Comments on: Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 photo update

By: think!

think! — Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:32:33 +0000

F1 is my favorite sport, period. but in now way does that mean that i will not give an auto company credit because it doesnt partake. anyone who does that is close minded and relativly shallow, and you shouldnt waste your time debating with them, it is afterall, opinion not fact that a car company is better than another because it races. Lambo does race a Murci GT-R and has had good results. It’s parent company VW ownes this other little company called Audi, maybe you’ve heard of it? and if you’re a race fan, i dont need to get into audi’s history in le mans racing…. so nuf said. here are some interesting facts though.. last year, ferrari rolled 5000+ cars out of the factory in Maranello, how many did lambo produce? 1600, 400 being murci’s. Guess that makes it FACT that lambo is a little more exclusive of a name plate than ferrari. I’ve said it before, Ferrari is the toyota of supercars, and lamborghini is the lamborghini of supercars…

Ferrari’s are for men trying to be somebody, Lamborghini’s are for men who already are.

By: Ke

Ke — Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:43:58 +0000

I perfer a Renault cos Renault has racing heritage.

By: Wickedated

Wickedated — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:03:54 +0000

Racing heritage is good street cred but to say Lambo is inferior than Ferrari because of heritage is pure idiocity!! First off, I do prefer a Ferrari but even though Lambo does not compete in Formula 1, they employ hundreds of engineers, mechanics and designers who have first hand experience in racing. In fact, several head mechanics are previous Ferrari and Mercedes engineers, so the point is, just because a car company doesnt have racing heritage doesn’t mean they produce any less of a “supercar.” When was the last time you’ve been a Pagani Zonda racing? or a Bugatti Veyron? Both would kick a similarly priced Ferrari’s ass left and right.

It comes down to taste, is all.

By: panda

panda — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:24:17 +0000

who cares if the car doesnt have racing heritage. but it still has heritige of building better cars than ferrari. you must absolutley stoned not to choose this car over any ferrari.

By: 1c3d0g

1c3d0g — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:17:28 +0000

#19: as opposed to your name? Oh yeah, you’re the man! Not!

By: Luxurylaunches.com

Luxurylaunches.com — Thu, 06 Jul 2006 08:15:43 +0000

Latest pics of Lamborghini Murciélago LP640

Lamborghini has released latest images of its 2007 Murcielago LP640 supercar. Lamborghini unveiled the 2007 Murcielago LP640, a refreshed version of its range-topping supercar in February. The car is powered by a 6.5-litre V12, longitudinally mounted …

By: USA

USA — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:28:49 +0000

#15 get a clue and then come back and run your mouth.

kthxbye!

ps. love the “leet” spelling of your nickname. that is just SO cool.

By: chi dell

chi dell — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:03:12 +0000

LAMBORGHINI….SUXX GAY COCKS

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 22:39:57 +0000

Funny thread.

By: BAMF

BAMF — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 22:05:27 +0000

dig. it’d be nice.

but this car is pretty nice too. dig?

By: USA

USA — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:34:04 +0000

well, all i’m saying is that if the day comes where i am able to drop 200+ grr on a “supercar” i’d like for it to have a little bit of heritage. that might be nice.

even a one-off like the mclaren f1 can trace its lineage to the mclaren team it draws its name from (despite using a bmw engine). dig?

By: W1ck3d / Dirk

W1ck3d / Dirk — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:20:27 +0000

I agree with #10, he’s got a .

You don’t need a racing team when you are doing such a pretty good job without it.

By: BAMF

BAMF — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:16:41 +0000

lol i had more to say, but it would’ve killed the humorous effect i was going for with the ‘bamf>usa’ thing.

Anyway, I do agree with you that having a racing tradition like Ferrari’s is something everyone should strive for, as a number of benefits come from of having one. But I also think that Lambos proud tradition of building very fast, very beautiful cars for the sole purpose of competeting with Ferrari in the supercar niche is very respectable as well, especially since they have done a pretty damn good job doing it. And the FACT that they can compete with Ferrari despite the lack of such a deep racing heritage says a lot for them as well.

By: USA

USA — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:00:11 +0000

yeah, it pretty much does.

sorry, but thx for playing.

your consolation prize is to look like a tool. congrats!

By: BAMF

BAMF — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:41:08 +0000

Racing tradition defines how good a car is? No?

didn’t think so.

BAMF > USA

By: USA

USA — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:02:20 +0000

oh, I should think that would be obvious, #7…

can anyone summarize lambo’s proud racing tradition? no?

didn’t think so.

prancing horse > charging bull

By: BAMF

BAMF — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:43:25 +0000

What the hell does that mean #6?

By: USA

USA — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:18:40 +0000

which just proves how much of a car enthusiast you AREN’T, #4.

By: The Stig

The Stig — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:55:24 +0000

Not particularly subtle is it? A bit like wearing it on your sleeve.

By: 1c3d0g

1c3d0g — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:51:12 +0000

It’s pretty nice. I’ll take this over a Ferrari any day.

By: BAMF

BAMF — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:51:13 +0000

Yeah thats pretty much the coolest looking thing I’ve ever seen.

I just picture huge flames shooting out of that exhaust. Like a rocket. I think it IS a rocket.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:40:05 +0000

my favorite car. ever.

By: panda

panda — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:59:22 +0000

deffinetley my favourite supercar of all time. not the fastest but speed doesnt matter on a thing this beutifull.