The Lexus LS 460 fell short of its claimed 0-60 mph time of 5.4 seconds in a road test in the latest issue of Car and Driver magazine. The C&D testers couldn’t get the car to complete the sprint in any less than 6.0 seconds. Braking distances were also unusually long. The car took 209 feet to come to a stop from 70 mph, the magazine said. That’s nearly the same as the GMC Seirra’s 210 foot braking distance. The new Mercedes S-Class, by comparison, takes 172 feet to stop from the same speed.
New car price quote
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.



09/06, 9:54 AM
posted by:
ehhh
Thats all right it will just get recalled for various things too in a year.
09/06, 9:56 AM
posted by:
British_Rover
A Supercharged range Rover Sport takes 168 feet to stop from 70 mph and it weighs nearly three tons. hahahah
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtests/10246/road-test-review-2006-land-rover-range-rover-sport-supercharged-page4.html
09/06, 9:59 AM
posted by:
Madcapp
Lexus in general disappoints.
09/06, 10:11 AM
posted by:
Renton
This car does what it was designed to do.
I’ll never buy one anyway.
09/06, 10:13 AM
posted by:
Just wondering
Did they have a pre-production model that may not be 100% comparable to the actual production model? I wonder because I don’t see the point in Lexus making all these performance predictions knowing full well that the car would not meet their claims when actually tested by the magazines.
09/06, 10:27 AM
posted by:
1952 MG TD
I can understand testing conditions explaining the 1/2 second slower than expected 0-60… but those braking numbers are horrible. Pre-production or not, for a sedan in this class to take 209 feet is laughable.
09/06, 10:28 AM
posted by:
Christopher Walken
Wow!
09/06, 10:38 AM
posted by:
J
Were they braking Flinstone style? That’s horrid.
09/06, 10:43 AM
posted by:
Sr. Automotive Engineer
58-year-old female real estate agents don’t need to accelerate that fast anyway!!
09/06, 10:52 AM
posted by:
steven
no matter how much cheaper this thing is, i’d still much rather take a s-class.
09/06, 11:29 AM
posted by:
not required
or an audi A8 or a BMW 7 series or a volkswagen phaeton or even cadillac’s still to come S class fighter
09/06, 11:30 AM
posted by:
not required
and madcapp you are 100% correct
09/06, 12:07 PM
posted by:
GarbageMotorsCorp
Cadillac can’t come up with an S-class fighter cause there isn’t a cheap-ass Chevrolet model to base it on yet. Plus they don’t have the cachet that the Germans have, just the rep as a fogeymobile.
09/06, 12:09 PM
posted by:
Robert
I’m sure it will still sell well. Acceleration or braking disappoints in an American car? Everyone would flee as if it were about to explode. Disappoint on a Lexus? “Oh, but it’s a Lexus. They’re perfect, and I’m boring.”
09/06, 12:11 PM
posted by:
teknomusik
The acceleration numbers are not that important with a Vehicle this size as many have already mention- I think what is disturbing is the braking distance.
It is disappointing because it is a safety concern, and I honestly feel it is sub-par. They (Toyota) need to address this promptly: investigate to either validate/rebuff the claims; take immediate action to remedy the situation.
09/06, 1:02 PM
posted by:
jtg
Wow, can’t wait to be rear-ended by a grandmother.
09/06, 1:38 PM
posted by:
cid
Don’t be too quick to bash. This is only one magazine review. But either way, they need to address this promptly.
09/06, 1:59 PM
posted by:
Random Jerk
Wait, isn’t Car and Driver one of the very same magazine that Jim Morgan and his ilk accuse of Conspiring against domestic manufactuers? Quick someone go outside and make sure the sky is still blue.
09/06, 2:06 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
LMAO…where’s Toy Ota now? Hahaha!
09/06, 2:31 PM
posted by:
2006300C
This is relatively minor, but just one of many issues developing against Toyota right now. Toyota is reaching too far, growing too fast and getting too big. It’s a Japanese version of General Motors circa early seventies all over again.
09/06, 2:43 PM
posted by:
The Stig
Lexus = no thanks.
09/06, 2:58 PM
posted by:
Z06ified
“Cadillac can’t come up with an S-class fighter cause there isn’t a cheap-ass Chevrolet model to base it on yet. Plus they don’t have the cachet that the Germans have, just the rep as a fogeymobile.
