<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mercedes coupe evolution: 1952 to 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:34:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Welsh View</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-190851</link>
		<dc:creator>A Welsh View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-190851</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mercedes Coupé Timeline&lt;/strong&gt;

The evolution of the Mercedes Coupé from the 1952 300 S to the 2007 CL 600. More info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mercedes Coupé Timeline</strong></p>
<p>The evolution of the Mercedes Coupé from the 1952 300 S to the 2007 CL 600. More info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 55lat CL at effigy: emerging life v.2.6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-182774</link>
		<dc:creator>55lat CL at effigy: emerging life v.2.6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-182774</guid>
		<description>[...] Przy tej okazji Left Lane News serwuje serię zdjęć ilustrujących ewolucję tej szlachetnej serii sportowych limuzyn, które od 55lat projektowane są według tej samej receptury – ekstrawaganckie, przestronne coupe, luksus, progresywne zawieszenie i ogromny silnik o niebotycznym momencie obrotowym dla niesamowitych wrażeń ze sportowej jazdy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Przy tej okazji Left Lane News serwuje serię zdjęć ilustrujących ewolucję tej szlachetnej serii sportowych limuzyn, które od 55lat projektowane są według tej samej receptury – ekstrawaganckie, przestronne coupe, luksus, progresywne zawieszenie i ogromny silnik o niebotycznym momencie obrotowym dla niesamowitych wrażeń ze sportowej jazdy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-179100</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-179100</guid>
		<description>I really like the newest one, not sure why no one else does. I&#039;m not a fan of the two previous generations, the mid 90s and the previous one. The styling seems too plain for my standards. For those of you like me who dig the new CL, check out desktopmachine.com for some neat wallpapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the newest one, not sure why no one else does. I&#8217;m not a fan of the two previous generations, the mid 90s and the previous one. The styling seems too plain for my standards. For those of you like me who dig the new CL, check out desktopmachine.com for some neat wallpapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thing3</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-179094</link>
		<dc:creator>Thing3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-179094</guid>
		<description>It looks nothing like an Acura.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nothing like an Acura.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOREA</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-179065</link>
		<dc:creator>KOREA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-179065</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 11 and I have a CL600 on order</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 11 and I have a CL600 on order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedated</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178965</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 02:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178965</guid>
		<description>I love the new CL. DAYUM! Give me the AMG treated, CL65!!!  What a beast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the new CL. DAYUM! Give me the AMG treated, CL65!!!  What a beast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mecky</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178947</link>
		<dc:creator>mecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178947</guid>
		<description>you do not have style?
you have money
buy it 
MERCEDES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you do not have style?<br />
you have money<br />
buy it<br />
MERCEDES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humber</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178914</link>
		<dc:creator>Humber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178914</guid>
		<description>The Acura RL tail works alot better on the Acura RL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Acura RL tail works alot better on the Acura RL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomicbri</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178857</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomicbri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178857</guid>
		<description>I noticed the first four cars in the side view lineup all look very revolutionary from the year before.... the last 3 very similar, I am afraid we as humans are either running out of ideas or people are too afraid to make a statement anymore. I find the last 3 purely evolutionary when compared to the first 4...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the first four cars in the side view lineup all look very revolutionary from the year before&#8230;. the last 3 very similar, I am afraid we as humans are either running out of ideas or people are too afraid to make a statement anymore. I find the last 3 purely evolutionary when compared to the first 4&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178813</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178813</guid>
		<description>The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178809</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178809</guid>
		<description>i think the new cl looks like a 2 door cls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the new cl looks like a 2 door cls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178800</guid>
		<description>God, the new CL is a big car…it looks almost as big as the S-Class.

Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, the new CL is a big car…it looks almost as big as the S-Class.</p>
<p>Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drummer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178762</link>
		<dc:creator>Drummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178762</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s funny how gas prices are at record highs, but the cars we make keep getting bigger.&quot;
The answer is simple. It&#039;s because people who drive/ride the cars are getting bigger themselves (From all that fast food, sugar, fattening foods, etc.), therefore they need bigger cars with more interior room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s funny how gas prices are at record highs, but the cars we make keep getting bigger.&#8221;<br />
The answer is simple. It&#8217;s because people who drive/ride the cars are getting bigger themselves (From all that fast food, sugar, fattening foods, etc.), therefore they need bigger cars with more interior room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178729</guid>
		<description>Scott, the SLC did have a backseat and was produced until 1981.  It was replaced by the all-new SEC in 1982 (at least in the US).  The SLC did look like a stretched SL, which was odd, but it was still a decent looking car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, the SLC did have a backseat and was produced until 1981.  It was replaced by the all-new SEC in 1982 (at least in the US).  The SLC did look like a stretched SL, which was odd, but it was still a decent looking car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cl my butt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178728</link>
		<dc:creator>cl my butt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178728</guid>
		<description>from some angles and some nicely shot photos, i think the car looks great (except the front). from some images - i think it looks awkward. proof will be in the sheetmetal. either way, seems like the nose of the car looks like crapola. not a very strong design. bland. the rear seems to strike me the same way. i&#039;m also not a big fan of the interior. oh well. i&#039;m not buying either way. piece of crap with  3-pointed star.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from some angles and some nicely shot photos, i think the car looks great (except the front). from some images &#8211; i think it looks awkward. proof will be in the sheetmetal. either way, seems like the nose of the car looks like crapola. not a very strong design. bland. the rear seems to strike me the same way. i&#8217;m also not a big fan of the interior. oh well. i&#8217;m not buying either way. piece of crap with  3-pointed star.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178718</link>
		<dc:creator>peter g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178718</guid>
		<description>I like the new one, it looks sort of...contemporary..! Well, at least I don&#039;t mind it...That said, the first three generations look absolutely sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new one, it looks sort of&#8230;contemporary..! Well, at least I don&#8217;t mind it&#8230;That said, the first three generations look absolutely sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178708</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178708</guid>
		<description>Those new alloys are hideous ugly and shit all in one. Put the SL alloys on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those new alloys are hideous ugly and **** all in one. Put the SL alloys on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178693</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178693</guid>
		<description>the first 4 gens are so pimping</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the first 4 gens are so pimping</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akia</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178684</link>
		<dc:creator>Akia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178684</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how gas prices are at record highs, but the cars we make keep getting bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how gas prices are at record highs, but the cars we make keep getting bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akia</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178683</link>
		<dc:creator>Akia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178683</guid>
		<description>^ I agree.  It did change though, I do like the last generation CL as well.  The new CL resembles the 6 series BMW and the Bently Continental GT a lot more than the old one IMO. I think that&#039;s why Mercedes changed it so drastically.  It seems that even if you don&#039;t like these Bangle-ish designs, they are the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ I agree.  It did change though, I do like the last generation CL as well.  The new CL resembles the 6 series BMW and the Bently Continental GT a lot more than the old one IMO. I think that&#8217;s why Mercedes changed it so drastically.  It seems that even if you don&#8217;t like these Bangle-ish designs, they are the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: specialk</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178662</link>
		<dc:creator>specialk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178662</guid>
		<description>I dont know why people dont like the new CL because i think it looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know why people dont like the new CL because i think it looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Karesh</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178659</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Karesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178659</guid>
		<description>They appear to like to alternate between beautiful and, well, not.

Scott,

The SEC replaced the SLC. I&#039;m pretty sure the SLC did have a rear seat. Ungainly looking beast--I cannot imagine they stretched the wheelbase ten inches but still didn&#039;t include a back seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They appear to like to alternate between beautiful and, well, not.</p>
<p>Scott,</p>
<p>The SEC replaced the SLC. I&#8217;m pretty sure the SLC did have a rear seat. Ungainly looking beast&#8211;I cannot imagine they stretched the wheelbase ten inches but still didn&#8217;t include a back seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178654</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178654</guid>
		<description>The Low-production, Short-lived SLC wasn&#039;t technically a coupe (by some definitions) since it was a two-seater.  All it was, was an SL from that style with a fixed roof, and I personally liked the SEC from that era Much better.  Cool article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Low-production, Short-lived SLC wasn&#8217;t technically a coupe (by some definitions) since it was a two-seater.  All it was, was an SL from that style with a fixed roof, and I personally liked the SEC from that era Much better.  Cool article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178649</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178649</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still a sucker for a mid 80s SEC - especially in European trim (smaller bumpers, flush headlights).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still a sucker for a mid 80s SEC &#8211; especially in European trim (smaller bumpers, flush headlights).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pruce</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178646</link>
		<dc:creator>Pruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178646</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re all nice! Except for the newest one... it looks... well... really weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re all nice! Except for the newest one&#8230; it looks&#8230; well&#8230; really weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178635</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178635</guid>
		<description>The SLC from the late 70&#039;s is missing in this lineup. It wasn&#039;t based on the W116 S-Class but shared some parts with it and was the large MB Coupé at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SLC from the late 70&#8217;s is missing in this lineup. It wasn&#8217;t based on the W116 S-Class but shared some parts with it and was the large MB Coupé at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donfuy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007.html/comment-page-1#comment-178632</link>
		<dc:creator>Donfuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/26/mercedes-coupe-evolution-1952-to-2007/#comment-178632</guid>
		<description>nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
