<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009.5 Pontiac G6 facelift [Updated with live images]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:35:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mShu7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420699</link>
		<dc:creator>mShu7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420699</guid>
		<description>Oh, by the way.  I&#039;d much rather have to replace a timing belt every 100K on a quality Japanese vehicle than drive a GM vehicle and have to put up with all the repairs that come with owning a GM.  And I&#039;m not talking about just under the hood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, by the way.  I&#8217;d much rather have to replace a timing belt every 100K on a quality Japanese vehicle than drive a GM vehicle and have to put up with all the repairs that come with owning a GM.  And I&#8217;m not talking about just under the hood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mShu7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420695</link>
		<dc:creator>mShu7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420695</guid>
		<description>olds307: I could really care less what you have to say about what&#039;s under the hood of all these cars you supposedly work on.  In more cases than not, the fact is that GM cars are inferior to most Japanese counterparts.  There&#039;s a reason that resale value&#039;s on GM vehicles are so horrible.  As I said earlier, I grew up in a GM family and owned GM cars up until I bought a Mazda3 in &#039;05 and a Tacoma in &#039;07.  Both cars blow the socks off anything I&#039;ve ever owned from GM.  No squeaks, rattles, other weird noises.  I don&#039;t have to constantly take either one of the vehicles in for warranty work.  My Mazda3&#039;s resale value is quite high.  All these things are things I could never say about any of the GM vehicles I ever owned.

Once again, there is a reason (or in this case multiple reasons) why GM products have the reputation they have.  There&#039;s a reason why so many people refuse to buy their products these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olds307: I could really care less what you have to say about what&#8217;s under the hood of all these cars you supposedly work on.  In more cases than not, the fact is that GM cars are inferior to most Japanese counterparts.  There&#8217;s a reason that resale value&#8217;s on GM vehicles are so horrible.  As I said earlier, I grew up in a GM family and owned GM cars up until I bought a Mazda3 in &#8216;05 and a Tacoma in &#8216;07.  Both cars blow the socks off anything I&#8217;ve ever owned from GM.  No squeaks, rattles, other weird noises.  I don&#8217;t have to constantly take either one of the vehicles in for warranty work.  My Mazda3&#8217;s resale value is quite high.  All these things are things I could never say about any of the GM vehicles I ever owned.</p>
<p>Once again, there is a reason (or in this case multiple reasons) why GM products have the reputation they have.  There&#8217;s a reason why so many people refuse to buy their products these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420465</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420465</guid>
		<description>Blakkar- I would agree with you there, if half the vehicles you mentioned weren&#039;t crap.

Large coupes just aren&#039;t the &quot;thing&quot; to own anymore. Most people have moved onto SUV&#039;s. People talked about this in the early 90&#039;s, when most of these vehicles as well as station wagons were disappearing. The Camaro and Firebird were never really good cars after the Pony Car Era. They didn&#039;t drive well, bombed with resale, only the top models were well sought after, cheap interiors and engineering. They didn&#039;t drive sharp aside from a few of the higher end performance models. I love the way the outgoing Firebird looked, it&#039;s definitely one of the coolest looking American cars to come out in the past 10 years.

And the G bodies had the same case. Not sharp to drive, even the current Monte Carlo is in my opinion good looking, but soft to drive, front wheel drive and a few other things. Even if they moved it to RWD, I&#039;m not so sure...

The B-bodies though... Ah, the B-bodies. This may surprise some of you, but the fastest car I&#039;ve ever driven was a Chevrolet Caprice V-8, with the police package. Was a little bit soft, but it handled ridiculously well, had huge amounts of power, and surprisingly got pretty good fuel economy! I think my mouth dropped when my friend, who had owned the vehicle, told me that he averaged just around 25 miles to the gallon... and not on a light pedal either. But everything else on that platform- the Roadmaster and Deville- was just overkill. The Roadmaster was way too soft, and the Deville just wasn&#039;t refined enough to be a luxury vehicle.
.
.
.
.
See, it&#039;s strange, but the beautiful thing about American cars were they never ironed out every crease, detail and part on their cars. They were just candid, you saw what they were, while the rest of the worlds vehicles  were down in the drain in the 50&#039;s to 70&#039;s. They were trying to be something they weren&#039;t. I think that&#039;s where The Big Three went wrong. When they started trying to make their performance coupes more high tech. When they tried to reverse everything the American auto industry was about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blakkar- I would agree with you there, if half the vehicles you mentioned weren&#8217;t crap.</p>
<p>Large coupes just aren&#8217;t the &#8220;thing&#8221; to own anymore. Most people have moved onto SUV&#8217;s. People talked about this in the early 90&#8217;s, when most of these vehicles as well as station wagons were disappearing. The Camaro and Firebird were never really good cars after the Pony Car Era. They didn&#8217;t drive well, bombed with resale, only the top models were well sought after, cheap interiors and engineering. They didn&#8217;t drive sharp aside from a few of the higher end performance models. I love the way the outgoing Firebird looked, it&#8217;s definitely one of the coolest looking American cars to come out in the past 10 years.</p>
<p>And the G bodies had the same case. Not sharp to drive, even the current Monte Carlo is in my opinion good looking, but soft to drive, front wheel drive and a few other things. Even if they moved it to RWD, I&#8217;m not so sure&#8230;</p>
<p>The B-bodies though&#8230; Ah, the B-bodies. This may surprise some of you, but the fastest car I&#8217;ve ever driven was a Chevrolet Caprice V-8, with the police package. Was a little bit soft, but it handled ridiculously well, had huge amounts of power, and surprisingly got pretty good fuel economy! I think my mouth dropped when my friend, who had owned the vehicle, told me that he averaged just around 25 miles to the gallon&#8230; and not on a light pedal either. But everything else on that platform- the Roadmaster and Deville- was just overkill. The Roadmaster was way too soft, and the Deville just wasn&#8217;t refined enough to be a luxury vehicle.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
See, it&#8217;s strange, but the beautiful thing about American cars were they never ironed out every crease, detail and part on their cars. They were just candid, you saw what they were, while the rest of the worlds vehicles  were down in the drain in the 50&#8217;s to 70&#8217;s. They were trying to be something they weren&#8217;t. I think that&#8217;s where The Big Three went wrong. When they started trying to make their performance coupes more high tech. When they tried to reverse everything the American auto industry was about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sakio327</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420377</link>
		<dc:creator>sakio327</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420377</guid>
		<description>Oh sure, Nissan and Infiniti has a brand new G37 and 370Z.  Honda has the new Accord.  Lexus has the new hybrid RX and the IS Convertible.  Pontiac has a facelifted G6..........and you wonder why they&#039;re in trouble?  This was from the comapny that created classics, GTO, Firebird Trans Am, Fiero (OK, not so classic, but it looked good).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh sure, Nissan and Infiniti has a brand new G37 and 370Z.  Honda has the new Accord.  Lexus has the new hybrid RX and the IS Convertible.  Pontiac has a facelifted G6&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.and you wonder why they&#8217;re in trouble?  This was from the comapny that created classics, GTO, Firebird Trans Am, Fiero (OK, not so classic, but it looked good).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Spadaro</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420294</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Spadaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420294</guid>
		<description>I like the overall shape of the G6 sedan.  Really, I do.  If the GXP didn&#039;t have that horrible schnoz on it, I&#039;d buy it in a heartbeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the overall shape of the G6 sedan.  Really, I do.  If the GXP didn&#8217;t have that horrible schnoz on it, I&#8217;d buy it in a heartbeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420275</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420275</guid>
		<description>mShu7: all you know about cars is what&#039;s on the surface. Every day I am under the hood and underneath every type of car, just today alone I did a tune up, oil service/general inspection, and fixed a gas leak on a 1971 Pontiac GTO, all the way up to interval service on a 2008 Cadillac CTS and 2006 BMW 6 series.

I know how different type of cars are build, the pattern failures found in every car, etc. And I know what types of cars *I* would like not own, not based on some magazine or what&#039;s in my neighbor&#039;s driveway, but actual experience of dealing with every manufacturer&#039;s design and engineering UNDER the pretty sheet metal.

For starters, I would NOT own a car with a timing BELT. There goes every Japanese car except Nissan. What about the engines found in the Pontiac G6 and most other GM cars? Yup.. they have a timing CHAIN.

