RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Kerkorian cuts stake in Ford to less than 5 percent

10/28/2008, 12:50 PM

By Andrew Ganz

Investor and casino mogul Kirk Kerkorian has reduced his share in Ford Motor Company to less than just 4.89 percent today by selling about 19 million shares in the Dearborn, Michigan, automaker. Working through his investment company, Tracinda Corporation, Kerkorian has been cutting his share of Ford at a significant loss in the last couple of weeks.

Just last week, Tracinda sold 7.3 million shares of Ford at an average price of $2.01 per share for a grand total of 26.4 million shares sold in a one week period. Tracinda paid an average of $7.10 per share of Ford. At one point, Tracinda had acquired 6.5 percent of Ford in an effort to help turn around the automaker.

Kerkorian told Reuters that he’s considering selling all of his shares in Ford, though he hasn’t given a reason for his seemingly abrupt change of heart.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

10/28, 1:09 PM

posted by:

Lariat Luxury Locomotive Liner No.3

“… though he hasn’t given a reason for his seemingly abrupt change of heart.” LMAOROF

10/28, 1:33 PM

posted by:

howsmydriving

Have you cut your stake in Ford — lately?

10/28, 1:38 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

Speaking of stakes, maybe Kerkorian’s buying up all the wooden ones before Halloween.

10/28, 2:30 PM

posted by:

Borat

he can afford silver still (and garlic)

10/28, 3:15 PM

posted by:

Borat

Actually makes me feel very good. My looses in the market are inconsequential compare to this. I feel like a genius!

10/28, 3:20 PM

posted by:

MercMark

Great bargain stock … if they can survive.

10/28, 3:28 PM

posted by:

Mike the loser

MercMark……………bargain?

You do realize that without a bailout Ford would have to file for bankruptcy. Ford can not afford to make fuel efficient cars without getting 25 Billion from the government.

Any company that would dies without governmental assistance can not be a BARGAIN.

10/28, 4:21 PM

posted by:

Z06ified

Kirk is going senile I think.

10/28, 5:03 PM

posted by:

Lionwithoutpride

And ya’ll do realize that if Ford goes under and Chrysler is gone as well that you are going to see a collapse in the American economy, right? 1 in 10 U.S. jobs relies on the success of AMERICAN car companies. Not the Asian or European car companies, but the American ones. I do not know about the rest of you; but, I do not feel like sitting through months of Congressional hearings on how/why this happened and the backlash against the foreign automakers (which will only make parts supplies more expensive for GM . . . assuming they do not go bust as well). If you all are so against bailouts (and fundamentally, I am as well) then you have to accept that the Asian companies have succeeded at the expense of your economy. Every time you buy an Asian import you put money into the Asian economies. Every time someone in Asia buys an American car it helps out our economy; but, the system is not stable. American manufacturers have never had the level of access to Asian markets that the Asian manufacturers have had in ours. So, the only fair way to avoid bailouts is to put up trade barriers against the Asian and European manufacturers (I have not heard as much about European trade barriers to U.S. autos, but feel free to correct me).

If you want to drive an import, that’s fine; however, until those countries from which we import cars remove their trade barriers, we should penalize them. Or, if you are one who believes it is okay for Japan to set a percentage of new cars that can be American, but you will not be okay with the U.S. having a mirrored policy then I think you should pay a HUGE tariff on your import. Don’t like it? I don’t care. I don’t like listening to import buyers say American cars “suck.” Why do they suck? Maybe because they are not making enough money to put into R&D, fit-and-finish, etc.? Are my ideas protectionist? Yes. Is protectionism bad for the international economy? Yes. Can America save its own economy without protectionist policies that only MIRROR those of other countries? No.

10/28, 5:25 PM

posted by:

freeyellow2000

shesh.. Even though a billionaire lost confidence in Ford. That says a lot.

I do agree with Lionwithoutpride but up to a certain extend. If Big 3 learned anything from they would have seen the shift from truck/minivan to more fuel efficiency cars. Just think about it

Drive a 5.7L truck to work (80 miles round trip) or drive a eco-box 1.8L-2.5L. Its a no brainier if you ask me with one I would drive. The higher gas price made it more apparent.

Most imports are made in US to get around the currency exchange and the cost of importing the cars from country of origin.

Big 3 said that that is the major reason why they don’t import there European/Asian counterpart cars into the US it adds additional cost In fact, Leftlanenews articles mention this.

10/28, 5:32 PM

posted by:

Fleming in Tennessee

I totally agree with you LIONWITHOUTPRIDE! Its time America treated other countries exactly the way they treat us…. Free trade isn’t free when we are the only ones practicing it! Believe me, every other country needs our economy far more than we need theirs. To all Americans, America should always be first in every way. America cannot survive long without American owned manufacturing. And congress: STOP giving all our money away! We need to fix everything in America B4 giving anyone a dime! Nuff said!

10/28, 6:06 PM

posted by:

1c3d0g

D@mn…can’t this old man give it up already? Why doesn’t he find another hobby instead of d!cking around stocks?!? :evil:

10/28, 8:23 PM

posted by:

Lionwithoutpride

freeyellow2000-

I agree with you that many imports are built in the U.S. to get around the currency exchange and import tariffs. That said, that is not a good thing overall. It is good for the jobs it provides; however, the corporate taxes go back to Asia/Europe, the imports are GETTING AROUND THE EXPENSES THAT AMERICAN COMPANIES CANNOT GET AROUND (how many GM plants are there in Japan?), etc.

That said, you are right that the Asian and European companies did not get as tied up in the truck/SUV craze; but, I do not think it was anything more than luck. Toyota would be my example. Their biggest SUVs and trucks did not really hit the market until just before and just after the latest gas crunch began. Leftlane printed plenty of stories about how badly the Asian and European companies wanted a piece of the highly lucrative big vehicles pie. Then again, Toyota was still well placed to weather the gas crunch because they had long ago solidified their hold of the small car market by making top-notch vehicles.

I have owned it before, I am one of those whack-job Ron Paul supporters; so, I HATE bailouts. Yet, if that is the only way to save our auto industry, which has huge implications for our economy AND our ability to militarize for REAL wars, then I will swallow my pride and accept it. I do not think this is the only way. The first step is to go to our Japanese, S. Korean and German (if indeed they have the same restrictive measures, which I simply do not know) allies and try to negotiate the lowering of their trade barriers. If they refuse then we simply mirror their own tariffs. Sadly, I do not believe there are any politicians brave enough and strong enough to take this message to our allies. And, overall, the American people are either not able or not willing to see the necessity. Hopefully I am wrong on both counts. Just remember, 1 in 10 jobs. 1 in 10!

10/28, 11:29 PM

posted by:

LS7

Where are you getting the 1 in 10 job stat? Source?

10/29, 12:05 AM

posted by:

Lionwithoutpride

LS7-

My suggestion is that you Google it. Why do I not just provide the link to you? The reason is that when I looked it up this afternoon (having read it awhile ago and the article I read said it was U.S. auto manufacturing alone) the links which quoted the same stat seemed to infer that it related to the Auto Industry as a whole (including imports). As I disagree with this interpretation, I will leave it up to those who are intrepid enough to do their own research to decide which way they wish to take the information. Either way, the point stands that the health of the Auto Industry as a whole is important to the overall U.S. economy.

p.s. If you are having trouble locating it, try search terms like “U.S. auto industry” and “1 in 10 U.S. jobs.”

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel