Refresh Image Size
 
 
 
 

07/29/2008, 4:39 PM

Convertible

Review: 2008 Nissan 350Z Roadster

Nothing compares to a summer’s day on a back country road with the top down on a two-seat roadster. Even if the Nissan 350Z Roadster is getting a little dated – an updated coupe version with slightly more horsepower will be out next year with the convertible updated soon after – it still offers as much fun in the summer day category as you can buy for less than $40,000. Who cares if it looks a little like a scared turtle when the soft top is up?

What Is It?

Top down or up in the 350Z, when you’re enjoying the raspy sound of the 306 horsepower engine with 268 pound-feet of torque, shifting with the short-throw six-speed manual transmission, and enjoying the taut suspension that takes the corners eagerly without being rough over the bumps, who cares what it looks like from the outside? And the top is going to be down as much as possible anyhow.

Appropriate to its purpose, the Z has a minimalist interior of matte black textured plastic and nylon that looks like a GT Prototype race car; no pretentious wood and chrome trim in this car.

What’s It Up Against?

There are several other drop-top roadsters on the market which compete against the 350Z, led by the venerable Mazda MX-5 (we still call it a Miata) which is cheaper, and maybe a bit more practical, but with less power.

The Honda S2000 is about the same price as the 350Z, but with its cramped interior and non-existent luggage space, it’s not much good for anything except short run-around trips and track fun.

The much newer Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky compare more with the MX-5 than the 350Z, and the other contenders, including the Audi TT and Porsche Boxster are much pricier.

Any Big Breakthroughs?

Let’s be honest: the 350Z itself isn’t a new face on the playground and there’s nothing new for 2008, unless you count the addition of one exterior color to the range.

Even though the roadster wasn’t introduced until well after the coupe, the ragtop is now several years beyond its launch party, and even the engine is in its second year. Nissan will be introducing the new 370Z coupe in Los Angeles this fall, so we can expect the convertible version to be past its sell-by date sometime in early 2010.

How Does It Look?

The Nissan Z-car styling has not changed much since the original introduction of the coupe, and we’ve grown to appreciate the idea of less-is-more that Nissan brought to the party. The Z has done away with excess air openings and ducts covered with fancy mesh grilles and front dams. Instead, there’s just the minimum amount of paneling needed to cover the chassis and wheels, with subtle curves to break up the light. Two triangular light housings on the front, two similarly-styled tail light structures on the rear, and two business-like tail pipes are the only trim pieces on the exterior.

The door handles are the only unnecessary pieces of trim on the exterior, added as if someone said at the last minute, “It still needs something” and dimpled slabs of brushed aluminum was the best idea they could come up with.

We do agree that from a styling perspective when the soft-top is up the convertible isn’t as graceful as the fastback coupe. However, we do like the look when the top is stowed under the hard tonneau cover. The simple fairing behind the headrests provides a nice little touch of roadster tradition, encouraging owners to keep the top down as much as possible.

And Inside?

The car is very comfortable in the top-down mode. Driver and passenger sit well down into the body, and the clear plastic panel between the headrests breaks the wind enough that the temperature has to be very low, or the rain pretty hard, before one will be forced to put the top up.

That’s fortunate, because like most of today’s roadsters, there is very limited vision to the back or sides with the top up, making us feel a little tentative when merging or maneuvering in busy freeway traffic.

The interior styling is all business, with very supportive seats – upholstered on our base Enthusiast model in comfortable and practical nylon – simple controls, and not much more to distract us from the purposive nature of this car.

There are a few storage compartments hidden away, but they’re mostly behind the seats where they are totally inaccessible when the car is underway. Even the locking compartment that fills in for the non-existent glove box is tucked behind the passenger seat.

On the other hand, there’s lots of people-space in the interior. Instead of feeling as if we’d just been shoehorned into a Formula 1 car, we had lots of shoulder and elbow space. A long-legged driver might have to bend a bit at the knees, but there was no serious limit to headroom (the convertible actually has more headroom than the coupe).

Unlike some of the other roadsters, this one actually has a trunk, and if you follow the instructions glued to the trunk lid, a medium golf bag can be stowed there. However, if you and your passenger need more than a small roll-aboard suitcase and a backpack, you aren’t going to be making any weekend trips.

But Does It Go?

With 306 horsepower moving 3600 pounds, the 350Z Roadster is very quick. It is at its best on the track or on back country roads, where you can enjoy the acceleration on the straights as well as the handling which allows you to take the corners flat and fast.