The timing CHAIN in my 1981 Olds lasted 28 years and 150,000 miles until I changed it as regular maintenance because even chains stretch a little over time and throw off the cam timing slightly.... however it&#039;s very unusual for one to break and cause fatal engine damage, as happens on Hondas and Toyotas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mShu7: all you know about cars is what&#8217;s on the surface. Every day I am under the hood and underneath every type of car, just today alone I did a tune up, oil service/general inspection, and fixed a gas leak on a 1971 Pontiac GTO, all the way up to interval service on a 2008 Cadillac CTS and 2006 BMW 6 series.</p>
<p>I know how different type of cars are build, the pattern failures found in every car, etc. And I know what types of cars *I* would like not own, not based on some magazine or what&#8217;s in my neighbor&#8217;s driveway, but actual experience of dealing with every manufacturer&#8217;s design and engineering UNDER the pretty sheet metal.</p>
<p>For starters, I would NOT own a car with a timing BELT. There goes every Japanese car except Nissan. What about the engines found in the Pontiac G6 and most other GM cars? Yup.. they have a timing CHAIN.</p>
<p>The timing CHAIN in my 1981 Olds lasted 28 years and 150,000 miles until I changed it as regular maintenance because even chains stretch a little over time and throw off the cam timing slightly&#8230;. however it&#8217;s very unusual for one to break and cause fatal engine damage, as happens on Hondas and Toyotas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tritonpower5.4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420197</link>
		<dc:creator>Tritonpower5.4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420197</guid>
		<description>The new Fusion blows this car out of the water!!  Nuff said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Fusion blows this car out of the water!!  Nuff said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strongbad</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420189</link>
		<dc:creator>strongbad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420189</guid>
		<description>And in one minor facelift, the car is now 10 years older.  Who put the Grand Am grill on the G6?  Can we get rid of that look already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in one minor facelift, the car is now 10 years older.  Who put the Grand Am grill on the G6?  Can we get rid of that look already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Spadaro</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420128</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Spadaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420128</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a pity GM didn&#039;t see fit to relieve the G6 GXP of that hideous (read: over-sized) upper grille.  It ruins an otherwise decent exterior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity GM didn&#8217;t see fit to relieve the G6 GXP of that hideous (read: over-sized) upper grille.  It ruins an otherwise decent exterior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idrinorbarsaku</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420120</link>
		<dc:creator>idrinorbarsaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420120</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know if its just me but the convertible looks as if it has a foot of ground clearance from the front bumper. they really need to redesign the interior. it still has that sh!ty pontiac look. well, at least it has shinny wheels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know if its just me but the convertible looks as if it has a foot of ground clearance from the front bumper. they really need to redesign the interior. it still has that sh!ty pontiac look. well, at least it has shinny wheels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mShu7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420115</link>
		<dc:creator>mShu7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420115</guid>
		<description>olds307: You&#039;re so right.  All the people that have driven GM (American) cars through the years and are now driving foreign cars are crazy.  All the people that buy foreign cars and keep going back to foreign cars when they are ready for a new vehicle, are crazy as well.  All people/magazines/etc. that give such high praise for the quality of foreign cars are crazy.  And to think none of these people realize that those cheap foreign cars used an &quot;automatic spring belt tensioner&quot; or &quot;cheap-headed distributor cap screws&quot;.  Crazy people I tell ya.

/sarcasm off

As DB9 pointed out, the G6 is a PRIME example of why GM is in the mess that they are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olds307: You&#8217;re so right.  All the people that have driven GM (American) cars through the years and are now driving foreign cars are crazy.  All the people that buy foreign cars and keep going back to foreign cars when they are ready for a new vehicle, are crazy as well.  All people/magazines/etc. that give such high praise for the quality of foreign cars are crazy.  And to think none of these people realize that those cheap foreign cars used an &#8220;automatic spring belt tensioner&#8221; or &#8220;cheap-headed distributor cap screws&#8221;.  Crazy people I tell ya.</p>
<p>/sarcasm off</p>
<p>As DB9 pointed out, the G6 is a PRIME example of why GM is in the mess that they are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB9</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-2#comment-420030</link>
		<dc:creator>DB9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420030</guid>
		<description>@ Blakkarr &quot;The Reason Why DETROIT is in such a bind is because their is not love for the American car just the money the job brings. If you love your work the money is secondary. These guys DO NOT LOVE THEIR WORK and it shows!&quot;

You&#039;ve hit it right on the head!!! If I was on the senate panel I would be force feeding Wagoner et al., words similar to your statement.

