I don’t need to remind you that OBJECTIVELY, we ALL know that’s not true. This car just happens to be one of the not-so-cute kids.

I only post OBJECTIVE FACT all the time. Deal with it.

When your point is too dull, don’t think you can sharpen it up with insults that easily.

You cannot have an objective view. Your view is subjective as it is rooted in your personal reaction and opinion. You can assess your view as being objective, but I can’t even credit that as being subjective and give you the benefit of the doubt because it’s not an opinion, it’s just a lie.

You are not attracted to the car. FACT.

Nobody else really cares. FACT.

You don’t need to buy it. FACT.

This car is unattractive, FACT. Having the ability to know this OBJECTIVELY, is also FACT. You are out of your league, FACT. And I hate that I have to drive around seeing far too many ugly vehicles because of people like you having no taste.

Get it yet? Ummmmmmm, of course not … you are one of many that won’t make it. Stick to the minor leagues.

That’s what makes me different from you.

The only thing that has to happen to make you 100% wrong in your assesment that the car is objectively unattractive is for ONE PERSON to say that they are attracted to it.

Let me have the pleasure of being that one.

And to assess that subjectivity as something that they can exert no total influence over when it is a reaciton of other people.

And to recognize the fact that they are not the messengers of any imaginary objectivity as reality.

Because, you see, to someone who buys this car because their brain and eyes see it as visually successful, your PURELY SUBJECTIVE view of it is MEANINGLESS, and probably won’t stop them enjoying it.

I didn’t say every opinion can be right, I said that every reactionary impulse to a visual stimulus is undeniable and uncontrollable to the viewing individual. Thus, to regard it as wrong is to deny the human ability to appreciate the visual aesthetic without deliberate thought process. You are essentially saying that a cerebral tendency of one particular human is wrong where yours are always correct. This is the essence of lunacy, regarding everyone else as wrong while the diluted and delusional mind can only find favor in itself. So who the hell are you to say that someone else is wrong, besides a clinically and diagnostically insane person?

I would protest that whoever sculpted this car would respect your right to dislike it. But nobody owes you the ability to proclaim your subjective opinions as fact. Nobody.

You, unfortunately, will never make it.

Regarding the circumstances surrounding my view, (it being subjective and based on worthless studying), I have to protest that the subjectivity of said view would cause it’s explicit wrongness to be impossible.

Considering the subjectivity of aesthetics, there is no way to be wrong in an opinion regarding a personal reaction to visual stimuli.

Given this reality, your assesment of my assesment (talk about useless and meaninless) cannot be right in any respect, nor can it even come close to qualifying as good enough to even clean the shoes of “FACT”.

My vocation is the continual pursuit of the ability to master the manipulation of reaction to visual stimuli in my viewer. I do this by being the master of the stimulative object in the first place. This object (the car) creates in my mind an undeniable visual reaction, which my brain doesn’t even need to dissect to recognize as positive.

And that’s all I need to know, as it becomes clearer who the amateur is.

Your references accomplish nothing. Your vocation means nothing. Your “studying” resulted in nothing.

The FACT remains this car is unattractive. The FACT also remains that you STILL have no taste. These are FACTS and they are OBJECTIVE. Fortunately for you, you are legally permitted to have your view made freely despite being subjective and wrong.

But your BS makes me feel entitled to abandon it for a moment.

Not to mention that I, someone who’s spent semester after semester closely studying the likes of Raphael, Brancusi, Mondrian, you know, tasteful guys like that. They weren’t my favorites, but they were certainly the authority on taste.

You seem like a Warhol guy at best as far as taste goes.

You have no taste, clearly. Those with taste can easily find something to appreciate in something they may not as a whole. And those with taste are seldom juvenille enough to talk as you just did.

Now, being a sculptor, I feel like I know a thing or two about this, but you don’t hear me jumping on anyone (until your stupidity just became too much).

Get the hell out of here.

The “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” nonsense only provides false security for those with little or no taste. You are one of those lost souls having no taste. Sorry your feelings may be hurt but someone had to tell you this.

He really does fit his name quite well.

And I don’t think it’s “small”, to be honest. It may look alot smaller than those American cars, but it’s fairly close to them, despite lacking a back seat.

I think I’d take it over a Cayman or a Corvette too though, personally. I think there’s a stigma attached to the Porche and the Corvette that screams “Midlife crisis car”. And at 20, that’s not really my M.O.

Plus I’m a huge fan of the classic Z’s, and this design recalls them better than the previous.

Those door handles need to die though.

And Impulsive- way to live up to the name and not think before you spew that silliness.

Right, that’s what I was thinking, where does the Mustang go from here? It seems that the retro gimmick was a two trick pony at most.

I’d like to see a mid exhaust on this 370Z à la Veyron.

The Z recalls it’s predecessors without using retro cues as a crutch. It has the long hood, short back profile, and a couple small gestures to Z’s of the past. Though a vertical stacked exhaust would be the full nuts on this thing.

So for style, the Z wins hands down.

Though I wouldn’t spring for an automatic…

Everyone is complaining about the paddles but what else could you have wanted Nissan to do? The “sportshift” shifter in hand is always lame so paddles are the best way to go and they did a great job in this car. The paddles are stationary, which are the best in my opinion, and the shifts are relatively quick.

Hahahah, nice try beatusmongous.

Hahah

“Look for a gas station honey, we’ve only got two dots of gas left.” – My Quest has that gauge, too. I’ve gone 35 miles with no dots before, but I don’t know if I’d want to do it again.

Good job Nissan – HOT car!