




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Supra? Toyota FT-HS approved for 2009 production?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Htay5500</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311599</link>
		<dc:creator>Htay5500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 01:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311599</guid>
		<description>sharif is rite, give or take, this car isnt even on the road yet, so why are we bagging it if its not in production or if any if us have driven it yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sharif is rite, give or take, this car isnt even on the road yet, so why are we bagging it if its not in production or if any if us have driven it yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311509</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311509</guid>
		<description>Given that Toyota has been building parallel hybrids for a number of year, not just the Prius, but larger more powerful cars as well, I would have to disagree about not snapping one up if one pleases to. 

I would not myself. I still feel that Toyota is pushing a new form of engine boosting with improved fuel economy as a minor side effect. 

But, Hey if Toyota does well by this car then more power to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that Toyota has been building parallel hybrids for a number of year, not just the Prius, but larger more powerful cars as well, I would have to disagree about not snapping one up if one pleases to. </p>
<p>I would not myself. I still feel that Toyota is pushing a new form of engine boosting with improved fuel economy as a minor side effect. </p>
<p>But, Hey if Toyota does well by this car then more power to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilby7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311394</link>
		<dc:creator>gilby7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311394</guid>
		<description>Hey, sorry for the rant gents, probably uncalled for on my part.  Who am I to say anything like that, I&#039;m as much of a meatball as anyone else, sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, sorry for the rant gents, probably uncalled for on my part.  Who am I to say anything like that, I&#8217;m as much of a meatball as anyone else, sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deantj</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311362</link>
		<dc:creator>deantj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311362</guid>
		<description>Hey, did the posting restrictions get lifted? Is it safe to come out (and all over your faces)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, did the posting restrictions get lifted? Is it safe to come out (and all over your faces)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311330</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311330</guid>
		<description>APOLOGIZE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APOLOGIZE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311328</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 15:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311328</guid>
		<description>and honestly i dont think wickedated meant any harm, and how come only whites are capable of racism, using hillbilly or redneck is perfectly acceptable, but if you abbreviate japaneese your a racist? come on guys &quot;why cant we all just get along&quot;. seriously though its our generation that has gone beyond all the racism and intolerance of previous generations, we are the greatest generation based upon social values, forgiveness, and a general acceptance of the masses. a term is only offensive if you let it be offensive.
.
flying sukahara we all did come down a little to harsh,but the first sentence &quot;idiot american&quot; gets people defensive. i apaolgise for my use of jap truck also, i meant no harm, to me jap is short for japaneese and harmless.
.
 but to those in this world who are still close minded i can see their point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and honestly i dont think wickedated meant any harm, and how come only whites are capable of racism, using hillbilly or redneck is perfectly acceptable, but if you abbreviate japaneese your a racist? come on guys &#8220;why cant we all just get along&#8221;. seriously though its our generation that has gone beyond all the racism and intolerance of previous generations, we are the greatest generation based upon social values, forgiveness, and a general acceptance of the masses. a term is only offensive if you let it be offensive.<br />
.<br />
flying sukahara we all did come down a little to harsh,but the first sentence &#8220;idiot american&#8221; gets people defensive. i apaolgise for my use of jap truck also, i meant no harm, to me jap is short for japaneese and harmless.<br />
.<br />
 but to those in this world who are still close minded i can see their point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311327</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311327</guid>
		<description>noun
singular
redneck
hillbilly
a racial slur referring to whites.
Redneck, in modern usage, predominantly refers to a particular stereotype of people who may be found in many regions of the United States or Canada. Originally limited to Appalachia and the American South, and later the Ozarks and Rocky Mountains, this stereotype is now widespread in other states and  Canada
.
.
it goes both ways here in leftlane so dont get all offended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noun<br />
singular<br />
redneck<br />
hillbilly<br />
a racial slur referring to whites.<br />
Redneck, in modern usage, predominantly refers to a particular stereotype of people who may be found in many regions of the United States or Canada. Originally limited to Appalachia and the American South, and later the Ozarks and Rocky Mountains, this stereotype is now widespread in other states and  Canada<br />
.<br />
.<br />
it goes both ways here in leftlane so dont get all offended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vdub</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311316</link>
		<dc:creator>Vdub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 03:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311316</guid>
		<description>Noun
Singular
Jap
  Plural
Japs
 

Jap (plural Japs)

(derogatory, racial slur) A person from Japan or of Japanese ancestry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noun<br />
Singular<br />
Jap<br />
  Plural<br />
Japs</p>
<p>Jap (plural Japs)</p>
<p>(derogatory, racial slur) A person from Japan or of Japanese ancestry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311311</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311311</guid>
		<description>Actually Ferrari&#039;s &quot;400 and 500 series&quot; has steadily been evolving in style for decades. I won&#039;t deny similarities but somehow I don&#039;t think the designers said &quot;let&#039;s make a Supra&quot;.  The profile is very similar, but then so is a first gen VIper, a 1973 Corvette, and 1969 Jaguar XK, the list goes on up and down auto history. It&#039;s good shape that works. you really can&#039;t same anyone copied anyone anymore. It&#039;s all been done ten times already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Ferrari&#8217;s &#8220;400 and 500 series&#8221; has steadily been evolving in style for decades. I won&#8217;t deny similarities but somehow I don&#8217;t think the designers said &#8220;let&#8217;s make a Supra&#8221;.  The profile is very similar, but then so is a first gen VIper, a 1973 Corvette, and 1969 Jaguar XK, the list goes on up and down auto history. It&#8217;s good shape that works. you really can&#8217;t same anyone copied anyone anymore. It&#8217;s all been done ten times already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naggs</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311306</link>
		<dc:creator>naggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311306</guid>
		<description>for everyone wondering where that 25 mpg estimate came from, see the article in automobile magazine about the fths concept car. that is TOYOTA&#039;S ESTIMATE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for everyone wondering where that 25 mpg estimate came from, see the article in automobile magazine about the fths concept car. that is TOYOTA&#8217;S ESTIMATE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naggs</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311305</link>
		<dc:creator>naggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311305</guid>
		<description>&quot;You lost me at &quot;jap cars&quot;. What kind of redneck meatball would say that post-1942? Unreal. Then everyone piles up on Sukahara for his/her hybrid comments? What a bunch of weirdos. Let&#039;s have some more everyone-that-drives-a-Prius-is-gay comments, or everyone-that-drives-a-Subaru-is-gay comments. Yeee&#039;uh, knuckle-draggin&#039; dirt-hick redneck Ameri&#039;kuns.
Fire up the General Lee boys, I think I saw a darkie a&#039;talkin&#039; to a white girl..

