A4: “i was gonna say cramrys, pieces of garbage.” And you were gonna be guilty of redundancy.

Livelyjay: A diesel Cobalt would still be a Cobalt.
Speaking of which, I got home and discovered that in one of my neighbors’ driveway, instead of her civic, I saw a Cobalt. Did she move up? Later, I asked her if she’d gotten a new car. Turned out she’d gotten into a wreck on I-5. It was a rental. Let’s see if she likes it. Her civic wasn’t totaled, (although it could be said it came off the boat/train totaled), so she should get that back. See if she misses it. When I needed to go out of state and had to rent a car, I rented a Plymouth breeze. For the only time ever, I was glad to be back in my Civic.

Comment by casualobserver: “They just decided to change the name from ‘buyerless’ to ‘driverless.’” Good one.

SwerveEarly: “Maybe we should just make the drivers license tests harder and more frequent.” I agree, particularly in California, where there are too many vehicles on the road anyway. My brother failed five times before passing.

“I could see some 15 year old hacker shutting down all major artteries in L.A. with a laptop and a high speed connection.”
I remember reading a book in which a guy took over the world with a 386 or something.

autonut: good stuff on Sen. Kennedy. Only thing less electable than a democrat from Massachusetts is a democrat from San Francisco.

All you guys bashing this as an enabling tool for idiots need to watch more Knight Rider.

Eddie Willers: “Back when I was your own age, I had to turn, brake and watch for when the light turned green!’

If they do introduce this technology, the benefit is that accidents will be greatly reduced. However, I think there should be some kind of option to drive the car yourself, but the system analyzes what you are doing and takes control if you are about to run into another car that is in your blind spot or something like that (if you are a moron).

Then they Through some Bole shit futuristic year out there, that they might have them on the roads by 2018. it wont be GM that Develops these… But they will take credit for throwing them in there death traps first.

Its sad, that its finally hitting them, taking part in all these advances when they happen are a Necessity, instead issuing all it out to 3rd party’s to develop it. LAME.

GEAT REAL….. Who wants a COBALT especially a DIESEL.

How about spending $$$ on good engine gaskets and transmission clutch packs.

Or… make a 50 MPG Diesel Cobalt to sell.

GM is full of idiots who can’t see reality around them.