




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Mazda RX-8 to sport evolutionary design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: key4wheels</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-495054</link>
		<dc:creator>key4wheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-495054</guid>
		<description>ND and Canuck...l got caught up in your conversation and completely forgot this article was about Mazda.  Nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ND and Canuck&#8230;l got caught up in your conversation and completely forgot this article was about Mazda.  Nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickelDime</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494919</link>
		<dc:creator>NickelDime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494919</guid>
		<description>Noah - it&#039;s all relative.  The Camaro is a good deal heavier than the Mustang, and is fractionally faster to 60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah &#8211; it&#8217;s all relative.  The Camaro is a good deal heavier than the Mustang, and is fractionally faster to 60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: futurezero</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494878</link>
		<dc:creator>futurezero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494878</guid>
		<description>Put it on a diet, give it twin turbos with at least 300hp, an LSD, and a ~50/50 weight distribution and you&#039;ll have a winner. A roadster shouldn&#039;t need gobs of torque, it should have a razor sharp suspension and a high power to weight ratio. This isn&#039;t a Mustang or a Camaro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put it on a diet, give it twin turbos with at least 300hp, an LSD, and a ~50/50 weight distribution and you&#8217;ll have a winner. A roadster shouldn&#8217;t need gobs of torque, it should have a razor sharp suspension and a high power to weight ratio. This isn&#8217;t a Mustang or a Camaro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokin305s</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494876</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokin305s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494876</guid>
		<description>Mmm...Rotaries,like communism, work in theory :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm&#8230;Rotaries,like communism, work in theory :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494869</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494869</guid>
		<description>315 hp is NOT enough for anyone. In a car that can look great like the mustang, 315HP is just OK. FORD always does this with HP. Now that the camero is out they are forced to up the ante</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>315 hp is NOT enough for anyone. In a car that can look great like the mustang, 315HP is just OK. FORD always does this with HP. Now that the camero is out they are forced to up the ante</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494845</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494845</guid>
		<description>ND... are you talking about young stuff or reminiscing about the American dollar?

And great point about playing the waiting game. You just never know when there&#039;s going to be a runaway Toyota with your name on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ND&#8230; are you talking about young stuff or reminiscing about the American dollar?</p>
<p>And great point about playing the waiting game. You just never know when there&#8217;s going to be a runaway Toyota with your name on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickelDime</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494844</link>
		<dc:creator>NickelDime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494844</guid>
		<description>armstealer: Just remember, 15 will get you 20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>armstealer: Just remember, 15 will get you 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armstealer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494832</link>
		<dc:creator>armstealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494832</guid>
		<description>Johnny- I am less concerned with finding a cherry on top than I am finding a cherry down below...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny- I am less concerned with finding a cherry on top than I am finding a cherry down below&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarLoveBoy88</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494828</link>
		<dc:creator>KarLoveBoy88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494828</guid>
		<description>They should be like BMW, AUDI and Ford and offer the 2.4L turbo 4 with 263hp across the line. If it cant move the SPEED3 to 69 in 5.9 seconds, then it should move this car in 5.0 flat! Think about it...less weight, slimmer rear occupant doors, wider stance on the road, more aerodynamic... Its a success story waiting to happen. Although they should add about 27 more horses to make it an even 280. And with rear wheel drive, this car would own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be like BMW, AUDI and Ford and offer the 2.4L turbo 4 with 263hp across the line. If it cant move the SPEED3 to 69 in 5.9 seconds, then it should move this car in 5.0 flat! Think about it&#8230;less weight, slimmer rear occupant doors, wider stance on the road, more aerodynamic&#8230; Its a success story waiting to happen. Although they should add about 27 more horses to make it an even 280. And with rear wheel drive, this car would own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plugot</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494816</link>
		<dc:creator>plugot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494816</guid>
		<description>I had an original RX-7 and really enjoyed it as long as I didn&#039;t try any stop light races. MK 1 GTI&#039;s would eat me for breakfast. I tried an RX8 and though I loved the handling, it was, as already noted, totally torque-less. However, the real killer was it&#039;s 15-16 MPG in real world everyday driving. Oh and cold start issues and gulping oli every 500 miles.
C&#039;mon Mazda, you can do better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had an original RX-7 and really enjoyed it as long as I didn&#8217;t try any stop light races. MK 1 GTI&#8217;s would eat me for breakfast. I tried an RX8 and though I loved the handling, it was, as already noted, totally torque-less. However, the real killer was it&#8217;s 15-16 MPG in real world everyday driving. Oh and cold start issues and gulping oli every 500 miles.<br />
C&#8217;mon Mazda, you can do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494806</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494806</guid>
		<description>Please for the love of god make a turbocharged version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please for the love of god make a turbocharged version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickelDime</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494801</link>
		<dc:creator>NickelDime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494801</guid>
		<description>So we&#039;re getting off track Johnny but I&#039;m enjoying the dialog here... I&#039;d be lying if I told you I&#039;ve owned fewer than 20 cars - it&#039;s something like 26 (my wife enjoys counting all of them during choice conversations).  This is my daily driver, and it is the most comfortable vehicle I have ever owned (my prev favorite was a 2003 540i, followed by a 1995 Legend with a 6 speed trans).  You&#039;ve sat in one so you know - I log 1.5 - 2 hours per day commuting and it&#039;s the most relaxing part of my week.  The technology is also a nice add, with Sync giving me a heads up on traffic and the integration of my iPod + Sirius ... very slick.  Some cars let you have one but not the other -- like you said, details.  It&#039;s also the quietest convertible I&#039;ve ever owned (4 previous, including Audi).   Trying not to overstate this thing, but I&#039;d venture to say that the Mustang is the best four-place convertible one can buy today this side of a BMW 335i.  Even with the venerable modular V8.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the best sports car, but the coupe&#039;s a cheap thrill.

