Lamborghini has released new images of its 2007 Murcielago LP640 supercar. The car was first unveiled back in February. The car is powered by a 6.5-litre V12, longitudinally mounted behind the driver. In all, we’ve added 34 new images of the car. [See the full gallery here].
New car price quote
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
07/05, 12:59 PM
posted by:
panda
deffinetley my favourite supercar of all time. not the fastest but speed doesnt matter on a thing this beutifull.
07/05, 1:40 PM
posted by:
Patrick
my favorite car. ever.
07/05, 1:51 PM
posted by:
BAMF
Yeah thats pretty much the coolest looking thing I’ve ever seen.
I just picture huge flames shooting out of that exhaust. Like a rocket. I think it IS a rocket.
07/05, 2:51 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
It’s pretty nice. I’ll take this over a Ferrari any day.
07/05, 2:55 PM
posted by:
The Stig
Not particularly subtle is it? A bit like wearing it on your sleeve.
07/05, 3:18 PM
posted by:
USA
which just proves how much of a car enthusiast you AREN’T, #4.
07/05, 3:43 PM
posted by:
BAMF
What the hell does that mean #6?
07/05, 4:02 PM
posted by:
USA
oh, I should think that would be obvious, #7…
can anyone summarize lambo’s proud racing tradition? no?
didn’t think so.
prancing horse > charging bull
07/05, 4:41 PM
posted by:
BAMF
Racing tradition defines how good a car is? No?
didn’t think so.
BAMF > USA
07/05, 5:00 PM
posted by:
USA
yeah, it pretty much does.
sorry, but thx for playing.
your consolation prize is to look like a tool. congrats!
07/05, 5:16 PM
posted by:
BAMF
lol i had more to say, but it would’ve killed the humorous effect i was going for with the ‘bamf>usa’ thing.
Anyway, I do agree with you that having a racing tradition like Ferrari’s is something everyone should strive for, as a number of benefits come from of having one. But I also think that Lambos proud tradition of building very fast, very beautiful cars for the sole purpose of competeting with Ferrari in the supercar niche is very respectable as well, especially since they have done a pretty damn good job doing it. And the FACT that they can compete with Ferrari despite the lack of such a deep racing heritage says a lot for them as well.
07/05, 5:20 PM
posted by:
W1ck3d / Dirk
I agree with #10, he’s got a .
You don’t need a racing team when you are doing such a pretty good job without it.
07/05, 5:34 PM
posted by:
USA
well, all i’m saying is that if the day comes where i am able to drop 200+ grr on a “supercar” i’d like for it to have a little bit of heritage. that might be nice.
even a one-off like the mclaren f1 can trace its lineage to the mclaren team it draws its name from (despite using a bmw engine). dig?
07/05, 6:05 PM
posted by:
BAMF
dig. it’d be nice.
but this car is pretty nice too. dig?
07/05, 6:39 PM
posted by:
Scott
Funny thread.
07/05, 7:03 PM
posted by:
chi dell
LAMBORGHINI….SUXX GAY ****S
07/05, 7:28 PM
posted by:
USA
#15 get a clue and then come back and run your mouth.
kthxbye!
ps. love the “leet” spelling of your nickname. that is just SO cool.
07/06, 4:15 AM
posted by:
Luxurylaunches.com
Latest pics of Lamborghini Murciélago LP640
Lamborghini has released latest images of its 2007 Murcielago LP640 supercar. Lamborghini unveiled the 2007 Murcielago LP640, a refreshed version of its range-topping supercar in February. The car is powered by a 6.5-litre V12, longitudinally mounted …
07/06, 8:17 AM
posted by:
1c3d0g
#19: as opposed to your name?
Oh yeah, you’re the man! Not!
07/06, 9:24 AM
posted by:
panda
who cares if the car doesnt have racing heritage. but it still has heritige of building better cars than ferrari. you must absolutley stoned not to choose this car over any ferrari.
07/06, 6:03 PM
posted by:
Wickedated
Racing heritage is good street cred but to say Lambo is inferior than Ferrari because of heritage is pure idiocity!! First off, I do prefer a Ferrari but even though Lambo does not compete in Formula 1, they employ hundreds of engineers, mechanics and designers who have first hand experience in racing. In fact, several head mechanics are previous Ferrari and Mercedes engineers, so the point is, just because a car company doesnt have racing heritage doesn’t mean they produce any less of a “supercar.” When was the last time you’ve been a Pagani Zonda racing? or a Bugatti Veyron? Both would kick a similarly priced Ferrari’s ass left and right.
It comes down to taste, is all.
07/08, 9:43 AM
posted by:
Ke
I perfer a Renault cos Renault has racing heritage.
07/08, 7:32 PM
posted by:
think!
F1 is my favorite sport, period. but in now way does that mean that i will not give an auto company credit because it doesnt partake. anyone who does that is close minded and relativly shallow, and you shouldnt waste your time debating with them, it is afterall, opinion not fact that a car company is better than another because it races. Lambo does race a Murci GT-R and has had good results. It’s parent company VW ownes this other little company called Audi, maybe you’ve heard of it? and if you’re a race fan, i dont need to get into audi’s history in le mans racing…. so nuf said. here are some interesting facts though.. last year, ferrari rolled 5000+ cars out of the factory in Maranello, how many did lambo produce? 1600, 400 being murci’s. Guess that makes it FACT that lambo is a little more exclusive of a name plate than ferrari. I’ve said it before, Ferrari is the toyota of supercars, and lamborghini is the lamborghini of supercars…
Ferrari’s are for men trying to be somebody, Lamborghini’s are for men who already are.