Comment by gilby7, posted on May11 at 6:42 am &quot;

wow that a pretty long rant considering that he simply abreviated japanesse, dumbass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You lost me at &#8220;jap cars&#8221;. What kind of redneck meatball would say that post-1942? Unreal. Then everyone piles up on Sukahara for his/her hybrid comments? What a bunch of weirdos. Let&#8217;s have some more everyone-that-drives-a-Prius-is-gay comments, or everyone-that-drives-a-Subaru-is-gay comments. Yeee&#8217;uh, knuckle-draggin&#8217; dirt-hick redneck Ameri&#8217;kuns.<br />
Fire up the General Lee boys, I think I saw a darkie a&#8217;talkin&#8217; to a white girl..</p>
<p>Comment by gilby7, posted on May11 at 6:42 am &#8221;</p>
<p>wow that a pretty long rant considering that he simply abreviated japanesse, dumbass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naggs</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311304</link>
		<dc:creator>naggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311304</guid>
		<description>i agree with other, this thing is stupid. the added weight isnt worth the hybridness. a hybrid sportscar is retared. any reasonably light weight sports car will get better milage than this thing and have the advantage of being lighter weight and much more affordable.

now if they are just going to put their 300 hp direct inject v6 into a car that looks the concept, well then they might be onto something but even then its not going to work at the $40-50k pricepoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with other, this thing is stupid. the added weight isnt worth the hybridness. a hybrid sportscar is retared. any reasonably light weight sports car will get better milage than this thing and have the advantage of being lighter weight and much more affordable.</p>
<p>now if they are just going to put their 300 hp direct inject v6 into a car that looks the concept, well then they might be onto something but even then its not going to work at the $40-50k pricepoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311285</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311285</guid>
		<description>The last Supra was the only one that I would remotely consider a &quot;sports&quot; car, with styling that has recently been aped by the Ferrari 599GTB Fiorano!  The first Supra was simply a stretched 6-cylinder Celica, and the second was a bloated, 280Z 2+2-like tourer with clear bodyside moldings! :0

I&#039;d like to see a new Supra that competes in size, performance and price with the Z and RX-8, which would rule out a V8 hybrid.. but then again, shouldn&#039;t that be reserved for the $100K Lexus variant of this platform instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last Supra was the only one that I would remotely consider a &#8220;sports&#8221; car, with styling that has recently been aped by the Ferrari 599GTB Fiorano!  The first Supra was simply a stretched 6-cylinder Celica, and the second was a bloated, 280Z 2+2-like tourer with clear bodyside moldings! :0</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see a new Supra that competes in size, performance and price with the Z and RX-8, which would rule out a V8 hybrid.. but then again, shouldn&#8217;t that be reserved for the $100K Lexus variant of this platform instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311273</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 22:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311273</guid>
		<description>Who gives a damn about this POS vehicle anyway? Fugly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a damn about this POS vehicle anyway? Fugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311270</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311270</guid>
		<description>V-series, 

Which year are you talking about? Last version of the  Supra was a beautiful car, with good but questionable performance (a C4 took turns better). It is still a very evocative name and I think well worth bringing back.  

In fact, they are but the car they peg as the next Supra (That one looks sweet too) is more in line to compete with the Standard C6 Corvette in terms of performance and price (But not the Z06 forget the SS/&quot;Blue Devil&quot;/Z07). Sadly when the Supra does ship, if in that form, It&#039;ll be behind the C7, which is said to base with specs on par with C6 Z06. If the FT-HS can make with Handling, it could be a solid runner though it&#039;s max speed and/or braking could suffer (I expect a car that weighs in at around 3500 lbs at least)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V-series, </p>
<p>Which year are you talking about? Last version of the  Supra was a beautiful car, with good but questionable performance (a C4 took turns better). It is still a very evocative name and I think well worth bringing back.  </p>
<p>In fact, they are but the car they peg as the next Supra (That one looks sweet too) is more in line to compete with the Standard C6 Corvette in terms of performance and price (But not the Z06 forget the SS/&#8221;Blue Devil&#8221;/Z07). Sadly when the Supra does ship, if in that form, It&#8217;ll be behind the C7, which is said to base with specs on par with C6 Z06. If the FT-HS can make with Handling, it could be a solid runner though it&#8217;s max speed and/or braking could suffer (I expect a car that weighs in at around 3500 lbs at least)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V-series</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311263</link>
		<dc:creator>V-series</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 21:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311263</guid>
		<description>the supra was such an ugly car...  why would we want it back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the supra was such an ugly car&#8230;  why would we want it back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311242</guid>
		<description>Z06ified- would you post your add ons? I for one am curious how you were able to extend the range on your Vette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Z06ified- would you post your add ons? I for one am curious how you were able to extend the range on your Vette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEKS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311237</link>
		<dc:creator>WEKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311237</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also interested in Z06ified&#039;s City MPGs too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also interested in Z06ified&#8217;s City MPGs too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311221</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 16:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311221</guid>
		<description>The Corvette is EPA Rated (old system) at 17 and 25, but because of it&#039;s efficient design, something more cars Could use, hearing it pull off 30+ MPG does not surprise me. after all these are people counting how much they put in the car and how far they went with it. 

Toyota, as I have said before is using Hybrid technology as a replacement for Turbos and Superchargers. They weigh more and cost more and they don&#039;t add to the cars maximum performance, in fact they hinder it. But what Parallel Hybrids do is give instant and incredible acceleration, assuming th motors are very powerful. But then again the motors, Like a turbo or supercharger may only  be boosting the smaller engine. 

At slower speeds the motors could be useful to extend F/econ, for not considering what one has to go though to get one of the cars built (This may also apply to the VOLT so I&#039;m not taking sides here), but Hybrids need batteries. Those batteries are typically highly toxic things, made in specialized facilities far from were the car will be sold. Those batteries must be shipped. Shipped takes a enormous amount of fuel, considering Toyota makes its batteries and ships them from JAPAN.

Those batteries typically CAN NOT be recycled so they have to be disposed of somehow when they wear out, more pollution and worse pollution. They are made with Heavy metals that defy recycling. Lithium ION/polymer/Magnesium batteries can be recycled but do have their safety issues (Li-Mg batts not so much).

In recent studies comparing a Prius to an H2, the H2 was far less polluting than the Prius because of the extremely inefficient manufacture and shipping of the Prius. The actually F/econ relative to the manufacturing shipping and so on was more like 5 MPG, Remember this includes shipping the batteries from JAPAN then all over the country to build the cars in the US, as opposed to the H2s 9 MPG. 

It will require some looking in to, but I&#039;m sure GM is aware of theses studies and will try to reduce the VOLT&#039;s impact with more efficient manufacturing and shipping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Corvette is EPA Rated (old system) at 17 and 25, but because of it&#8217;s efficient design, something more cars Could use, hearing it pull off 30+ MPG does not surprise me. after all these are people counting how much they put in the car and how far they went with it. </p>
<p>Toyota, as I have said before is using Hybrid technology as a replacement for Turbos and Superchargers. They weigh more and cost more and they don&#8217;t add to the cars maximum performance, in fact they hinder it. But what Parallel Hybrids do is give instant and incredible acceleration, assuming th motors are very powerful. But then again the motors, Like a turbo or supercharger may only  be boosting the smaller engine. </p>
<p>At slower speeds the motors could be useful to extend F/econ, for not considering what one has to go though to get one of the cars built (This may also apply to the VOLT so I&#8217;m not taking sides here), but Hybrids need batteries. Those batteries are typically highly toxic things, made in specialized facilities far from were the car will be sold. Those batteries must be shipped. Shipped takes a enormous amount of fuel, considering Toyota makes its batteries and ships them from JAPAN.</p>
<p>Those batteries typically CAN NOT be recycled so they have to be disposed of somehow when they wear out, more pollution and worse pollution. They are made with Heavy metals that defy recycling. Lithium ION/polymer/Magnesium batteries can be recycled but do have their safety issues (Li-Mg batts not so much).</p>
<p>In recent studies comparing a Prius to an H2, the H2 was far less polluting than the Prius because of the extremely inefficient manufacture and shipping of the Prius. The actually F/econ relative to the manufacturing shipping and so on was more like 5 MPG, Remember this includes shipping the batteries from JAPAN then all over the country to build the cars in the US, as opposed to the H2s 9 MPG. </p>
<p>It will require some looking in to, but I&#8217;m sure GM is aware of theses studies and will try to reduce the VOLT&#8217;s impact with more efficient manufacturing and shipping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311212</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311212</guid>
		<description>DoD as well, but that&#039;s really only good for something like a 6% economy increase. It&#039;s the Vette&#039;s advanced design that really shines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DoD as well, but that&#8217;s really only good for something like a 6% economy increase. It&#8217;s the Vette&#8217;s advanced design that really shines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311208</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311208</guid>
		<description>^ Displacement on demand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Displacement on demand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311202</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311202</guid>
		<description>Lacrosse is a totally different car with a totally different engine. The Corvette pulls off nice mileage because of low weight (for a V8 sports car) and low drag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lacrosse is a totally different car with a totally different engine. The Corvette pulls off nice mileage because of low weight (for a V8 sports car) and low drag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suthuna</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311194</link>
		<dc:creator>suthuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311194</guid>
		<description>All you Corvette guys, how do you pull off 25mpg in the city? I&#039;m in a Buick Lacrosse rental and in 5 miles of stop-and-go everyday, I&#039;m doing about 22.3 or so. That is me being extremely conservative with acceleration, coasting a lot and even using neutral.

For me, a hybrid is the best option because it&#039;d operate in electric mode most of the commute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you Corvette guys, how do you pull off 25mpg in the city? I&#8217;m in a Buick Lacrosse rental and in 5 miles of stop-and-go everyday, I&#8217;m doing about 22.3 or so. That is me being extremely conservative with acceleration, coasting a lot and even using neutral.</p>
<p>For me, a hybrid is the best option because it&#8217;d operate in electric mode most of the commute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311192</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311192</guid>
		<description>Zero - Why am I worried about nickel mines? Do a search for Sudbury, Canada. And read up on the process of smelting. It&#039;s not a pretty thing. Toyota has already said lithium Ion is a long way out. The Tesla is suppose to have a lithium ion, that car is not ready for the public either. I&#039;m sure it will be once they figure out how to keep the pack from blowing up. Just think how warm your cell phone gets from talking on it... amplify that for a car...

Everyone else - 25mpg is MY estimate. It&#039;s an educated estimate considering what the similarly equiped Lexus GS450h gets. It&#039;s also a logical deduction...The Prius only gets 41mpg average and that vehicle is meant to achieve very high standards. I&#039;ll meet everone back here when the real numbers come out, see how close I am.

I appreciate Lotusfire&#039;s intellectual honesty. Some others could benefit from this... I&#039;m not trying to bash this car per se, I like the way it looks, and I like Toyota. I happen to really like the V8 that&#039;s in this car. However, hybrid cars with batteries are not the answer to any problem, performance, economy or environment. There are other ways. If you are wondering why I don&#039;t care for hybrids, I have detailed it out in my comments above. If you still don&#039;t understand, I don&#039;t know what else to tell ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zero &#8211; Why am I worried about nickel mines? Do a search for Sudbury, Canada. And read up on the process of smelting. It&#8217;s not a pretty thing. Toyota has already said lithium Ion is a long way out. The Tesla is suppose to have a lithium ion, that car is not ready for the public either. I&#8217;m sure it will be once they figure out how to keep the pack from blowing up. Just think how warm your cell phone gets from talking on it&#8230; amplify that for a car&#8230;</p>
<p>Everyone else &#8211; 25mpg is MY estimate. It&#8217;s an educated estimate considering what the similarly equiped Lexus GS450h gets. It&#8217;s also a logical deduction&#8230;The Prius only gets 41mpg average and that vehicle is meant to achieve very high standards. I&#8217;ll meet everone back here when the real numbers come out, see how close I am.</p>
<p>I appreciate Lotusfire&#8217;s intellectual honesty. Some others could benefit from this&#8230; I&#8217;m not trying to bash this car per se, I like the way it looks, and I like Toyota. I happen to really like the V8 that&#8217;s in this car. However, hybrid cars with batteries are not the answer to any problem, performance, economy or environment. There are other ways. If you are wondering why I don&#8217;t care for hybrids, I have detailed it out in my comments above. If you still don&#8217;t understand, I don&#8217;t know what else to tell ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilby7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311190</link>
		<dc:creator>gilby7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 11:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311190</guid>
		<description>You lost me at &quot;jap cars&quot;.  What kind of redneck meatball would say that post-1942?  Unreal.  Then everyone piles up on Sukahara for his/her hybrid comments?  What a bunch of weirdos.  Let&#039;s have some more everyone-that-drives-a-Prius-is-gay comments, or everyone-that-drives-a-Subaru-is-gay comments.  Yeee&#039;uh, knuckle-draggin&#039; dirt-hick redneck Ameri&#039;kuns.
Fire up the General Lee boys, I think I saw a darkie a&#039;talkin&#039; to a white girl..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lost me at &#8220;jap cars&#8221;.  What kind of redneck meatball would say that post-1942?  Unreal.  Then everyone piles up on Sukahara for his/her hybrid comments?  What a bunch of weirdos.  Let&#8217;s have some more everyone-that-drives-a-Prius-is-gay comments, or everyone-that-drives-a-Subaru-is-gay comments.  Yeee&#8217;uh, knuckle-draggin&#8217; dirt-hick redneck Ameri&#8217;kuns.<br />
Fire up the General Lee boys, I think I saw a darkie a&#8217;talkin&#8217; to a white girl..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zer0</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311178</link>
		<dc:creator>Zer0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311178</guid>
		<description>A couple of points here:
First off, I like the styling. It&#039;s definitely Toyota, and it&#039;s definitely eye-catching and different than almost anything on the road.

Performance wise, it may do no better 0-60 or MPG (but we don&#039;t know for sure yet, do we?) than a Z06..... but that costs quite a bit more than this cars estimated price point.

As the electric portion of this drivetrain improves in future models, so will the efficiency, much faster than the combustion engine portion. Applaud Toyota for the fact that they are trying to move on in this direction, when most companies have not even attempted to scratch the surface.

As far as weight, I have read about this car elsewhere, and have heard that they are considering a lot of lightweight materials, even going so far as to use carbon fiber for the WHEELS. (but this idea makes you question the price point again.)

For those who want to say that guys who like v-8&#039;s won&#039;t buy this car, you&#039;re right. Some people are unrealistically attached to the throaty growl (which I myself enjoy) and insist that they have a combustion engine that has exactly 8 big cylinders in it. But more importantly, I like my cars fast and could ultimately care less if they can deliver their quoted speed/power at the quoted price.

Piablo, why are you worried about nickel mines? They also did not mention anything about Nickel Metal Hydride batteries, so this is just speculation. They may be using Lithium Ion, and don&#039;t get me started about a lithium shortage, we (earth) have plenty of it we just haven&#039;t found a cost effective way to mine and refine it yet.