So here&#039;s my parting thought on the subject - 2011 will have bugs, so 2012 is the one to get.  Problem is, Motor Trend says Ford will do another complete redesign in 2014 - the 50th anniversary.  That&#039;s only 2 years from 2012 - why not wait?  There&#039;s always a reason to wait.  In the long run, we&#039;re all dead - so enjoy it while you can.  I know I am (cue the key turn, rumble in the exhaust, rubber burn.....)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we&#8217;re getting off track Johnny but I&#8217;m enjoying the dialog here&#8230; I&#8217;d be lying if I told you I&#8217;ve owned fewer than 20 cars &#8211; it&#8217;s something like 26 (my wife enjoys counting all of them during choice conversations).  This is my daily driver, and it is the most comfortable vehicle I have ever owned (my prev favorite was a 2003 540i, followed by a 1995 Legend with a 6 speed trans).  You&#8217;ve sat in one so you know &#8211; I log 1.5 &#8211; 2 hours per day commuting and it&#8217;s the most relaxing part of my week.  The technology is also a nice add, with Sync giving me a heads up on traffic and the integration of my iPod + Sirius &#8230; very slick.  Some cars let you have one but not the other &#8212; like you said, details.  It&#8217;s also the quietest convertible I&#8217;ve ever owned (4 previous, including Audi).   Trying not to overstate this thing, but I&#8217;d venture to say that the Mustang is the best four-place convertible one can buy today this side of a BMW 335i.  Even with the venerable modular V8.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the best sports car, but the coupe&#8217;s a cheap thrill.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my parting thought on the subject &#8211; 2011 will have bugs, so 2012 is the one to get.  Problem is, Motor Trend says Ford will do another complete redesign in 2014 &#8211; the 50th anniversary.  That&#8217;s only 2 years from 2012 &#8211; why not wait?  There&#8217;s always a reason to wait.  In the long run, we&#8217;re all dead &#8211; so enjoy it while you can.  I know I am (cue the key turn, rumble in the exhaust, rubber burn&#8230;..)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asb81689</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494793</link>
		<dc:creator>asb81689</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494793</guid>
		<description>I love the looks of this car, I love the handling (test drove for 40 minutes), but don&#039;t care too much for the rotary, but I&#039;m sure I could get used to it if I did buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the looks of this car, I love the handling (test drove for 40 minutes), but don&#8217;t care too much for the rotary, but I&#8217;m sure I could get used to it if I did buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494789</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494789</guid>
		<description>The RX-8 doesn&#039;t need more HP, it needs more torque.  Mazda could adapt direct injection technology to the rotary.
It also needs to lose some weight.  They&#039;ve apparently forgotten the lesson of 3rd generation RX-7: lots of power, less weight.  3rd gen RX-7&#039;s are still highly desireable while chunky-butt 2nd gens are at the bottom of their depreciation curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RX-8 doesn&#8217;t need more HP, it needs more torque.  Mazda could adapt direct injection technology to the rotary.<br />
It also needs to lose some weight.  They&#8217;ve apparently forgotten the lesson of 3rd generation RX-7: lots of power, less weight.  3rd gen RX-7&#8242;s are still highly desireable while chunky-butt 2nd gens are at the bottom of their depreciation curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494786</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494786</guid>
		<description>ND, very nice analysis. So really... we&#039;re almost at the same point if you go from mine to yours. I have 260 horse, you have 315. I have 302 ft/lb, you have 325. Mine weighs about 3,270, yours about 3,400. I have no doubt yours not only has a decided edge in acceleration but in handling as well. I hope so... they&#039;re 8 years apart.

