




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renault not interested in Volvo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got Handling?</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-325483</link>
		<dc:creator>Got Handling?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-325483</guid>
		<description>Renault also bought Nissan, and I don&#039;t see Infiniti design suffering Deanster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renault also bought Nissan, and I don&#8217;t see Infiniti design suffering Deanster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-325253</link>
		<dc:creator>Cire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-325253</guid>
		<description>I agree with AMGoff. I can see Ford releasing Jaguar and Land Rover. I think Ford should keep Volvo. I think there are a lot of synergies between Volvo and Ford that benefit both companies/brands. It also gives Ford an upscale brand to sell in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with AMGoff. I can see Ford releasing Jaguar and Land Rover. I think Ford should keep Volvo. I think there are a lot of synergies between Volvo and Ford that benefit both companies/brands. It also gives Ford an upscale brand to sell in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMGoff</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324999</link>
		<dc:creator>AMGoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324999</guid>
		<description>nor am I interested in this nonstory...

either way, dumping Volvo would be the biggest (aside from the whole aston thing) boner move ever made by Ford. I&#039;m all for dumping Land Rover... and Jag, but to a lesser extent. But heaven forbid Ford hold on to a fairly respected euro-brand. Volvo is one of those rare brands that transcends categories and carves a nice niche of their own. keep it as their euro quasi-lux brand so to let Lincoln get back to making real Lincolns, not acura-esque turds like the MKZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nor am I interested in this nonstory&#8230;</p>
<p>either way, dumping Volvo would be the biggest (aside from the whole aston thing) boner move ever made by Ford. I&#8217;m all for dumping Land Rover&#8230; and Jag, but to a lesser extent. But heaven forbid Ford hold on to a fairly respected euro-brand. Volvo is one of those rare brands that transcends categories and carves a nice niche of their own. keep it as their euro quasi-lux brand so to let Lincoln get back to making real Lincolns, not acura-esque turds like the MKZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324916</link>
		<dc:creator>angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324916</guid>
		<description>are we praising Volvo&#039;s boring design?  Sure, it&#039;s an improvement of the old Volvo... but with the exception of the new C30... what&#039;s so revolutionary about it?

The S40 looks neat, but the C70 was a wasted opportunity to make a great car and the S80/S60 are plan dull.  The new V70/XC70 has barely any changes from the previous one and the V50 has little different from the S40.

Conclusion: It can do better.  I&#039;ll take the Infiniti staff under Renault that designed the new G35/37 and the M35 and the FX SUVs.  That&#039;s good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are we praising Volvo&#8217;s boring design?  Sure, it&#8217;s an improvement of the old Volvo&#8230; but with the exception of the new C30&#8230; what&#8217;s so revolutionary about it?</p>
<p>The S40 looks neat, but the C70 was a wasted opportunity to make a great car and the S80/S60 are plan dull.  The new V70/XC70 has barely any changes from the previous one and the V50 has little different from the S40.</p>
<p>Conclusion: It can do better.  I&#8217;ll take the Infiniti staff under Renault that designed the new G35/37 and the M35 and the FX SUVs.  That&#8217;s good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324910</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324910</guid>
		<description>Renault&#039;s cheap cars are some of the most interesting cheap cars on the planet. I wish to God we could get them Stateside (re: the Le Car: all is forgiven). I agree that the bigger / costlier vehicles in the Renault stable are kind of sophomoric but who&#039;s to say Volvo wouldn&#039;t raise their game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renault&#8217;s cheap cars are some of the most interesting cheap cars on the planet. I wish to God we could get them Stateside (re: the Le Car: all is forgiven). I agree that the bigger / costlier vehicles in the Renault stable are kind of sophomoric but who&#8217;s to say Volvo wouldn&#8217;t raise their game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324884</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324884</guid>
		<description>Thank G-d. Volvo doesn&#039;t need to be ruined by Renault&#039;s butt-ugly designs and crap materials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank G-d. Volvo doesn&#8217;t need to be ruined by Renault&#8217;s butt-ugly designs and crap materials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoosierHero</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324855</link>
		<dc:creator>HoosierHero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324855</guid>
		<description>Just another chance for Ford to keep something that isn&#039;t hurting their bottom line too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another chance for Ford to keep something that isn&#8217;t hurting their bottom line too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carguy5</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324841</link>
		<dc:creator>Carguy5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324841</guid>
		<description>I hope the continue the current designs but technicals could be fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the continue the current designs but technicals could be fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324834</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324834</guid>
		<description>Translation:
Lower the price and we might get interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation:<br />
Lower the price and we might get interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deanster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324823</link>
		<dc:creator>Deanster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/renault-not-interested-in-volvo.html#comment-324823</guid>
		<description>Good to know, because Volvo needs to be taken up by someone who can retain the mature design language, not the cartoonish wild crap that Renault is famous for. For small coupes and hatchbacks, Renault is cool. Their sedans, however, are too gimmicky and unsophisticated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know, because Volvo needs to be taken up by someone who can retain the mature design language, not the cartoonish wild crap that Renault is famous for. For small coupes and hatchbacks, Renault is cool. Their sedans, however, are too gimmicky and unsophisticated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 265/266 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 13:18:54 -->