AND FINALLY FOR FLYING SUKAHARA:

How dare you call us a bunch of gas-guzzling, know-nothings who care nothing about the environment (I&#039;m paraphrasing) just because a Japan-based car company has a HYBRID sports car? Perhaps someone should remind you about a little American car company called Tesla, that makes an ALL-ELECTRIC sports car.(which, BTW is just as fast as this, is built on a modified Lotus chassis and is closer to production than this is).  If we&#039;re only going to compare one car to an entire country&#039;s offerings, then I submit the Tesla Roadster.  When Toyota makes something more efficient, call me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points here:<br />
First off, I like the styling. It&#8217;s definitely Toyota, and it&#8217;s definitely eye-catching and different than almost anything on the road.</p>
<p>Performance wise, it may do no better 0-60 or MPG (but we don&#8217;t know for sure yet, do we?) than a Z06&#8230;.. but that costs quite a bit more than this cars estimated price point.</p>
<p>As the electric portion of this drivetrain improves in future models, so will the efficiency, much faster than the combustion engine portion. Applaud Toyota for the fact that they are trying to move on in this direction, when most companies have not even attempted to scratch the surface.</p>
<p>As far as weight, I have read about this car elsewhere, and have heard that they are considering a lot of lightweight materials, even going so far as to use carbon fiber for the WHEELS. (but this idea makes you question the price point again.)</p>
<p>For those who want to say that guys who like v-8&#8242;s won&#8217;t buy this car, you&#8217;re right. Some people are unrealistically attached to the throaty growl (which I myself enjoy) and insist that they have a combustion engine that has exactly 8 big cylinders in it. But more importantly, I like my cars fast and could ultimately care less if they can deliver their quoted speed/power at the quoted price.</p>
<p>Piablo, why are you worried about nickel mines? They also did not mention anything about Nickel Metal Hydride batteries, so this is just speculation. They may be using Lithium Ion, and don&#8217;t get me started about a lithium shortage, we (earth) have plenty of it we just haven&#8217;t found a cost effective way to mine and refine it yet.</p>
<p>AND FINALLY FOR FLYING SUKAHARA:</p>
<p>How dare you call us a bunch of gas-guzzling, know-nothings who care nothing about the environment (I&#8217;m paraphrasing) just because a Japan-based car company has a HYBRID sports car? Perhaps someone should remind you about a little American car company called Tesla, that makes an ALL-ELECTRIC sports car.(which, BTW is just as fast as this, is built on a modified Lotus chassis and is closer to production than this is).  If we&#8217;re only going to compare one car to an entire country&#8217;s offerings, then I submit the Tesla Roadster.  When Toyota makes something more efficient, call me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotusfire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311169</link>
		<dc:creator>lotusfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311169</guid>
		<description>Ricardo, I agree that price is key. Especially with the next-gen GT-R, Espirit, NSX, Corvette, etc ALL coming out within 2 model years of eachother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricardo, I agree that price is key. Especially with the next-gen GT-R, Espirit, NSX, Corvette, etc ALL coming out within 2 model years of eachother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotusfire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311168</link>
		<dc:creator>lotusfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311168</guid>
		<description>^lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acura_el2000</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311167</link>
		<dc:creator>acura_el2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311167</guid>
		<description>STOP SAYING 25MPG there was NO mention of milage. God damn!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOP SAYING 25MPG there was NO mention of milage. God damn!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311166</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311166</guid>
		<description>high 30`s without a doubt but i also doubt it will beat the 41 that the prius gets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>high 30`s without a doubt but i also doubt it will beat the 41 that the prius gets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311165</guid>
		<description>Methinks Flying Fukka-whorah has some hate he needs to vent at the Shrink-san&#039;s office.

I also am not particularly impressed with hybrids (a decent Honda Civic does about as well as a Prius) and the concept of 0-60 in 4 seconds plus 25mpg is yesterday&#039;s news.  But ... if Toyota brings this performance to the market at 30k to 40k, then they one-upped the Corvette which is a pretty pricey item anymore.

With regard to styling, this is just a standard dated Nouveau-Gobot look but since Toyota can put stylistic shit on wheels and sell it, this will be all over the road too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks Flying Fukka-whorah has some hate he needs to vent at the Shrink-san&#8217;s office.</p>
<p>I also am not particularly impressed with hybrids (a decent Honda Civic does about as well as a Prius) and the concept of 0-60 in 4 seconds plus 25mpg is yesterday&#8217;s news.  But &#8230; if Toyota brings this performance to the market at 30k to 40k, then they one-upped the Corvette which is a pretty pricey item anymore.</p>
<p>With regard to styling, this is just a standard dated Nouveau-Gobot look but since Toyota can put stylistic shit on wheels and sell it, this will be all over the road too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acura_el2000</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311153</link>
		<dc:creator>acura_el2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 21:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311153</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don&#039;t have a 505hp Z06. That one gets 26 MPG on the highway, and about 21 MPG average. Hardly a gas guzzler, and I&#039;m willing to bet this Toyota hybrid sports car won&#039;t do much better if at all, with substantially less horsepower.

I have an &#039;02 Z06 with 450hp thanks to a few bolt-on mods that not only increased its horsepower, but also improved its fuel efficiency. It gets 33 MPG on the highway, and 25 MPG average city/highway. When it was stock, it got 28 MPG on the highway with 405 hp. &quot;&quot;

First off were the F**K did this 25mpg talk come from? there was absolutely no milleage posted in the article....

secondly, this is a hybrid engine, which generally speaking gets 25-30% more mpg then a conventional vehicle. 

