Koenigsegg CCXR Special Edition

November26

november2007/koenigsegg-ccxr-ri.jpg

Koenigsegg has released official images of its production CCXR Special Edition. Based on the CCX, the CCXR features a body made completely of carbon fiber and is powered by a twin-supercharged 4.7L V8 — good for an astonishing 1018 horsepower — that can run on E85 biofuel.

The result is a car that can go from 0-62 in 2.9 seconds, hit a top speed of over 250 mph and achieve 1.4g on the skidpad. That kind of perfomance comes at a price, though, with the CXXR listing for €1,575,000. No word on how many CCXRs Koenigsegg plans to produce.




 


49 Comments

  1. This thing was stupid fast with “only” 650-700hp. This car will will trump the Veyron’s top speed by a good margin.

    Any bets? 260mph or better?

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on November26 at 1:14 pm
  2. This certainly appears to be the most refined Koenigsegg to date, but the price goes along with the refinement. I wonder how well it does in stop-n-go traffic?

    Comment by F451, posted on November26 at 1:24 pm
  3. Pretty cool, but enough with this E85 garbage already. Who gives a xxxx? It’s pointless.

    Comment by CA36GTP, posted on November26 at 1:24 pm
  4. That has got to be the worst photoshop job ive ever seen. I wonder how fast it goes with the top down. Nothing like the wind blowing through your hair at 260 mph

    Comment by LP640, posted on November26 at 1:25 pm
  5. I don’t like the back, but the rest is perfect.

    Comment by Commodore, posted on November26 at 1:32 pm
  6. Totally wicked. I love the horsepower wars. :-)

    Comment by jamaicandude, posted on November26 at 1:34 pm
  7. I think that the car looks great! I don’t like the wing… but with power and speed like that, I’m sure it’s a necessity. Quite nice.

    Comment by atourya, posted on November26 at 1:39 pm
  8. I’m a fan of the CCX, but talk about extreme. I’m absolutely sure you need that rear wing for stability at such insane speeds, but it is pretty gawdy. Good thing its carbon fiber–in a light-colored paint, it probably wouldn’t look as good.

    And that price is absolutely insane. How many will Koenigseg produce? How many venture capitalists and Arab princes have room in their garages?

    Comment by Scarface03, posted on November26 at 1:40 pm
  9. Holy ****. This machine is absolutely insane…and I love insanity.

    Comment by LamborghiniZ, posted on November26 at 1:40 pm
  10. I just ordered one…

    Comment by injunraiv, posted on November26 at 1:41 pm
  11. Put down the hand lotion Lambo Z.

    Comment by lamboz get a life, posted on November26 at 2:21 pm
  12. LP640, why am I not surprised you come up with a comment like that.

    The rendering was done with a 3d modeling program, not sure which one, either 3D max or Maya.

    Get you facts straight before you make a post.

    Comment by dmanero, posted on November26 at 2:55 pm
  13. I love the Koenigsegg CCX, it would by my personal choice of supercar if I was every in the market for one. Just a wonderful piece of engineering/

    Comment by livelyjay, posted on November26 at 3:27 pm
  14. dmanero,

    True it is not Photoshop. But given that there are no less than three 3d packages using the Mental Ray rendered, which this looks like (though it could be C4D or Flamingo or a half dozen others), it is nearly impossible to to pin down exactly which program it is. But then that wasn’t the point of your comment.

    Given the proclivity of Super car makers to what to build cars that don’t like like something churned out of a mass production line, this could be CAD models from the company rendered from view.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on November26 at 4:00 pm
  15. Who knew the swedes were capable of building such a super exotic! Awsome car, I’m so glad they stopped using those crap ford engines and are building their own. Too many customer complaints about the ford engines breaking apart after a few laps on the track. The new engines have proved to be solid and alot more powerfull.

    Comment by trooper1, posted on November26 at 4:14 pm
  16. I guess this pretty much wastes all the “superchargers suck” arguments.

    Comment by CA36GTP, posted on November26 at 4:30 pm
  17. wow this is gonna be stupid fast

    Comment by A4, posted on November26 at 4:34 pm
  18. by the way the e85 is what allows it to have that high a horsepower rating. e85 has a intercooling like effect and allows to run the engine at a higher level of compression which allows koenigsegg to get alot more power out of it

    Comment by 441Zuke, posted on November26 at 4:50 pm
  19. All carbon fiber? Bad-****ing-ass!
    Blakkarr, I’d be surprised if this thing broke even 255mph. At those speeds, you need around 20hp to increase top speed just 1mph, regardless of weight. This barely has 17 more hp that a Veyron and that tops out at about 251mph if I’m not mistaken.

