




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Ford to expand Mustang line to include sedan, wagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chevy490</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-287246</link>
		<dc:creator>chevy490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-287246</guid>
		<description>s-60 u are gay u like men!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s-60 u are gay u like men!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-287151</link>
		<dc:creator>Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-287151</guid>
		<description>hey Tomzy it reminds me of an old pinto. Mustang II dont do it. THey could do the wagon that I just saw but they could put the three bar grill in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Tomzy it reminds me of an old pinto. Mustang II dont do it. THey could do the wagon that I just saw but they could put the three bar grill in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomzy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-287037</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-287037</guid>
		<description>If they do it like this be my guest... 
http://www.cwwcardesign.com/cars/ford_mustang_shooting_brake.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they do it like this be my guest&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.cwwcardesign.com/cars/ford_mustang_shooting_brake.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cwwcardesign.com/cars/ford_mustang_shooting_brake.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devils</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286852</link>
		<dc:creator>Devils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286852</guid>
		<description>Name it something else. The Mustang is Ford&#039;s only good car, besides the GT. V8 on a light RWD car is THE ONLY REASON YOU BUY AN AMERICAN SPORTS CAR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name it something else. The Mustang is Ford&#8217;s only good car, besides the GT. V8 on a light RWD car is THE ONLY REASON YOU BUY AN AMERICAN SPORTS CAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saud</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286392</link>
		<dc:creator>Saud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286392</guid>
		<description>Screw, the corporate bastads MoFuCo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw, the corporate bastads MoFuCo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286315</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286315</guid>
		<description>Manster -- I remember the Cutlass thing well.  Those asshats just put the Cutlass name on everything.  They also got paid to do it.  Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manster &#8212; I remember the Cutlass thing well.  Those asshats just put the Cutlass name on everything.  They also got paid to do it.  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dodgeyaussie</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286210</link>
		<dc:creator>dodgeyaussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286210</guid>
		<description>Stupid, Just stupid. If they want a decent 4 door, just get the Falcon range over here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid, Just stupid. If they want a decent 4 door, just get the Falcon range over here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie#1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286130</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie#1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286130</guid>
		<description>GO FORD AUSTRALIA!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO FORD AUSTRALIA!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VDuv Kux Klan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286128</link>
		<dc:creator>VDuv Kux Klan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286128</guid>
		<description>Thats the stupidest thing Ford can do, they better star selling the new Giugiaro concept if they want to increase sales</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats the stupidest thing Ford can do, they better star selling the new Giugiaro concept if they want to increase sales</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obsessedwithautos</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286115</link>
		<dc:creator>obsessedwithautos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got an idea for the Mustang sedan. It&#039;s called the MONDEO. Bring it here. Now. (&#039;cept it ain&#039;t RWD, but that&#039;s not the point!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got an idea for the Mustang sedan. It&#8217;s called the MONDEO. Bring it here. Now. (&#8216;cept it ain&#8217;t RWD, but that&#8217;s not the point!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286110</link>
		<dc:creator>Manster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286110</guid>
		<description>Jeez........they NEVER learn, do they? How do they justify their salaries at Ford when they come up with the most asinine ideas? WHY dilute the Mustang name??