We’re pleased that Nissan figured out the problems in the first generation suspension in the 350Zs, because this model is actually comfortable over rough pavement. This is a trackable car we could live with during the week without many regrets.

Nissan doesn’t seem to have sacrificed much in the way of torsional rigidity with the convertible body, either. If you think in terms of the car as a very low coupe with a hole in the roof, rather than a regular coupe with the top half cut off, you’ll see the wisdom in the somewhat awkward exterior styling.

In the interest of full disclosure, fuel efficiency is only 17 mpg city and 24 mpg highway, but if you’re the type who likes the no-nonsense look of the 350Z, you’re probably filling up with $8 a gallon track gas whenever possible, so you’ve already factored low mileage into your personal buying equation.

Why You Would Buy It

If you like your roadsters looking as if they were designed in a wind tunnel rather than a jewelry store, and rate track performance higher than luggage hauling capabilities, you’ll enjoy the power, handling, and functional nature of the 350Z roadster. And the medium-sized price is attractive, too.

Why You Wouldn’t

But if you want to have a car that will turn heads from across the parking lot, maybe you should wait for the next generation Z-car, because no one is going to notice that your car is brand-new.

What We Drove?

Our test car was the “Roadster Enthusiast” package, priced at $36,350, including dealer prep and optional carpeted floor mats, it is actually the least costly of the three versions of the roadster.

However, it’s the only version of the Z roadster we would buy, even if they all cost the same. The high-tech “web” seats and fancy stereo available on the Touring model are unnecessary, and the upgrades to brakes, wheels and aerodynamics on the Grand Touring model would be negated by the automatic transmission even if better go-fast stuff wasn’t available at less cost on the aftermarket.

Word and photos by Gary and Genie Anderson.

 
 

07/29, 4:44 PM

posted by:

Need4SSpeed

That’s funny I was just looking at some used 350Z’s (Coupes) on autotrader a few hours ago… Saw some pretty newer, and low mileage 350Z’s going for low-mid 20’s… Wouldn’t mind picking one up actually. But I have no experience whatsoever with Nissan’s motor, so maybe not…

07/29, 4:53 PM

posted by:

jumpoffit

just stay away from the ‘05 Rev-up motor, those are the pain in the ass oil cu.mguzzling whores that nissan decided to put in i believe was the Touring and in the G35 Sport

07/29, 4:57 PM

posted by:

beatusmongous

The VQ to me is Nissan’s version of the Chevy 350. It’s in just about everything, and it’s a decently reliable motor that can be tuned however Nissan wants. I have essentially the same motor in my Quest, and it’s plenty powerful. Actually, it can spin the tires for a couple of seconds on take off (with traction control off), and then once it hits about 20 mph, it has a bit of extra oomph that really gets it moving. Of course, the Quest is 1,000 lbs. heavier than the Z, and the VQ is detuned to only 240 hp (with a bit more torque for pulling), but it’s still a good motor. I’d recommend you take one for a spin first, Need4SSpeed, just to get a feel for it. I have almost 70,000 miles on my Quest, and I’ve only had minor issues with electronics components. The motor and the transmission have both been very reliable so far, and I drive pretty hard. Probably the only major issue I’ve ever noticed with Nissans is the tendency to break motor mounts. But that’s just my experience. I can’t speak for everyone.

07/29, 5:13 PM

posted by:

jumpoffit

yeah, the VQ in my G35 happens to be the Rev-up Version, high output, and guzzles oil like crazy- this was a problem for alot of the 2005 models(standard not auto)- there have been ALOT of complaints from other drivers for this oil consumption issue but nissan never did a recall or had a TSB on this since the problem was more here and there, or you had to go in and get a oil consumption test every 1000 miles to see where you’re oil was, i’ve modded my engine so i voided my warranty :D

07/29, 5:15 PM

posted by:

beatusmongous

I’m glad I don’t have that oil guzzling problem.

07/29, 5:19 PM

posted by:

xyunya

There is nothing wrong with Nissan motors. Like with any mechanical component you can get a lemon, and I would question why car is being for sale ( end of lease is reasonable answer), but overall they are good motors.

07/29, 5:26 PM

posted by:

jumpoffit

course there isn’t anything wrong with the motors, thats why the VQ series is in ALOT of the nissan products, some of the high performance version of the VQ that was released in ‘05 though had oil problems and alot of dealers didn’t want to replace the WHOLE engine under warranty, again this was all new so alot of people paid it no mind until 2 or 3 years later, you were either close to expired warranty or already had expired warranty, plus some dealerships would turn their back if you touched the engine and some didn’t mind, trust me there have been quite a few pissed off people that i know that’s gone through this, so i’m only saying the 05’s were troublesome

07/29, 5:32 PM

posted by:

xyunya

I was under impression that engine and tranny have 5 years 60K mi. warranty. I understand, that some (most)dealers are assholes and particularly service managers. For them it is not an expense, but filing up paperwork for manufacturer to cover the cost. They are lazy bastards.

