RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Michigan pushing for $27 billion in Federal aid for Detroit 3

07/29/2008, 2:11 PM

By paulee

With the seemingly non-stop announcements of plant closures, shift eliminations and job cuts surrounding Detroit’s automakers, the local politicians are recognizing that, if left unchecked, the continued fall of the automakers will have disastrous consequences. As such, they trying to do something about it now, believing it will become much harder to do so later on.

Michigan’s congressional delegation is pushing for proposals that would include $27 billion over the next five years in federal loans, tax incentives and subsidies to Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and Chrysler LLC. The chiefs of staff and top auto policy aides of the majority of the state’s 17 congressional delegation discussed policies to help the ailing automakers at a meeting on Friday, according to Detroit News reports.

Subsidies that cover one-third of carmakers’ losses, government-issued loans and bigger tax credits for the companies and consumers were discussed at the meeting. The proposal included $5 billion in direct loans over five years, $3 billion a year for five years to speed up the retirement of 1.5 million polluting vehicles and $2 billion in tax breaks for new, ultra-efficient vehicles. As well, $800 million was pledged over three years to develop an advanced battery trust fund that would help build three domestic battery manufacturing facilities as well as block California from imposing its own emissions standards.

Recently, presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama has been reported to back a Congress plan to fund $25 billion in loan guarantees for automakers over five years in a second stimulus package under consideration for September. These loans would cost the Treasury $3.75 billion. Adding more pressure to automakers in these tough times are the government-mandated CAFE standards, which force automakers to increase the average fuel efficient of their cars by 40 percent by 2020. It is estimated that through the 2015 model year, automakers will have to spend $47 billion to meet these higher requirements.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

07/29, 2:15 PM

posted by:

xyunya

I am sure as taxpayer I will be looking for this expense. I would find many ways to spend the money on my family and myself, but government thinks otherwise. I am sure it will happen if Barack Hussein Obama will move into oval office.

07/29, 2:33 PM

posted by:

zeeck

come on now, seriously? why can’t anything in this country be responsible for themselves anymore? **** happens, deal with it, eventually things will change and the stronger will end up on top. I’m just waiting for someone to come on here yelling at me for how many jobs people will be losing, well oh well, those people should be preparing to make a career change. There really are a large amount of jobs out there, you just have to look

07/29, 2:36 PM

posted by:

howsmydriving

Let the free market work.

07/29, 2:40 PM

posted by:

travis0017

I would hate to see the US auto industry go -and especially the lost jobs of blue collar workers, but the big 3 needs to make some big changes in how they design, market and develop their products or this will just happen again after the bailout.

07/29, 2:40 PM

posted by:

RaineMan

So they want the taxpayers to pick up the tab so the “Big 3″ can go back to producing the same overpriced crap cars that they have been making for years now? I say no… hell no… they need to learn their lesson. The taxpayers are already covering for the idiots at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… we can’t just give more federal loans and suddenly prop up the economy. Too much federal debt is why the dollar is worth jack shyte in the international market in the first place… and that, my friends, is why our economy is in the toilet.

07/29, 2:41 PM

posted by:

POWER-2-WEIGHT

I don’t want my tax dollars going to the big 3 as much as I don’t want it going to the war!

07/29, 2:43 PM

posted by:

Z06ified

“$3 billion a year for five years to speed up the retirement of 1.5 million polluting vehicles ”

Huh? What does this have to do with Detroit? Sounds like a big fat waste of money right there. And what do they plan to do with this money? Offer to buy back old cars from poor people at a premium over blue book, then scrap them?

That’s just dumb.

07/29, 2:48 PM

posted by:

RaineMan

So is the government going to step in and give federal aid to the thousands of small businesses that employ the vast majority of this nation’s workforce? Of course they aren’t… if anything the two lovely candidates running for office this term want to charge small businesses more taxes. What kind of message are we sending here?
Welcome to the USA… where capitalism rules… make your corporate empire vast and huge by selling low quality overpriced products, squander all your profits on multi-million dollar bonuses for your board members, then go crying to mommy up on capitol hill when you get in trouble.

