<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lincoln considering rear-wheel drive for MKS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:05:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-29350</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-29350</guid>
		<description>all these options are awesome, i think lincoln will finally replace the towncar with a decent replacement, for me, ill take the v6 twin turbo with 350hp and 325 lf lbs of torque. It outbeats the 4.4 v8 with 315hp, and it may get better mpg. which is everyones issue now aday. But the v6 might use more fuel than a v8, only because i own a grand prix with the 3.8 v6 240hp supercharged, and i have to go to the gas station 2 times a week, and it gets 19 mpg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all these options are awesome, i think lincoln will finally replace the towncar with a decent replacement, for me, ill take the v6 twin turbo with 350hp and 325 lf lbs of torque. It outbeats the 4.4 v8 with 315hp, and it may get better mpg. which is everyones issue now aday. But the v6 might use more fuel than a v8, only because i own a grand prix with the 3.8 v6 240hp supercharged, and i have to go to the gas station 2 times a week, and it gets 19 mpg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paracelsus</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19311</link>
		<dc:creator>Paracelsus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19311</guid>
		<description>Hey you BMW suck-ups, cut a guy some slack......the Mark VIII was a VERY NICE RIDE in it&#039;s day and took off like a bat out of hell with it&#039;s DOHC 32 Valve aluminum V8.....and the last really enthusiast-oriented Lincoln made. So, if you haven&#039;t driven one, don&#039;t hate.... and don&#039;t start me on BMW&#039;S...overrated piles of $€£€&amp;@#   IMHO....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you BMW suck-ups, cut a guy some slack&#8230;&#8230;the Mark VIII was a VERY NICE RIDE in it&#8217;s day and took off like a bat out of hell with it&#8217;s DOHC 32 Valve aluminum V8&#8230;..and the last really enthusiast-oriented Lincoln made. So, if you haven&#8217;t driven one, don&#8217;t hate&#8230;. and don&#8217;t start me on BMW&#8217;S&#8230;overrated piles of $€£€&amp;@#   IMHO&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert  Fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19150</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert  Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19150</guid>
		<description>Rear wheel drive with V8, independent rear suspension.  NO idiot iDrive system.  A modernized Mark II dash could be a nice touch.  Mark VIII&#039;s were very nice, but Mark VII&#039;s have a cult like following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rear wheel drive with V8, independent rear suspension.  NO idiot iDrive system.  A modernized Mark II dash could be a nice touch.  Mark VIII&#8217;s were very nice, but Mark VII&#8217;s have a cult like following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHUT</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19134</link>
		<dc:creator>WHUT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19134</guid>
		<description>Spadaro, everything in Lincoln&#039;s line-up _is_ RWD except the Zephyr. I do agree that they need to make the car in RWD and AWD. They also need to have all the cool techno stuff too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spadaro, everything in Lincoln&#8217;s line-up _is_ RWD except the Zephyr. I do agree that they need to make the car in RWD and AWD. They also need to have all the cool techno stuff too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHUT</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19130</link>
		<dc:creator>WHUT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 00:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19130</guid>
		<description>Mark - c&#039;mon, you&#039;re embarrasing yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; c&#8217;mon, you&#8217;re embarrasing yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lars ulrich</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19123</link>
		<dc:creator>lars ulrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 00:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19123</guid>
		<description>hahaha #7 are you serious, your comparing a mark viii to a BMW 8 series, the bmw is FAR more superior in all aspects</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha #7 are you serious, your comparing a mark viii to a BMW 8 series, the bmw is FAR more superior in all aspects</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johny</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19035</link>
		<dc:creator>Johny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19035</guid>
		<description>yeah...air ride suspension only makes the driver more comfortable with krappy suspesion design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230;air ride suspension only makes the driver more comfortable with krappy suspesion design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corban</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-19030</link>
		<dc:creator>Corban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-19030</guid>
		<description>AIR RIDE &amp; PERFORMANCE? NOT!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIR RIDE &amp; PERFORMANCE? NOT!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FFFFF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18984</link>
