<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honda planning sub-Fit CRX hybrid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:37:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Lude</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-317553</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Lude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-317553</guid>
		<description>&quot;Winding Road isn&#039;t the most accurate source for info. The Honda CRX is retired, just like the Legend and Prelude. It ain&#039;t coming back, no matter how much Honda fans pine for it.
It&#039;s already confirmed that the new Fit is on its way, along with a new sub-Civic family hybrid. Wether these will share the same platform is yet to be seen. Until we see what Honda shows at the Tokyo, anything is pure speculation

Comment by global_lightning, posted on July11 at 10:05&quot; 

Correction, the Legend was brought back, It&#039;s called the Acura RL here in the U.S. in Japan it&#039;s still called the Legend. Who knows, as a Prelude owner I look forward to Honda bringing back the Prelude with a RWD setup and a v6 engine. :D As for the CRX, this vehicle was intended as a extremely good gas saver with practicality for local use. It was never a &quot;sports&quot; car. Reason people tune them is because the vehicle is so light a mildly robust engine powerplant swapped in can make this car fast. Honda keeping with the CRX tradition of it&#039;s original intention is doing right by making it a hybrid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Winding Road isn&#8217;t the most accurate source for info. The Honda CRX is retired, just like the Legend and Prelude. It ain&#8217;t coming back, no matter how much Honda fans pine for it.<br />
It&#8217;s already confirmed that the new Fit is on its way, along with a new sub-Civic family hybrid. Wether these will share the same platform is yet to be seen. Until we see what Honda shows at the Tokyo, anything is pure speculation</p>
<p>Comment by global_lightning, posted on July11 at 10:05&#8243; </p>
<p>Correction, the Legend was brought back, It&#8217;s called the Acura RL here in the U.S. in Japan it&#8217;s still called the Legend. Who knows, as a Prelude owner I look forward to Honda bringing back the Prelude with a RWD setup and a v6 engine. <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  As for the CRX, this vehicle was intended as a extremely good gas saver with practicality for local use. It was never a &#8220;sports&#8221; car. Reason people tune them is because the vehicle is so light a mildly robust engine powerplant swapped in can make this car fast. Honda keeping with the CRX tradition of it&#8217;s original intention is doing right by making it a hybrid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLISS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-317522</link>
		<dc:creator>BLISS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-317522</guid>
		<description>GOOD....GO AHEAD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD&#8230;.GO AHEAD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-317024</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-317024</guid>
		<description>Mugen must be screaming right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mugen must be screaming right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saud</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-317016</link>
		<dc:creator>Saud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-317016</guid>
		<description>Why dont they try to turn the Fit into a hybrid. It&#039;s so small &amp; lightweight that they can outsource a less than litre engine &amp; mate it with the civic hybrid&#039;s electric plug-in battery. Good power and fuel mileage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dont they try to turn the Fit into a hybrid. It&#8217;s so small &amp; lightweight that they can outsource a less than litre engine &amp; mate it with the civic hybrid&#8217;s electric plug-in battery. Good power and fuel mileage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-317004</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-317004</guid>
		<description>A new Hybrid CRX?  Didn&#039;t Honda already built that?  It was called the Insight.  It looked similar to the CRX, was a Two Seater hatchback, with a 5 speed manual.  The basics all mimic the original CRX.  I would bet good money that this &#039;new&#039; CRX will look very similar to the Insight, without the strange rear-wheel cover treatment.  Just an evolution of the design.  
I would agree with the previous post, they should offer two flavours, a hybrid, and a performer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Hybrid CRX?  Didn&#8217;t Honda already built that?  It was called the Insight.  It looked similar to the CRX, was a Two Seater hatchback, with a 5 speed manual.  The basics all mimic the original CRX.  I would bet good money that this &#8216;new&#8217; CRX will look very similar to the Insight, without the strange rear-wheel cover treatment.  Just an evolution of the design.<br />
I would agree with the previous post, they should offer two flavours, a hybrid, and a performer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316984</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316984</guid>
		<description>Flipper has a point.. the original CRX was never intended to be the S2000 or some overt sports car.. it was offered as either a super-basic HF model that offered over 50 MPG due to light weight and skinny tires (not diesel or hybrid trickery), or a sportier Si with great handling and decent acceleration.