07/29, 3:09 PM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

If the state of Michigan thinks it’s such a great investment of federal funds, then surely it is also a great investment for the state of Michigan itself, which can issue bonds or raise local taxes to bail ou .. I mean FUND this worthwhile expenditure.
.
RIGHT???

07/29, 3:14 PM

posted by:

Xile

27 Billion is about 2.5 months in Iraq. I’d start bitching about the trillion dollar war before I start complaining about this.

07/29, 3:34 PM

posted by:

crackerhemi

who cares if they get fired?? Maybe then illegal immigrants and uneducated highschool drop outs can duke it out and lower prices for everyone.

07/29, 3:36 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

Thank you Xile, the Retarplicans are out in full force on this one.

07/29, 3:37 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

“Retard-plicans”

07/29, 3:38 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

Mayer, you dont see the southern states pimping out their population to get the new Foreign plants, it is state vs state, and its time for Michigan to get theirs.

07/29, 3:43 PM

posted by:

xyunya

^^^^^^^Not true: libertarians don’t want to piss their hard earned money as well. There is no such thing as good government initiative; it’s always gets f*ucked along the way. Just like cars and trucks GM is making.

07/29, 4:00 PM

posted by:

bolex

i agree Xile. your comment sums it up for me.

07/29, 4:07 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

As a concerned Canadian I’d be willing to donate all the money I get from my empties towards this cause. Most of that usually goes for smokes, but without cars how am I going to get to the store anyway. I’d put wheels on the wife, but she costs more to fill up than the car.

07/29, 4:45 PM

posted by:

ktulu

Y not just give money to the customers? Buy an “American” car, U can deduct half of it from your tax return.

subsidies to the companies will not work.

Y mention the Obamster’s middle name? He’ll win anywar, wven with the rite-wing moiuslim gfear tactics.

those people should be preparing to make a career change.

The jobs in the auto auto industry R important, bcuz if we have 2 go 2 war, we don’t want 2 B dependat on 4n companies 2 switch 2 tank production.
Wespecially if we have 2 fight germany or japan.

the overpriced crap cars cum on boats from asia

Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac bailoutrs R stupid.

The gov’t has 2 much debt

the war is a bigger waste of $ than this proposed dailout.

old cars R cool

the number o’ low-quality overpriced products from the big 3 has plummeted. They did squander a lot on fat bonuses sted R&D

It is not us Vs. us, it is us Vs. them

07/29, 4:54 PM

posted by:

Bremen_Koenigsegg

I’m not American, and I don’t give two ****s about your economy; however, I am Canadian, and our economy is unfortunately quasi-dependent on yours, so it is my prerogative to fill you guys in. Right-wing market fundamentalism will ruin your economy. If you leave it up to the free market, the Big Three will fail, and a dozen municipalities will suffer.

As little as I respect the Big Three, and as much as I regard everything they make as intolerable crap, if they went bust, the damage it will cause to your country’s economy would be crippling. There are a whole slew of factors working together to ruin your automobile manufacturing industry; namely, the oil crisis and those two rubbish wars which have devastated your economy.

While automobile demands changed almost instantly (a couple years’ time; an instant in the large scale manufacturing industry) with the development of the oil crisis, initiatives then currently underway did not consider such an event, and to cancel initiatives would be costly and ruin investor confidence. So they pressed on and are now being scolded for not being sensitive to today’s issues. You see, large corporations can’t do U-turns; the reason for that is an essay unto itself.

This “bail out” is in the best interest of your country, because to lose any one of the Big Three would do irreparable damage to communities across the continent. Read a bloody economics textbook; learn about the dangers of market fundamentalism; look at the sorry state of your damn country! Clearly something is wrong. Being taxed is not a crime! Privatized healthcare should be. I know the invisible hand of the market is a compelling argument, but it is dangerous ideology — economics is vastly more complicated than you all seem to think. The United States, indeed. It’s like you’re working together to destroy your own nation.

07/29, 5:29 PM

posted by:

xyunya

Chinese and Indian steel in the cars is in not best interest of our country, but assembly lines where cars are screwed together are? We lost textile, steel manufacturing, electronics, and slew of other industries to less expensive labor markets and country will not be able to sustain shift of auto industry form north/midwest to south? Most of automotive industry is actually growing, but not by inept “Big 3″. There are tons of Asian and European assembly factories and components manufacturers are spreading around Carolinas, Texas, Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee. Those factories don’t have unions and don’t have labor relationship like Ford and GM. This can only be good for us, American consumers.