    Comment by C6Racer, posted on November26 at 4:52 pm
  20. E85 is equal to 103 or 104 octane. Having an E85 equipped vehicle makes more power and in the case of this car it’s a good 100hp or so.

    Comment by terminator, posted on November26 at 4:56 pm
  21. sweet!

    Comment by jackjimturkey, posted on November26 at 5:03 pm
  22. Why not just use high octane gas? E85 is a gimmick, nothing more.

    Comment by CA36GTP, posted on November26 at 5:06 pm
  23. C6Racer,

    I can’t fault the laws of physics but the CCX will do 247mph with 806hp. given that just short of 260 sounds reasonable. But the Koenigsegg has better aerodynamics that the Veyron so we should not be surprised at 260+mph.

    But the bigger problem would be tires. The reason why the Veyron’s top speed is a theoretical 255+mph is because no one makes tire to carry a 4200lb car to and over those speeds. Actually they do but they are hard to find and buy and impossible to use on streets. They aren’t made of rubber.

    The “Kone” weighs under 2700lbs so part of the problem is accounted for. But rotation stresses will need to be dealt with about 5000 wheel-rpm, is not fun. This is the number of rotation per minute a tire must undergo, assuming perfect traction - no slip, to attain 300mph. Of course, the car isn’t going to make to 300, but you always engineer overage in case of a “warp malfunction”.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on November26 at 6:43 pm
  24. If I was a kid, this would go on my wall. SInce I’m not it’ll be my desktop background.

    Comment by jonnycat, posted on November26 at 6:47 pm
  25. Big deal, why is this so impressive? Because it’s all carbonfiber?

    I could strap a rocket onto a frame made of balsawood and smoke this ****ing Koenigsegg.

    Comment by DeansterTJ, posted on November26 at 7:19 pm
  26. Beautiful, just beautiful. I wouldn’t doubt it if this broke the Speed record, but the Bugatti Veyron is no longer the holder in the first place…

    Technically though, since Shelby Supercars hasn’t manufactured their supercar yet, the Bugatti Veyron still remains the record holder, but we’ll see in a few years…

    I still don’t like the flat front too much, though =\

    Blakkar- Rotation stresses can be accounted for by larger wheels. But I doubt this will have large enough wheels, as one or two inch increases doesn’t make a large enough difference. And once again, we come to tire manufacturing, for such large wheels.

    Comment by jJayC08, posted on November26 at 7:23 pm
  27. Nice. This is what I call f*cking awesome! :cool:

    Comment by 1c3d0g, posted on November26 at 7:26 pm
  28. This is a gorgeous piece of machinery, but for that scratch I would get few Alfa’s in either different colors (if they come in something in addition to red) or just few red ones. Alfa gives me a bigger hardon (of course it is subjective!)

    Comment by autonut, posted on November26 at 7:35 pm
  29. Another useless car that I’ll never get.

    Comment by Veda, posted on November26 at 8:22 pm
  30. Can anyone tell me if this still uses a Ford small-block like the last generation Koenigsegg?

    Comment by illwill, posted on November26 at 8:46 pm
  31. Should be a fun car to play around with in future racing games. Because lets face it, that’s as close as any of us are to driving one of these. =)

    Comment by cwwilson, posted on November26 at 8:53 pm
  32. jJayC08,
    How big do you think the wheels need to be? On 20 inch wheels and 26-inch tires you need just under 4800 wheel-Rpm to hit 300 mph. This is about the size the Kone is going to have and has. But I think we are in agreement that the tires are the only real stumbling block to speeds well over 250. They’ll fly apart.

    also the Veyron is not really the record holder as such it’s top speed it theoretical because no one has even taken the car that fast. Not even the testers at Bugatti have done it or they would have posted it. To my knowledge, the “Kone” CCX is the CONFIRMED fastest production car in the world with a top speed just under 248mph. I may be wrong but not that far off.

    Having a theoretical top speed of 256, is very different from having a proven top speed of about 248.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on November26 at 9:34 pm
  33. It just took me almost 2 hours to get home in the first snow of the year here in Vancouver. My commute usually takes 40 minutes. Do you have any idea how lucky I was NOT to have taken the CCXR this morning?