They - and their former colleagues and bosses - have run these businesses as if they were toilet paper factories. few were true Car people or engineers for that matter. At least, Ford&#039;s Mullaly has experience running a company that lives or dies by its design and engineering. The others, well it has all been said and the past 20-30yrs to apparent. However, the big 3 should never have had to bear the benefit burdens that the UAW has extracted from them. 

However, does not change the fact that Honda and Toyota are the blandest boring appliances on the road.  Funnier still, the big three basically ceded the market to them. Anyone still remember the manual choke on the earl 80&#039;s civics and accord:-))) Haysus now they are kings of the road:-))) TDF (Too Damn Funny)

DB9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Blakkarr &#8220;The Reason Why DETROIT is in such a bind is because their is not love for the American car just the money the job brings. If you love your work the money is secondary. These guys DO NOT LOVE THEIR WORK and it shows!&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve hit it right on the head!!! If I was on the senate panel I would be force feeding Wagoner et al., words similar to your statement.</p>
<p>They &#8211; and their former colleagues and bosses &#8211; have run these businesses as if they were toilet paper factories. few were true Car people or engineers for that matter. At least, Ford&#8217;s Mullaly has experience running a company that lives or dies by its design and engineering. The others, well it has all been said and the past 20-30yrs to apparent. However, the big 3 should never have had to bear the benefit burdens that the UAW has extracted from them. </p>
<p>However, does not change the fact that Honda and Toyota are the blandest boring appliances on the road.  Funnier still, the big three basically ceded the market to them. Anyone still remember the manual choke on the earl 80&#8217;s civics and accord:-))) Haysus now they are kings of the road:-))) TDF (Too Damn Funny)</p>
<p>DB9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tzu13</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-420028</link>
		<dc:creator>tzu13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-420028</guid>
		<description>...I give up. What did they change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I give up. What did they change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419991</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419991</guid>
		<description>All these comments just proves how uneducated the car-buying public is, yet everyone thinks (s)he&#039;s an expert.

Heres a fact about Japanese &quot;big 3&quot; cars: they&#039;re built so cheap they don&#039;t even have an automatic spring belt tensioner. Something that most American and German cars has had since the 80s. Why? because a wormscrew and a bolt is much cheaper. They&#039;re cheap cars. Cheap. End of story. A wormscrew manual &quot;tensioner&quot; is equivelant to a rotary dial telephone today. That&#039;s just one example... or how about the cheap screws that the heads easily twist off they used to hold down distributor caps until they JUST RECENTLY went to distributorless ignition... again something most American cars has had since the 80s. And why can&#039;t Honda build an automatic transmission shifter that locks at Overdrive like EVERY other manufacturer instead of easily slipping right past into &#039;D3&#039;. 