07/29, 5:35 PM

posted by:

sterfry71

Chrysler is closing the St. Louis minivan plant but not the Windsor, Ontario minivan plant. If they are going to close US plants and leave foreign plants open building the same vehicles, they shouldn’t qualify for any assistance from the US government. Tax payers shouldn’t subsidize foreign jobs. I don’t know if GM and Ford have done the same thing but if so, they should be exempt from assistance as well.

07/29, 6:50 PM

posted by:

RaineMan

An extremely valid point sterfry. The Big 3 should not qualify for any federal aid unless they close down their Canadian and (especially) Mexican plants first. Why should the taxpayers give money to them so they can continue to keep employing the citizens of Canada and Mexico… who aren’t paying a dime to help them out.

07/29, 6:55 PM

posted by:

bolex

johnnycanuck you seriously crack me up. lol

07/29, 7:01 PM

posted by:

bolex

Bremen_Koenigsegg, nice right up and i agree. not to get too political its unfortunate that a Canadian can see this but half of the U.S can’t. oh well, this country is going down the drain, we know who’s laregely responsible yet they’ll blame the innocent party on the damages done. ?

07/29, 7:05 PM

posted by:

RaineMan

I hate to say it… but maybe parts of this country need to go down the drain. The rich have been getting richer and the poor have been getting poorer for far too long. Someone needs to reach up and hit the reset button.

07/29, 7:06 PM

posted by:

brentray

Everyone should listen to what Bremen_Koenigsegg has to say. He’s spot on.

Sometimes it takes an objective view to find the answers.

07/29, 7:21 PM

posted by:

Turkle

Beyond simply looking at where cars are being built, I would first have to question how the Big 3 would use this money. Would it go to improving the quality, efficiency, and perception of their products solely in the United States? Would money provided by U.S. taxpayers stop at the border? Or would it help fund the growth of the emerging markets where profits are more immediate (near term) and market share is easier to expand?
I am a believer in free markets and cringe every time I hear of an industry getting “bailed” out by the tax payers. One criteria for each instance should be the immediate dismissal of the CEO, COO, CFO, and senior voting directors of the board.

07/29, 7:42 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

It’s been said may times before< Bush has f@cked it up for everybody for many years to come, thank you to the a@@holes who voted him in twice, now WE are all f*cked.

07/29, 7:55 PM

posted by:

bolex

RaineMan, very true. the middleclass is virtually being wiped out right before our eyes. The U.S continues to give the rich tax incentives to companies that they deem beneficial to them, helping out the U.S Auto is not a growing cash cow like, say the oil business, so they wont help the Domestics…even though it makes up a large part of US economy. so yeah ,we need a reset button…

07/29, 7:57 PM

posted by:

bolex

400horsesSS, tryin to stay away from politics but im with ya’..

07/29, 8:00 PM

posted by:

beatusmongous

Um, yeah, one single person in responsible for messing up the lives of 300 million other people? I don’t think so. He can’t screw everything up without the help of Congress. Sure, I’m pissed because I voted him in and I feel like he turned on me, but there are more than 600 other people there that all pitched in for whatever reason. I don’t even think they are 100% responsible, as I think we citizens need to take quite a bit of responsibility of this upon ourselves as well. I like RaineMan’s suggestion: Hit the reset button! The effects will be drastic, but the strong will survive, and we will become stronger because of it. I have a feeling the reset is coming fast.

07/29, 8:31 PM

posted by:

Turkle

The U.S. does not function as a pure capitalist market (where capitalism trumps all) as a certain Canadian poster assumes most Americans believe. The federal, state, and local governments regulate just about every aspect of our capitalist state. There are also private organizations that regulate through association with employees, consumers, and the executives of companies (ex., unions, ACLU, IEEE, etc.).

The politics of this will prevent it from being voted on. Democrats would dance with glee on the grave site of any one of the Big 3. Liberals will not allow the federal government to prop up the same companies that are responsible for so much green house gas production. Corporations are evil and deserve what they get is the mentality of the hard left, forget that they are made up of hard working, tax paying, contributors to society.