Still, that&#039;s not a heck of a lot of difference when you really think about it. The real difference is in the details. Now I&#039;m not going to knock my interior because interiors just aren&#039;t that important to me... well perhaps I should say I don&#039;t spend a lot of time fondling my dash or door panels to see how soft they are. I just want comfortable seats and driving position above all... and then switches that do what they&#039;re supposed to. But I have sat in the 2010 and I&#039;d be lying if I said I didn&#039;t want that interior over mine. 

Now I don&#039;t know if your &#039;Stang is a daily driver or a car that has its &#039;missions&#039;. Mine is the latter. About 90% of its miles are spent driving between Vancouver&#039;s lower mainland and a place in the B.C. interior called Osoyoos. And that&#039;s only 6 months of the year as well. It does snow up here... unfortunately. Oh and did I mention that for about two thirds of that close to 400km run the odds of running into anything with a cherry on top are very, very minimal. 

Believe me, it&#039;s a hoot even with a &#039;paltry&#039; 260 horse. So do I need 400... or more? Well of course &#039;I&#039; do. Trouble is I&#039;ve been married close to 20 years and there&#039;s that little &#039;we&#039; hurdle to get over as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ND, very nice analysis. So really&#8230; we&#8217;re almost at the same point if you go from mine to yours. I have 260 horse, you have 315. I have 302 ft/lb, you have 325. Mine weighs about 3,270, yours about 3,400. I have no doubt yours not only has a decided edge in acceleration but in handling as well. I hope so&#8230; they&#8217;re 8 years apart.</p>
<p>Still, that&#8217;s not a heck of a lot of difference when you really think about it. The real difference is in the details. Now I&#8217;m not going to knock my interior because interiors just aren&#8217;t that important to me&#8230; well perhaps I should say I don&#8217;t spend a lot of time fondling my dash or door panels to see how soft they are. I just want comfortable seats and driving position above all&#8230; and then switches that do what they&#8217;re supposed to. But I have sat in the 2010 and I&#8217;d be lying if I said I didn&#8217;t want that interior over mine. </p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t know if your &#8216;Stang is a daily driver or a car that has its &#8216;missions&#8217;. Mine is the latter. About 90% of its miles are spent driving between Vancouver&#8217;s lower mainland and a place in the B.C. interior called Osoyoos. And that&#8217;s only 6 months of the year as well. It does snow up here&#8230; unfortunately. Oh and did I mention that for about two thirds of that close to 400km run the odds of running into anything with a cherry on top are very, very minimal. </p>
<p>Believe me, it&#8217;s a hoot even with a &#8216;paltry&#8217; 260 horse. So do I need 400&#8230; or more? Well of course &#8216;I&#8217; do. Trouble is I&#8217;ve been married close to 20 years and there&#8217;s that little &#8216;we&#8217; hurdle to get over as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auto X</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494763</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494763</guid>
		<description>To Need4SSpeed yes R-x7&#039;s have always had a bit of a problem with TQ or lack there of it

