah i was gonna say cramrys, pieces of garbage, these things will be stupid, save for say taxis or something.
01/07, 12:49 PM
posted by:
Get Real
GM is wasting a lot of money on this.
How about spending $$$ on good engine gaskets and transmission clutch packs.
Or… make a 50 MPG Diesel Cobalt to sell.
GM is full of idiots who can’t see reality around them.
01/07, 12:53 PM
posted by:
livelyjay
I agree with GetReal … this is a pretty dumb way to spend money when there isn’t much market for it. Car crashes, as bad as it sounds, creates a lot of jobs: tow trucks, repair shops, parts sales, and even new cars for those that are totaled. Investing money in vehicles that can compete, are reliable, and decreasing dependency on non-renewable resources should be the target of their R&D. A diesel Cobalt would be pretty awesome by the way.
01/07, 1:06 PM
posted by:
hfry
This is the Principle. BFD… They are so behind in all this automotive Development ****. They are Merely trying to save there ass and Show they are capable of all this technological Adv. that Foreign Auto Companies have been doing for quite a fews year now…
Then they Through some Bole **** futuristic year out there, that they might have them on the roads by 2018. it wont be GM that Develops these… But they will take credit for throwing them in there death traps first.
Its sad, that its finally hitting them, taking part in all these advances when they happen are a Necessity, instead issuing all it out to 3rd party’s to develop it. LAME.
GEAT REAL….. Who wants a COBALT especially a DIESEL.
01/07, 1:23 PM
posted by:
CA36GTP
This is just stupid PR crap to get in the headlines. The media eats this **** up.
01/07, 1:42 PM
posted by:
Commodore
No thanks. I like driving my car and will continue to do so.
If they do introduce this technology, the benefit is that accidents will be greatly reduced. However, I think there should be some kind of option to drive the car yourself, but the system analyzes what you are doing and takes control if you are about to run into another car that is in your blind spot or something like that (if you are a moron).
01/07, 1:58 PM
posted by:
Bryce
This is the first time that Get Real is right.
01/07, 2:33 PM
posted by:
frylock350
Is that Caterpillar on the Tahoe’s windshield?
01/07, 2:34 PM
posted by:
BAMF
This is the same idea as that BMW 3-series that drove itself on the last episode of Top Gear, right? Hasn’t it already been done then? By BMW? WTF?
01/07, 2:35 PM
posted by:
Z06ified
Leave it to the lawyers to hinder technological progress and advancement. Proof that they truly are blood sucking leaches.
01/07, 2:39 PM
posted by:
casualobserver
It’s all a matter of spin. They just decided to change the name from “buyerless” to “driverless”. Just like changing the name from “used” to “pre-owned”.
01/07, 2:56 PM
posted by:
DeansterTJ
If a normal GM car can’t go 50,000 miles without a transmission failing or some basic electrical component crapping out, who’s going to trust them with 50 interconnected systems that are supposed to prevent you from crashing? That’s insane.
01/07, 3:02 PM
posted by:
LP640
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ROFLMAO
01/07, 3:21 PM
posted by:
roger426
LP640…Do you have a LP640?
01/07, 3:23 PM
posted by:
LP640
ha ha roger426 if i did then i wouldnt be blogging on LLN.
01/07, 3:24 PM
posted by:
roger426
Oh…what do you drive?
01/07, 3:28 PM
posted by:
LP640
ive got a Golf GT
what do you drive?
01/07, 3:47 PM
posted by:
roger426
04 Audi A4
01/07, 4:27 PM
posted by:
C6Racer
DeansterTJ, my 2000 Sierra went 150k miles without an tranny fluid change and still runs strong. Those 700-R4 transmissions that burned the 3-4 clutch pack were due to misadjusted throttle link cables. If you want crappy transmissions, go to Dodge. I’ve NEVER heard of a GM trans going before, or even near, 50k miles. You probably just had really bad luck.
