Nissan today announced it would offer an E85 flex-fuel version of its Armada SUV in 2007. The truck will have a 5.6-liter V8 capable of running on 85% ethanol fuel, or regular gasoline. It will join Nissan’s existing E85 Titan, which was introduced in 2005.
New car price quote
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.



07/20, 4:06 PM
posted by:
tino
meh i like gm’s….more efficent
07/20, 4:07 PM
posted by:
GMrules
Thanks Tino, I thought I was the only rational person here.
07/20, 4:26 PM
posted by:
GMrules
Oh, and I’m a giant tool – a big giant tool.
07/20, 4:32 PM
posted by:
JMa
I was going to **** on #1’s comment because I was confident that the comment wasn’t backed by fact. Turns out (per fueleconomy.gov) he is right. the sierra gets better mileage and lower emissions. still wouldn’t buy either though.
07/20, 4:39 PM
posted by:
Nathan
I had an Armada and it was the biggest piece of **** in the world.
07/20, 4:50 PM
posted by:
V V
TO GMrules,
Bro I cought you, ha ha, hey lets be honest here. GM has couple cars that are ok, but GM is in serious trouble. Hey VW might have some electrical problems but man that thing atleast has style. So in conclution you thought you would never get caught HA? Yep this world has smart people like me and we can track you down. HAHA
GM and that camaro suck!!!
07/20, 5:55 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
#6: are you a stubborn little script gone crazy? Really now…spam your crap elsewhere.
07/20, 6:03 PM
posted by:
GMrules
No kidding V V, we’re getting tired of your crap.
07/20, 6:24 PM
posted by:
V V
To GMrules,
Hey you are getting tired of my crap, well, we are all tired of your crap. So, lets leave it at that and lets discuss cars only.
P.S. If you start your crap again, I will bust your crap.
07/20, 7:21 PM
posted by:
chewy
Here is why their are building an E85 vehicle. It isn’t because they are nice.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?article_id=11174§ion_id=4&page_number=7#flex
07/20, 7:43 PM
posted by:
gonewiththewind
Any of you know what the E85 MPG rating is compare to its gasoline counterpart?
07/20, 10:05 PM
posted by:
Anonymous
#10 never visit streetfire.net then
07/20, 10:17 PM
posted by:
JB
GM’s SUCK!
07/21, 6:47 AM
posted by:
JMa
#13, e85 vehicles get worse mileage, but produce fewer emissions (see http://www.fueleconomy.gov)
07/21, 7:10 AM
posted by:
zan
e85 is a waste of time. We could never produce enough fuel for everyone to use it and the engines are not efficient enough.
07/21, 3:04 PM
posted by:
joeb
E85 is a red herring and the only reason car companies are immediately persuing it is because of the lack of having to sink money into new engine design. This is bascially non-news for the huge majority of people who don’t have a reliable supply of E85 fuel available. Forget E85 and bring on the diesels!!
07/23, 1:23 AM
posted by:
Kickin
Motorweek had articles about E85 back in 2003. Why is it being marketed JUST NOW as some miracle fuel alternative?
http://www.ilcorn.org/update/html/5-15-03.html
07/30, 9:05 AM
posted by:
E85 Flex Fuel
I agree with Joeb. E85 is a red herring. See:
http://alt-e.blogspot.com/2006/07/is-ethanol-e85-fuel-solution.html