And while the 13b REW (twin turbo 1.3L 2 rotor for the un-rotarted) was really cool and made good power for almost no displacment it suffered from bad gas milage and low torque.

The 20b REW was a twin turbo 2.0L 3 rotor that made 300hp and 300 ft lbs back in the early to mid 90&#039;s that was about the same power as a corvette of the time only instead of coming from a 5.7 it came from a 2.0 tt

Imagine what they could make it do now (gas milage will remain horrible) Damn would it be fun 

or what about a 4 rotor :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Need4SSpeed yes R-x7&#8242;s have always had a bit of a problem with TQ or lack there of it</p>
<p>And while the 13b REW (twin turbo 1.3L 2 rotor for the un-rotarted) was really cool and made good power for almost no displacment it suffered from bad gas milage and low torque.</p>
<p>The 20b REW was a twin turbo 2.0L 3 rotor that made 300hp and 300 ft lbs back in the early to mid 90&#8242;s that was about the same power as a corvette of the time only instead of coming from a 5.7 it came from a 2.0 tt</p>
<p>Imagine what they could make it do now (gas milage will remain horrible) Damn would it be fun </p>
<p>or what about a 4 rotor <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickelDime</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494751</link>
		<dc:creator>NickelDime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494751</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys... my thoughts on the 5.0 vs. the modular 4.6 are this: 

1) the 315 HP is plenty and the economy is surprisingly good (20mpg average, which trumps the G35 and A4 2.0T I used to drive).  The car is very well balanced, and the Bullitt parts stiffened up the ride nicely.  
2)The powertrain is rock solid, very refined, smooth as silk.  Ford has steadily improved this platform over the last 15 or so years and it shows.
3) The promised 85hp performance boost doesn&#039;t make the car 27% faster - it&#039;s a few fractions of a second to 60.  If I need more &quot;go,&quot; it&#039;s quite easy to drop an FRPP blower on, and probably less than the cost of doing a trade (shoot, I think that&#039;s the tax alone in the People&#039;s Republic of California).
4) Ford&#039;s history with brand new powertrains is mixed.  They tend to resolve them one to two years following the introduction.  Not a chance I&#039;d like to take, and potentially a bigger depreciation risk than an &quot;oldie but goodie.&quot;

The main thing that gives me heartburn is the extra cog in the trans.  I have the 5sp manual now, and I&#039;d bet a paycheck they&#039;ll add a sixth gear.  The 5sp is extremely well-spaced (I think cars.com said it was better than most 6 speeds) but still - having a taller 6th (or shorter spacing 1st -&gt; 2nd) would be sweet.

All that being said, I am not looking forward to the question/statement &quot;Nice car... is it a 5.0?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys&#8230; my thoughts on the 5.0 vs. the modular 4.6 are this: </p>
<p>1) the 315 HP is plenty and the economy is surprisingly good (20mpg average, which trumps the G35 and A4 2.0T I used to drive).  The car is very well balanced, and the Bullitt parts stiffened up the ride nicely.<br />
2)The powertrain is rock solid, very refined, smooth as silk.  Ford has steadily improved this platform over the last 15 or so years and it shows.<br />
3) The promised 85hp performance boost doesn&#8217;t make the car 27% faster &#8211; it&#8217;s a few fractions of a second to 60.  If I need more &#8220;go,&#8221; it&#8217;s quite easy to drop an FRPP blower on, and probably less than the cost of doing a trade (shoot, I think that&#8217;s the tax alone in the People&#8217;s Republic of California).<br />
4) Ford&#8217;s history with brand new powertrains is mixed.  They tend to resolve them one to two years following the introduction.  Not a chance I&#8217;d like to take, and potentially a bigger depreciation risk than an &#8220;oldie but goodie.&#8221;</p>
<p>The main thing that gives me heartburn is the extra cog in the trans.  I have the 5sp manual now, and I&#8217;d bet a paycheck they&#8217;ll add a sixth gear.  The 5sp is extremely well-spaced (I think cars.com said it was better than most 6 speeds) but still &#8211; having a taller 6th (or shorter spacing 1st -&gt; 2nd) would be sweet.</p>
<p>All that being said, I am not looking forward to the question/statement &#8220;Nice car&#8230; is it a 5.0?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Need4SSpeed</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494747</link>
		<dc:creator>Need4SSpeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494747</guid>
		<description>Hmm let&#039;s see Rotary power with V8 gas mileage, oil guzzling, and no torque... no thank you...

like Auto X said what Mazda needs to bring back the 13B, or something just like that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm let&#8217;s see Rotary power with V8 gas mileage, oil guzzling, and no torque&#8230; no thank you&#8230;</p>
<p>like Auto X said what Mazda needs to bring back the 13B, or something just like that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auto X</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494745</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494745</guid>
		<description>The RX8 is a really fun autox car but come on bring back the rx7 and give it a 2.0 3 rotor with a turbo like it deserves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RX8 is a really fun autox car but come on bring back the rx7 and give it a 2.0 3 rotor with a turbo like it deserves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeK66</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494728</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeK66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494728</guid>
		<description>ND - I&#039;m sorry too - I think the GT is still a great cor in 2010 - I&#039;m really talking about the secretary V-6s more than anything... 315 hp is enough to make anyone happy ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ND &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry too &#8211; I think the GT is still a great cor in 2010 &#8211; I&#8217;m really talking about the secretary V-6s more than anything&#8230; 315 hp is enough to make anyone happy <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494720</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494720</guid>
		<description>Sorry ND... you can go sit in my &#039;02 if you think that will help as well! I&#039;m curious though, would that extra 100 horse... speculating at that number of course... entice you at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry ND&#8230; you can go sit in my &#8217;02 if you think that will help as well! I&#8217;m curious though, would that extra 100 horse&#8230; speculating at that number of course&#8230; entice you at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickelDime</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494714</link>
		<dc:creator>NickelDime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494714</guid>
		<description>Rotary is like the turbo CX7.  It&#039;s a small motor that gets the same fuel economy of a larger motor.  Seems like a great science experiment, but not something I want to commit to.

Oh, and, that hurts Johnny.  You almost made me feel bad about my 2010 Mustang GT.... that is, until I sit in it again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rotary is like the turbo CX7.  It&#8217;s a small motor that gets the same fuel economy of a larger motor.  Seems like a great science experiment, but not something I want to commit to.</p>
<p>Oh, and, that hurts Johnny.  You almost made me feel bad about my 2010 Mustang GT&#8230;. that is, until I sit in it again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeK66</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494713</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeK66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494713</guid>
		<description>For once in a looong time I agree with everyone 
-I love the RX-8 as much as the next guy... I&#039;ve been serious about buying one five of the past 7 years it&#039;s been out. But they need it get it a boost in power and reliability

-the 2010 Mustang is a lame duck - they can&#039;t get rid of them now according to one dealer contact of mine and I can&#039;t blame anyone. I love it&#039;s looks and it&#039;s now a solid car inside but why get one now?