07/29, 8:42 PM

posted by:

DeansterTJ

Blah blah blah ****ing blah.

I’m NOT GIVING MONEY TO A BUNCH OF RICH EXECS SO THEY CAN KEEP GETTING RICHER. **** YOU ALL, THANK YOU ASSHOLES

07/30, 3:53 AM

posted by:

Omnis

Privatize profit, socialize risk. It’s the American way.

07/30, 5:44 AM

posted by:

marcdevon

I’m not American, and I don’t give two ****s about your economy; however, I am Canadian, and our economy is unfortunately quasi-dependent on yours, so it is my prerogative to fill you guys in. Right-wing market fundamentalism will ruin your economy. If you leave it up to the free market, the Big Three will fail, and a dozen municipalities will suffer.

As little as I respect the Big Three, and as much as I regard everything they make as intolerable crap, if they went bust, the damage it will cause to your country’s economy would be crippling. There are a whole slew of factors working together to ruin your automobile manufacturing industry; namely, the oil crisis and those two rubbish wars which have devastated your economy.

While automobile demands changed almost instantly (a couple years’ time; an instant in the large scale manufacturing industry) with the development of the oil crisis, initiatives then currently underway did not consider such an event, and to cancel initiatives would be costly and ruin investor confidence. So they pressed on and are now being scolded for not being sensitive to today’s issues. You see, large corporations can’t do U-turns; the reason for that is an essay unto itself.

This “bail out” is in the best interest of your country, because to lose any one of the Big Three would do irreparable damage to communities across the continent. Read a bloody economics textbook; learn about the dangers of market fundamentalism; look at the sorry state of your damn country! Clearly something is wrong. Being taxed is not a crime! Privatized healthcare should be. I know the invisible hand of the market is a compelling argument, but it is dangerous ideology — economics is vastly more complicated than you all seem to think. The United States, indeed. It’s like you’re working together to destroy your own nation.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There is so much lunacy in this post I don’t know where to begin. You don’t seem to care for a market based economy where producers and buyers freely interact with each other. The free market has been the best wealth creating vehicle encountered by mankind. It has produced numerous products that make our lives enjoyable and better. I guess that you are more acceptable to a command and control economy. It worked well in the USSR didn’t.

What hurting GM, Ford, and Chrysler is not “two rubbish wars”. What’s killing them is the legacy cost associated with paying for the pensions and health care for their retired workers. High gas prices are hurting them because it has reduced the demand for their highly profitable SUVs. My sister used to work for GM as an IE. She told me that they hardly mae money (or may have lost money) on their smaller cars. With the new CAFE standards, congress and the president may have just legislated their most profitable vehicles out of existence (see the wonderful effects of a command and control economy).

The bail out is not in the best interest of the country. If all the idiots who post here along with the idiot writers of LLN feel that way then go ahead and send to GM, Ford, and Chrysler your own bailout check out of your own checking account. Of course none of you numbskulls will do it. You will demand that everyone else fund (via the gubmint) what you are not willing to fund yourself.

By the way, you are right. The economy is very complex. That’s why central planners such as yourself should stay out of it. An economy as big as ours is too big and complex for a few “enlightened” people to plan and control.

Privatized health care should be a crime? That is to say that you would make illegal for a health care provider to provide a service for willing customer a service for an agreed upon price. Man, you are ready for a straight jacket.

07/30, 5:48 AM

posted by:

marcdevon

I hate to say it… but maybe parts of this country need to go down the drain. The rich have been getting richer and the poor have been getting poorer for far too long. Someone needs to reach up and hit the reset button.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Do you care to explain (in detail) how one person becomes richer at the expense of another person becoming poorer? Or would you rather just keep spouting your tired lefting rhetoric?

07/30, 7:18 AM

posted by:

VictorRaikkonen

I agree with Johnnycanuk to an extent. As an Australian, who once lived in the US, I too do not give a rats arse about your economy. Hell, thanks to Bush, your banks, and the former “Big 3,” the Aussie dollar is nearly on par with that of the green back. And.., because of that I can import things from the states for a much cheeper price than it would cost here in oz. Now that I think about it, I do care about your economy because it being in the toilet is good for my wallet plus, unlike Canada, our economy is insulated from the US.

