




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeep unveils Cherokee with 4.7-liter &#8220;Stroker&#8221; inline-six</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftwingagenda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497416</link>
		<dc:creator>leftwingagenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497416</guid>
		<description>ad, not add...i guess my ADD got in the way of spelling ad properly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ad, not add&#8230;i guess my ADD got in the way of spelling ad properly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftwingagenda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497415</link>
		<dc:creator>leftwingagenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497415</guid>
		<description>i linked an add to an &#039;88 bronco on craigslist the other day...it has the 351 motor, which is only rated for 200 something horsepower, which seems puny these days, but you could pull a house down with that truck...hp ain&#039;t everything, especially with respect to truck motors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i linked an add to an &#8217;88 bronco on craigslist the other day&#8230;it has the 351 motor, which is only rated for 200 something horsepower, which seems puny these days, but you could pull a house down with that truck&#8230;hp ain&#8217;t everything, especially with respect to truck motors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wideopenthrottle</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497370</link>
		<dc:creator>wideopenthrottle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497370</guid>
		<description>My next door neighbor has a &#039;93 wrangler with the 4.0, an 11&quot; lift, and 42&quot; tires...and his only complaint is that he wishes it had more power.  This solves that problem for a lot of people interested in serious off-roading.  

And yes, they could make a V8 with the same displacement, but that requires new mounts and reconfiguring the entire engine bay.  By keeping the same inline-6 layout, Mopar kept the ease of installation as a re-built 4.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My next door neighbor has a &#8217;93 wrangler with the 4.0, an 11&#8243; lift, and 42&#8243; tires&#8230;and his only complaint is that he wishes it had more power.  This solves that problem for a lot of people interested in serious off-roading.  </p>
<p>And yes, they could make a V8 with the same displacement, but that requires new mounts and reconfiguring the entire engine bay.  By keeping the same inline-6 layout, Mopar kept the ease of installation as a re-built 4.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajm11</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497255</link>
		<dc:creator>ajm11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497255</guid>
		<description>Why do I get the feeling a lot of people on this site are not into the whole off roading thing.  One of the best engines for offroading is the 4.0L inline 6 in a Jeep.  The other good candidate for crawling through the mud is late 80&#039;s through 90&#039;s Toyota 4Runner.  The stroker 4.7 may not have a lot in the way of horsepower but I bet it would put to shame a lot of small block v8&#039;s with the amount of Torque it has.  I could see this motor making a nice sleeper out of a early 70&#039;s AMC Gremlin if you add some performance parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I get the feeling a lot of people on this site are not into the whole off roading thing.  One of the best engines for offroading is the 4.0L inline 6 in a Jeep.  The other good candidate for crawling through the mud is late 80&#8242;s through 90&#8242;s Toyota 4Runner.  The stroker 4.7 may not have a lot in the way of horsepower but I bet it would put to shame a lot of small block v8&#8242;s with the amount of Torque it has.  I could see this motor making a nice sleeper out of a early 70&#8242;s AMC Gremlin if you add some performance parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497243</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497243</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I definitely wanna drive around with &quot;Stroker&quot; written on the side of the truck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I definitely wanna drive around with &#8220;Stroker&#8221; written on the side of the truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497231</link>
		<dc:creator>shaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497231</guid>
		<description>This is a great upgrade.  Simple, straight in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great upgrade.  Simple, straight in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chryslercurse</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497228</link>
		<dc:creator>chryslercurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497228</guid>
		<description>the name honors the chrysler management team !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the name honors the chrysler management team !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftwingagenda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497220</link>
		<dc:creator>leftwingagenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497220</guid>
		<description>hp?  these engines don&#039;t output hp, they output pure awesome...old school awesome, but awesome nonetheless...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hp?  these engines don&#8217;t output hp, they output pure awesome&#8230;old school awesome, but awesome nonetheless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armstealer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497199</link>
		<dc:creator>armstealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497199</guid>
		<description>I, for one, think it is great that a manufacture is supporting a product that they didn&#039;t even produce.  It shows that they are investing R&amp;D money and that they plan to stick around for a while (or at least not just strip the company for parts and sell it off).  

There are a billion old wranglers out there that you can pick up for $400 because they blew a rod or a piston.  I hadn&#039;t even thought about Cherokees until this.  

Love &amp; Hate the doors at the same time, but the engine is what is important.  