-I really don&#039;t care eiter LWA - if it had just a normal 4 cylinder I probably would have already owned one/ I like the fact it&#039;s different and small as can be, but geting poor MPG, poor startups in cold weather and having it eat oil at a super fast rate isn&#039;t my thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once in a looong time I agree with everyone<br />
-I love the RX-8 as much as the next guy&#8230; I&#8217;ve been serious about buying one five of the past 7 years it&#8217;s been out. But they need it get it a boost in power and reliability</p>
<p>-the 2010 Mustang is a lame duck &#8211; they can&#8217;t get rid of them now according to one dealer contact of mine and I can&#8217;t blame anyone. I love it&#8217;s looks and it&#8217;s now a solid car inside but why get one now?</p>
<p>-I really don&#8217;t care eiter LWA &#8211; if it had just a normal 4 cylinder I probably would have already owned one/ I like the fact it&#8217;s different and small as can be, but geting poor MPG, poor startups in cold weather and having it eat oil at a super fast rate isn&#8217;t my thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftwingagenda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494700</link>
		<dc:creator>leftwingagenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494700</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m a mazda fan, but i wouldn&#039;t give a crap if they dropped the rotary...if the power and economy of the new engine is &quot;good for a rotary&quot; but not &quot;good compared to the competition&quot; then they&#039;re misguided...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m a mazda fan, but i wouldn&#8217;t give a crap if they dropped the rotary&#8230;if the power and economy of the new engine is &#8220;good for a rotary&#8221; but not &#8220;good compared to the competition&#8221; then they&#8217;re misguided&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stix</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494695</link>
		<dc:creator>Stix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494695</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll sit back and see how the new Renesis performs when it comes out. If it helps get rid of the lack of torque in the past RX cars, then that&#039;s one good improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll sit back and see how the new Renesis performs when it comes out. If it helps get rid of the lack of torque in the past RX cars, then that&#8217;s one good improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494692</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494692</guid>
		<description>Yes... don&#039;t make the same mistake Ford did with the 2010 Mustang. The new car and the new engine should come out together otherwise you&#039;re sitting with a lame duck in your showroom. It&#039;s an enthusiast car... they&#039;ll wait for the good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; don&#8217;t make the same mistake Ford did with the 2010 Mustang. The new car and the new engine should come out together otherwise you&#8217;re sitting with a lame duck in your showroom. It&#8217;s an enthusiast car&#8230; they&#8217;ll wait for the good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TornadoGTI</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494690</link>
		<dc:creator>TornadoGTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494690</guid>
		<description>I have always been a fan of this car.  The only thing it lacked was power.  Granted, it handled well but couldn&#039;t go.  Maybe another 30 or 40 hp will put this where it needs to be.  With cars like the Mazda Speed 3 and WRX beating this car in performance and saving $5k-$10k makes it hard for Mazda.
I have taken quite a few of these with my stock MKV GTI.  Just straight walked on them.  That should not happen for a $32k RWD sports car.  No question.  I always compared this to the 370z but as a 2+2.  The 370z always dominated this car and for not much more money.

All it needs is an evolution and not a revolution.  I will be awaiting this refresh.  Should/could be good.  Heck keep the car EXACTLY the same but with at least 250 hp and it would be a winner in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been a fan of this car.  The only thing it lacked was power.  Granted, it handled well but couldn&#8217;t go.  Maybe another 30 or 40 hp will put this where it needs to be.  With cars like the Mazda Speed 3 and WRX beating this car in performance and saving $5k-$10k makes it hard for Mazda.<br />
I have taken quite a few of these with my stock MKV GTI.  Just straight walked on them.  That should not happen for a $32k RWD sports car.  No question.  I always compared this to the 370z but as a 2+2.  The 370z always dominated this car and for not much more money.</p>
<p>All it needs is an evolution and not a revolution.  I will be awaiting this refresh.  Should/could be good.  Heck keep the car EXACTLY the same but with at least 250 hp and it would be a winner in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat128</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494688</link>
		<dc:creator>mat128</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494688</guid>
		<description>erm, Sky engine technology? that&#039;s not a rotary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>erm, Sky engine technology? that&#8217;s not a rotary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat128</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/next-mazda-rx-8-to-sport-evolutionary-design.html#comment-494687</link>
		<dc:creator>mat128</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=22016#comment-494687</guid>
		<description>Mazda please put the 16X in this new 8!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mazda please put the 16X in this new 8!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 482/483 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 17:37:58 -->