    Comment by johnnycanuck, posted on November26 at 10:10 pm
  34. ^^they reached 401kmh in the top gear test of the veyron, didn’t they?

    Comment by Syrax, posted on November27 at 4:30 am
  35. Great. Another 1.5M EUR car with the reliability of a 1970’s Fiat.

    Comment by Rotman, posted on November27 at 9:09 am
  36. syrax,

    That comes to 240mph.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on November27 at 11:18 am
  37. Veda: If we all wanted useful cars, we’d all be driving Golfs and Exploders

    Comment by jackjimturkey, posted on November27 at 11:39 am
  38. ^Illwill, they stopped using ford engines and are making their own which is an incredible peice of machinery. They stopped using ford engines because they were too unreliable and not capable of handling even more power for future projects.

    Comment by moto-racer13, posted on November27 at 3:09 pm
  39. ^^^ Unreliable? Not capable? Umm… Didn’t they hold the title of “fastest production car” back in 2005 with that ford engine (beating the McLaren f1! i dont see this new “incredible piece of machinery” beating the Shelby-supercars or Bugatti champs)? So, please stfu with your biased opinion you bastard, but thanks anyway for answering my question; i could’ve just checked wikipedia though.

    Comment by illwill, posted on November27 at 3:33 pm
  40. i hear you there illwill, the saleen has a proven race history with a ford smallblock, theese panty waist haters are scumbags.

    Comment by CTS DRIVER, posted on November27 at 4:23 pm
  41. ^ill will what the hell is wrong with you? I don’t understand why you get so offended? are you one of those pathetic ford fans that gets upset at any negative comment about Ford? Stop being pathetic and stop supporting some corporation that couldn’t care less if you live or die. Christian von Koenigsegg has mentioned in several interviews for European auto magazines and shows that the reason he stopped using Ford engines is due to reliability issues. The constant breakdowns of the engines was getting expensive for his company. It was actually cheaper in the long run to develop his own engine that will run stronger and more reliably. He also mentioned that the Ford engines in his earlier cars have already reached the max power that it can handle, not enough for future projects. So next time try to do a bit of research and stop being such a goof, your comment only shows your insecurities for a corporation that doesn’t even know you exist. Loser!

    Comment by moto-racer13, posted on November27 at 6:01 pm
  42. Anyway, Ford Duratecs are fairly damn reliable… Our Zetec has been for the past 7 years, and Noble have been using Ford Duratecs, but may opt for another engine soon for more power (Was it Volvo?)

    Comment by JohnnyBlazE, posted on November28 at 8:11 am
  43. moto-racer13 - where were the Ford engines sourced from? The US? Cos that would probably explain it lol…

    Comment by JohnnyBlazE, posted on November28 at 8:12 am
  44. Haha who would ever thought thought that this amazing Swedish supercar would be powered by a Ford Duratec engine? Not dissing the engine at all, I just think it’s funny though that this bad ass car is being powered by an American auto company’s engine!

    Comment by SS4LIFE, posted on November28 at 10:51 am
  45. SS you idiot, don’t you read? They stopped using Ford engines because it was crap. It was costing the company too much money replacing the customers engines. They make their own engine, their own design a blend of sweedish and german engineering. This bad ass car is NOT powered by an American engine.

    Comment by planet_drive, posted on November28 at 12:00 pm
  46. Pd:

    based on the Ford Modular engine architecture, and assembled by Grainger & Worrall

    Comment by jackjimturkey, posted on November28 at 12:42 pm
  47. oh **** jack you just tossed a wrench in their sprockets.

    Comment by CTS DRIVER, posted on November28 at 4:02 pm
  48. That’s Right Planet_drive! Still based on Ford engine architecture! Thank you JJT!! Lol actually PD, I stopped reading the comments halfway into it so I didn’t read entirely. But it’s all good. I guess I’d probably be pissed if JJT proved me wrong. lol

    Comment by SS4LIFE, posted on November29 at 1:09 am
  49. Either way, the original ford engines used were NOT duratecs… duratecs can take the power noble need, and do the job well, but noble opting for more too now, so moving on…

    Comment by JohnnyBlazE, posted on November29 at 8:10 am

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Auto Loan
Request a Auto Loan from LendingTree.com
Car Rentals
For convenient car rental locations in the US, use Dollar Car Rental.
Insurance Quotes
Quote, compare and save! Free auto insurance quotes at Progressive.com
Auto Insurance
Unitrin Direct: Get an auto insurance quote & save up to $303 or more.