That said, I am surprised not to hear people up in arms over the fact that sine politicians are trying to create a new welfare class to give out money the federal government does not have. Well, I guess they can just print off more money without the gold to actually back it up just as they have in the past, and continue to do so today. I guess it will register with Americans just how screwed their economy is when California considers independence and China offers to purchase Washington state. Hell, with the looks of it Mexico is mounting a hostile take over of Texas and the Cubans south Florida.

07/30, 7:25 AM

posted by:

DeansterTJ

Koenigsegg, you are a ****ing retard. Private healthcare should be a crime?

As a doctor in Canada (public healthcare) I dare say you’d be better served choking off your balls and jerking off to Old Farts/Young Tarts than dispensing your sloppy wasted crap on this site. Thanks asshole!

07/30, 9:03 AM

posted by:

Bremen_Koenigsegg

^ @ Deanster TJ
If you’re not going to make a rebuttal, it is probably best not to say anything at all. Might I suggest moving to America? You don’t come across as polite enough to be Canadian.

^ @ MarcDevon
PICK UP AN ECONOMICS TEXT. The free market, as employed throughout Asia, Africa, South America, and the former Soviet Union, via Washington-based international institutions, is largely responsible for a whole slew of economic failures. The most dramatic examples of which you will find in Russia, Argentina, and that spot of trouble Asia suffered back in 1996-97. You are buying into the same dangerous ideology I mentioned in my original post! And you seem to suffer a very black-and-white mentality. There are varying levels of government intervention, even in market-based economies; I don’t need to be a communist to think the current variety of market capitalism is not working. The only point I am trying to make, MarcDevon, is that a government bailout for any of the Big Three is a good thing for your country. (And that a country as powerful as America should provide free healthcare. It is the economically advantageous thing to do.)

07/30, 9:06 AM

posted by:

xyunya

I have a solution: everybody feeling bad for big 3 and city of Detroit can send them their contribution. It will better your continence and will not affect my pocket. I have pretty clear conscience and frankly don’t give a crap about Detroit’s problem and big 3 problems. They shall pass, I do give a lot of thought about my family and my welfare, and not interested to subsidize any type of ass*holes: corporate or politicos.

marcdevon, right on!

07/30, 9:11 AM

posted by:

xyunya

Bremen_Koenigsegg,there is no such thing as a good government bailout. By definition somebody (taxpayer and consumer) who has nothing to do with business or political failure has to pay for business or politician lack of judgment. As a consumer and taxpayer I am all against it. I have no objection to those who support bailouts do it on charity level, but I have no intention mortgage the future of my children for someone else greed, miscalculation and more often then criminality.

07/30, 9:12 AM

posted by:

xyunya

“more often then not criminality”

07/30, 9:20 AM

posted by:

zoomnbyu

Funny. We have a free enterprise system yet this year alone we need to bail out mortgagees, mortgagers and now the auto industry. Personally, I would like my tax money spent elsewhere! Thank you for listening, Congress. (Yeah, right.) Fix the energy prices and you will fix the economy!!! Make individuals and businesses accountable for their own actions and let the chips fall as they may.

07/30, 1:32 PM

posted by:

jumpoffit

i need some cash, can anyone bail me out?

07/30, 1:55 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

^But what you dont understand is what if you have a foreign neighbor who pays less taxes and is paid to live next to you with steep discounts, you wouldn’t like that would you, its the same **** GM, Ford and whatever DCX is called nowadays.

07/30, 1:59 PM

posted by:

Random Jerk

Is there a dumber argument to justify an expensive government backed redistribution of wealth than saying “well we are spending billions in Iraq”. What kind of idiot reasons like that? “If were wasting a lot of money on X I don’t see why we can’t waste more on Y?”

07/31, 2:43 AM

posted by:

Xile

@Random Jerk –
The argument is one of priorities and severity. If you have someone stealing an apple from the supermarket and another stealing thousands of dollars from a bank, which one would you try to stop? If I use your reasoning, both are crimes so it really doesn’t matter.

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel