




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: BMW plans 3-Series based crossover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312846</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312846</guid>
		<description>A4: Crossovers definitely don&#039;t suck gas down at a rate comparable to truck based or full size SUV&#039;s, that&#039;s definitely not true, and more times than not crossovers aren&#039;t as large as full size SUV&#039;s, as most exist in the small to midsize SUV segment, not the full size (there are exceptions). I&#039;m not really defending the segment because I like it or something, but just because there certainly are positive attributes as opposed to larger SUV&#039;s, and you&#039;re incorrect in stating they suck gas down in the same way, the whole point of them is that they DON&#039;T use as much gas, and if you want to be realistic, the general populace could care less about off road ability, it effects so little a percentage of the market share that it wouldn&#039;t make economical sense for these companies to not have car based crossovers and instead have what you suggest, jacked up off road wagons. Just being realistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A4: Crossovers definitely don&#8217;t suck gas down at a rate comparable to truck based or full size SUV&#8217;s, that&#8217;s definitely not true, and more times than not crossovers aren&#8217;t as large as full size SUV&#8217;s, as most exist in the small to midsize SUV segment, not the full size (there are exceptions). I&#8217;m not really defending the segment because I like it or something, but just because there certainly are positive attributes as opposed to larger SUV&#8217;s, and you&#8217;re incorrect in stating they suck gas down in the same way, the whole point of them is that they DON&#8217;T use as much gas, and if you want to be realistic, the general populace could care less about off road ability, it effects so little a percentage of the market share that it wouldn&#8217;t make economical sense for these companies to not have car based crossovers and instead have what you suggest, jacked up off road wagons. Just being realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312833</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312833</guid>
		<description>I think BMW shouldn&#039;t bother with this idea. They already have a REALLY strong line up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think BMW shouldn&#8217;t bother with this idea. They already have a REALLY strong line up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainObvious</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312820</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainObvious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 09:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312820</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the stationwagon idea. Maybe a compact SUV with a M-Series would be a better choice. Cadillac CTS V-series CUV versus BMW M-series CUV. Hmmm 

A CUV would look a lot better than the stationwagon &quot;I&#039;m married with kids&quot; look. Audi&#039;s making the Q5 and you know it&#039;s going to hit the world in the face like a brick. Better listen and not screw this up BMW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the stationwagon idea. Maybe a compact SUV with a M-Series would be a better choice. Cadillac CTS V-series CUV versus BMW M-series CUV. Hmmm </p>
<p>A CUV would look a lot better than the stationwagon &#8220;I&#8217;m married with kids&#8221; look. Audi&#8217;s making the Q5 and you know it&#8217;s going to hit the world in the face like a brick. Better listen and not screw this up BMW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deantj</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312811</link>
		<dc:creator>deantj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312811</guid>
		<description>Everything Mazda has done this last generation of vehicles has come out amazing. 

The CX-7 is gorgeous and is fast and slick to boot. Killer crossover. I like this segment, but I agree that the sudden trend is a little annoying. It&#039;s going to become overexposed and risks being remembered as a fad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything Mazda has done this last generation of vehicles has come out amazing. </p>
<p>The CX-7 is gorgeous and is fast and slick to boot. Killer crossover. I like this segment, but I agree that the sudden trend is a little annoying. It&#8217;s going to become overexposed and risks being remembered as a fad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312810</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 23:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312810</guid>
		<description>Although yes i give the CX-7 credit for apparently being a very good driving experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although yes i give the CX-7 credit for apparently being a very good driving experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312809</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312809</guid>
		<description>TomF... BMW has had a 3-series wagon for years... crossovers are something different, and usually theyre crap in the sense that most carmakers talk about them. True crossovers are the ones you spoke of... subarus, XC70&#039;s, allroad&#039;s, etc. Those are what crossovers SHOULD BE but they arent. This GMC Acadia crap, CX-7, etc... not crossovers. Just mini SUV&#039;s. They still suck gas and are as big as an SUV, only they lack any off-road prowess. Id be more inclined to take a subaru outback offroading than any of these car-based SUV&#039;s that they try to call &quot;crossovers&quot;. Real crossovers are jacked up station wagons, not scaled down SUV&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TomF&#8230; BMW has had a 3-series wagon for years&#8230; crossovers are something different, and usually theyre crap in the sense that most carmakers talk about them. True crossovers are the ones you spoke of&#8230; subarus, XC70&#8242;s, allroad&#8217;s, etc. Those are what crossovers SHOULD BE but they arent. This GMC Acadia crap, CX-7, etc&#8230; not crossovers. Just mini SUV&#8217;s. They still suck gas and are as big as an SUV, only they lack any off-road prowess. Id be more inclined to take a subaru outback offroading than any of these car-based SUV&#8217;s that they try to call &#8220;crossovers&#8221;. Real crossovers are jacked up station wagons, not scaled down SUV&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadMatt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312806</link>
		<dc:creator>MadMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312806</guid>
		<description>Just buy a wagon people!  Why do people feel the need to sit up high?  Half the people I see driving SUV/CUV&#039;s don&#039;t know how to drive one anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just buy a wagon people!  Why do people feel the need to sit up high?  Half the people I see driving SUV/CUV&#8217;s don&#8217;t know how to drive one anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312805</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 17:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312805</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather have people be driving crossovers than full size or even mid size truck based SUV&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have people be driving crossovers than full size or even mid size truck based SUV&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312797</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 04:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312797</guid>
		<description>SUV users are moving to crossovers, so think about how many people own SUV&#039;s and imagine the number of different models that will be available in the near future.  If you&#039;re not into SUV&#039;s to begin with, then why bother commenting as you won&#039;t buy crossovers in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUV users are moving to crossovers, so think about how many people own SUV&#8217;s and imagine the number of different models that will be available in the near future.  If you&#8217;re not into SUV&#8217;s to begin with, then why bother commenting as you won&#8217;t buy crossovers in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottacontrol</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312793</link>
		<dc:creator>ottacontrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 02:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312793</guid>
		<description>come onnnnn this shit is mad confusing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come onnnnn this shit is mad confusing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyperion</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312791</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyperion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312791</guid>
		<description>Dodge used to sell an entry level sedan.  Then they replaced it with a &quot;crossover&quot; as the sole entry level vehicle in their lineup.