Remember many many years ago when the Oldsmobile Cutlass was the hottest and best selling nameplate for GM? And remember when Oldsmobile started to put the &quot;Cutlass&quot; name on almost every car they produced? And they used that name on some really horrble cars. Needless to say the Cutlass name, hell, the Oldsmobile brand is now history. Sure, let Ford dilute the Mustang name, and we can watch history repeat itself....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez&#8230;&#8230;..they NEVER learn, do they? How do they justify their salaries at Ford when they come up with the most asinine ideas? WHY dilute the Mustang name??</p>
<p>Remember many many years ago when the Oldsmobile Cutlass was the hottest and best selling nameplate for GM? And remember when Oldsmobile started to put the &#8220;Cutlass&#8221; name on almost every car they produced? And they used that name on some really horrble cars. Needless to say the Cutlass name, hell, the Oldsmobile brand is now history. Sure, let Ford dilute the Mustang name, and we can watch history repeat itself&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leozug</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286096</link>
		<dc:creator>leozug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286096</guid>
		<description>hey ford. way to ruin every single thing you touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey ford. way to ruin every single thing you touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286079</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286079</guid>
		<description>Yeah S60 driver always has to flip a shit to support Ford Motor Company. Chill the hell out, Ford isn&#039;t that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah S60 driver always has to flip a shit to support Ford Motor Company. Chill the hell out, Ford isn&#8217;t that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286077</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286077</guid>
		<description>DUMB DUMB DUMB , a Mustang wagon? A sedan? Bringing the Charger name to a sedan didn&#039;t work, and the Mustang name is even more revered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DUMB DUMB DUMB , a Mustang wagon? A sedan? Bringing the Charger name to a sedan didn&#8217;t work, and the Mustang name is even more revered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286071</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286071</guid>
		<description>i think S60 realized his car couldnt provide any thrills so he got hopped up on cocaine today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think S60 realized his car couldnt provide any thrills so he got hopped up on cocaine today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286057</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286057</guid>
		<description>Im like I said If its a Belair, Fairlane, Falcon whatever fine call it that. A Mustang is and never should be a sedan or a wagon. All I care about is the legacy and reputaion of the Mustang. Call me A purist or whatever I dont care NOT the Mustang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im like I said If its a Belair, Fairlane, Falcon whatever fine call it that. A Mustang is and never should be a sedan or a wagon. All I care about is the legacy and reputaion of the Mustang. Call me A purist or whatever I dont care NOT the Mustang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S-60-driver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286056</link>
		<dc:creator>S-60-driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286056</guid>
		<description>RELAX, PEOPLE!!!  LOOK AT THE CHARGER, MAGNUM, AND SOON COMING ALL NEW CHALLENGER.

CHALLENGER==== MUSTANG
CHARGER====== MUSTANG SEDAN (different name, for sure)
MAGNUM====== MUSTANG WAGON (different name, for sure)

THEY ARE TRYING TO START SOMETHING WITH DIE HARD MUSTANG FANS BY SAYING THAT THEY WILL USE THE MUSTANG NAME, JUST LIKE BACK IN 1980s WHEN THEY WERE THINKING OF MAKING THE MUSTANG AS FWD CAR, BUT NAMED AS PROBE!!!!

RRREEEEEELLLLAAAXXXXXXX!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RELAX, PEOPLE!!!  LOOK AT THE CHARGER, MAGNUM, AND SOON COMING ALL NEW CHALLENGER.</p>
<p>CHALLENGER==== MUSTANG<br />
CHARGER====== MUSTANG SEDAN (different name, for sure)<br />
MAGNUM====== MUSTANG WAGON (different name, for sure)</p>
<p>THEY ARE TRYING TO START SOMETHING WITH DIE HARD MUSTANG FANS BY SAYING THAT THEY WILL USE THE MUSTANG NAME, JUST LIKE BACK IN 1980s WHEN THEY WERE THINKING OF MAKING THE MUSTANG AS FWD CAR, BUT NAMED AS PROBE!!!!</p>
<p>RRREEEEEELLLLAAAXXXXXXX!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanlond</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286051</link>
		<dc:creator>hanlond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286051</guid>
		<description>Ford can go ahead and make it as long as they don&#039;t screw up, they change the name, and they don&#039;t just make it a four door mustang with a different name. Bringing the Falcon would be better though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford can go ahead and make it as long as they don&#8217;t screw up, they change the name, and they don&#8217;t just make it a four door mustang with a different name. Bringing the Falcon would be better though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286033</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286033</guid>
		<description>MItch -- yes it would.  

I would not call it a Mustang though.  Tell us why a small RWD sedan with V8 power would be bad.  If it cost under $30K and had the same performance as a Mustang, how coulr that go wrong?

Just don&#039;t call it a Mustang.

Call it a Falcon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MItch &#8212; yes it would.  </p>
<p>I would not call it a Mustang though.  Tell us why a small RWD sedan with V8 power would be bad.  If it cost under $30K and had the same performance as a Mustang, how coulr that go wrong?</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t call it a Mustang.</p>
<p>Call it a Falcon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mbukukanyau</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mbukukanyau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286029</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Ford should fix ford, Mercury and Lincoln before taking on another brand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Ford should fix ford, Mercury and Lincoln before taking on another brand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phileas Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286009</link>
		<dc:creator>Phileas Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286009</guid>
		<description>Fine, I just would not call it a Mustang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine, I just would not call it a Mustang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286008</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286008</guid>
		<description>I want a Mustang with 13000 pounds of towing capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a Mustang with 13000 pounds of towing capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanpants555</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286006</link>
		<dc:creator>meanpants555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286006</guid>
		<description>Mini is about to spin off the Clubman and an SUV: the Z4 and TT both have &#039;shooting brakes&#039; which are cooler than the convertible and coupe.

Besides, the four door 911 is coming, which is a much more heinous crime if you want to get real whiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mini is about to spin off the Clubman and an SUV: the Z4 and TT both have &#8216;shooting brakes&#8217; which are cooler than the convertible and coupe.</p>
<p>Besides, the four door 911 is coming, which is a much more heinous crime if you want to get real whiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-286000</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-286000</guid>
		<description>Hey what happened to the use of the Mustang plat form to make the Mercury Cougar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey what happened to the use of the Mustang plat form to make the Mercury Cougar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mblommel</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285999</link>
		<dc:creator>mblommel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285999</guid>
		<description>This is the WORST idea I&#039;ve heard of from Ford yet. Here I was thinking things were going to get better at Ford with them bringing over some of the fine rest of the world products to North America, and then this turd of an idea floats along. Ford; get your head out of your ass!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the WORST idea I&#8217;ve heard of from Ford yet. Here I was thinking things were going to get better at Ford with them bringing over some of the fine rest of the world products to North America, and then this turd of an idea floats along. Ford; get your head out of your ass!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285997</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285997</guid>
		<description>well this is iffy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well this is iffy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285996</guid>
		<description>No. No matter the performance or the retro craze it is a complete sign of Fords disrespect for the name plate that has been there for 42 years without the need for a four door. And what is retro about a Mustang with four doors? The Mustang has never had four doors in a production model. NEVER. The concepts existed and the inteligent decision makers at the time knew it wouldn&#039;t fly. You want a Belair make a car and name it a Belair. The Mustang is not a Chevelle. THe Chevelle was always a two door or four door car. The Chevelle isnt a Ford but I can&#039;t think of a car off my head that ford had to compete or was as good as the Chevelle.

 The Holden Comadore  by the way is not the first Aussie car to become a GTO. LOOK IT UP the original GTO was imported from a Holden Design back in the Day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. No matter the performance or the retro craze it is a complete sign of Fords disrespect for the name plate that has been there for 42 years without the need for a four door. And what is retro about a Mustang with four doors? The Mustang has never had four doors in a production model. NEVER. The concepts existed and the inteligent decision makers at the time knew it wouldn&#8217;t fly. You want a Belair make a car and name it a Belair. The Mustang is not a Chevelle. THe Chevelle was always a two door or four door car. The Chevelle isnt a Ford but I can&#8217;t think of a car off my head that ford had to compete or was as good as the Chevelle.</p>
<p> The Holden Comadore  by the way is not the first Aussie car to become a GTO. LOOK IT UP the original GTO was imported from a Holden Design back in the Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285993</link>
		<dc:creator>F451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285993</guid>
		<description>Yeeeeeehaaaah...I want one of them there Mustang vans! Giddy up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeeeeeehaaaah&#8230;I want one of them there Mustang vans! Giddy up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fromes</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285987</link>
		<dc:creator>Fromes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285987</guid>
		<description>I can understand them wanting to use the mustang platform to create different vehicles, but I think the idea of using the mustang look and name on vehicles other then a 2 door coupe is retarded, it would be a huge mistake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand them wanting to use the mustang platform to create different vehicles, but I think the idea of using the mustang look and name on vehicles other then a 2 door coupe is retarded, it would be a huge mistake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285981</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285981</guid>
		<description>^^ it would rock. 
Anyone ever hear of the Belair? How many variants of the Belair were there? Lest you forget, we are in the middle of a retro design period. So far, the only things that have come out of the retro craze are the iconic whole vehicle designs. The PT Cruiser, Thunderbird, Mustang, Camaro, Challenger (and if I must, the HHR). That&#039;s it. If anyone thinks all the retro tricks have been played, think again. Ford is now turning the next page and pulling out some of the different cues from back in the 50s and 60s like a sport wagon based off the 2dr coupe. And they all retained their original namesake. Unless of course, you would rather have a manufacturer try to lie and market you to death convincing you it&#039;s NOT a Mustang? Give me a break. Don&#039;t piss on my leg and tell me it&#039;s raining. Just like GM shouldn&#039;t have imported a rebadged Holden and called it a GTO. 