you say your 450hp Z06 can get 33mpg highway?? then you can bet your friggen ass this toyota is going to get high 30&#039;s to mid 40&#039;s..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t have a 505hp Z06. That one gets 26 MPG on the highway, and about 21 MPG average. Hardly a gas guzzler, and I&#8217;m willing to bet this Toyota hybrid sports car won&#8217;t do much better if at all, with substantially less horsepower.</p>
<p>I have an &#8217;02 Z06 with 450hp thanks to a few bolt-on mods that not only increased its horsepower, but also improved its fuel efficiency. It gets 33 MPG on the highway, and 25 MPG average city/highway. When it was stock, it got 28 MPG on the highway with 405 hp. &#8220;&#8221;</p>
<p>First off were the F**K did this 25mpg talk come from? there was absolutely no milleage posted in the article&#8230;.</p>
<p>secondly, this is a hybrid engine, which generally speaking gets 25-30% more mpg then a conventional vehicle. </p>
<p>you say your 450hp Z06 can get 33mpg highway?? then you can bet your friggen ass this toyota is going to get high 30&#8242;s to mid 40&#8242;s..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotusfire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311151</link>
		<dc:creator>lotusfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311151</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that&#039;s interesting, Piablo. I&#039;ve heard terrible things about the way miners live. Actually, I&#039;ve also heard that more polution is sent into the atmosphere making hybrid cars than in an SUV&#039;s entire lifetime of poluting. So I won&#039;t dissagree that hybrids aren&#039;t really helping the situation--at least not right now. Problem is that the consumers don&#039;t really care..at least in the case of the Prius, they&#039;re saving money and time, and controversial reports seem to be swept under the rug.
.
.
Anyway, I still think it&#039;s a cool idea simply because it&#039;s a new technology, and I think that if it can keep up with proven methods, that&#039;s enough...without having to shatter them. From a scientific point of view anyway. I believe there will be pros and cons to owning this car as opposed to a Corvette. 
.
.
But I acknowledge that hybrids do not seem to be the way forward...at least not right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#8217;s interesting, Piablo. I&#8217;ve heard terrible things about the way miners live. Actually, I&#8217;ve also heard that more polution is sent into the atmosphere making hybrid cars than in an SUV&#8217;s entire lifetime of poluting. So I won&#8217;t dissagree that hybrids aren&#8217;t really helping the situation&#8211;at least not right now. Problem is that the consumers don&#8217;t really care..at least in the case of the Prius, they&#8217;re saving money and time, and controversial reports seem to be swept under the rug.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
Anyway, I still think it&#8217;s a cool idea simply because it&#8217;s a new technology, and I think that if it can keep up with proven methods, that&#8217;s enough&#8230;without having to shatter them. From a scientific point of view anyway. I believe there will be pros and cons to owning this car as opposed to a Corvette.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
But I acknowledge that hybrids do not seem to be the way forward&#8230;at least not right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonstew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311138</link>
		<dc:creator>jonstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311138</guid>
		<description>piablo, you are crazy if you think a cast iron exhaust manifold, cast iron downpipe, 2nd cat, turbo, intercooler and piping will only weigh 100lbs and that is if it&#039;s air to air which it likely would not be....  You are talking about a car you know nothing about and instead of thinking &quot;I&#039;ll see what happens when it comes out&quot; you are condemming it with no good or real reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>piablo, you are crazy if you think a cast iron exhaust manifold, cast iron downpipe, 2nd cat, turbo, intercooler and piping will only weigh 100lbs and that is if it&#8217;s air to air which it likely would not be&#8230;.  You are talking about a car you know nothing about and instead of thinking &#8220;I&#8217;ll see what happens when it comes out&#8221; you are condemming it with no good or real reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z06ified</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311132</link>
		<dc:creator>Z06ified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311132</guid>
		<description>&quot;im thinking it will be priced similarly to the new skyline GT-R, $40,000 is just far too cheap to have all the things that it says it will have. 2009 is just around the corner so its not that long of a wait.&quot;

Comment by homeboy234, posted on May10 at 2:30 pm 

That&#039;s the most sensible post homeboy234 has ever made.  I&#039;m shocked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;im thinking it will be priced similarly to the new skyline GT-R, $40,000 is just far too cheap to have all the things that it says it will have. 2009 is just around the corner so its not that long of a wait.&#8221;</p>
<p>Comment by homeboy234, posted on May10 at 2:30 pm </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the most sensible post homeboy234 has ever made.  I&#8217;m shocked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z06ified</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311130</link>
		<dc:creator>Z06ified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311130</guid>
		<description>&quot;If it weighs 3200lbs with 400hp it should pull better times than 4seconds.&quot;

Nah - the &#039;02 Z06 I have weighs 3,150 lbs. with 405hp and did 3.9 seconds 0-60 when stock (published times), and that&#039;s pushing it (power shifting, etc.).

&quot;A stock G weighs about 3500lbs and only 280hp pulling about 4.5secs 0-60.&quot;
Comment by njg35, posted on May10 at 2:26 pm 

I know you corrected this to 5.5 seconds, and while it&#039;s probably been done before, the 280hp InfinitiG35 coupe 6MT is a 5.7 second 0-60 car realistically.  Many auto magazines tested it, and consistently got 5.7 0-60.  I used to own an &#039;03 so I know first hand :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If it weighs 3200lbs with 400hp it should pull better times than 4seconds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah &#8211; the &#8217;02 Z06 I have weighs 3,150 lbs. with 405hp and did 3.9 seconds 0-60 when stock (published times), and that&#8217;s pushing it (power shifting, etc.).</p>
<p>&#8220;A stock G weighs about 3500lbs and only 280hp pulling about 4.5secs 0-60.&#8221;<br />
Comment by njg35, posted on May10 at 2:26 pm </p>
<p>I know you corrected this to 5.5 seconds, and while it&#8217;s probably been done before, the 280hp InfinitiG35 coupe 6MT is a 5.7 second 0-60 car realistically.  Many auto magazines tested it, and consistently got 5.7 0-60.  I used to own an &#8217;03 so I know first hand <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311128</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed Z06