I could go on and on but it will fall on deaf ears. People will believe what they want to believe despite fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these comments just proves how uneducated the car-buying public is, yet everyone thinks (s)he&#8217;s an expert.</p>
<p>Heres a fact about Japanese &#8220;big 3&#8243; cars: they&#8217;re built so cheap they don&#8217;t even have an automatic spring belt tensioner. Something that most American and German cars has had since the 80s. Why? because a wormscrew and a bolt is much cheaper. They&#8217;re cheap cars. Cheap. End of story. A wormscrew manual &#8220;tensioner&#8221; is equivelant to a rotary dial telephone today. That&#8217;s just one example&#8230; or how about the cheap screws that the heads easily twist off they used to hold down distributor caps until they JUST RECENTLY went to distributorless ignition&#8230; again something most American cars has had since the 80s. And why can&#8217;t Honda build an automatic transmission shifter that locks at Overdrive like EVERY other manufacturer instead of easily slipping right past into &#8216;D3&#8242;. </p>
<p>I could go on and on but it will fall on deaf ears. People will believe what they want to believe despite fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hateful83</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419983</link>
		<dc:creator>hateful83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419983</guid>
		<description>This, to me, is one of the main reasons why GM is in the boat it&#039;s in. This is just a subpar entry in the segment. It&#039;s not even as good as its stablemate the malibu. This facelift pretty much sucks, sad to say it, but it does. Hopefully GM gets an opportunity to get its shit straight. To start eliminating all these unnecessary overlaped models. America is way to competitive a market to have so many midpack models. As of late I thought they&#039;d been moving in the right direction, with models like the CTS and the malibu. Then they pull some shit like this, and don&#039;t forget that rebadged aveo the &quot;G3&quot; I believe it is. What the hell is that, and why in gods name does it have a pontiac grill on it? All that said, I am a GM fan, and if they survive I hope they get someone at the helm that can actually run the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, to me, is one of the main reasons why GM is in the boat it&#8217;s in. This is just a subpar entry in the segment. It&#8217;s not even as good as its stablemate the malibu. This facelift pretty much sucks, sad to say it, but it does. Hopefully GM gets an opportunity to get its **** straight. To start eliminating all these unnecessary overlaped models. America is way to competitive a market to have so many midpack models. As of late I thought they&#8217;d been moving in the right direction, with models like the CTS and the malibu. Then they pull some **** like this, and don&#8217;t forget that rebadged aveo the &#8220;G3&#8243; I believe it is. What the hell is that, and why in gods name does it have a pontiac grill on it? All that said, I am a GM fan, and if they survive I hope they get someone at the helm that can actually run the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: downhillwarrior</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419849</link>
		<dc:creator>downhillwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419849</guid>
		<description>I was referring mostly to the looks of the car.. though I would still never own the engine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was referring mostly to the looks of the car.. though I would still never own the engine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mShu7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419708</link>
		<dc:creator>mShu7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419708</guid>
		<description>olds307: Even if it has a decent engine, it doesn&#039;t change the fact that anybody that buys the car would have to drive that pile of low-quality garbage.  I&#039;d rather spend my money on something that is a complete package (what the G6 is NOT).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olds307: Even if it has a decent engine, it doesn&#8217;t change the fact that anybody that buys the car would have to drive that pile of low-quality garbage.  I&#8217;d rather spend my money on something that is a complete package (what the G6 is NOT).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419582</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419582</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say the current generation Accord Coupe AND Sedan is BUTT UGLY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say the current generation Accord Coupe AND Sedan is BUTT UGLY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PW</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419580</link>
		<dc:creator>PW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419580</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say last-generation Honda Accord Coupe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say last-generation Honda Accord Coupe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419574</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419574</guid>
		<description>Looks good.

Anyone hear making negative comments doesn&#039;t know what they&#039;re talking about. The GM 4 cylinder &quot;ECOTEC&quot; engine is superior to anything from the japanese, and the G6 is a solid competitor to the Accord, Camry, etc.

Pontiac G6  4 cyl,  2.4 L,  Automatic  (S6),  Regular  22 city  33 hwy
Honda Accord 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular 21 city 30 hwy
Toyota Camry 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular 21 city 31 hwy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good.</p>
<p>Anyone hear making negative comments doesn&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re talking about. The GM 4 cylinder &#8220;ECOTEC&#8221; engine is superior to anything from the japanese, and the G6 is a solid competitor to the Accord, Camry, etc.</p>
<p>Pontiac G6  4 cyl,  2.4 L,  Automatic  (S6),  Regular  22 city  33 hwy<br />
Honda Accord 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular 21 city 30 hwy<br />
Toyota Camry 4 cyl, 2.4 L, Automatic 5-spd, Regular 21 city 31 hwy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mShu7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419553</link>
		<dc:creator>mShu7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419553</guid>
		<description>@ sj79
&quot;Oh well that clears it up. Thanks for the thoughtful response. Its amazing that cars that people claim have no redeeming value still sell. The G6 sells almost as well as the Fusion and Sonata and handily beats the media darling 6 in sales. And dont say fleet sales are the answer because ALL of those models are sold to fleets. If the car is so low quality why is it still selling in a competitive segment? &quot;

The reason it sells is because it&#039;s CHEAP.  It&#039;s cheaper than foreign cars brand new because of large rebates and other incentives.  As a used car, the G6&#039;s re-sale value is laughable compared to Accord/Camry/etc.  There are a lot of people in the market for cheap cars, especially with today&#039;s market.  Some people don&#039;t care or don&#039;t understand quality when they purchase a vehicle.  Those types of people are more concerned about price.  

I grew up in a GM family but I saw the light in 2005 when I purchased a Mazda3 and then again in 2007 when I purchased a Toyota Tacoma.  I won&#039;t go back to a GM (or any other domestic) anytime soon.

Denial is the first step to recovery sj79.  Once you&#039;re able to come to grips with the fact that the G6 is a pile of crap, you&#039;ll be better off.  Good luck with your road to recovery!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ sj79<br />
&#8220;Oh well that clears it up. Thanks for the thoughtful response. Its amazing that cars that people claim have no redeeming value still sell. The G6 sells almost as well as the Fusion and Sonata and handily beats the media darling 6 in sales. And dont say fleet sales are the answer because ALL of those models are sold to fleets. If the car is so low quality why is it still selling in a competitive segment? &#8221;</p>
<p>The reason it sells is because it&#8217;s CHEAP.  It&#8217;s cheaper than foreign cars brand new because of large rebates and other incentives.  As a used car, the G6&#8217;s re-sale value is laughable compared to Accord/Camry/etc.  There are a lot of people in the market for cheap cars, especially with today&#8217;s market.  Some people don&#8217;t care or don&#8217;t understand quality when they purchase a vehicle.  Those types of people are more concerned about price.  </p>
<p>I grew up in a GM family but I saw the light in 2005 when I purchased a Mazda3 and then again in 2007 when I purchased a Toyota Tacoma.  I won&#8217;t go back to a GM (or any other domestic) anytime soon.</p>
<p>Denial is the first step to recovery sj79.  Once you&#8217;re able to come to grips with the fact that the G6 is a pile of crap, you&#8217;ll be better off.  Good luck with your road to recovery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419551</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419551</guid>
		<description>No, pzimet, the Pontiac Vibe is just as much GM as it is Toyota. Both Toyota and GM say so, take their word for it. Much of the engineering, technicals and design work was done by GM, and much of the mechanics come from Toyota.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, pzimet, the Pontiac Vibe is just as much GM as it is Toyota. Both Toyota and GM say so, take their word for it. Much of the engineering, technicals and design work was done by GM, and much of the mechanics come from Toyota.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beatusmongous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419548</link>
		<dc:creator>beatusmongous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419548</guid>
		<description>Blakkarr, your last paragraph was 100% correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blakkarr, your last paragraph was 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rms492</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419544</link>
		<dc:creator>rms492</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419544</guid>
		<description>Hello, can someone explain to me what constitutes a model year?  How can a car be made in a &quot;1/2&quot; year?  How come when the &#039;09 Corolla came out in March of &#039;08, it was an &#039;09 and not an &#039;08?
How come when the Tundra came out in February of &#039;07, it was an &#039;07 and not an &#039;08?

I would appreciate it if I could have an explanation, including these &quot;1/2&quot; years.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, can someone explain to me what constitutes a model year?  How can a car be made in a &#8220;1/2&#8243; year?  How come when the &#8216;09 Corolla came out in March of &#8216;08, it was an &#8216;09 and not an &#8216;08?<br />
How come when the Tundra came out in February of &#8216;07, it was an &#8216;07 and not an &#8216;08?</p>
<p>I would appreciate it if I could have an explanation, including these &#8220;1/2&#8243; years.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419535</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419535</guid>
		<description>Wow, this will make it even more competitive against its main rivals: the Chevrolet Malibu and the Saturn Aura.  Oh, wait...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this will make it even more competitive against its main rivals: the Chevrolet Malibu and the Saturn Aura.  Oh, wait&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419519</link>
		<dc:creator>Borat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419519</guid>
		<description>@sj79,

