Chrysler Group is preparing to announce that it has decided to go ahead with production of the Dodge Challenger Concept, according to today’s Detroit Free Press. The announcement will be made at the Pepsi 400 NASCAR race in Daytona Beach on Saturday, the report said. The car could come to market as soon as next year, as a 2008 model, Freep said. The newspaper didn’t provide further details, other than saying insiders confirmed the decision had been made, and an announcement was imminent. Interestingly, Chrysler has scheduled a media briefing for 12:30 p.m. tomorrow afternoon. Could it be related? We’ll keep you posted. [See also: our full report on the Dodge Challenger Concept]. Update: The Wall Street Journal is also reporting that the Challenger has been approved for production. The announcement was moved forward several months to create some buzz for Chrysler, the report says.
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.



06/30, 8:00 AM
posted by:
ss
sounds good to me! now…how long before chevy greenlights the Camaro?
06/30, 8:31 AM
posted by:
Atomicbri
Awesome! Dodge’s new halo car…. curious if CHrysler is gonna jump onto the 0% thing with the announcements as well….
06/30, 8:47 AM
posted by:
John
Excellent news!
06/30, 8:48 AM
posted by:
Slap My Thigh
Cars for Yee Haas! just what we need from the big 3
06/30, 8:53 AM
posted by:
Slap My Thigh
I prefer this to the Camaro, whereas in original form I preferred the camaro to this. Will it come in purple with a white vinyl top?
06/30, 9:00 AM
posted by:
HWA
Something is Missing….origin!
06/30, 9:27 AM
posted by:
Anonymous
Excellent!
06/30, 9:47 AM
posted by:
Anonymous
Camaro is where its at. This would have been cool if Chrysler was a red blooded American brand and not a traitor.
The only brand worth buying is GM, get that through your thick skulls people
06/30, 10:00 AM
posted by:
British_Rover
I just wish Chevy would move as quickly as this. If chevy had moved witht he speed that dodge did the camaro would already be out.
06/30, 10:03 AM
posted by:
Kowalski
Can I get one in white? I have a need to haul ass from Colorado to Frisco…
06/30, 10:03 AM
posted by:
JCwhitless
Anonymous said: The only brand worth buying is GM, get that through your thick skulls people
I am so going to save up 30K and deliver it to whichever american car company can deliver me the RWD street machine first.
Chevy or Dodge
Period.
That is my “Challenge” to you, Domestic Car Gods…
06/30, 10:06 AM
posted by:
JCwhitless
Kowalski wins….
/I’m so waiting for the white with black vinyl interior Dodge Challenger VP Vanishing Point Edition®
//Hopefully it has pills in the glovebox
///and leads to encounters with topless biker chicks
06/30, 10:41 AM
posted by:
mike
After looking at the Camero a little more, I think, 100% that the Challenger gets my money. 6.1L HEMI V8 MOPAR BABY!
06/30, 10:48 AM
posted by:
Derek
Dodge already had all the parts to build this car ready to go since it is on the same platform as Charger, 300C. GM is creating an all new platform and what not, let’s see how quickly they respond.
06/30, 10:56 AM
posted by:
Jim in LA
fantastic news.
and, two doors. (yes, disgruntled charger reference)
06/30, 11:07 AM
posted by:
JCwhitless
and, two doors.
Somebody should work on a ’shop of this thing with a front bumper on it, since that is what the production one will probably have. Also a ragtop, and for fun, the four door version the ‘bean counters’ would rather they build.
/because ‘bean counters’ are teh suck
06/30, 11:30 AM
posted by:
chi dell
this is not good news for toyota supra fans!!!!!
06/30, 11:42 AM
posted by:
Greg
The word CONCEPT creates association to something futuristic, or in this case, a classic model rebirth, that has only characteristics of its ancestor, but doesn’t look exactly like it and has bigger engine. This is BS. A 2008 model has to be something new, something fresh. How about investing money for a new idea instead of digging the past? This is addressed to all US automakers: you’re loosing our own market, maybe already lost. Try to build something that is contemporary in terms of design, fuel efficiency, ergonomics, quality and don’t give me the Ethanol ****.
06/30, 11:48 AM
posted by:
Greg
Camaro is where its at. This would have been cool if Chrysler was a red blooded American brand and not a traitor.
The only brand worth buying is GM, get that through your thick skulls people
Comment by Anonymous, posted on June30 at 9:47 am
The Camaro will probably be made in Mexico. The only true American made cars today are Toyota and Hyundai.
06/30, 11:49 AM
posted by:
JCwhitless
that has only characteristics of its ancestor, but doesn’t look exactly like it and has bigger engine.
Really? That explains why all of those new-fangled Ford Mustangs are just sitting around the new car lots, not doing anything. Heck, I heard my local FO-MO-CO dealer is offering two for one to get rid of them!!
/sarcasm
//still can’t figure out why ford is going broke
06/30, 12:30 PM
posted by:
Mike
from the WSJ:
“The launch highlights some development and manufacturing advantages that have emerged for Chrysler recently. As part of its restructuring a few years ago, the car maker overhauled the way it designs and manufactures cars to cut time and cost.
The Challenger will be the fourth vehicle produced from the same components used to make Chrylser’s hot-selling 300 sedan. While the first vehicle cost $1 billion or more to develop, the others each cost about a third of that, auto experts estimate. Chrysler will reap other savings because it will build all four of the cars on one production line at a plant in Brampton, Ontario.
Reusing parts also cut the time it takes to develop the car. Chrysler first showed a Challenger concept last January. At the same time, GM presented a concept for its own muscle car, a new Camaro, but that car is still at least two years from production.”
