




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM&#8217;s North American operations to be profitable by 2010 or 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-360107</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-360107</guid>
		<description>I like to play &quot;Master of Puppets&quot; on an explorer, but I like to play the solos on a Flying V. The classical &quot;Bridge&quot; part is a good time to make the switch,but after the solos, it goes right back into the main riff. 
What to do?
I have been just finishing the tune with the Flying V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to play &#8220;Master of Puppets&#8221; on an explorer, but I like to play the solos on a Flying V. The classical &#8220;Bridge&#8221; part is a good time to make the switch,but after the solos, it goes right back into the main riff.<br />
What to do?<br />
I have been just finishing the tune with the Flying V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359300</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359300</guid>
		<description>^^^We&#039;re still here.

We just wish GM would spend the money they have left on good products, cool cars that make people want to own a GM car again.  

Stop wasting money on H3&#039;s and concept cars they will never ever build.

Stop letting engineers design cars and let art students into the company.

The spirit of Harley Earl would be proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^We&#8217;re still here.</p>
<p>We just wish GM would spend the money they have left on good products, cool cars that make people want to own a GM car again.  </p>
<p>Stop wasting money on H3&#8242;s and concept cars they will never ever build.</p>
<p>Stop letting engineers design cars and let art students into the company.</p>
<p>The spirit of Harley Earl would be proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwerveEarly</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359062</link>
		<dc:creator>SwerveEarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359062</guid>
		<description>Where have all the car enthusiasts gone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where have all the car enthusiasts gone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359047</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359047</guid>
		<description>The only thing going down the toilet is your posts.
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing going down the toilet is your posts.<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AxeHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359010</link>
		<dc:creator>AxeHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-359010</guid>
		<description>GM needs to keep at quality in production and in promotion to head off Toyota.  Nothing else will suffice.  People buy Toyota&#039;s and Honda&#039;s over GMs because (percieved or real) they believe the car will not let them down, will last a long time, and will hold it&#039;s value.  Some of them (me included) had bad experiances with domestics and even if that&#039;s a long time ago - it&#039;s hard to change real life experiance.  Quality boys - Reliability - Value...thats the ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM needs to keep at quality in production and in promotion to head off Toyota.  Nothing else will suffice.  People buy Toyota&#8217;s and Honda&#8217;s over GMs because (percieved or real) they believe the car will not let them down, will last a long time, and will hold it&#8217;s value.  Some of them (me included) had bad experiances with domestics and even if that&#8217;s a long time ago &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to change real life experiance.  Quality boys &#8211; Reliability &#8211; Value&#8230;thats the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdasch1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358991</link>
		<dc:creator>jdasch1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358991</guid>
		<description>Jim Cramer with CNBC and host of Mad Money said yesterday that GM by 2010 would be a NON-UNION company. LLN needs to follow that prediction with some news story about it. He predicted that GM is poised to take back the lead from Toyota and have massive profits from 2010 on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Cramer with CNBC and host of Mad Money said yesterday that GM by 2010 would be a NON-UNION company. LLN needs to follow that prediction with some news story about it. He predicted that GM is poised to take back the lead from Toyota and have massive profits from 2010 on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358990</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358990</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t you guys read the link on this blog to article to &quot;myopians in Detroit&quot; by Brook Yates? It was very good article and it basically sums up GM and Ford management: ass holes in exquisite houses and offices with their heads berried in their rectums.  I am surprised LLN censors did not yanked the link before I could read it. They sure yanked plenty of my posts that are disparaging to their client (I understand that - they got to eat).
Those jack asses are running companies into the ground, destroying people livelihood and making millions in the process. What qualities Lutz demoed to make that kind of  scratch? At least his co-conspirator finished Harvard business school.
This article is quite pessimistic: there will be losses for 2008, 2009, 2010 and perhaps 2011. Who can say for sure that 2012 will have great economic outlook and price oil will drop to 1998 level so we can all drive Suburbans with 10 mpg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t you guys read the link on this blog to article to &#8220;myopians in Detroit&#8221; by Brook Yates? It was very good article and it basically sums up GM and Ford management: ass holes in exquisite houses and offices with their heads berried in their rectums.  I am surprised LLN censors did not yanked the link before I could read it. They sure yanked plenty of my posts that are disparaging to their client (I understand that &#8211; they got to eat).<br />
Those jack asses are running companies into the ground, destroying people livelihood and making millions in the process. What qualities Lutz demoed to make that kind of  scratch? At least his co-conspirator finished Harvard business school.<br />
