Mitsubishi today announced the pricing for its all-new 2007 Eclipse Spyder convertible. With a starting price of $25,389, the Spyder offers premium features reserved for convertibles costing thousands of dollars more. A premium GT edition, featuring a more powerful engine capable of accelerating from zero to 60 mph in about seven seconds, begins at $28,269. All-new Spyders will arrive in dealerships this week.
New car price quote
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
03/13, 4:21 PM
posted by:
captain america
it needs more power
03/13, 4:47 PM
posted by:
John
yeah, a lot more, by the way.
03/13, 5:14 PM
posted by:
Scrumper
It has plenty of power.
What it needs to do is loose weight. Lots of weight.
03/13, 5:22 PM
posted by:
John
fair enough
03/13, 6:57 PM
posted by:
digitalzombie
are they selling the eclipse well? In my opinion it’s really ugly and they have a huge blind spot. I remember the engine being crappy and the weight is around 3000lbs? Anyway just an opinion just wondering if mitsu is selling em eclipses.
03/13, 8:31 PM
posted by:
Nuno
I really don’t like the way these new Eclipses look, the previous generation looked much better.
03/13, 10:27 PM
posted by:
Dre
This car should have been built on the Lancer Evo platform with awd and the 2.0L turbo available
03/14, 12:00 AM
posted by:
Thing2
Yay! NO ONE CARES MITSU!
03/14, 12:35 AM
posted by:
digitalzombie
“This car should have been built on the Lancer Evo platform with awd and the 2.0L turbo available”
mind as well call it an evo lol. Plus this new car your sugguesting will steal away money from the evo if not then it’ll be a waste because they’ll choose evo over your suggestion because the evo have a liter more.
03/14, 1:39 AM
posted by:
gsh
0-60 in 7 seconds for 28k???? hahhahhahh
03/14, 3:18 AM
posted by:
DaveO
No a fan of Mits, but I have to say I like it better than the disproportionate 350Z.
03/14, 3:37 AM
posted by:
digitalzombie
“No a fan of Mits, but I have to say I like it better than the disproportionate 350Z.”
performance wise or just asthetic wise?
03/14, 7:23 AM
posted by:
Dave. T
Everyone that says the mitsu doesn’t have enough power or is overweight hasn’t driven it. Excellent car. Every review I’ve seen, including ours, of the convertible has said it is a better package than the coupe. If you don’t like the looks that’s one thing but if you haven’t driven it don’t complain.
03/14, 5:01 PM
posted by:
Dre
“mind as well call it an evo lol. Plus this new car your sugguesting will steal away money from the evo if not then it’ll be a waste because they’ll choose evo over your suggestion because the evo have a liter more.”
Well for one the evo is a sedan not a coupe, distinct markets. And where did the extra litre come from?!?!?! Building the eclipse on the evo platform would have reduced costs, the evo isnt exactly a high volume car. With the older evos, colts & mirage/cyborgs you could literally bolt on and bolt off most parts and interchange them.
03/14, 6:10 PM
posted by:
digitalzombie
i thought mitsu evo is a 3.0? maybe i’m wrong hehe
03/14, 6:12 PM
posted by:
digitalzombie
ooooo i’m sorry 1997 displacement
03/23, 3:26 PM
posted by:
matthew douglas
i think this one of the most sexiest cars i have ever seen and i want to rape it aaaallllllllllll nnnnniiiigggghhhhhhttttt lllloooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnngggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
06/01, 10:09 PM
posted by:
USA
Don’t waste your money…
But buy a Saturn SKY……..