Comments on: NEW: First clear pics of 2010 Opel Vectra/Saturn Aura

By: t-ak-box

t-ak-box — Tue, 15 May 2007 00:20:34 +0000

How does an article on the new Opel Vectra/ Possible Saturn Aura become a hate the new not even seen Accord posts? :-{

By: Htay5500

Htay5500 — Mon, 14 May 2007 23:44:28 +0000

i dont like neither the nxt accord or this aura. IT IS too soon for a new aura. i dont like the current aura as well.

By: 1487_GM_SALES

1487_GM_SALES — Mon, 14 May 2007 12:25:42 +0000

Some people really have no clue. The Aura has bigger fish to fry than the measly Accord and Camry. The consumers have voted with their wallets and the current Aura is clearly the winner. The new one is about to move beyond that while the G6 and Malibu trounce the Camcords in the market.

Just wait, this one is special.

By: autonutt

autonutt — Mon, 14 May 2007 04:25:51 +0000

I still think it is too soon for a new Aura.. perhaps like the current Aura, Vectra and Malibu, the next ones will still have unique bodies on the same platform.. so maybe this Vectra bodyshell will be dualed with the next Pontiac G6 sedan instead, and the concept Vectra GTC coupe could foreshadow the next G6 coupe/convertible? Seems like it would be a good style fit with the upcoming G8.

By: F451

F451 — Sun, 13 May 2007 17:36:46 +0000

I have to agreed with others…the Honda Accord has not looked good since the model in the fourth generation (1989–1993) model years, and this Opel Vectra/Saturn Aura looks much better than even the new proposed Accord.

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Sun, 13 May 2007 12:41:49 +0000

Leaps better than Accord. At least this appears to have some style.

By: stick2clutch

stick2clutch — Sun, 13 May 2007 08:41:50 +0000

What I see so far already looks better than the new accord.

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Sat, 12 May 2007 15:57:44 +0000

#1 its not a gm fansite its a site for car enthusiasts
#2 its an anti american site if you havnt noticed
#3 10 to one its a gm hater site
.
flying suckmeahara, stop trolling gm#1 finally stopped is it impossible to talk cars without bashing americans?
GM is diong some things rite for once, give them credit for at least trying to see what consumers want, not just saying “we are GM you will buy what we will build crappy or not”

By: Carnut4ever

Carnut4ever — Sat, 12 May 2007 10:57:36 +0000

It looks better than the upcoming new Accord.

By: 1487_GM_SALES

1487_GM_SALES — Fri, 11 May 2007 20:35:49 +0000

For a GM fansite, there is an aweful lot of trolling going around here. Why not troll elsewhere for a change? Seems simple enough for even the most childish of posters here.

If you don’t have anything nice to say, then don’t speak. Go GM.

By: Ricardo Head

Ricardo Head — Fri, 11 May 2007 19:16:51 +0000

Seems like the trunk opening of that car must be very small. Wonder if they will offer a hatch…

By: rodeo40

rodeo40 — Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:53 +0000

I too cheer for GM every time they introduce something new…but they always let me down with inferior interior design an overall crappy driving experience. Please GM give us something to be proud of!

By: hateful83

hateful83 — Fri, 11 May 2007 17:24:13 +0000

Some times it doesn’t even seem worth arguing on here. It kinda comes down to a matter of opinion. I like what GM’s been doing. They seem to be the only american car company on some sort of track. You can actually notice improvements. Call me crazy, but being from the US and all, I’m kinda cheering for the home team. At least they’re competitive. Ford and Chrysler really need to get there **** together.

By: 1487_GM_SALES

1487_GM_SALES — Fri, 11 May 2007 16:36:39 +0000

Or like you, they are dumb enough not to buy GM. Go ahead and buy your Camry pal, and when it breaks down on your for the umpteenth time, maybe you won’t be so eager to bash GM.

By: Flying Sukahara

Flying Sukahara — Fri, 11 May 2007 15:06:37 +0000

Hey homeslice GTP I have more brains in my pinky than you do in your whole body!