You are correct, I haven&#039;t rent G8 and it drives well(I did test drive one). Considering that it is Australian car there is no reason to pound your own chest (I assume that you either sell Pontiac or work for GM).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sj79,</p>
<p>You are correct, I haven&#8217;t rent G8 and it drives well(I did test drive one). Considering that it is Australian car there is no reason to pound your own chest (I assume that you either sell Pontiac or work for GM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: downhillwarrior</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419512</link>
		<dc:creator>downhillwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419512</guid>
		<description>crap on wheels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crap on wheels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F3INT))AP3X</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419491</link>
		<dc:creator>F3INT))AP3X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419491</guid>
		<description>FinRox you hit the nail on the head</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FinRox you hit the nail on the head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinRox32</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419479</link>
		<dc:creator>FinRox32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419479</guid>
		<description>Instead of face-lift, how about a funeral?  Lose the crap-box, GM. Get your shit together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of face-lift, how about a funeral?  Lose the crap-box, GM. Get your **** together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419453</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419453</guid>
		<description>Thats an Accord coupe with a BMW grill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats an Accord coupe with a BMW grill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419441</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419441</guid>
		<description>Lot of people talking to themselves today. As if no one actually reads the by line for their comments. Cut it out. It is just weird and more than a little stupid.

I&#039;m not hip on the downturn on what was PONTIAC&#039;s comeback. GM&#039;s poor management and worse business models, favoring Chevy , Cadillac, and GMC more than any other division has led to a very dilute series of line ups. 

With plenty of opportunities and reasons to do things right and right away, GM has continually screwed up on important products and never followed through on Division mission declarations. 

The G6 was supposed to become an Alpha Platform car but instead is going to be held over until 2013. The G8 was supposed to get a coupe version but now we hear that GM will not renew the G8 after 2013, that might change but GM has always opted to kill off good stuff than find way to make it work. 

The complaints I have have been voiced by other on this thread in this forum alone. GM killed the Fiero, which with the OLDS Quad 4 motor was better than a C4 CORVETTE instead of making a better CORVETTE. GM killed the F-bodies, the Camaro and Firebird twins,  without a real replacement. In Fact GM never let on they were going to make a replacement for years, then they took years to roll out a new car, just as GM is in the worst trouble possible. They Kill ed the B-bodies, everyone favorite Caprice Police car, Impala SS (Most Bad @$$ muscle Car GM ever made), Buick Roadmaster and Cadillac DeVille, against without a worthy successor. The G-bodies, THe Monte Carlo (the one we wanted when we were kids), Olds Cutlass supreme, Buick Regal/GNX, and so on...

This Company needs NEW management that isn&#039;t going to play stupid games to satisfy their own egos. I would wager that the Board of Directors is going to opt to Oust Wagoner for someone with some love for the company and CARS and a vision for it&#039;s future that includes all its divisions. These boring old guys don&#039;t even look like they are really excited about their company&#039;s products. 

I mean I would have been jumping on furniture like Tom Cruise &quot;pretending&quot; to be in love with Katie Holmes (Whatever I&#039;m no star watcher) for the VOLT. I would have been going crazy to bring the Kappa Cars front and center for tuners and compact car racing, Heck! I would have said build me a new Cobalt (Don&#039;t cal it that) off the Kappa. Half the Concepts GM rolled out over the last 10 years like the Chevy SS and Ultra WTCC would have made production. Who needs bob Lutz to push these things if you have Execs that really want this stuff because they love it and it cool. 

