Mercury suppliers reveal brand will be dead by 2012, Ford continues to deny Mercury is headed for the chopping block
06/10/2008, 11:10 AM
By Drew Johnson
As we have reported on these pages before, it looks as though Ford’s Mercury division doesn’t have a life expectancy after 2012. While Ford is still optimistic about the brand’s future, Mercury suppliers have revealed that their supply orders simply stop after 2012.
In a report by Edmunds — which echos a Leftlane story from October — it is confirmed that Mercury has no future vehicle plans beyond 2012, with every model going through a phase-out within the next four years. The Mercury Sable will likely be the first victim, with Mercury getting the cold shoulder on a new version of the 2010 Ford Taurus.
Subsequently, the Mariner SUV and Grand Marquis sedan will be dead by 2011 or early 2012. It is believed that the Milan will be the last Mercury produced, holding on until 2012 when an all-new Ford Fusion — the Milan’s sister car — is scheduled to bow.
With Ford killing any plans to give Mercury a version of the Ford Flex, the once proud marque officially has nothing in the future vehicle pipeline.
But despite the evidence that Mercury is on life support, Ford insists that Mercury is an important part of its portfolio. At a media event held on Monday, Mark Fields, Ford’s president of the Americas, told Automotive News that Mercury is an important part of Ford’s lineup and that Ford is continually investing in the division. “It is an important part of the stable of brands,” Fields said.
With suppliers now chiming in on the fate of Mercury, it’s getting even harder to believe Ford’s side of the story.



06/10, 11:25 AM
posted by:
TomF
I’d think more highly of Ford if they dropped the charade and admitted Mercury was doing an Oldsmobile-style exit. You’d actually create a little demand for the last couple of model years as a classic marque goes out… and Ford would get credit for focusing realistically on a clearly defined future.
06/10, 11:27 AM
posted by:
xyunya
Is there a guarantee that Ford will be around in 2012? Their balance sheet disagrees with their expectations.
06/10, 11:31 AM
posted by:
lucklaster
Let it die in a dignified way. There is just no reason to have two of everything from Ford. Details at Merc were often better than the base version at Ford and Mercury had a good history – not so much now. But let this be a huge lesson at Ford and other makes – be creative with your reasons for branding.
06/10, 11:34 AM
posted by:
TomF
No, there is no guarantee, but they’d improve their odds a lot if they did rational brand and product focus. Kill Mercury, kill the biggest SUVs, stick to one or two CUVs instead of four or more, import European minicars more quickly.
06/10, 11:35 AM
posted by:
Fletch
Ford Europe will still be around in 2012, they have cars people actually want.
06/10, 11:40 AM
posted by:
400horseSS
Why not sooner like summer ‘08.
06/10, 11:50 AM
posted by:
johnnycanuck
If Lincoln had kept pace with Cadillac in terms of pursuing their goal to deliver world class product, then there might have been enough of a gap to slot Mercury between them and Ford. As they are now, it’s a stretch to say Lincoln is in the position Mercury was in its heyday.
06/10, 11:59 AM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Is Mercury still alive? Come on guys, let’s face it, Mercury’s been dead for a long time. Some nostalgic people may still want to keep them alive, but just like GM’s Oldsmobile, the time has come to kill it off permanently and move on.
06/10, 12:13 PM
posted by:
A4
i dont get it i like the mercury versions better than the ford ones they are based on… what am i missing here? they are much more upscale from the ford’s with a small bump in pricing. They all get things like LED taillights, projector beam headlamps, tasteful chrome touches, and sharper styling. At first i begged to differ that the sable is sharp, but then i remembered what the taurus looks like. Mercury’s are at a good stage, They just need to be marketed better.
06/10, 12:23 PM
posted by:
TOZO
If Ford reveals that the Mercury brand will be dead, people will stop buying it. True, they are not buying so many right now, but it will be worse. Ford’s “keep quiet” policy is probably best. My Lincoln-Volvo dealership theory may come to fruition.
