<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaguar XF: S-Type replacement gets new name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:05:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-283031</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-283031</guid>
		<description>Did they yank the grill off the Veyron verbatim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they yank the grill off the Veyron verbatim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282854</link>
		<dc:creator>F451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282854</guid>
		<description>Both Jaguar and Aston Martin need to find their way back home. It is only there and under the rightful country ownership will these marquees again be what they were intended to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Jaguar and Aston Martin need to find their way back home. It is only there and under the rightful country ownership will these marquees again be what they were intended to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282831</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282831</guid>
		<description>so hyudai style</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so hyudai style</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmanero</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282785</link>
		<dc:creator>dmanero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282785</guid>
		<description>- Piablo - so true. I know alot of these manufactuers are wowned one of the top three, but still does mean you can be diffrent and be orginal. VW still starting to look like a cheap Audi for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Piablo &#8211; so true. I know alot of these manufactuers are wowned one of the top three, but still does mean you can be diffrent and be orginal. VW still starting to look like a cheap Audi for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282773</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282773</guid>
		<description>So I take it no one here feels challenged to think of Jag as daring and different? Challeneged at all? 

Last I checked, Ford thought it&#039;s customers were too ambivilent to care if their Jag looked like a Taurus or a Crown Vic knock off. I think they should really lay off challenging others and challenge themselves to come out with a car worthy of carrying the Jaguar name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I take it no one here feels challenged to think of Jag as daring and different? Challeneged at all? </p>
<p>Last I checked, Ford thought it&#8217;s customers were too ambivilent to care if their Jag looked like a Taurus or a Crown Vic knock off. I think they should really lay off challenging others and challenge themselves to come out with a car worthy of carrying the Jaguar name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282772</link>
		<dc:creator>peter g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282772</guid>
		<description>-dmanero,

true, but the overall feel isn&#039;t Bugatti-ish. And not even Jaguar-ish, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-dmanero,</p>
<p>true, but the overall feel isn&#8217;t Bugatti-ish. And not even Jaguar-ish, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmanero</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282771</link>
		<dc:creator>dmanero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282771</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does this jag remind you of a Bugatti front end. The lining on the hood leading down to the center grill, remind me alot of the Bugatti. Still needs work, but then Jag never really were orginal in their designs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does this jag remind you of a Bugatti front end. The lining on the hood leading down to the center grill, remind me alot of the Bugatti. Still needs work, but then Jag never really were orginal in their designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282758</link>
		<dc:creator>peter g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282758</guid>
		<description>Saw it some years back at an exhibition in Copenhagen and it sort of looked good. Small and quite compact, that said I&#039;m not sure this is the new Jag, and had it been it should have been aluminium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw it some years back at an exhibition in Copenhagen and it sort of looked good. Small and quite compact, that said I&#8217;m not sure this is the new Jag, and had it been it should have been aluminium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282750</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282750</guid>
		<description>looks better than the current one at least</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks better than the current one at least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elvio</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282743</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282743</guid>
		<description>hmm....look like a CAT face to me....Not a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230;.look like a CAT face to me&#8230;.Not a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucifer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282741</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282741</guid>
		<description>this is not the actual XF people...this is a concept car that jaguar relaesed some time ago!!!

it&#039;s great that the brand is moving upmarket leaving room for volvo. with the X type dieng, this can be a CLS competior if done right, leaving the S80 for Eclass territory, although volvos still got a long way to go to compete with the germans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is not the actual XF people&#8230;this is a concept car that jaguar relaesed some time ago!!!</p>
<p>it&#8217;s great that the brand is moving upmarket leaving room for volvo. with the X type dieng, this can be a CLS competior if done right, leaving the S80 for Eclass territory, although volvos still got a long way to go to compete with the germans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacalao</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282740</link>
		<dc:creator>bacalao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282740</guid>
		<description>it should change  its look too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it should change  its look too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British_Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282739</link>
		<dc:creator>British_Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282739</guid>
		<description>S-Type should have been aluminium to really set jag apart from the rest of the luxury herd.

I would guess the S-type is goigng to be on its own platform or perhaps a shortened, steel version of the XJ8 platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S-Type should have been aluminium to really set jag apart from the rest of the luxury herd.</p>
<p>I would guess the S-type is goigng to be on its own platform or perhaps a shortened, steel version of the XJ8 platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyGodBeatsYourGod</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282734</link>
		<dc:creator>MyGodBeatsYourGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282734</guid>
		<description>Well, Jag has been X-Fing Ford and its money for years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Jag has been X-Fing Ford and its money for years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megator</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282733</link>
		<dc:creator>megator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282733</guid>
		<description>i liked the the type-r s type. my father testdrove one of the first s-types. i was in the back at the time and i almost vomited from the ride. never really liked the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i liked the the type-r s type. my father testdrove one of the first s-types. i was in the back at the time and i almost vomited from the ride. never really liked the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282728</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282728</guid>
		<description>Jaguar really needs to differentiate from the rest of Ford&#039;s vehicles, but in a good way. I&#039;m not convinced this is the right approach. :-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaguar really needs to differentiate from the rest of Ford&#8217;s vehicles, but in a good way. I&#8217;m not convinced this is the right approach. <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':-|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtv6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282724</link>
		<dc:creator>gtv6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282724</guid>
		<description>The 4.2 is great. The new grill on this one is pretty ugly though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 4.2 is great. The new grill on this one is pretty ugly though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282717</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282717</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not feeling it -from this angle at least. What chassis is it built from? XK or XJ? Mondeo? Is it RWD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not feeling it -from this angle at least. What chassis is it built from? XK or XJ? Mondeo? Is it RWD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egbert Souse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282716</link>
		<dc:creator>Egbert Souse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282716</guid>
		<description>Should have went with aluminum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have went with aluminum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282715</link>
		<dc:creator>Bimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282715</guid>
		<description>This car is FUGLY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car is FUGLY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282712</link>
		<dc:creator>American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282712</guid>
		<description>Maybe is just me, but Jaguar should drop it entirely. 

The S-type almost killed Jaguar.

The brand dilution combined with not so great engines require lots of repair work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe is just me, but Jaguar should drop it entirely. </p>
<p>The S-type almost killed Jaguar.</p>
<p>The brand dilution combined with not so great engines require lots of repair work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-282711</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/27/jaguar-xf-s-type-replacement-gets-new-name/#comment-282711</guid>
		<description>They can only improve on the S-Type.  The outgoing car is an ungraceful pig.  The only good  thing about it is that  the X-Type exists, making the S better by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can only improve on the S-Type.  The outgoing car is an ungraceful pig.  The only good  thing about it is that  the X-Type exists, making the S better by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
