<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mercedes SLK to ditch SLR look for 2008?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 19:37:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-174002</link>
		<dc:creator>jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-174002</guid>
		<description>I could care less about the front apearance. How about chaning the icrappy nterior that looks more like a CLK or SL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could care less about the front apearance. How about chaning the icrappy nterior that looks more like a CLK or SL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-60187</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-60187</guid>
		<description>The best thing about the SLK is the frontal appearance. They should change the silly back lights and the horrific interior. The front already looks much better than the outdated &quot;double-circle&quot; headlights of the SL. Some car makers are so idiotic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing about the SLK is the frontal appearance. They should change the silly back lights and the horrific interior. The front already looks much better than the outdated &#8220;double-circle&#8221; headlights of the SL. Some car makers are so idiotic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charkes</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-25952</link>
		<dc:creator>Charkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 03:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-25952</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s stupid to change the hood and grill of current SLK. People like the F1 look nose.  If any change required for 2008 ,it should be the hardtop roof to be with a sunroof or a glasstop .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s stupid to change the hood and grill of current SLK. People like the F1 look nose.  If any change required for 2008 ,it should be the hardtop roof to be with a sunroof or a glasstop .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-19051</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 20:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-19051</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with some of the previous posts...  why change the nose ?  It is the interior that should be updated/revised....  way too much plastic and not all that interesting for a sports car/roadster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with some of the previous posts&#8230;  why change the nose ?  It is the interior that should be updated/revised&#8230;.  way too much plastic and not all that interesting for a sports car/roadster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18780</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 11:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18780</guid>
		<description>The SLR nose is the only interesting part of the car... the rest of the body is boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SLR nose is the only interesting part of the car&#8230; the rest of the body is boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18762</link>
		<dc:creator>isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 06:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18762</guid>
		<description>what? why get rid of it? people but it FOR that! if anything add the SLE nose on the SL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what? why get rid of it? people but it FOR that! if anything add the SLE nose on the SL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsh</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18742</link>
		<dc:creator>gsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 03:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18742</guid>
		<description>wow people are stupid, the f1 nose was probably the best thing the SLK had going for it...for 55k you could have a baby SLR...what idiots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow people are stupid, the f1 nose was probably the best thing the SLK had going for it&#8230;for 55k you could have a baby SLR&#8230;what idiots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Tsui</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18715</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Tsui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18715</guid>
		<description>2008 SLK 63 AMG wil be a fanastic car with new front look without the SLR appearance.
Good move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008 SLK 63 AMG wil be a fanastic car with new front look without the SLR appearance.<br />
Good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lars ulrich</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18700</link>
		<dc:creator>lars ulrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18700</guid>
		<description>AMG is wack anyway, the M models from BMW and the S and RS models from Audi are the way to go IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMG is wack anyway, the M models from BMW and the S and RS models from Audi are the way to go IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tosta_mista</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18622</link>
		<dc:creator>tosta_mista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18622</guid>
		<description>I spelt ditch wrong, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spelt ditch wrong, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tosta_mista</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18621</link>
		<dc:creator>tosta_mista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18621</guid>
		<description>Why dith the SLR-style grille? They should worry more about changing the interior, which has too much plastic, especially the cheap feeling window switches. Are there any updates to the SLK200 Kompressor 168hp engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dith the SLR-style grille? They should worry more about changing the interior, which has too much plastic, especially the cheap feeling window switches. Are there any updates to the SLK200 Kompressor 168hp engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18620</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18620</guid>
		<description>Why dith the SLR-style grille? They should worry more about changing the interior, which has too much plastic, especially the cheap feeling window switches. Are there any updates to the SLK200 Kompressor 168hp engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dith the SLR-style grille? They should worry more about changing the interior, which has too much plastic, especially the cheap feeling window switches. Are there any updates to the SLK200 Kompressor 168hp engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18602</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18602</guid>
		<description>I like its sporty grille.

They&#039;re going to change the grille to a more conservative look?  Could be good or bad, as long as they do a good job of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like its sporty grille.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re going to change the grille to a more conservative look?  Could be good or bad, as long as they do a good job of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Neves</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18601</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Neves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18601</guid>
		<description>wow that sucks...SLK 55 AMG is the their best looking car in my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow that sucks&#8230;SLK 55 AMG is the their best looking car in my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue h</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-18599</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/01/mercedes-slk-to-ditch-slr-look-for-2008/#comment-18599</guid>
		<description>DAMN I WAS JUST ABOUT TO GET ONE OF THOSE IN OCTOBER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAMN I WAS JUST ABOUT TO GET ONE OF THOSE IN OCTOBER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