What would any of you prefer, a 4dr sedan or wagon with Mustang styling, or a Ford 500 with scoops, ground effects and a bigger engine. I&#039;ll take the Mustang style and don&#039;t lie to me by giving it a false name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^ it would rock.<br />
Anyone ever hear of the Belair? How many variants of the Belair were there? Lest you forget, we are in the middle of a retro design period. So far, the only things that have come out of the retro craze are the iconic whole vehicle designs. The PT Cruiser, Thunderbird, Mustang, Camaro, Challenger (and if I must, the HHR). That&#8217;s it. If anyone thinks all the retro tricks have been played, think again. Ford is now turning the next page and pulling out some of the different cues from back in the 50s and 60s like a sport wagon based off the 2dr coupe. And they all retained their original namesake. Unless of course, you would rather have a manufacturer try to lie and market you to death convincing you it&#8217;s NOT a Mustang? Give me a break. Don&#8217;t piss on my leg and tell me it&#8217;s raining. Just like GM shouldn&#8217;t have imported a rebadged Holden and called it a GTO. </p>
<p>What would any of you prefer, a 4dr sedan or wagon with Mustang styling, or a Ford 500 with scoops, ground effects and a bigger engine. I&#8217;ll take the Mustang style and don&#8217;t lie to me by giving it a false name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megator</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285980</link>
		<dc:creator>megator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285980</guid>
		<description>Just dont use the name and looks of the mustang and it will all be good. Ford dont look into the past for names come up with something new and exciting to start a new legacy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just dont use the name and looks of the mustang and it will all be good. Ford dont look into the past for names come up with something new and exciting to start a new legacy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatstrat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285979</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatstrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285979</guid>
		<description>Just relax a bit folks. This is obviously someone just &#039;thinking out loud&#039;. But look at all the successful hatches and &#039;shootingbrakes&#039; done by european makers. I say wait to see the finished product (if it ever happens) before getting your blood pressure up. This might just be a strategical trial balloon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just relax a bit folks. This is obviously someone just &#8216;thinking out loud&#8217;. But look at all the successful hatches and &#8216;shootingbrakes&#8217; done by european makers. I say wait to see the finished product (if it ever happens) before getting your blood pressure up. This might just be a strategical trial balloon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285977</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285977</guid>
		<description>No. No it wouldn&#039;t. 

Ford doesn&#039;t need a Charger competator till it can make a better four door with out screwing up a classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. No it wouldn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Ford doesn&#8217;t need a Charger competator till it can make a better four door with out screwing up a classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285975</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285975</guid>
		<description>I have always thought  a small 4 door, RWD sedan, with V8 power that was based on the Mustang would rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always thought  a small 4 door, RWD sedan, with V8 power that was based on the Mustang would rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285970</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285970</guid>
		<description>Somebody photoshop one of these things...  make a Shelby wagon, black with gold stripes, hood pins and torque thrust wheels. Ford, do not call these &quot;Mustang&quot;. Don&#039;t ruin the only reputable car you have going for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody photoshop one of these things&#8230;  make a Shelby wagon, black with gold stripes, hood pins and torque thrust wheels. Ford, do not call these &#8220;Mustang&#8221;. Don&#8217;t ruin the only reputable car you have going for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 04focus</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285967</link>
		<dc:creator>04focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285967</guid>
		<description>RWD Ford sedans and wagons and a couple of Lincolns off the mustang platform: Great idea.
Naming the Ford sedan a Mustang: Not so much.
Hope to god that the report just got &quot;a Ford sedan and wagon based on the Mustang&quot; confused with &quot;it&#039;s going to be badged a Mustang&quot;. I can see a Falcon and a Country Squire from Ford, and then a new Town Car and Mark IX. I&#039;m guessing Ford still has rights to the Falcon seeing how it&#039;s still marketed in Australia. Then they get back a &quot;global brand.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RWD Ford sedans and wagons and a couple of Lincolns off the mustang platform: Great idea.<br />
Naming the Ford sedan a Mustang: Not so much.<br />
Hope to god that the report just got &#8220;a Ford sedan and wagon based on the Mustang&#8221; confused with &#8220;it&#8217;s going to be badged a Mustang&#8221;. I can see a Falcon and a Country Squire from Ford, and then a new Town Car and Mark IX. I&#8217;m guessing Ford still has rights to the Falcon seeing how it&#8217;s still marketed in Australia. Then they get back a &#8220;global brand.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285966</guid>
		<description>Ive seen the Sedan and Wagon 64 1/2 Concepts and I felt the Sedan was a bit much. The wagon had a fairly polished look to it and at the time would have been a good car to go with the Mustang. This however is not the time for a Mustang wagon or sedan. In 64 and the preceding years he Mustang was simply designed to be a comuter car; NOT a performance or sport car. The Mustang did not become a true GT car until with Ford backing a few enthusists like and best known Mustang tuner Carol Shelby tuned and primped the cars into true pure blooded pony cars that spit rubber and shoot gasoline. The Mustang then wasn&#039;t a teens speed dream or an adults mid-life crisis car now its the pinacle of what(to me anyways) driving is. Nothing fancy just simple technology that has power you can count on. The wagon/sedan no longer fits the definition of the Mustang or its consumer market. If you make a car that completely violates the public image of a car (especially one that holds such a deep root in the culture of our nation) you complete debase the value and victory of the line. I hate Ford and always will but I love Mustang and I will always have a car with the pony and tri-bar delicately placed on the fender. However if for trucks screw Ford ill buy a Duramax. If Ford does this I know people who will completely disown Ford including myself. This car is deeply rooted into my childhood and teenage memories and I cannot even use the word here that I would use to descirbe the idiots at Ford if they do this. PLUS MUSTANGS AND F-SERIES ARE THE ONLY PROFIT BRINGERS TO FORD! 