		<dc:creator>FFFFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18984</guid>
		<description>HAHAHAH    that was funny, comparing a bmw 8 series to a mark 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAH    that was funny, comparing a bmw 8 series to a mark 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaffe</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18951</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 19:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18951</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t Lincoln resurrect one of the best cars they recently built, the magnificent Mark VIII? I have had two of these and they are awesome! When I tell people about this car, I compare it to the BMW 6-series; high-tech DOHC V-8, 4-wheel disk brakes, 4-wheel independent suspension, plus air-ride and a real driver-centered cockpit. The only thing I would ask for in a remake is manual transmission and a higher performance (think M-series or AMG) to compete with M-B and BMW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Lincoln resurrect one of the best cars they recently built, the magnificent Mark VIII? I have had two of these and they are awesome! When I tell people about this car, I compare it to the BMW 6-series; high-tech DOHC V-8, 4-wheel disk brakes, 4-wheel independent suspension, plus air-ride and a real driver-centered ****pit. The only thing I would ask for in a remake is manual transmission and a higher performance (think M-series or AMG) to compete with M-B and BMW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18930</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18930</guid>
		<description>Chalk another one up to the turbo 6.  Audi and BMW have won me over to what turbos can do.  More torque, more power, less fuel, less weight.  What are the advantages to a DOHC v8?

Oh yeah, gotta be RWD.  And how about 50/50? That might be asking too much huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chalk another one up to the turbo 6.  Audi and BMW have won me over to what turbos can do.  More torque, more power, less fuel, less weight.  What are the advantages to a DOHC v8?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, gotta be RWD.  And how about 50/50? That might be asking too much huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maranello</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18919</link>
		<dc:creator>Maranello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 19:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18919</guid>
		<description>i wouldn&#039;t mind a turbo v6 and real wheel, or all wheel drive. everyone is not gonna get a v8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldn&#8217;t mind a turbo v6 and real wheel, or all wheel drive. everyone is not gonna get a v8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18891</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18891</guid>
		<description>i want a front wheel drive V6 twin-turbo with rain sensing wipers and twin DVDs-in-the-headrests. YEAH!

not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want a front wheel drive V6 twin-turbo with rain sensing wipers and twin DVDs-in-the-headrests. YEAH!</p>
<p>not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Spadaro</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18888</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Spadaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18888</guid>
		<description>Everybody, go take that survey now!  For drivetrain choice, select RWD!  Maybe this will convince Ford that Lincoln&#039;s lineup needs to be rear-drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody, go take that survey now!  For drivetrain choice, select RWD!  Maybe this will convince Ford that Lincoln&#8217;s lineup needs to be rear-drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18881</guid>
		<description>I think the car looks pretty sharp, I mean hopefully they make it a little more Lincoln-esque... but it will sell... Less Lincoln-esque is needed in their dash and steering wheel.. it needs to be modernized</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the car looks pretty sharp, I mean hopefully they make it a little more Lincoln-esque&#8230; but it will sell&#8230; Less Lincoln-esque is needed in their dash and steering wheel.. it needs to be modernized</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks.html/comment-page-1#comment-18877</link>
		<dc:creator>canut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/02/lincoln-considering-rear-wheel-drive-for-mks/#comment-18877</guid>
		<description>Ford must be really stupid to ask obvious questions on what people will like for its MKS sedan. Dohc v-8, rear drive, and a new more distinctive body styling to set it apart from the rest. Copying design cues from other luxury cars will do no good for the brand. Just take a look at the more successful Cadillac division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford must be really stupid to ask obvious questions on what people will like for its MKS sedan. Dohc v-8, rear drive, and a new more distinctive body styling to set it apart from the rest. Copying design cues from other luxury cars will do no good for the brand. Just take a look at the more successful Cadillac division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
