Rumors are again swirling about a possible buyout of the McLaren Group by DaimlerChrysler’s Mercedes-Benz. Mercedes acquired a 40 percent stake in the company in 1999, and was rumored to be considering a complete buyout this summer. Speculation subsided over the past few months, but a new round of media reports citing credible sources indicate a deal is near.
When asked if a deal was in the works, CEO Ron Dennis said he was open to the possibility. “If an opportunity presents itself and can make McLaren better, it is supported by its management and I embrace it,” he told Motorsport News magazine.
Dennis hinted McLaren and Mercedes might also be working on new projects outside of motorsports. “We have some really exciting programs outside our formula one team and want the company to grow,” he said. The companies previously collaborated on the Mercedes McLaren SLR, and are rumored to be working on a successor.



12/15, 6:24 PM
posted by:
Andre Neves
I dunno, I don’t think I like the Idea. Mclaren is turning into a Mercedes-only company.
12/15, 6:35 PM
posted by:
adam713
I agree. I’d like to see McLaren build another car with BMW. After all, the SLR wasn’t ever the fastest car in the world .
12/15, 6:36 PM
posted by:
acura_el2000
is AMG not enough?
12/15, 6:44 PM
posted by:
Andre Neves
^ exactly what I was thinking.
12/15, 7:33 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Well, I don’t really care as long as they’re absorbed by a reputable company like Daimler-Chrysler or BMW.
12/15, 7:53 PM
posted by:
A4
well hey theyve got 40% why not top it off
12/15, 8:31 PM
posted by:
The Stig
I wonder if the words “outside our formula one team” have anything to do with Raikkonen sliding over to Ferrari for 2007?
12/15, 10:02 PM
posted by:
megator
Yeah but McLaren get Alonso who is a two time world champion instead. Kimmi is fast and a good driver but hes got the ****iest luck ever.
12/15, 11:42 PM
posted by:
chevy490
sorry for using caps my bad!
12/15, 11:50 PM
posted by:
S-60-driver
I drive a Volvo. I have a hot g.f. I have money. Ya jealous, CHEVY?? GM is CRAP!!!!
12/16, 1:54 AM
posted by:
americanrevolution
Especially jealous of the Volvo. Not much a girl wouldn’t do on the front seat of one of those. No, S-60, I’ll keep my old Z-28. Nay, I’ll even keep my new Civic over your “chick-magnet” Volvo.
12/16, 2:03 AM
posted by:
Stuart
Imagine the Mclaren F1 with the Chrysler ME4-12 AMG Quad turbo. **** that would be a possible 280mph. Anyway seems like a good idea as long as they bring out the new models with Mclaren badges and not Mercedes-Benz.
P.S. AMG is a tuning company, Mclaren actually makes cars. Its like comparing Shelby to Astom-Martin @ Ford
12/16, 3:19 AM
posted by:
A4
WOOOOW
12/16, 3:20 AM
posted by:
A4
a volvo, better watch out yaris’s.. here comes S60
12/16, 3:53 AM
posted by:
The Stig
@ megator,
Alonso may want to reconsider his move to McLaren if the reliability does not improve beyond what we’ve seen.
12/16, 10:13 AM
posted by:
Saud
Nice. But I hope their next project is executed in a more McLaren F1 style.
12/16, 10:13 AM
posted by:
Andre Neves
I believe the only reason they didn’t produce the amazing chrysler ME-four12 is because of Mercedes not wanting anything interfering with the sales of the wanna-be supercar SLR. Sorry, I just don’t like it.
12/16, 10:16 AM
posted by:
Saud
S-60 stop insulting GM because of one jackass.
12/16, 11:14 AM
posted by:
chevy490
s-60 i thought whoopin ur ass and making ur mom give me head in front of u was enough!but no here u go being all gay again!
12/16, 11:42 AM
posted by:
maqm3
“…founder Ron Dennis…” Ron Dennis is not the founder of McLaren. This mistake is a bit unprofessional.
12/16, 3:50 PM
posted by:
Eisen Faust
Hell LLN, are you forgeting about the legendary New Zealander Bruce McLaren?!! I’m Pretty sure a 10 year old Ron Dennis Didnt Found McLaren back in the 60’s you ignorant twats
12/16, 3:54 PM
posted by:
Eisen Faust
And someone needs to get over that ford owned abortion they call Volvo. Buy a Saab if you want to be Different
12/17, 3:53 PM
posted by:
???
I don’t want offend anyone but Volvo’s aren’t that great…. nobody really cares for them…. so don’t go flashing off that you have one and think your cool
12/17, 6:59 PM
posted by:
Sharif
I kind of disagree volvo does make some nice cars like the S 60R, I personally think their only problem is that they are luxury-sport cars but that makes no sense cuz as a sports car its over weight and its underpowered. Still they are nice cars + their safe. So Eisen Faust I kind have to break it to you Saab sucks. They are also heavy, underpowered, less reliable, and according to me they look intensely ugly. Either way they are both pointlessly overpriced.