I&#039;d like to see Honda bring back the CRX with these two distinct personalities.. one an Insight-like hybrid and one a 200-hp Civic Si junior.. but since the Hybrid system and modern safety requirements require extra weight and expense, this time the economy Hybrid model would end up priced the same as the Si model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flipper has a point.. the original CRX was never intended to be the S2000 or some overt sports car.. it was offered as either a super-basic HF model that offered over 50 MPG due to light weight and skinny tires (not diesel or hybrid trickery), or a sportier Si with great handling and decent acceleration.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see Honda bring back the CRX with these two distinct personalities.. one an Insight-like hybrid and one a 200-hp Civic Si junior.. but since the Hybrid system and modern safety requirements require extra weight and expense, this time the economy Hybrid model would end up priced the same as the Si model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipper</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316977</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316977</guid>
		<description>A CRX should be lightweight  nimble handling machine. The weight of the batteries and the high mileage tires will work opposite of these ideals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A CRX should be lightweight  nimble handling machine. The weight of the batteries and the high mileage tires will work opposite of these ideals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0GSharK6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316971</link>
		<dc:creator>0GSharK6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316971</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really liked Honda&#039;s interior materials/styling lately myself. The tachometers are done decently but then everything else falls short. Exterior-wise, they&#039;re average. Mechanically they&#039;re sound, but they have had their issues of late as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really liked Honda&#8217;s interior materials/styling lately myself. The tachometers are done decently but then everything else falls short. Exterior-wise, they&#8217;re average. Mechanically they&#8217;re sound, but they have had their issues of late as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny W</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316918</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316918</guid>
		<description>Hold
On
Not
Done
Accelerating

is the version I know. On topic though I&#039;m disappointed in Honda of late, they&#039;re better than Toyota but that divide has been shrinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold<br />
On<br />
Not<br />
Done<br />
Accelerating</p>
<p>is the version I know. On topic though I&#8217;m disappointed in Honda of late, they&#8217;re better than Toyota but that divide has been shrinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316902</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316902</guid>
		<description>Honda prides itself on performance?
Bosh.
In my honda, Hagar&#039;s &quot;I Can&#039;t Drive 55&quot; had a literal meaning.

How
Odd
No
Damn
Acceleration

but, to stay on point, hiondea neads a prius -- a new model from the ground up, not an altered accord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honda prides itself on performance?<br />
Bosh.<br />
In my honda, Hagar&#8217;s &#8220;I Can&#8217;t Drive 55&#8243; had a literal meaning.</p>
<p>How<br />
Odd<br />
No<br />
Damn<br />
Acceleration</p>
<p>but, to stay on point, hiondea neads a prius &#8212; a new model from the ground up, not an altered accord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Htay5500</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316887</link>
		<dc:creator>Htay5500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316887</guid>
		<description>CRX hybrid? come on, its not gonna do you any good. will there be a non-hybird CRX? tht will sound nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRX hybrid? come on, its not gonna do you any good. will there be a non-hybird CRX? tht will sound nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316881</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316881</guid>
		<description>It really is a disgrace to the CRX name... It should be what it always was. Screw hybrids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is a disgrace to the CRX name&#8230; It should be what it always was. Screw hybrids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316866</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316866</guid>
		<description>Hybrids are the answer, but you need to be specific as to what kind of Hybrid. Toyota and Handa&#039;s Parallel hybrid systems are over-engineered and over cost per unit. But this is the Japanese way it seems. Gadgets and more gadgets. 

Serial Hybrids are a better solution because the technology is so relatively simple in comparison. No Transmission, smaller, lighter simpler engine, driven only by motors... HONDA would do well to look at the CHEVY VOLT, TESLA roadster, and the Ellica  to get their inspiration. 

HONDA prides itself on performance but never seems to deliver in a way that makes a solid, lasting, impact. I mean, the S2000, great as it is, is not the first name in sports cars that springs to mind. It&#039;s not even in my personal top ten. This is a real chance for that. 

Otherwise, I would Doubt the CRX would return in name, but in concept it is not unlikely. But I would Like  HONDA to kick their FWD habit on performance cars. But now-a-days the CRX would be much too small, it was smaller than a Mini Cooper. The Insight is only slightly smaller. But the concept makes some sense, but I would rather a RWD &quot;Prelude&quot;, small inexpensive (tops out at 22K USD), four to six cylinder (who wouldn&#039;t want a hot six from HONDA), with handling and drive befitting HONDA. 