This goes back to my post 2 days ago about DCX’s emerging use of flexible manufacturing.
The one thing that I am confused about: On this timeframe, the Challenger would be on the LX platform… I thought it was going to be an LY?
06/30, 12:35 PM
posted by:
Mike Assole
Like everyone else wasn’t doing that first Mike. Volkswagen was platform sharing way before dcx
06/30, 12:52 PM
posted by:
Mike
ummm, when did I say nobody else does it? dumbass.
did you even read any of what I pasted from the Wall Street Journal? let me re-paste for you.
“The launch highlights some development and manufacturing advantages that have emerged for Chrysler recently. As part of its restructuring a few years ago, the car maker overhauled the way it designs and manufactures cars to cut time and cost.”
is ‘reading comprehension’ not a part of your vocabulary?
btw, nice name… way to hide behind me when making a moronic post.
06/30, 12:57 PM
posted by:
TomG
Shocking! Common is anyone really surprised about this? Of course they were going to produce this car.
06/30, 2:01 PM
posted by:
Mike is a Dumbass
dumbass is all you can say when criticised.
Mike when you write the following msinformation..
“As more manufacturers switch to a DCX style of flexible manufacturing, model turnaround becomes less expensive and the breakeven point is dramatically reduced.”
you are suggesting that DCX invented this form of manufacturing technique
DUMBASS you are so pro CHrysler youcan’t even see the truth any more
06/30, 2:02 PM
posted by:
Mike is a Dumbass
Mike is a nice name I think I will use it more often
06/30, 2:05 PM
posted by:
Mike
I never, not once, state or imply that DCX created flexible manufacturing. I simply use the emerging practice of DCX as an example.
you are reading WAY too far between the lines to attempt to nail me on something that I never came close to saying.
The WSJ article mimics exactly what I was saying. Or do you consider the WSJ article to also explicitly state that DCX invented this as well?
06/30, 2:18 PM
posted by:
Andy
they better keep it low production because the muscle car market is a sketchy one. GTOs never took off and I guarantee mustang sales will slide off the map soon
06/30, 2:26 PM
posted by:
Justin
I agree with poster # 7!! the Challenger better come out screaming cuz the market is gettin crowed fast! And I would buy the CAMARO over this anyday!
06/30, 2:46 PM
posted by:
Knobheads
As more manufacturers switch to a DCX style of flexible manufacturing
what does that mean if it is not a deliberate attempt to misinform the reader that dcx created flexible manufacturing, why not say Toyota style as it is more correct
06/30, 3:14 PM
posted by:
Mike
“a DCX style of flexible manufacturing” -me
“The launch highlights some development and manufacturing advantages that have emerged for Chrysler recently.” -WSJ
saying: “the flexible manufacturing as pioneered by DCX…” or “the manufacturing process invented by DCX” is a FAR CRY from using DCX as an example of how the flexible manufacturing process can be successfully implimented.
Try to twist my words all you want, the message is clear… I used DCX as an example…and the challenger is one example within DCX…
I never came close to saying that DCX invented this.
06/30, 3:17 PM
posted by:
Mike
forgot to add: I use DCX as an example, rather than Toyota, as I not familliar with Toyota’s flexible manufacturing capabilities and what platforms and vehicles are involved. If you are, please feel free to enlighten me.
06/30, 3:19 PM
posted by:
Chris
Stop whining at least its not a K Car lol. GM should be ashamed that DCX is beating them to market. Way to come in last place GM, oh and how long were ppl screaming for a Camaro?
06/30, 3:28 PM
posted by:
Paul
I wonder if this means Viper is history. No need for Dodge to have two halo cars.
06/30, 3:49 PM
posted by:
Mike
Viper is getting a *mild* facelift and an extended model year run for the ‘08 MY viper (there is no ‘07 MY). The biggest addition is the switch from the 8.3l to an 8.4l ~650hp engine.
a full redesign is scheduled for a late ‘09 MY release.
so the viper is moving safely up the HP food chain from the Challenger. This is just a cost effective program that has great profit potential.
06/30, 5:12 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Right on. The Viper is in a different class entirely, performance and price-wise.
06/30, 6:59 PM
posted by:
Al
Kudos to DCX…I am going to buy one of these !
07/01, 12:30 AM
posted by:
yomama
cccccccccccccccccwhy does this car looks like its fat and not a muscle car?????????????????????????????
07/01, 2:22 AM
posted by:
Michael Spadaro
All is right with the world
07/01, 6:42 AM
posted by:
canut4ever
The GM styling did a better job than their Chrysler counterparts because they made the Camaro retro but they managed to make it a modern classic with updated stance and detailing. The Challenger looks like a blatant copy of the original- DCX designers are lazy. Be prepared to get smoked by the Camaro and Mustang.
07/01, 10:52 AM
posted by:
300k mile trep
who the hell cares were its built, nobody here is pure 100% red blooded american (unless your an indian)
07/01, 10:56 AM
posted by:
300k mile trep
wow, i just thought of this, now that each big 3 has a muscle car, they should race em in NASCAR. dodge with the challenger, chevy with the camaro, and ford with the mustang. there all pretty even, so why not. better than the fusion monte carlo and charger.
07/01, 1:05 PM
posted by:
2006300C
The Indians walked over a ancient land bridge that connected Europe and north America. No humans lived in this part of the world for a very long time. If you were born in America or immigrated you are an American, your ancestors are not who you
07/01, 3:22 PM
posted by:
2006300C
ASIA and north america.
07/02, 3:54 PM
posted by:
Jason
Sweet !! you can allready get challenger t-shirts at http://www.callieskustoms.com