Flying Sukahara
Too bad the Supra will never have the racing heritage of the Vette though Sure the JGTC is cool but American Lemans and Lemans 24hr is better. I may not be a Vette fanboy but don&#039;t try to dismis it and what it has accomplished in automotive history. Now enough feeding the troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed Z06</p>
<p>Flying Sukahara<br />
Too bad the Supra will never have the racing heritage of the Vette though Sure the JGTC is cool but American Lemans and Lemans 24hr is better. I may not be a Vette fanboy but don&#8217;t try to dismis it and what it has accomplished in automotive history. Now enough feeding the troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311127</guid>
		<description>&quot;
&quot;I&#039;m not so sure buyers of those cars would be very interested in a hybrid sports car.  Buyers of V-8 Mustangs and Camaros are interested in the cars styling and V-8 performance and sound, and for the most part really don&#039;t care much about fuel economy or eco-friendliness.  350z and RX8 buyers are more interested in handing, styling, and bang for the buck.  I highly doubt Toyota will be able to build a hybrid sports car that will handle better than those cars, given the inherent weight problem with hybrids, and Toyotas history of building mediocre-handling cars in recent years.&quot;
Good points Z06.
I think Homeboy was also correct that this may be the precursor of a Supra fighter. I think that Toyota will offer the car in a Base config (3.5 v6) , eco friendly (3.5v6 hybrid) and a turbo to compete with the GT-R.

Basically the Supra has enough Fast abd Furious fanboys that will buy it regardless. 2009 will see the Camaro Challenger (2008 but still fresh), Nissan GT-R and this? What a good year for auto enthusiasts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m not so sure buyers of those cars would be very interested in a hybrid sports car.  Buyers of V-8 Mustangs and Camaros are interested in the cars styling and V-8 performance and sound, and for the most part really don&#8217;t care much about fuel economy or eco-friendliness.  350z and RX8 buyers are more interested in handing, styling, and bang for the buck.  I highly doubt Toyota will be able to build a hybrid sports car that will handle better than those cars, given the inherent weight problem with hybrids, and Toyotas history of building mediocre-handling cars in recent years.&#8221;<br />
Good points Z06.<br />
I think Homeboy was also correct that this may be the precursor of a Supra fighter. I think that Toyota will offer the car in a Base config (3.5 v6) , eco friendly (3.5v6 hybrid) and a turbo to compete with the GT-R.</p>
<p>Basically the Supra has enough Fast abd Furious fanboys that will buy it regardless. 2009 will see the Camaro Challenger (2008 but still fresh), Nissan GT-R and this? What a good year for auto enthusiasts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z06ified</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311126</link>
		<dc:creator>Z06ified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311126</guid>
		<description>&quot; You know what I mean Z06! It will beat your vette not only at the pump but in real terms. When your vette is fueling at the Pump fueling is gas guzzling 505 HP engine- I will be miles down the road now who really is ahead me or you. &quot; Comment by Flying Sukahara, posted on May10 at 11:09 am 

I don&#039;t have a 505hp Z06.  That one gets 26 MPG on the highway, and about 21 MPG average.  Hardly a gas guzzler, and I&#039;m willing to bet this Toyota hybrid sports car won&#039;t do much better if at all, with substantially less horsepower.  

I have an &#039;02 Z06 with 450hp thanks to a few bolt-on mods that not only increased its horsepower, but also improved its fuel efficiency.  It gets 33 MPG on the highway, and 25 MPG average city/highway.  When it was stock, it got 28 MPG on the highway with 405 hp.  

If the Toyota hybrid sports car can do better than that, I&#039;ll be impressed.  But if the hybrid Lexus LS600h is any indicication, it will be a miserable failure at improving fuel efficiency in this application.  

&quot;Ah sooo. I think me. So I win. Sooo sorry!&quot;

I think you&#039;re a rambling idiot.  So sorry for you indeed!

Go bow down to your rising sun.  I&#039;ve gotta drive home in my 450hp 33mpg Z06.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; You know what I mean Z06! It will beat your vette not only at the pump but in real terms. When your vette is fueling at the Pump fueling is gas guzzling 505 HP engine- I will be miles down the road now who really is ahead me or you. &#8221; Comment by Flying Sukahara, posted on May10 at 11:09 am </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a 505hp Z06.  That one gets 26 MPG on the highway, and about 21 MPG average.  Hardly a gas guzzler, and I&#8217;m willing to bet this Toyota hybrid sports car won&#8217;t do much better if at all, with substantially less horsepower.  </p>
<p>I have an &#8217;02 Z06 with 450hp thanks to a few bolt-on mods that not only increased its horsepower, but also improved its fuel efficiency.  It gets 33 MPG on the highway, and 25 MPG average city/highway.  When it was stock, it got 28 MPG on the highway with 405 hp.  </p>
<p>If the Toyota hybrid sports car can do better than that, I&#8217;ll be impressed.  But if the hybrid Lexus LS600h is any indicication, it will be a miserable failure at improving fuel efficiency in this application.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Ah sooo. I think me. So I win. Sooo sorry!&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re a rambling idiot.  So sorry for you indeed!</p>
<p>Go bow down to your rising sun.  I&#8217;ve gotta drive home in my 450hp 33mpg Z06.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homeboy234</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311117</link>
		<dc:creator>homeboy234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311117</guid>
		<description>im thinking it will be priced similarly to the new skyline GT-R, $40,000 is just far too cheap to have all the things that it says it will have. 2009 is just around the corner so its not that long of a wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im thinking it will be priced similarly to the new skyline GT-R, $40,000 is just far too cheap to have all the things that it says it will have. 2009 is just around the corner so its not that long of a wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njg35</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311116</link>
		<dc:creator>njg35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311116</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys...I tried to say 0-60 in 5.5sec!  Wtf am I smoking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys&#8230;I tried to say 0-60 in 5.5sec!  Wtf am I smoking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: njg35</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311115</link>
		<dc:creator>njg35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311115</guid>
		<description>If it weighs 3200lbs with 400hp it should pull better times than 4seconds.  That thing is weighing about 3500lbs.  A stock G weighs about 3500lbs and only 280hp pulling about 4.5secs 0-60.  Don&#039;t know if they&#039;re just making up numbers to keep everything a secret, but those numbers just don&#039;t seem right to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it weighs 3200lbs with 400hp it should pull better times than 4seconds.  That thing is weighing about 3500lbs.  A stock G weighs about 3500lbs and only 280hp pulling about 4.5secs 0-60.  Don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re just making up numbers to keep everything a secret, but those numbers just don&#8217;t seem right to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311114</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311114</guid>
		<description>Jonstew - Batteries, electric motor, and the systems needed to govern them = $5000 and an additional 800lbs in weight. Turbo setup, the same cost, maybe even cheaper, less than 100lbs, with 100hp gain. Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonstew &#8211; Batteries, electric motor, and the systems needed to govern them = $5000 and an additional 800lbs in weight. Turbo setup, the same cost, maybe even cheaper, less than 100lbs, with 100hp gain. Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z06ified</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311111</link>
		<dc:creator>Z06ified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 19:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311111</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also don&#039;t forget that Toyota is the one current car company that could reasonably make a niche car at a loss and not hurt its bottom line.&quot;
Yes, but that is not part of Toyota&#039;s business model.  They&#039;ll sell a model at a lost in the short term if they believe there is a larger market for it in the future that will enable them to make a profit a few years down the road (e.g. the Prius).  Hybrid economy sedans are a potential large market.  Hybrid sports cars?  I just don&#039;t see that as a huge money making segment, ever.  Unless they think it will have a halo effect for the entire company, which is possible.