12/17, 7:05 PM
posted by:
Sharif
For the record I tried talking in a unbiased manner. Anyway I think Benz should go through with purchasing the rest of the company because it would help both parties. Question, what is going on with Lotus, are the still thinking about potentially doing work with other car brands? Cause if they are that would be sweet powered by McLaren, tuned by AMG, and suspension by Lotus.
12/17, 10:54 PM
posted by:
Eisen Faust
Forget about all this volvo talk – this is a McLaren story! and I seriously hope they correct the glaring flaw in the story for the betterment of all – Bruce McLaren founded McLaren! thats a great way to alienate all New Zealanders LLN
12/17, 10:56 PM
posted by:
Eisen Faust
ahh i just noticed the correction… thanks
12/18, 12:08 AM
posted by:
Veda
???, why don’t you elaborate on why volvo’s aren’t great?
12/18, 1:48 AM
posted by:
Stuart
Volvo might not be great but at this moment they can make more money then the whole of GM put together including Saab. Personally I prefer Mercedes either way
12/18, 9:09 AM
posted by:
meanpants555
Lotus has a consultancy division called Lotus Engineering that advises numerous manufacturers. I think it’s mostly suspension related work. The car won’t necessarily be badged as such ie: Isuzu Impulse or the formidably Lotus Carlton, but many go to Lotus since they know their schizzle.
12/18, 9:11 AM
posted by:
meanpants555
My point being that maybe McLaren would do the same under Mercedes.
12/18, 9:12 AM
posted by:
meanpants555
Paris Hilton scoots around in a SLR by the way.
12/18, 9:46 AM
posted by:
Fasterbater
Lotus has been working closely with nissan on the new gtr’s suspension, cosworth on the engine, and renault on the materials and transmission. Go Carlos! Back on topic though, McLaren doesn’t need to make a new F1 road car, IMO. They’ve established themselves as a capable design house and engineering firm with the production of that vehicle, and now they’re looking to improve their name as a general supercar manufacturer. Supercars these days don’t have a specific cylinder or door count anymore, and they don’t have to be mid-engined either. But a Mid-engined, low displacement high-revving v8 in a lightweight composite chassis would do wonders for marketing as a new successor to the fabled F1. Look at the Caparo T1, which in my opinion, is the true follow-up to the 90’s Mclaren F1. 3 of the top designers for the Mclaren teamed up together to build this road and track monster, and it’s the only vehicle that reads a spec sheet damn similar to that of the current Grand Prix cars. Either way, McLaren won’t stain it’s name building a car that won’t wear it’s badge properly.
12/18, 4:19 PM
posted by:
Jazz
Why would DaimlerChrysler do this? The only reason that I can come up with is that they want to build cars under the McLaren marque to compete with Ferrari and not be beholden to a Mercedes shape and platform.
Seriously as great a car as the SLR is it is just wierd looking from certain angles. Mostly the front and side.
12/18, 4:36 PM
posted by:
dre
i agree, jazz. i would still take one in a mili sec….. but money talks so who knows what will happen/
12/19, 12:40 AM
posted by:
Jason
Jazz, as long as Mercedes flows it’s strategy of mushy steering, overweight and automatic slushbox cars to McLaren like it did with the SLR then Ferrari has nothing to worry about. The SLR is a car for rich guys’ wives like Donald Trump and Erikson (Malibu Enzo crasher) and heiresses like Paris Hilton. McLaren hasn’t built a real drivers car since the F1.
12/19, 9:54 PM
posted by:
GMrules
Who cares. Buy a godamn vette if you want a real car.
12/20, 1:07 AM
posted by:
Andre Neves
^Wow, your really dumb.
12/20, 1:08 AM
posted by:
Andre Neves
Jason,
I agree with you totally.
12/20, 9:20 AM
posted by:
GMrules
GM haters need to leave please. This is a GM site thank you very much.
12/20, 10:35 AM
posted by:
Tim_s
GM site. What are you talking about?
12/20, 12:04 PM
posted by:
GMrules
Mclaren is nothing more than a Corvette wannabe that failed to impress. They should hire some GM engineers next time and maybe, just maybe they’ll build a car worth buying.
Nah, who am I kidding, everyone would rather have a Gm product over this pile o ****.
01/22, 6:49 PM
posted by:
maddawg0
Its funny alot of people bag the SLR Mclaren saying its ugly and thats the final story and move onto ford and shelby… But how many ford GT’s out there can keep up with an SLR mclaren on a track, and yet be able to drive cross country for endless amounts of miles without breaking down once.
Go watch Jeremy Clarkson talking about the SLR on Top Gear, and he made a great point, a super car with supercar conviencence, its brilliant… and you shouldnt be supprised from from the price tag.