I hope BMW won&#039;t do the same to the 3-series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dodge used to sell an entry level sedan.  Then they replaced it with a &#8220;crossover&#8221; as the sole entry level vehicle in their lineup.</p>
<p>I hope BMW won&#8217;t do the same to the 3-series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SRT-4Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312790</link>
		<dc:creator>SRT-4Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312790</guid>
		<description>----------&gt;PrimeGTP, i&#039;m definately with you on that one: &quot;I&#039;m just sick of them. Yea, they are useful, but I don&#039;t understand why there needs to be 6 billion different models.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&gt;PrimeGTP, i&#8217;m definately with you on that one: &#8220;I&#8217;m just sick of them. Yea, they are useful, but I don&#8217;t understand why there needs to be 6 billion different models.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312784</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312784</guid>
		<description>GMC will probably have multiple crossovers when all is said and done. 2 BMWs are talked of in this article alone. And yea, Toyota, Ford, maybe Honda though they are fairly quiet lately. It just seems like too much for a young segment that is being smothered to death because it showed some life. The funny thing is when all these two-faced automakers b*tch that no one is buying big cars anymore and they want to start building more compacts, and then what is the first thing to come off the drawing boards afterwards? A crossover SUV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMC will probably have multiple crossovers when all is said and done. 2 BMWs are talked of in this article alone. And yea, Toyota, Ford, maybe Honda though they are fairly quiet lately. It just seems like too much for a young segment that is being smothered to death because it showed some life. The funny thing is when all these two-faced automakers b*tch that no one is buying big cars anymore and they want to start building more compacts, and then what is the first thing to come off the drawing boards afterwards? A crossover SUV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrio</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312783</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312783</guid>
		<description>If theres anything that I&#039;ve wanted from the 3 series, its for it to be taller and slower and handle worse than it does. I cant wait for them to make this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If theres anything that I&#8217;ve wanted from the 3 series, its for it to be taller and slower and handle worse than it does. I cant wait for them to make this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312782</guid>
		<description>Lol I understand
Chew on this- I just went to msn.auos and they listed 44 automakers that sell cars in the US auto market. Taking out the obvious makers that probably won&#039;t make a crossover (Aston-Martin,Bentley Ferrari &amp; rolls Royce) leaves us with 40 possible crossovers that may come to the market. Maybe more from companies like Toyota and Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol I understand<br />
Chew on this- I just went to msn.auos and they listed 44 automakers that sell cars in the US auto market. Taking out the obvious makers that probably won&#8217;t make a crossover (Aston-Martin,Bentley Ferrari &amp; rolls Royce) leaves us with 40 possible crossovers that may come to the market. Maybe more from companies like Toyota and Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312781</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312781</guid>
		<description>Jazz, I don&#039;t have any hate per-se for crossovers, I&#039;m just sick of them. Yea, they are useful, but I don&#039;t understand why there needs to be 6 billion different models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jazz, I don&#8217;t have any hate per-se for crossovers, I&#8217;m just sick of them. Yea, they are useful, but I don&#8217;t understand why there needs to be 6 billion different models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312780</guid>
		<description>I missed the minivan craze but got caught in the SUV maelstrom. Now that gas prices suck I may have to follow the lemmings and get a crossover. I don&#039;t want to lose the versatility of a SUV.

I don&#039;t know about Choas Titans. Are they fuel efficient?

PrimeGTP why the hate for Crossovers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the minivan craze but got caught in the SUV maelstrom. Now that gas prices suck I may have to follow the lemmings and get a crossover. I don&#8217;t want to lose the versatility of a SUV.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Choas Titans. Are they fuel efficient?</p>
<p>PrimeGTP why the hate for Crossovers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312771</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 18:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312771</guid>
		<description>For cryin&#039; out loud....crossover #523,117,905...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For cryin&#8217; out loud&#8230;.crossover #523,117,905&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kosai03</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312768</link>
		<dc:creator>kosai03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312768</guid>
		<description>mini vans -&gt; suvs -&gt; crossovers -&gt; chaos titans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mini vans -&gt; suvs -&gt; crossovers -&gt; chaos titans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c4Menace</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312767</link>
		<dc:creator>c4Menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312767</guid>
		<description>&quot;LP640&quot; at least they will make it fuel efficient..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;LP640&#8243; at least they will make it fuel efficient..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP640</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312763</link>
		<dc:creator>LP640</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312763</guid>
		<description>just what we need, yet more stupid crossovers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just what we need, yet more stupid crossovers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312760</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312760</guid>
		<description>Smart move into a neglected market segment that needs more options. if you want a premium station wagon and don&#039;t like the Outback, Avant or V70/XC70, where do you look? It&#039;s good news that Caddy is jumping in with a CTS wagon, and better news that BMW&#039;s adding a 3-series variant. I&#039;m telling you, wagons are coming back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart move into a neglected market segment that needs more options. if you want a premium station wagon and don&#8217;t like the Outback, Avant or V70/XC70, where do you look? It&#8217;s good news that Caddy is jumping in with a CTS wagon, and better news that BMW&#8217;s adding a 3-series variant. I&#8217;m telling you, wagons are coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312756</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312756</guid>
		<description>or you could buy a 3-series wagon and sit on phone books!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or you could buy a 3-series wagon and sit on phone books!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312752</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-bmw-plans-3-series-based-crossover.html#comment-312752</guid>
		<description>If they put the twin-turbo in it, I&#039;ll get one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they put the twin-turbo in it, I&#8217;ll get one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 419/420 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 18:06:21 -->