The Reason Why DETROIT is in such a bind is because their is not love for the American car just the money the job brings. If you love your work the money is secondary. These guys DO NOT LOVE THEIR WORK and it shows!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lot of people talking to themselves today. As if no one actually reads the by line for their comments. Cut it out. It is just weird and more than a little stupid.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not hip on the downturn on what was PONTIAC&#8217;s comeback. GM&#8217;s poor management and worse business models, favoring Chevy , Cadillac, and GMC more than any other division has led to a very dilute series of line ups. </p>
<p>With plenty of opportunities and reasons to do things right and right away, GM has continually screwed up on important products and never followed through on Division mission declarations. </p>
<p>The G6 was supposed to become an Alpha Platform car but instead is going to be held over until 2013. The G8 was supposed to get a coupe version but now we hear that GM will not renew the G8 after 2013, that might change but GM has always opted to kill off good stuff than find way to make it work. </p>
<p>The complaints I have have been voiced by other on this thread in this forum alone. GM killed the Fiero, which with the OLDS Quad 4 motor was better than a C4 CORVETTE instead of making a better CORVETTE. GM killed the F-bodies, the Camaro and Firebird twins,  without a real replacement. In Fact GM never let on they were going to make a replacement for years, then they took years to roll out a new car, just as GM is in the worst trouble possible. They Kill ed the B-bodies, everyone favorite Caprice Police car, Impala SS (Most Bad @$$ muscle Car GM ever made), Buick Roadmaster and Cadillac DeVille, against without a worthy successor. The G-bodies, THe Monte Carlo (the one we wanted when we were kids), Olds Cutlass supreme, Buick Regal/GNX, and so on&#8230;</p>
<p>This Company needs NEW management that isn&#8217;t going to play stupid games to satisfy their own egos. I would wager that the Board of Directors is going to opt to Oust Wagoner for someone with some love for the company and CARS and a vision for it&#8217;s future that includes all its divisions. These boring old guys don&#8217;t even look like they are really excited about their company&#8217;s products. </p>
<p>I mean I would have been jumping on furniture like Tom Cruise &#8220;pretending&#8221; to be in love with Katie Holmes (Whatever I&#8217;m no star watcher) for the VOLT. I would have been going crazy to bring the Kappa Cars front and center for tuners and compact car racing, Heck! I would have said build me a new Cobalt (Don&#8217;t cal it that) off the Kappa. Half the Concepts GM rolled out over the last 10 years like the Chevy SS and Ultra WTCC would have made production. Who needs bob Lutz to push these things if you have Execs that really want this stuff because they love it and it cool. </p>
<p>The Reason Why DETROIT is in such a bind is because their is not love for the American car just the money the job brings. If you love your work the money is secondary. These guys DO NOT LOVE THEIR WORK and it shows!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pzimet</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419440</link>
		<dc:creator>pzimet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419440</guid>
		<description>johnnycanuk: The names were kind of coo, but the cars just sucked so bad. The Grand Am was, in my opinion, one of the ugliest cars Pontiac ever made. I thought that the last gen Grand Prix was a better interpretation of that styling exercise, and the only Bonneville worth a second glance was the GXP..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>johnnycanuk: The names were kind of coo, but the cars just sucked so bad. The Grand Am was, in my opinion, one of the ugliest cars Pontiac ever made. I thought that the last gen Grand Prix was a better interpretation of that styling exercise, and the only Bonneville worth a second glance was the GXP..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tranceformer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419439</link>
		<dc:creator>tranceformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419439</guid>
		<description>thank god I live in europe and i won&#039;t be seeing this car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank god I live in europe and i won&#8217;t be seeing this car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pzimet</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419438</link>
		<dc:creator>pzimet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419438</guid>
		<description>Borat: The reason the Vibe doesn&#039;t drive that way is because it&#039;s a Toyota Matrix. And I will definitely agree with you on your statement about all other Pontiac&#039;s, with one exception: The G8 GT. I drove one over the summer, and I have to admit, it was a lot of fun. It felt like it was bolted together well, had the best interior a Pontiac has seen...perhaps ever, and had a brute of a V8, plus RWD. However it&#039;s pertinent to note that it&#039;s not really a Pontiac, but a Holden, which explains why it&#039;s so much better than the other S-H-I-T that Pontiac spews out of its plants here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borat: The reason the Vibe doesn&#8217;t drive that way is because it&#8217;s a Toyota Matrix. And I will definitely agree with you on your statement about all other Pontiac&#8217;s, with one exception: The G8 GT. I drove one over the summer, and I have to admit, it was a lot of fun. It felt like it was bolted together well, had the best interior a Pontiac has seen&#8230;perhaps ever, and had a brute of a V8, plus RWD. However it&#8217;s pertinent to note that it&#8217;s not really a Pontiac, but a Holden, which explains why it&#8217;s so much better than the other S-H-I-T that Pontiac spews out of its plants here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/pontiac-g6.html/comment-page-1#comment-419430</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11537#comment-419430</guid>
		<description>Despite having enough lower side body cladding to make a decent shelter for the homeless, I thought the old Grand Am looked better than than the G6. And am I the only one that misses the names? Grand Am, Grand Prix, Bonneville- hell even the Sunfire moniker makes me misty at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite having enough lower side body cladding to make a decent shelter for the homeless, I thought the old Grand Am looked better than than the G6. And am I the only one that misses the names? Grand Am, Grand Prix, Bonneville- hell even the Sunfire moniker makes me misty at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
