




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jaguar X-Type: a station wagon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Dillon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon.html#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Dillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/20/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon/#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to know if these people who are condemning the X type are owners or previous owners.  There is a jag-lovers web site and the x type forum has contributors who are unhappy about certain problems with their particular vehicle but lots and lots of people who are extremely happy and would/ hopefully will buy again.

It would be interesting to hear the credentials of the critics!  Other vehicles share floor pans and components indeed it seems difficult to find a vehicle in the X type sector which does not have some sharing - SAAB&#039;s are Vectra&#039;s!! - still seem to have an enthusiastic following but for some reason Jaguar must have every car as a stand alone sharing nothing - get real they are in a very very competitive market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to know if these people who are condemning the X type are owners or previous owners.  There is a jag-lovers web site and the x type forum has contributors who are unhappy about certain problems with their particular vehicle but lots and lots of people who are extremely happy and would/ hopefully will buy again.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to hear the credentials of the critics!  Other vehicles share floor pans and components indeed it seems difficult to find a vehicle in the X type sector which does not have some sharing &#8211; SAAB&#8217;s are Vectra&#8217;s!! &#8211; still seem to have an enthusiastic following but for some reason Jaguar must have every car as a stand alone sharing nothing &#8211; get real they are in a very very competitive market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon.html#comment-7700</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/20/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon/#comment-7700</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even think it was bad for being an upgraded Mondeo.  It was bad because... it was bad.  Upgraded sedans can work; the Lexus ES and Acura TL are perfectly competitive.  It should work for Jaguar too because they don&#039;t emphasize sport over luxury.  

Try again, Jaguar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t even think it was bad for being an upgraded Mondeo.  It was bad because&#8230; it was bad.  Upgraded sedans can work; the Lexus ES and Acura TL are perfectly competitive.  It should work for Jaguar too because they don&#8217;t emphasize sport over luxury.  </p>
<p>Try again, Jaguar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon.html#comment-7694</link>
		<dc:creator>JSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/20/new-jaguar-x-type-a-station-wagon/#comment-7694</guid>
		<description>The X-Type did not fail for being a sedan.  It failed because it was an upgraded Ford Mondeo.  Jaguar can&#039;t afford to alienate its traditional customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The X-Type did not fail for being a sedan.  It failed because it was an upgraded Ford Mondeo.  Jaguar can&#8217;t afford to alienate its traditional customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 188/189 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 14:47:05 -->