Besides, Isn&#039;t the Civic Si enough? Just add AWD and you&#039;d have a kickin&#039; WRX and EVO fighter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids are the answer, but you need to be specific as to what kind of Hybrid. Toyota and Handa&#8217;s Parallel hybrid systems are over-engineered and over cost per unit. But this is the Japanese way it seems. Gadgets and more gadgets. </p>
<p>Serial Hybrids are a better solution because the technology is so relatively simple in comparison. No Transmission, smaller, lighter simpler engine, driven only by motors&#8230; HONDA would do well to look at the CHEVY VOLT, TESLA roadster, and the Ellica  to get their inspiration. </p>
<p>HONDA prides itself on performance but never seems to deliver in a way that makes a solid, lasting, impact. I mean, the S2000, great as it is, is not the first name in sports cars that springs to mind. It&#8217;s not even in my personal top ten. This is a real chance for that. </p>
<p>Otherwise, I would Doubt the CRX would return in name, but in concept it is not unlikely. But I would Like  HONDA to kick their FWD habit on performance cars. But now-a-days the CRX would be much too small, it was smaller than a Mini Cooper. The Insight is only slightly smaller. But the concept makes some sense, but I would rather a RWD &#8220;Prelude&#8221;, small inexpensive (tops out at 22K USD), four to six cylinder (who wouldn&#8217;t want a hot six from HONDA), with handling and drive befitting HONDA. </p>
<p>Besides, Isn&#8217;t the Civic Si enough? Just add AWD and you&#8217;d have a kickin&#8217; WRX and EVO fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316858</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316858</guid>
		<description>The Accord Hybrid was a bad idea bc they were more concerned with horsepower than mileage The Insight needed two more doors and some more room and it would have sold well. If they sell a hybrid CRX they will just make the same mistake as they did with the Insight. They need to make a separate model with 4 doors and some room just like Toyota did with the second generation Prius or have a hybrid CRV. That would sell like crazy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Accord Hybrid was a bad idea bc they were more concerned with horsepower than mileage The Insight needed two more doors and some more room and it would have sold well. If they sell a hybrid CRX they will just make the same mistake as they did with the Insight. They need to make a separate model with 4 doors and some room just like Toyota did with the second generation Prius or have a hybrid CRV. That would sell like crazy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316853</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316853</guid>
		<description>This new model is not a CRX. Honda doesn&#039;t even know their own cars. Hybrids are not the answer Honda. Take a look at your Accord and Insight which sell very poorly.
Comment by sunshine1810, posted on July11 at 9:49 am


The Accord was over optioned and priced (they should have included a &quot;low end&quot; hybrid Accord) and the Insight was too small for most.
The hybrid is here, ie Prius and like sized and priced.. Get used to it. 100% corn power is a joke. For one unit of ethanol the produsers use 1.7 units. Dumb use of energy. Plus the mileage is worse than petrol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new model is not a CRX. Honda doesn&#8217;t even know their own cars. Hybrids are not the answer Honda. Take a look at your Accord and Insight which sell very poorly.<br />
Comment by sunshine1810, posted on July11 at 9:49 am</p>
<p>The Accord was over optioned and priced (they should have included a &#8220;low end&#8221; hybrid Accord) and the Insight was too small for most.<br />
The hybrid is here, ie Prius and like sized and priced.. Get used to it. 100% corn power is a joke. For one unit of ethanol the produsers use 1.7 units. Dumb use of energy. Plus the mileage is worse than petrol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316852</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316852</guid>
		<description>Winding Road isn&#039;t the most accurate source for info.  The Honda CRX is retired, just like the Legend and Prelude.  It ain&#039;t coming back, no matter how much Honda fans pine for it.
It&#039;s already confirmed that the new Fit is on its way, along with a new sub-Civic family hybrid.  Wether these will share the same platform is yet to be seen.  Until we see what Honda shows at the Tokyo, anything is pure speculation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winding Road isn&#8217;t the most accurate source for info.  The Honda CRX is retired, just like the Legend and Prelude.  It ain&#8217;t coming back, no matter how much Honda fans pine for it.<br />
It&#8217;s already confirmed that the new Fit is on its way, along with a new sub-Civic family hybrid.  Wether these will share the same platform is yet to be seen.  Until we see what Honda shows at the Tokyo, anything is pure speculation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunshine1810</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316848</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine1810</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316848</guid>
		<description>This new model is not a CRX. Honda doesn&#039;t even know their own cars. Hybrids are not the answer Honda. Take a look at your Accord and Insight which sell very poorly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new model is not a CRX. Honda doesn&#8217;t even know their own cars. Hybrids are not the answer Honda. Take a look at your Accord and Insight which sell very poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acura_el2000</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html/comment-page-1#comment-316845</link>
		<dc:creator>acura_el2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-planning-sub-fit-crx-hybrid.html#comment-316845</guid>
		<description>a disgrace to the CRX name.. hybrids are band-aid solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a disgrace to the CRX name.. hybrids are band-aid solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