This article is quite pessimistic: there will be losses for 2008, 2009, 2010 and perhaps 2011. Who can say for sure that 2012 will have great economic outlook and price oil will drop to 1998 level so we can all drive Suburbans with 10 mpg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358931</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358931</guid>
		<description>And C6Racer
You KNOW BETTER than to compare quality records with Toyota.
Sorry you had a tough time, but you KNOW you are an exception, not the rule.
Let&#039;s keep one foot on the ground.
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And C6Racer<br />
You KNOW BETTER than to compare quality records with Toyota.<br />
Sorry you had a tough time, but you KNOW you are an exception, not the rule.<br />
Let&#8217;s keep one foot on the ground.<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358929</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358929</guid>
		<description>I know speaking the truth here is like pi$$ing in the wind, but the facts remain.
No one said Toyota is perfect.
No one is saying GM is crap.
But GM has had their time in the sun, and now it&#039;s over.
They have to hustle, and sweat, and work, and learn about what their customers really want/need.
They have as much ability as Toyota, or anyone else.  Maybe more.
My question to you is what happened before 2002?  
Where was all of this sudden interest in the customers before now?
GM needs to rebuild it&#039;s name, which it spent a generation destroying.
I WANT to love GM.  We all do.  But we all WON&#039;T. 
GM has a lot to learn, and has a lot of respect to earn.
I wish GM all the best.
Unlike Ford and Chrysler, they&#039;ve shown an interest in competing with the best.
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know speaking the truth here is like pi$$ing in the wind, but the facts remain.<br />
No one said Toyota is perfect.<br />
No one is saying GM is crap.<br />
But GM has had their time in the sun, and now it&#8217;s over.<br />
They have to hustle, and sweat, and work, and learn about what their customers really want/need.<br />
They have as much ability as Toyota, or anyone else.  Maybe more.<br />
My question to you is what happened before 2002?<br />
Where was all of this sudden interest in the customers before now?<br />
GM needs to rebuild it&#8217;s name, which it spent a generation destroying.<br />
I WANT to love GM.  We all do.  But we all WON&#8217;T.<br />
GM has a lot to learn, and has a lot of respect to earn.<br />
I wish GM all the best.<br />
Unlike Ford and Chrysler, they&#8217;ve shown an interest in competing with the best.<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358919</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358919</guid>
		<description>Sorry &quot;Dr.&quot; Fill. Toyota sucks just as it always has. I&#039;ve never had any good experiences in one. $3k head repair because of a burnt exhaust valve in a &#039;91 4Runner, plastic bits just falling off randomly and broken window motors on a &#039;98 Camry, and $1k repair for mushroomed valve stems on a 2000 Tacoma 2WD I-4. Yep, they&#039;re perfect alright.
Besides the tailgate cables on my 2000 Sierra, only the headlight switch has given me problems so far. I had to think for about 3 mins just to remember something has gone wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8220;Dr.&#8221; Fill. Toyota sucks just as it always has. I&#8217;ve never had any good experiences in one. $3k head repair because of a burnt exhaust valve in a &#8217;91 4Runner, plastic bits just falling off randomly and broken window motors on a &#8217;98 Camry, and $1k repair for mushroomed valve stems on a 2000 Tacoma 2WD I-4. Yep, they&#8217;re perfect alright.<br />
Besides the tailgate cables on my 2000 Sierra, only the headlight switch has given me problems so far. I had to think for about 3 mins just to remember something has gone wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS4LIFE</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358905</link>
		<dc:creator>SS4LIFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358905</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s going to take some time, but GM and eventually Ford and Chrysler will return profitable in the next few years but definitely GM before the other domestics. While a lot of this is GM&#039;s fault and while many people think I may be a big defender of GM, from owning their products all of my life, and having to put up with some of the bs they&#039;ve given me, I understand why a lot of buyers moved away from GM and that is certainly GM&#039;s fault. However they are turning around, and their latest cars are really turning out well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to take some time, but GM and eventually Ford and Chrysler will return profitable in the next few years but definitely GM before the other domestics. While a lot of this is GM&#8217;s fault and while many people think I may be a big defender of GM, from owning their products all of my life, and having to put up with some of the bs they&#8217;ve given me, I understand why a lot of buyers moved away from GM and that is certainly GM&#8217;s fault. However they are turning around, and their latest cars are really turning out well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358891</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358891</guid>
		<description>THEIR  SECOND  MOON  SHOT.....HERE  AND  NOW  !!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THEIR  SECOND  MOON  SHOT&#8230;..HERE  AND  NOW  !!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: injunraiv</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358889</link>
		<dc:creator>injunraiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358889</guid>
		<description>Xile - assertations of crap is different from mediocre.  For years I&#039;ve had nothing but good luck from my GM products.  Sure, a minot problem here or there, but nothing that wouldn&#039;t have happened with a car from another maker.

I think there are many factors in the domestics slide, and not all of them are their fault.  However, I do believe the union stranglehold on Detroit was not a good thing, whether or not it was as big a factor as others seem to think.