01/07, 4:46 PM
posted by:
SwerveEarly
Another way for dumb asses to survive. Maybe we should just make the drivers license tests harder and more frequent. We could eliminate the 5% of dickbags who cant drive.
I could see some 15 year old hacker shutting down all major artteries in L.A. with a laptop and a high speed connection. People couldnt even avoid the mobs of rioters as they sit helplessly in their automated cars.
01/07, 4:52 PM
posted by:
autonut
I see law suit: Senator Kennedy programmed his Tahoe to get it him from Boston to Portland, took his dose of Chavis Regal and ended up without gas in Ohio (without killing any secretaries). Old man got confused between Main and Oregon and froze to death!
01/07, 5:00 PM
posted by:
LP64O
This is my dream vehicle.
01/07, 5:14 PM
posted by:
Bryce
C6Racer, more likey, he’s probably just full of ****.
01/07, 6:27 PM
posted by:
GT40
This is stupid, its just another way for people who cant drive to live.
01/07, 7:04 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
GT40: fully agreed. Drivers who can’t drive should die in a self-inflicted car accident, as long as they don’t take others along with them to their graves.
01/07, 9:49 PM
posted by:
hateful83
I never would’ve thought GM would be the ones pushing to get this “technology” out there. I’m kind of sad.. But I bet the insurance companies have a huge one over this. No more “human mistakes”, this just sucks. I can see it now, 2018, we’ll all have honda asimo’s driving around in our auto pilot tahoes doing all our errands for us. We’ll never have to leave the house, now that’s living!
01/07, 11:37 PM
posted by:
Eddie Willers
Obviously we all know this is where technology is heading…in 30 years kids will laugh about how us oldsters had to actually drive ourselves to destinations.
01/08, 12:32 AM
posted by:
Bryce
I dunno, Eddie. If that’s true, I’d be laughing that them for being too stupid to drive themselves anywhere.
01/08, 4:30 AM
posted by:
GT40
The future is going to suck.
01/08, 7:51 AM
posted by:
V2
I can see these being used in iraq……..thats it. Are americans really getting that lazy?????
01/08, 1:20 PM
posted by:
Cyclone of Red
I was reading an article in a car mag recently in which the author was driving a Jag with the intrusive cruise control. Said a few times the sensor saw a truck going 30 mph slower in a different lane but because of a curve the sensor thought the truck was in the same lane and slammed on the brakes. If someone had been behind him…
01/09, 8:38 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
Michael ….
01/10, 1:24 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
34 Comments
RicardoHead: “Honda has been building driverless Accords since the early 90s†Classic!
A4: “i was gonna say cramrys, pieces of garbage.†And you were gonna be guilty of redundancy.
Livelyjay: A diesel Cobalt would still be a Cobalt.
Speaking of which, I got home and discovered that in one of my neighbors’ driveway, instead of her civic, I saw a Cobalt. Did she move up? Later, I asked her if she’d gotten a new car. Turned out she’d gotten into a wreck on I-5. It was a rental. Let’s see if she likes it. Her civic wasn’t totaled, (although it could be said it came off the boat/train totaled), so she should get that back. See if she misses it. When I needed to go out of state and had to rent a car, I rented a Plymouth breeze. For the only time ever, I was glad to be back in my Civic.
Comment by casualobserver: “They just decided to change the name from ‘buyerless’ to ‘driverless.’†Good one.
SwerveEarly: “Maybe we should just make the drivers license tests harder and more frequent.†I agree, particularly in California, where there are too many vehicles on the road anyway. My brother failed five times before passing.
“I could see some 15 year old hacker shutting down all major artteries in L.A. with a laptop and a high speed connection.â€
I remember reading a book in which a guy took over the world with a 386 or something.
autonut: good stuff on Sen. Kennedy. Only thing less electable than a democrat from Massachusetts is a democrat from San Francisco.
All you guys bashing this as an enabling tool for idiots need to watch more Knight Rider.
Eddie Willers: “Back when I was your own age, I had to turn, brake and watch for when the light turned green!’