<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lotus looking to revive big sedan in the same vein as Carlton?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/lotus-looking-to-revive-big-sedan-in-the-same-vein-as-carlton.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lotus-looking-to-revive-big-sedan-in-the-same-vein-as-carlton.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:36:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyBlazE</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lotus-looking-to-revive-big-sedan-in-the-same-vein-as-carlton.html/comment-page-1#comment-402158</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyBlazE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8326#comment-402158</guid>
		<description>The Lotus Carlton was amazing... Still costs a lot to buy nowadays.

However, if you want a big, quick GM sedan we have the aussies now and their Holdens!

Lotus should move on to something new...

Perhaps the Insignia would be good, but a Lotus-powered Mondeo would kick some booty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lotus Carlton was amazing&#8230; Still costs a lot to buy nowadays.</p>
<p>However, if you want a big, quick GM sedan we have the aussies now and their Holdens!</p>
<p>Lotus should move on to something new&#8230;</p>
<p>Perhaps the Insignia would be good, but a Lotus-powered Mondeo would kick some booty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inline6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lotus-looking-to-revive-big-sedan-in-the-same-vein-as-carlton.html/comment-page-1#comment-402025</link>
		<dc:creator>inline6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8326#comment-402025</guid>
		<description>Lotus seems to be on a roll lately. Lots to be encouraged about with this underfunded British powerhouse.

The Insignia will probably be a great foundation. But 441, let&#039;s not forget that Lotus have experience with FWD and making it work. Look at the 89-95 Elan.

I don&#039;t see Lotus, the supreme authority on lightweight, simple designs, doing an Insignia with AWD. Perhaps Lotus should wait until the GM Beta RWD platform comes out under a Cadillac. THEN they can work their magic and brand it a Lotus or Vauxhall or whatever they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lotus seems to be on a roll lately. Lots to be encouraged about with this underfunded British powerhouse.</p>
<p>The Insignia will probably be a great foundation. But 441, let&#8217;s not forget that Lotus have experience with FWD and making it work. Look at the 89-95 Elan.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Lotus, the supreme authority on lightweight, simple designs, doing an Insignia with AWD. Perhaps Lotus should wait until the GM Beta RWD platform comes out under a Cadillac. THEN they can work their magic and brand it a Lotus or Vauxhall or whatever they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 441Zuke</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/lotus-looking-to-revive-big-sedan-in-the-same-vein-as-carlton.html/comment-page-1#comment-402002</link>
		<dc:creator>441Zuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8326#comment-402002</guid>
		<description>eesshh ... front wheel drive? is that the best you can do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eesshh &#8230; front wheel drive? is that the best you can do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