Too bad my GC already has a 4.7...
...with 2 extra cylinders and 35 more pound-feet.  Wish I still owned a CJ or YJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, think it is great that a manufacture is supporting a product that they didn&#8217;t even produce.  It shows that they are investing R&amp;D money and that they plan to stick around for a while (or at least not just strip the company for parts and sell it off).  </p>
<p>There are a billion old wranglers out there that you can pick up for $400 because they blew a rod or a piston.  I hadn&#8217;t even thought about Cherokees until this.  </p>
<p>Love &amp; Hate the doors at the same time, but the engine is what is important.  </p>
<p>Too bad my GC already has a 4.7&#8230;<br />
&#8230;with 2 extra cylinders and 35 more pound-feet.  Wish I still owned a CJ or YJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 71fiveanddime</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497187</link>
		<dc:creator>71fiveanddime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497187</guid>
		<description>those old 4L motors are known for being nearly indestructible (doing so is practically an accomplishment). i hope these dont turn into paper weights the first time you beat on them. but i guess for simplicity sake this makes sense- its less of a hassle than turbo/SC. heres hoping they work out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those old 4L motors are known for being nearly indestructible (doing so is practically an accomplishment). i hope these dont turn into paper weights the first time you beat on them. but i guess for simplicity sake this makes sense- its less of a hassle than turbo/SC. heres hoping they work out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2WheeledSpeed</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497186</link>
		<dc:creator>2WheeledSpeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497186</guid>
		<description>I know 2 guys who drive Cherokees with the straight 6, and they&#039;re pretty awesome little engines. They put out a lot of torque too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know 2 guys who drive Cherokees with the straight 6, and they&#8217;re pretty awesome little engines. They put out a lot of torque too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idrinorbarsaku</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497171</link>
		<dc:creator>idrinorbarsaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497171</guid>
		<description>I still think jeep/chrysler/dodge don&#039;t know how o put out efficient engines! Common, a 4.7 I6?? make that a small block v8!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think jeep/chrysler/dodge don&#8217;t know how o put out efficient engines! Common, a 4.7 I6?? make that a small block v8!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sprockkets</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497112</link>
		<dc:creator>sprockkets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497112</guid>
		<description>It put out 190 HP, and regardless of its output, riding in a Rubicon Wrangler is like that Spiderman ride at Universal and just as fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It put out 190 HP, and regardless of its output, riding in a Rubicon Wrangler is like that Spiderman ride at Universal and just as fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocksterS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497105</link>
		<dc:creator>cocksterS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497105</guid>
		<description>This is so irrelevant it&#039;s funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so irrelevant it&#8217;s funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497098</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497098</guid>
		<description>reedfast, I think during its heyday the 4.0 put out about 180... so 265 isn&#039;t bad for something that began life when dinosaurs still roamed the Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reedfast, I think during its heyday the 4.0 put out about 180&#8230; so 265 isn&#8217;t bad for something that began life when dinosaurs still roamed the Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reedfast</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497089</link>
		<dc:creator>reedfast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497089</guid>
		<description>only 265 hp out of a 4.7, that kind of small?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only 265 hp out of a 4.7, that kind of small?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doty</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497065</link>
		<dc:creator>Doty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497065</guid>
		<description>How about a Cummins in-line six? that would be alot more exciting, or even a 4BT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a Cummins in-line six? that would be alot more exciting, or even a 4BT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497051</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497051</guid>
		<description>I wish CHRYSLER would bring back the XJ are retire that girlie-mobile the Liberty. This and the WRANGLER epitomize exactly what JEEP is about. The GRAND CHEROKEE can still be the flagship, but the XJ is what it was about when it came to SUVs by JEEP. 

Who knows maybe FIAT will force it back into production as the 4-door Wrangler with the hardtop May not be doing for buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish CHRYSLER would bring back the XJ are retire that girlie-mobile the Liberty. This and the WRANGLER epitomize exactly what JEEP is about. The GRAND CHEROKEE can still be the flagship, but the XJ is what it was about when it came to SUVs by JEEP. </p>
<p>Who knows maybe FIAT will force it back into production as the 4-door Wrangler with the hardtop May not be doing for buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atoms</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497050</link>
		<dc:creator>atoms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497050</guid>
		<description>I wonder if you can drop this engine into other cars, of course pending the engine mounts, but still an interesting thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you can drop this engine into other cars, of course pending the engine mounts, but still an interesting thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thunder Chicken</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497039</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunder Chicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497039</guid>
		<description>Why indeed, would a company that is headed for oblivion put together a concept vehicle based on a production vehicle that was retired in 2001, and was hopelessly obsolete when it was retired (having been essentially unchanged since its debut in 1984)?

Not hating on Cherokees here. I own one, and have owned two others. I love the little POS for just what it is - a little POS. It&#039;ll go anywhere thanks to its small size and capable 4WD system. I just think Chrysler should be concentrating on getting back to business...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why indeed, would a company that is headed for oblivion put together a concept vehicle based on a production vehicle that was retired in 2001, and was hopelessly obsolete when it was retired (having been essentially unchanged since its debut in 1984)?</p>
<p>Not hating on Cherokees here. I own one, and have owned two others. I love the little POS for just what it is &#8211; a little POS. It&#8217;ll go anywhere thanks to its small size and capable 4WD system. I just think Chrysler should be concentrating on getting back to business&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluvamcars</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/jeep-unveils-cherokee-with-4-7-liter-stroker-inline-six.html#comment-497031</link>
		<dc:creator>iluvamcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22335#comment-497031</guid>
		<description>Why?

-iluvamcars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?</p>
<p>-iluvamcars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 386/387 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 18:34:17 -->
