British-made cars have never been world renown for their reliability, with that reputation continuing into the 21st century. Although Land Rover is now owned by an India company – and also has recent history with U.S. and German automakers – it’s still technically a British marque, and therefore can be blamed for carrying that stereotype into the future.
Now Tata-owned Land Rover has announced the recall of 19,169 Range Rover vehicles. The recall includes 2003 to 2005 model year vehicles.
According to Land Rover, the “the front differential coupling sleeve and the propeller shaft may be misaligned” on some 2003-2005 model year Range Rovers, which could eventually lead to the failure of the front drive system.
No accidents or injuries have been linked to the defect. Land Rover dealers will begin fixing recalled vehicles at the beginning of next year.



12/05, 4:59 PM
posted by:
Chris C.
Bad Teeth. Bad Cars.
12/05, 5:31 PM
posted by:
jayjc08
Oh come on. LLN is blaming the future of the British Auto Industries lack of quality on a recall of just 19,000 vehicles that are now turning 6 years old, with no reported injuries or accidents?
12/05, 5:38 PM
posted by:
yarddog82abn
Quality British Craftsmanship…
Is it tea time yet?……… Any one?
12/05, 5:43 PM
posted by:
JSurfer1451
Haha makes me think of fight club when edward norton says the only way they have a recall is if the total of all out of court settlements is more expensive then it is to fix all the vehicles
12/05, 5:45 PM
posted by:
jayjc08
Hey buddy, what’s the first rule about fight club?
12/05, 5:47 PM
posted by:
JSurfer1451
I’m sorry, I’m not allowed to talk about that.
12/05, 5:47 PM
posted by:
F3INT))AP3X
Your Comment
12/05, 5:48 PM
posted by:
Sabon
In 2003 my wife and I were checking out Jeep Grand Cherekee, Toyotas, and Land Rovers.
While the Land Rovers definitely could do more in 4 wheel drive than I would ever be able to keep up with, the issue for us was quality control on the way they were built.
We ended up buying a 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. They ruined the looks the next version of it, making it back to the very ugly square looking vehicle. As for maintenance, I’m too used to Toyotas now and the Jeep’s maintenance costs are significantly higher than even four wheel drive Toyotas.
12/05, 5:58 PM
posted by:
howsmydriving
Bad Teeth. Bad plumbing. Bad food. Bad Cars. Nice scenery.
12/05, 8:10 PM
posted by:
Get Real
Why doesn’t LLN write so harshly about Saab or Volvo quality ???
All LLN does is wring their hands about who will save them.
12/05, 8:30 PM
posted by:
TomF
Land Rovers are status bombs for people with more money than brains. They are some of the worst-assembled vehicles from a major manufacturer on the face of the Earth.
12/05, 9:19 PM
posted by:
kitko
howsmydriving, you nailed it. Brits don’t have cuisine, they have only food
And that’s a quote from a British author.
Back to the cars, there was a saying in Britain: How do you improve a factory Land Rover? Just tighten up the screws…
12/05, 11:21 PM
posted by:
CJ-XKR
wtf TomF?? i’m on my second Range Rover (and no nothing went wrong with the first one, it was a lease) and plan to always have one no matter what other cars i may own. no vehicle i’v had has recieved the number of complements and “wows” as the full-szie range with its smooth ride and luxury amenities. whats the competition? a freakin GL? at least the Range is it’s own pedigree and not a bloated version of a baby-SUV that preceeded it.
12/06, 12:51 AM
posted by:
maxcar
personally, i like the series ii landies of the ’60’s. true rugged military grade, no fuss vehicles. light aluminium body bolted onto a rhinoceros chassis.
12/06, 1:15 AM
posted by:
LDMAN
Land Rovers are only as good as the dealer that services them. If the dealer in your area sucks, then walk away.
Just a reminder to Range Rover bashers. This car was designed by BMW, and built by what was technically a Ford plant with Ford quality control measures.
Some would argue that both BMW and Ford knew well in the design or build process that Land Rover would be sold off, and that, maybe some unscrupulous decisions were made by some to cut corners.
Easy to criticize and go into more money than brain cliché but I have been off-road many times, in larges mixed brand convoy and Land Rover as a rule always managed to maintain momentum and take a beating better than the competition. To be fair Jeep did, too, (all new Jeeps need a lift kit for serious off road duty). However, straight off the showroom floor, in stock form, few cars beat a Land Rover product in term of price/off-road performance combination.
BTW I do NOT work for Land Rover or Tata.
12/06, 1:49 AM
posted by:
tyler_is_aero_tt
After all these years being at the bottom on the list for reliability and they can’t seem to fix it? Does that spell LAZY or what?
12/06, 7:21 AM
posted by:
Got Handling?
the Big Three for Chris C.
Fat Arses, Fat Chance
12/06, 2:43 PM
posted by:
murderedout
SALEEN FORD EXPLORER S/C OR A GMC TYPHOON OVER A LAND ROVER ANYDAY.
12/06, 2:49 PM
posted by:
Noah
Why people, especially the big hollywood stars, keep buying this worst rated suv by consumer reports amazes me.
12/06, 2:53 PM
posted by:
murderedout
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXxZnGwyD6w
12/06, 3:02 PM
posted by:
murderedout
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXxZnGwyD6w
Best vehicle chase of all time!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12/06, 7:35 PM
posted by:
wideopenthrottle
The more you put into a car, the more things can go wrong. Hence, more luxury automobiles with reliability problems than economy cars. By the time ‘luxury’ features trickle down to the less expensive variants, the manufacture should have had time to work all the kinks out.
Still, that doesn’t explain how they missaligned about 20,000 driveshafts without noticing since 4WD has been around for decades.
12/07, 6:05 AM
posted by:
carl065
And american cars are so much better than british crap. Can anyone tell me an american car that does not have a dash board that isnt made out of plastic like yogurt pots? Not to mention leaf springs as suspension and anybody able to tell me one single GOOD american sports car???
12/07, 9:57 AM
posted by:
murderedout
carl065 All imports have plastic interiors too! Single good american sports car? how bout the CHEVROLET CORVETTE ZR1, that can beat every import and cost thousands of $ less!
12/07, 11:05 AM
posted by:
jayjc08
carl065- Your stupidity amazes me. Aside from trucks and the Corvette, there aren’t any American vehicles that use leaf springs. How about the Corvette, Solstice, Sky, Crossfire, etc..
12/08, 8:32 AM
posted by:
JohnnyBlazE
Are you guys off your f***ing tits?
Land Rovers are easily going to spank any American SUV off-road, end of.
So they made some unreliable, albeit un-fatal, cars… 20,000 isn’t THAT bad.
20,000 recalls on Chrysler’s cop cars?
Merc Recalling 103,000 M Class SUVs??
GM recalling 300,000 Chevy HHRs??
VW recalling 410,000 passats?!
Porsche was at least reasonable for a similar misaligned fuel line with 5,965 recalled but that was only from the start of the 2008 model year built through to Jan 18 2008, so put it into context!
12/08, 2:12 PM
posted by:
Rafa LL
You know carl, you’re not right when you said that there’s no american good car, there is, but it’s still undiscovered.
Corvette (Does accelerate, but it has a personality that sucks, the original one had what it need)
Solstice (C’mon, maybe if you live in Transformers world you like this Zippo mobile…)
Sky (Just for 20ers and still not a good car)
Crossfire (ROFL…)
12/08, 3:42 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
land Rover is still among tyhe best off-road.
12/08, 3:51 PM
posted by:
Don
no news here. Land Rover is consistently last place in reliability