06/10, 12:36 PM
posted by:
Brendino
Even though I own a Mercury and would hate to see the brand go, it makes sense given the current positioning of the marques.
Here’s my idea to save Mercury: make Mercury all about near-lux small cars. A, B, and C-segment vehicles, with some cute utes to boot. Make them ALMOST as nice as Lincolns and definitely nicer than Fords.
Lincoln doesn’t suffer the downmarket hit it’d take by adding something under the MKZ, Mercury becomes a niche brand in a segment that America desperately needs to compete in, there is clear distinction between brands once more, L/M dealers get the volume they need to stay in business, and Ford’s small cars get some profit margins by putting them in a decent luxury outfit.
Someone get me Mually’s address.
06/10, 12:55 PM
posted by:
brassmonkey
It’s Mullaly. Ford does not have room in it’s pricing structure to keep Merc around. They would either have to raise Lincoln, or lower Ford to give Merc it’s segment back. Just kill it, but do it like TomF said. Admit the timetable, give it a good sendoff, and put the dirt on top of it.
06/10, 12:55 PM
posted by:
Badass Z51
I really couldn’t care any less.
The Ford Motor Company that sells cars in America is like a obnoxious girl at a party that wants everyones attention & doesn’t care that she’s the fat ugly one in a room full of attractive women. You kind of give her a quick look, decide you don’t like what you see & you ignore her until she finally goes away.
****’em…….don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
06/10, 1:17 PM
posted by:
dl_caldwell
Mercury would be a great place to showcase the Mondeo, S-Max, C-Max, Ka and other of Fords “Euro” designs. Much easier than creating a new brand like Saturn. Most of the R&D is already done, the Euro cars are more fuel-efficient and pretty much ready to go. Now THAT would be a BOLD move.
Opportunity lost yet again…
06/10, 1:44 PM
posted by:
xyunya
TomF, johnnycanuck, et all, gentlemen you are all correct and if company board and management consisted of people who actually drive their own cars with their own 2 hands and even 1 leg, your voices may be heard. Unfortunately for the company reason had left their headquarters 30 odd years ago and never came back.
06/10, 1:45 PM
posted by:
Impulsive
I agree with ‘caldwell’. Sell the usual North American **** as Ford products, since the Focus is accepted by the monkeys, and sell the Euro stuff as Mercurys.
06/10, 2:38 PM
posted by:
mayer_ray_nagin
Maybe instead of checking with only American suppliers they can check with European suppliers to Ford, and see if they are getting orders for 2013 Mercury’s.
06/10, 2:58 PM
posted by:
moto-racer13
Ford as a company should be dead by 2012. We don’t need a worthless peice of **** company building cars anymore.
06/10, 3:27 PM
posted by:
tripleonefive
We don’t need a worthless peice of **** company building cars anymore.
We would have to kill GM then
06/10, 4:23 PM
posted by:
corvette
Chrysler – Plymouth
GM – Oldsmobile
Ford – Mercury.
06/10, 4:28 PM
posted by:
howsmydriving
Kill Mercury, kill all bull**** brands and so-called divisions.
06/10, 5:50 PM
posted by:
NoNameDenton1
Not suprising, other then a refresh of the Milan and a hybrid version of that car, Mercury has almost nothing in the product pipeline, plus Lincoln can pick up were high trim Ford’s leave off.
06/11, 11:09 AM
posted by:
SSEAN54
THEY SHOULD KILL GHETTO MAZDA
06/11, 12:50 PM
posted by:
TOZO
Who the hell gets orders for 2013+ model year parts in the middle of 2008 anyway?
06/11, 11:16 PM
posted by:
NoNameDenton1
SSEAN54, you do not kill of a brand or company that is pulling a profit.
06/12, 2:21 PM
posted by:
NoNameDenton1
off
06/13, 3:08 PM
posted by:
DialM4Speed
Another dumb move by Ford if true. You could use Mercury as you low priced, fuel saving, “average man” brand.