&quot;So selling a 50-60k car at 30-40k to steal Market share from the Mustang,Camaro, 350z, RX-8 and WRT-sti could actually be a positive step.&quot;  Comment by Jazz, posted on May10 at 10:02 am 

I&#039;m not so sure buyers of those cars would be very interested in a hybrid sports car.  Buyers of V-8 Mustangs and Camaro&#039;s are interested in the car&#039;s styling and V-8 performance and sound, and for the most part really don&#039;t care much about fuel economy or eco-friendliness.  350z and RX8 buyers are more interested in handing, styling, and bang for the buck.  I highly doubt Toyota will be able to build a hybrid sports car that will handle better than those cars, given the inherent weight problem with hybrids, and Toyota&#039;s history of building mediocre-handling cars in recent years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also don&#8217;t forget that Toyota is the one current car company that could reasonably make a niche car at a loss and not hurt its bottom line.&#8221;<br />
Yes, but that is not part of Toyota&#8217;s business model.  They&#8217;ll sell a model at a lost in the short term if they believe there is a larger market for it in the future that will enable them to make a profit a few years down the road (e.g. the Prius).  Hybrid economy sedans are a potential large market.  Hybrid sports cars?  I just don&#8217;t see that as a huge money making segment, ever.  Unless they think it will have a halo effect for the entire company, which is possible.</p>
<p>&#8220;So selling a 50-60k car at 30-40k to steal Market share from the Mustang,Camaro, 350z, RX-8 and WRT-sti could actually be a positive step.&#8221;  Comment by Jazz, posted on May10 at 10:02 am </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure buyers of those cars would be very interested in a hybrid sports car.  Buyers of V-8 Mustangs and Camaro&#8217;s are interested in the car&#8217;s styling and V-8 performance and sound, and for the most part really don&#8217;t care much about fuel economy or eco-friendliness.  350z and RX8 buyers are more interested in handing, styling, and bang for the buck.  I highly doubt Toyota will be able to build a hybrid sports car that will handle better than those cars, given the inherent weight problem with hybrids, and Toyota&#8217;s history of building mediocre-handling cars in recent years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonstew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311109</link>
		<dc:creator>jonstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/new-supra-toyota-ft-hs-approved-for-2009-production.html#comment-311109</guid>
		<description>Piablo, &quot;the facts are already out there&quot; what facts are those?  This car has not been produced yet and you are trying to use the Prius as a benchmark for what a performance car will do.  I know the Prius does not meet the EPA estimates (which are not assigned by Toyota or any other manufacturer) neither but neither do any of the cars I drive.  There is no mention whatsoever of what kind of hybrid this car will be only that it will use the same electric motor that is used in GS450h.  I am not going to argue with you anymore as you have made up your closed mind on what you guess this car will be and perform like.  I know plenty about turbos, likely much more than yourself (how many 400 all wheel horsepower torbo charged cars have you built?)....if we were talking about a Toyota that is going to cost the same as a 911 TT then I could see your point but dual ballbearing twin turbo setups are costly and complex and this is going to be a 40K car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piablo, &#8220;the facts are already out there&#8221; what facts are those?  This car has not been produced yet and you are trying to use the Prius as a benchmark for what a performance car will do.  I know the Prius does not meet the EPA estimates (which are not assigned by Toyota or any other manufacturer) neither but neither do any of the cars I drive.  There is no mention whatsoever of what kind of hybrid this car will be only that it will use the same electric motor that is used in GS450h.  I am not going to argue with you anymore as you have made up your closed mind on what you guess this car will be and perform like.  I know plenty about turbos, likely much more than yourself (how many 400 all wheel horsepower torbo charged cars have you built?)&#8230;.if we were talking about a Toyota that is going to cost the same as a 911 TT then I could see your point but dual ballbearing twin turbo setups are costly and complex and this is going to be a 40K car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.020 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 654/655 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 19:12:24 -->