07/29, 5:41 PM

posted by:

SWM335

My father just purchased a used 2007 Roadster Grand Touring a couple of weeks ago and is absolutely in love with the engine in this thing. Being from Canada, he bought in the US for thousands less then he could get it for up here. This is his first experience with a Nissan engine, but so far so good. I can’t wait to take it for a spin.

07/29, 5:43 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

This is the one Japanese sports car I would consider. It looks good, sounds good and should be damn near bulletproof at this point. And sometimes not being noticed can be very advantageous.

07/29, 6:31 PM

posted by:

02WRXPSM

Yes, there are so many of them on the road here that they are pretty damn invisible. Still, a nice powerplant that has a smooth, flat torque curve (especially considering the displacement). I think they are nose-heavy in a corner, and the convertible has a HIDEOUS trunk where they made the space for the top — as ass-tastic as the current model Eclipse — but yeah, they are pretty cool cars. Drriftoro!

07/29, 7:14 PM

posted by:

RaineMan

My dad had a Z roadster when they first hit the market. Nice little convertible… fun to drive… zippy… clean looking. He’s an old-timer though and couldn’t get used to the thought of driving an import… so it got traded for a C6 ‘vette.

07/29, 7:25 PM

posted by:

fuk-u-asshole

raineman

he couldnt get used to the tought of driving an import. God ****ing help him. what a stupid statement. the man must have very little on his mind

07/29, 7:40 PM

posted by:

RaineMan

Heheheh. I guess so… he’s in his mid 60’s now… so I figure let him be. Funny thing though… his new company car is a Honda Accord.

07/29, 8:19 PM

posted by:

MugenSentraKen

======>>had no problems what so ever with my tuned-out SR20DET ;-)

07/29, 8:27 PM

posted by:

brassmonkey

What the hell does LLN mean by it looks like a scared turtle? Turtles don’t get scared!

07/29, 9:16 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

brassmonkey: you must be circumcised.

07/29, 9:28 PM

posted by:

howsmydriving

Always have appreciated the Z. Corvette attracts too much attention, traps you into idiotic conversations with strangers with no car knowledge.

07/29, 9:37 PM

posted by:

Need4SSpeed

Yeah I’d love to even drive one of these babies…. My lease ends in 12 months so I started doing my car shopping research already… lol

First I wanted a RX8, but I don’t even want to bother with owning the rotary, oil drinker, and the crappy low-end torque, and not the best in fuel efficiency either…

So I’m still considering a newer like 1-2 years used 350Z with low miles on it. I actually didn’t know it went through a lot of oil either, but you say it’s the the 05 auto version? Cause I’m definitely getting a manual…
So yeah I’m going to go for a slightly used one of these, although I’m afraid to see what it’s going to cost me in insurance, and if I can’t get one of these I’m still going to try for a brand new Solstice Coupe…

07/30, 9:25 AM

posted by:

Z06ified

What did they screw up in ‘05 with the VQ? I wasn’t aware of this oil consumption problem. I had an ‘03 VQ in my G35 coupe, and it didn’t burn a drop of oil the entire time I owned it. I had a lot of problems with the manual transmission and clutch in that car, but the engine was great and trouble-free.

The 350Z is a fun car, and it is positioned well so it has little competition at its price point and power level.

07/30, 10:56 AM

posted by:

jumpoffit

nah the 03 VQ is fine, it was in ‘05 that nissan had the Rev-UP VQ35, this was the fresh updated version of the VQ at the time, it rev’ed higher than the ‘03-’04, but it also consumed oil, the problem was fixed for the ‘06-’07 , it was just in ‘05 that the issue was there, oh and Need4SSpeed it wasn’t the auto version, it was the manuals, the manuals had the RevUP version but the auto’s didn’t have that version. sounds weird i know…

07/30, 11:28 AM

posted by:

Jazz

03-04 had VQ35DE
05-06 had VQ35 Rev-Up
07+ have VQHR

So get any year except 2005. Some say the auto is faster everywhere except the track.

No problems on my 04 350z — knock on wood

07/30, 2:58 PM

posted by:

Need4SSpeed

Cool, thanks for the tips guys. Yeah I’m now considering a 350Z as my next ride….

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.