I could see a return of the Coupe/Convertable/Fastback which I think would give Ford more diversity in the brand that its looking for. I see this path as one failed to start and Mustang lovers everywhere will not buy these bastard children with Mustang Logos slapped on.

My advice to ford would be more engine and suspension options. Offer a Mach I model with the attached shacker induction system and an advanced engine tune and keep it out like the 01-04 Mach I&#039;s. Give the GT different rear end gears and air induction options. I always liked the Idea of the GT500 so I say lighten it up, keep the SuperCharged 5.4L V8; however as a cheaper option make a GT350 with the SVT SuperCharged  4.6L from the 03-04 Cobra. Ford also launched the the new BOSS line of crate motors! BRING BACK THE BOSS! The BOSS 302s an 429s where top sellers in the day. Also since gas is again becoming a problem why not back track to where SVO left of and offer Turbo V4 (don&#039;t like em but better than a sedan)or even a Turbo V6(Carrol Shelby Sells Performance Turbo V6s and manufatures them along side the GT-H). I dunno just my view.  

Oh and the MustangII was not a failure they actually set sales records (sales tripled in 74 or the previous year. 73 also bein the last year for a convertable mustang till 83) and originated the evolution of the 302 to the 5.0 all Foxbody and SN95 owners know and love. The size and suspension of the car also led to the developement of the Foxbody platform which had an unchanged frame from 79 - 04. The 05 mustang was the first full redesign of the Mustang since 1979.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive seen the Sedan and Wagon 64 1/2 Concepts and I felt the Sedan was a bit much. The wagon had a fairly polished look to it and at the time would have been a good car to go with the Mustang. This however is not the time for a Mustang wagon or sedan. In 64 and the preceding years he Mustang was simply designed to be a comuter car; NOT a performance or sport car. The Mustang did not become a true GT car until with Ford backing a few enthusists like and best known Mustang tuner Carol Shelby tuned and primped the cars into true pure blooded pony cars that spit rubber and shoot gasoline. The Mustang then wasn&#8217;t a teens speed dream or an adults mid-life crisis car now its the pinacle of what(to me anyways) driving is. Nothing fancy just simple technology that has power you can count on. The wagon/sedan no longer fits the definition of the Mustang or its consumer market. If you make a car that completely violates the public image of a car (especially one that holds such a deep root in the culture of our nation) you complete debase the value and victory of the line. I hate Ford and always will but I love Mustang and I will always have a car with the pony and tri-bar delicately placed on the fender. However if for trucks screw Ford ill buy a Duramax. If Ford does this I know people who will completely disown Ford including myself. This car is deeply rooted into my childhood and teenage memories and I cannot even use the word here that I would use to descirbe the idiots at Ford if they do this. PLUS MUSTANGS AND F-SERIES ARE THE ONLY PROFIT BRINGERS TO FORD! </p>
<p>I could see a return of the Coupe/Convertable/Fastback which I think would give Ford more diversity in the brand that its looking for. I see this path as one failed to start and Mustang lovers everywhere will not buy these bastard children with Mustang Logos slapped on.</p>
<p>My advice to ford would be more engine and suspension options. Offer a Mach I model with the attached shacker induction system and an advanced engine tune and keep it out like the 01-04 Mach I&#8217;s. Give the GT different rear end gears and air induction options. I always liked the Idea of the GT500 so I say lighten it up, keep the SuperCharged 5.4L V8; however as a cheaper option make a GT350 with the SVT SuperCharged  4.6L from the 03-04 Cobra. Ford also launched the the new BOSS line of crate motors! BRING BACK THE BOSS! The BOSS 302s an 429s where top sellers in the day. Also since gas is again becoming a problem why not back track to where SVO left of and offer Turbo V4 (don&#8217;t like em but better than a sedan)or even a Turbo V6(Carrol Shelby Sells Performance Turbo V6s and manufatures them along side the GT-H). I dunno just my view.  </p>
<p>Oh and the MustangII was not a failure they actually set sales records (sales tripled in 74 or the previous year. 73 also bein the last year for a convertable mustang till 83) and originated the evolution of the 302 to the 5.0 all Foxbody and SN95 owners know and love. The size and suspension of the car also led to the developement of the Foxbody platform which had an unchanged frame from 79 &#8211; 04. The 05 mustang was the first full redesign of the Mustang since 1979.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GL1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285965</link>
		<dc:creator>GL1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285965</guid>
		<description>This is the most BRAINLESS idea yet from Ford.. It sounds like they&#039;re too lazy and cheap to design anything new and original for this so they decide to bastardize the ONLY thing they have left that sells, the Mustang..  and its gonna be short lived too as it won&#039;t sell very well at all as soon as the challenger and the camaro finally come out against it, when that happens the Mustang too will likley get burried..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most BRAINLESS idea yet from Ford.. It sounds like they&#8217;re too lazy and cheap to design anything new and original for this so they decide to bastardize the ONLY thing they have left that sells, the Mustang..  and its gonna be short lived too as it won&#8217;t sell very well at all as soon as the challenger and the camaro finally come out against it, when that happens the Mustang too will likley get burried..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285964</link>
		<dc:creator>sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285964</guid>
		<description>yeah there&#039;s no way Ford would be that stupid to have a mustang sedan and wagon...This car is a freakin legacy for their brand and it has always been a RWD 2 door.