I guess I&#039;m just tired of people talking trash about American workers and manufacturers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xile &#8211; assertations of crap is different from mediocre.  For years I&#8217;ve had nothing but good luck from my GM products.  Sure, a minot problem here or there, but nothing that wouldn&#8217;t have happened with a car from another maker.</p>
<p>I think there are many factors in the domestics slide, and not all of them are their fault.  However, I do believe the union stranglehold on Detroit was not a good thing, whether or not it was as big a factor as others seem to think.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m just tired of people talking trash about American workers and manufacturers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvette</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358870</link>
		<dc:creator>corvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358870</guid>
		<description>go GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xile</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358867</link>
		<dc:creator>Xile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358867</guid>
		<description>I just want to clarify one thing.  I really like the stuff GM/Ford are putting out lately.  As far as quality is concerned, I don&#039;t think there is currently that much of a difference between them and the Japanese.  But I&#039;m talking about my experience a few years ago.  You can&#039;t tell me that GM/Ford quality was as good as the Japanese and the products were bland.  And everything isn&#039;t the union&#039;s fault.  Doesn&#039;t management deserve most of the responsibility?  They are the ones in charge right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to clarify one thing.  I really like the stuff GM/Ford are putting out lately.  As far as quality is concerned, I don&#8217;t think there is currently that much of a difference between them and the Japanese.  But I&#8217;m talking about my experience a few years ago.  You can&#8217;t tell me that GM/Ford quality was as good as the Japanese and the products were bland.  And everything isn&#8217;t the union&#8217;s fault.  Doesn&#8217;t management deserve most of the responsibility?  They are the ones in charge right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookie4me</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358864</link>
		<dc:creator>cookie4me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358864</guid>
		<description>Buy now because I doubt they can avoid a drop in quality (for whatever brief period of time) by turning over so many workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy now because I doubt they can avoid a drop in quality (for whatever brief period of time) by turning over so many workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358842</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358842</guid>
		<description>I see some very enlightened commentary from people who haven&#039;t driven GM&#039;s before 5 years ago.
GM is to commended for their RECENT turnaround in quality, design, and styling.
Having said that, the fact that they have mor eor less lost their leadership in car production, with more capacity and more car companies than any other, speaks to a general dissatisfcation with GM.  
GM cars have been mediocre at best, and only recently are showing promise.
GM does work with a disadvantage of cutting bad union deals, a fault of their own doing.
More importantly, they suffer from poor planning, poor leadership, and losing touch with their customer base/market conditions.
GM will make money in 3 years.
Ford will make decent engines in 3 years.
Chrysler will be more efficient in 3 years.
Many people are just sick and tired of being sick and tired.
It&#039;s Toyota&#039;s time now. 
And they can thank the domestics just as much as their own considerable effort.
Thank you.
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see some very enlightened commentary from people who haven&#8217;t driven GM&#8217;s before 5 years ago.<br />
GM is to commended for their RECENT turnaround in quality, design, and styling.<br />
Having said that, the fact that they have mor eor less lost their leadership in car production, with more capacity and more car companies than any other, speaks to a general dissatisfcation with GM.<br />
GM cars have been mediocre at best, and only recently are showing promise.<br />
GM does work with a disadvantage of cutting bad union deals, a fault of their own doing.<br />
More importantly, they suffer from poor planning, poor leadership, and losing touch with their customer base/market conditions.<br />
GM will make money in 3 years.<br />
Ford will make decent engines in 3 years.<br />
Chrysler will be more efficient in 3 years.<br />
Many people are just sick and tired of being sick and tired.<br />
It&#8217;s Toyota&#8217;s time now.<br />
And they can thank the domestics just as much as their own considerable effort.<br />
Thank you.<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358840</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358840</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m sure those of us not in the UAW or CAW are all happy enough to cough up a golden furball on our respective self administered pension plans after this proclamation, this does not make the unions go away. This is likely just going to make them even less joyous.

What mystifies me is how GM ended up with so many employees to begin with. When in recent memory were times that good that they had to build up such a huge workforce? Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but hasn&#039;t their market share been eroding for years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m sure those of us not in the UAW or CAW are all happy enough to cough up a golden furball on our respective self administered pension plans after this proclamation, this does not make the unions go away. This is likely just going to make them even less joyous.</p>
<p>What mystifies me is how GM ended up with so many employees to begin with. When in recent memory were times that good that they had to build up such a huge workforce? Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but hasn&#8217;t their market share been eroding for years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358835</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358835</guid>
		<description>They had ample warning to stop building crap and start making good cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had ample warning to stop building crap and start making good cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: injunraiv</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358831</link>
		<dc:creator>injunraiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358831</guid>
		<description>Xile, they were no more shitty than any of it&#039;s competitors products, no matter what Consumer Reports or 1115 says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xile, they were no more shitty than any of it&#8217;s competitors products, no matter what Consumer Reports or 1115 says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xile</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358820</link>
		<dc:creator>Xile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358820</guid>
		<description>The unions were part of the problem but the real problem was shitty products and high oil prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unions were part of the problem but the real problem was shitty products and high oil prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358817</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-north-american-operations-to-be-profitable-by-2010-or-2011.html#comment-358817</guid>
		<description>Bye bye, UAW! Let someone else deal with your vampire leech bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bye bye, UAW! Let someone else deal with your vampire leech bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 397/398 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 21:41:03 -->