And by the way GetReal the same company complaining about Jelly Bean shaped cars- ahem is General Motors- and now they can’t make enough of them. Call them what you like that is what the public likes Aerodynamic shaped cars. So say whatever you want dummy. GM did so and then went back to their design department said we will build what we want and people will buy it.

In essence, they fought modern design flow for years, And after GM said we are losing customers in droves that
they have begun to waken up and change their ways.
But Mr. and Mrs consumer has told GM repeatedly no your not the market. You build what we want. And about the only ones dumb enough to buy GM well lets just say their dumb or their employed by GM

By: rodeo40

rodeo40 — Fri, 11 May 2007 14:47:23 +0000

It may look Japanese, but it’s a big step forward. Please GM give us an affordable car with looks and quality!

By: Get Real

Get Real — Fri, 11 May 2007 11:35:16 +0000

Another soap-bar shaped car.

How long until the Taurus school of design dies ??

Chrysler sell the 300 in spite of poor quality and fuel mileage BECAUSE it doesn’t look like this boring crap.

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Fri, 11 May 2007 11:15:38 +0000

Cool, we have a new homeboy in Flying Sukahara, just even more incapable of making coherent posts!

I would love to know, though, how you know what the new Impala looks like when it hasn’t been designed yet. You must have some incredible sources!

By: Flying Sukahara

Flying Sukahara — Fri, 11 May 2007 07:14:06 +0000

(EDITED FOR LANGUAGE)

By: autonutt

autonutt — Thu, 10 May 2007 23:37:25 +0000

Are you sure the new shots are the same car? The grille in particular looks a lot like the Chrysler Sebring.

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Thu, 10 May 2007 22:05:08 +0000

are* camo’d, sorry

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Thu, 10 May 2007 22:04:53 +0000

What’s funny is that the side mirrors and camo’d, as if side mirrors ever change, LOL!

By: snoboardguy21

snoboardguy21 — Thu, 10 May 2007 22:03:12 +0000

GM loves them some zebra stripes.

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Thu, 10 May 2007 21:30:15 +0000

If you notice from the new camo shots, even with the covers on it the nose doesn’t seem nearly as pushed out as in the rendering.

By: jackdev73

jackdev73 — Thu, 10 May 2007 21:15:34 +0000

This doesn’t look anything like a Camry. Camrys are grotesque and misshapen.

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Thu, 10 May 2007 20:50:36 +0000

All in all, looks promising. Need to know more to discuss it further.

By: F451

F451 — Thu, 10 May 2007 20:44:33 +0000

I love the mule camouflage!

By: cknoff

cknoff — Thu, 10 May 2007 20:24:04 +0000

The back end has a real Bangle butt going on…

By: GMCsyclone#478

GMCsyclone#478 — Thu, 10 May 2007 02:31:47 +0000

THANK YOU TOZO!! I was saying the same thing!! No wonder people fall for Dr.Al Gore’s propoganda.

By: TOZO

TOZO — Thu, 10 May 2007 02:05:44 +0000

This is all based on the artist’s picture! No one has seen nuthin’! Nuthin!!!

By: autonutt

autonutt — Wed, 09 May 2007 07:13:39 +0000

It’s too soon for a new Aura and Malibu, considering one has been in showrooms less than 12 months and the other hasn’t arrived at all yet! But the next Pontiac G6 sedan, the oldest of the bunch, could very well share the bodystyle of the new Vectra, since they all share the same platform.

By: anyclearer

anyclearer — Tue, 08 May 2007 18:57:15 +0000

Looks great to me!

By: Mitch Bangowitz

Mitch Bangowitz — Tue, 08 May 2007 16:23:53 +0000

Altima had intercourse with an Ion.

Yawn.

By: golf4me

golf4me — Tue, 08 May 2007 16:14:51 +0000

To me, it looks just like an Acura RL, which isn’t bad at all…

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Tue, 08 May 2007 14:49:38 +0000

Kaptain is 100% correct about European bumper regulations. That’s why you never see anything good-looking come out of Europe for under $60,000.