Comment by GarbageMotorsCorp, posted on September6 at 12:07 pm ”
You’re an ignorant moron. Cadillac doesn’t have any models based on Chevrolets, except for the Escalade which is based on the Tahoe/Suburban, and the XLR, which is based on the Corvette. Neither of which are cheap. The CTS & SRX are the first of its kind for the platform, and same for the STS and DTS (i.e. no cheap Chevrolets shared with them).
Fogeymobile? The DTS is, I agree. But that’s it. One lap on the Nurburgring in a CTS-V, and you will poop your pants.
09/06, 3:23 PM
posted by:
Anonymous
GMC is right, Caddy is for fogeys. The only people pooping pants are the ones in the drivers seat . GM should market an optional bedpan for their Cadillac models. I think it would sell!
09/06, 4:57 PM
posted by:
BR
I’d rather be run over in an STS-V than come near this bland BMW/Merc wannabe
09/06, 5:26 PM
posted by:
2006300C
The five kids that drive CTS’s at my university are ancient; they’re like goddamn twenty or something.
09/06, 6:27 PM
posted by:
xenoonx
this is impossible !!
check out this link, it is Car and Driver says 0-60 takes 5.5 seconds ……hahahaha
http://www.caranddriver.com/previews/11509/2007-lexus-ls460-and-ls460l-seclusion-and-v-8-engine-page2.html
09/06, 6:52 PM
posted by:
No sirree
I don’t want to poop my pants by driving a CTS-V around the Nurburgring. That would ruin the pleather!
09/06, 7:37 PM
posted by:
Anonymous
Spoiled rotten brats at your university bud.
Never mind, there just Cadillacs, nothin special… Kids at my college aspire to own real cars
09/06, 7:47 PM
posted by:
Patrick
The point of this car is not drag racing, it is to cart wealthy people around in EXTREME luxurious comfort, with a smooth and powerful engine, and it does all of that perfectly, no its not the fastest but that’s not the point. Just wait for the LS 460h, with that combo of a hybrid/V8 it’ll make about 500 horsepower, maybe that will satisfy all of you.
09/06, 7:49 PM
posted by:
Patrick
1c3d0g, the answer to your question is they’re at the very top. They’re about to be the #1 car manufacturer in the world, making the highest quality vehicles. I don’t give a **** what the braking distances ONE magazine got on ONE test car, however i do care that toyota makes the most reliable and dependable vehicles on the road, something extremely important to 95% of the car buying public. But tell me , where is Ford and GM now? Oh that’s right, getting **** on by Toyota.
09/06, 8:20 PM
posted by:
Anonymous
poor man’s s class haha
09/06, 8:34 PM
posted by:
teknomusik
Patrick, I am sure you will give a crap when you rear-end someone because the breaks of your LS460 weren’t able to bring the car to compete stop quickly or worse still run into a Semi.
If I recollect correctly, the word “dependable” hasn’t lost it’s meaning.
09/06, 8:41 PM
posted by:
Stuart
“I’d rather be run over in an STS-V than come near this bland BMW/Merc wannabe”
Comment by BR, posted on September6 at 4:57 pm
You talk so much ****. Merc and BMW are in a different league compared to Lexus let alone cadillac.
09/06, 9:31 PM
posted by:
British_Rover
That kind of braking performance is completly unacceptable in a vehicle of that caliber.
09/06, 10:06 PM
posted by:
minduza
ooooooooops, Lexus Lexus what happened to you, looks like you have some problems?!
09/07, 12:26 AM
posted by:
The LoveHorsepower BLOG! » Blog Archive » Lexus LS 460 performance numbers
[...] Article Link [...]
09/07, 9:47 AM
posted by:
Carnut4ever
Lexus should stick to its mantra of producing whisper quiet luxury cars. Forget about BMWs and sporting models.
09/07, 10:05 AM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Mercedes/BMW are lightyears ahead of whatever POS “luxury” car Lexus tries to sell to the poor suckers who think they’ve bought a good car.
09/07, 11:00 AM
posted by:
Veda
1c3d0g, there are a good number of people who actually think the other way around given Lexus’ famous properties. For the same price as a BMW or MB, the cars (at least the Japanese versions) have far more technology features integrated. I can see why they would think Lexus is the smart choice. You should try owning a few, it may change the way you think about them.
09/07, 1:11 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
No thanks Mister, I’ve driven enough of them around to cause me a week-long headache.
09/07, 5:11 PM
posted by:
gsh
i sat inside a C230 before…one of the most boring cars ive ever been in. drove like a wheelbarrow too..
09/14, 8:43 PM
posted by:
Dakine
Car and Driver magazine SUck “D”
They are worse than Motor Trends…
Road & Track is the far best ~