THey could make something off the same platform but they&#039;d be idiots to name them mustangs... Call the sedan &quot;the Shire&quot; and call the Wagon &quot;the Clydesdale&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah there&#8217;s no way Ford would be that stupid to have a mustang sedan and wagon&#8230;This car is a freakin legacy for their brand and it has always been a RWD 2 door.</p>
<p>THey could make something off the same platform but they&#8217;d be idiots to name them mustangs&#8230; Call the sedan &#8220;the Shire&#8221; and call the Wagon &#8220;the Clydesdale&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rey323</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285963</link>
		<dc:creator>rey323</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285963</guid>
		<description>A Ford Mustang Pickup Truck! Yes!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Ford Mustang Pickup Truck! Yes!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chevy490</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285961</link>
		<dc:creator>chevy490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285961</guid>
		<description>a station wagon mustang lol ford ur gay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a station wagon mustang lol ford ur gay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendino</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285957</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285957</guid>
		<description>Do a Google search for &quot;mustang shooting brake&quot; (LLN won&#039;t let you post URLs?) and look at the first three hits (particularly the third one). This has been discussed before and apparently the original mustang had a hatch variant, but I dunno. If you make a sedan with Mustang styling cues that&#039;s one thing, but at least change the name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a Google search for &#8220;mustang shooting brake&#8221; (LLN won&#8217;t let you post URLs?) and look at the first three hits (particularly the third one). This has been discussed before and apparently the original mustang had a hatch variant, but I dunno. If you make a sedan with Mustang styling cues that&#8217;s one thing, but at least change the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanpants555</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285955</link>
		<dc:creator>meanpants555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285955</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they wouldn&#039;t have to name it Mustangagon or Musedantang, just some other equestrian name, like Palomino or Trotter or Appaloosa.

It&#039;s not a bad idea. I don&#039;t like American Fords, but Mustangs are kind of cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they wouldn&#8217;t have to name it Mustangagon or Musedantang, just some other equestrian name, like Palomino or Trotter or Appaloosa.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a bad idea. I don&#8217;t like American Fords, but Mustangs are kind of cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285952</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285952</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah ... I want a Mustang with a thrid row of seating so I can carry 8 kids, too.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah &#8230; I want a Mustang with a thrid row of seating so I can carry 8 kids, too.  <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon.html#comment-285950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/13/report-ford-to-expand-mustang-line-to-include-sedan-wagon/#comment-285950</guid>
		<description>I want my 4x4 OFF ROAD SUV MUSTANG!  NOWWWW!
.
This has got to be a freakin joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want my 4&#215;4 OFF ROAD SUV MUSTANG!  NOWWWW!<br />
.<br />
This has got to be a freakin joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 654/655 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 20:28:59 -->
