<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Rear-wheel-drive Pontiac G6 due in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Solar.110mb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-359422</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar.110mb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-359422</guid>
		<description>Being from Michigan, I need a FWD car for all weather driving.  I would never consider buying RWD again.  The only way I would go RWD is as a compromise if there is an E-Flex electric hybrid, then I would settle.  Why go backwards and make RWD cars again?  I own a 2004 Grand Prix GT and it is a super solid driving car.  There is something about FWD cars that give an extra solid feel in the steering, especially on larger cars.  For 99% of driving, the FWD feels more solid and tight, maybe 1% the RWD may be better by not having torque steer when entering a corner full throttle at 120 MPH, but seriously, how many of us do that?  
I do not buy the argument that traction control makes a rear wheel drive good enough in the snow.  I had a BMW 7 series with traction control, no where near as good as the Grand Prix in the snow.  In fact when I owned the BMW 7 series it was pretty solid driving although the steering wheel diameter is so big it belongs on a truck, and plastic radiators blowing up and damaging the engine.  That&#039;s right, BMW has plastic radiators, and they are terrible, will damage the engine eventually.  Anyway, when I got my 2000 Bonneville SE, being FWD, it drives much more solid than the BMW.  Then I got the 2004 Grand Prix GT and it is even more solid than any car I have had.  RWD can not compare to the solid feel.  Sure I have had Firebirds that were pretty solid RWD, but once they hit 150,000 miles, the front end starts to loosen up a bit.  Something about FWD that keeps it&#039;s solid feel even after 200,000 miles.
If you ever looked at the front end suspension of a FWD car you will notice all the chunky solid parts, while looking at the front end suspension of a RWD you will see skinny arms that eventually loosen up.  That may be the difference I believe.
Good thing, my next car will be a GM Volt, and it is planned to be FWD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being from Michigan, I need a FWD car for all weather driving.  I would never consider buying RWD again.  The only way I would go RWD is as a compromise if there is an E-Flex electric hybrid, then I would settle.  Why go backwards and make RWD cars again?  I own a 2004 Grand Prix GT and it is a super solid driving car.  There is something about FWD cars that give an extra solid feel in the steering, especially on larger cars.  For 99% of driving, the FWD feels more solid and tight, maybe 1% the RWD may be better by not having torque steer when entering a corner full throttle at 120 MPH, but seriously, how many of us do that?<br />
I do not buy the argument that traction control makes a rear wheel drive good enough in the snow.  I had a BMW 7 series with traction control, no where near as good as the Grand Prix in the snow.  In fact when I owned the BMW 7 series it was pretty solid driving although the steering wheel diameter is so big it belongs on a truck, and plastic radiators blowing up and damaging the engine.  That&#8217;s right, BMW has plastic radiators, and they are terrible, will damage the engine eventually.  Anyway, when I got my 2000 Bonneville SE, being FWD, it drives much more solid than the BMW.  Then I got the 2004 Grand Prix GT and it is even more solid than any car I have had.  RWD can not compare to the solid feel.  Sure I have had Firebirds that were pretty solid RWD, but once they hit 150,000 miles, the front end starts to loosen up a bit.  Something about FWD that keeps it&#8217;s solid feel even after 200,000 miles.<br />
If you ever looked at the front end suspension of a FWD car you will notice all the chunky solid parts, while looking at the front end suspension of a RWD you will see skinny arms that eventually loosen up.  That may be the difference I believe.<br />
Good thing, my next car will be a GM Volt, and it is planned to be FWD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-314580</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-314580</guid>
		<description>Piablo. My point was that all these &quot;would-be presidents&quot; are the same. Even if a black guy or a woman of any race gets elected, that person will still be beholden to GFCs, and we&#039;ll continue to get bent over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piablo. My point was that all these &#8220;would-be presidents&#8221; are the same. Even if a black guy or a woman of any race gets elected, that person will still be beholden to GFCs, and we&#8217;ll continue to get bent over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313825</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313825</guid>
		<description>400Horse, I would say that Piablo handily kicked all you whiny asshole&#039;s butts.  Now get back to work pumping my gas ... since you think that having done so for 3 years makes you an economic expert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>400Horse, I would say that Piablo handily kicked all you whiny asshole&#8217;s butts.  Now get back to work pumping my gas &#8230; since you think that having done so for 3 years makes you an economic expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 400horseSS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313819</link>
		<dc:creator>400horseSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313819</guid>
		<description>piablo you lose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>piablo you lose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313818</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313818</guid>
		<description>PrimeGTP,

I  am sorry if I came off as saying the G6 GXP was some kind of supercar. I was simply pointing out the styling and how I would rather that than the styling of the Holden cars. Besides which the long running news is that the to speed the platform to market, their would only be minor changes, new grills being the big thing with a few redesign to follow a couple of years later. 

At any rate you should maybe look up some pics of the G6 GXP-R, a full race converted G6 GXP. I love it, though I imagine you won&#039;t, and shows me what the G6 can really be like.  This is what I&#039;m hoping for in the Alpha-plat G6.

As for performance, Did you amp up your suspension? More power is great but cars in that class and type get more from handling.. being FF and all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PrimeGTP,</p>
<p>I  am sorry if I came off as saying the G6 GXP was some kind of supercar. I was simply pointing out the styling and how I would rather that than the styling of the Holden cars. Besides which the long running news is that the to speed the platform to market, their would only be minor changes, new grills being the big thing with a few redesign to follow a couple of years later. </p>
<p>At any rate you should maybe look up some pics of the G6 GXP-R, a full race converted G6 GXP. I love it, though I imagine you won&#8217;t, and shows me what the G6 can really be like.  This is what I&#8217;m hoping for in the Alpha-plat G6.</p>
<p>As for performance, Did you amp up your suspension? More power is great but cars in that class and type get more from handling.. being FF and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313795</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313795</guid>
		<description>performance gain OVER*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>performance gain OVER*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313794</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313794</guid>
		<description>Blakkar:

As a G6 owner, trust me, I was keeping a close eye on the G6 GXP. It&#039;s possibly the biggest disappointment I&#039;ve seen from GM amongst a lot of AWESOME new models I&#039;ve seen this past year or two. A factory-ricer kit and no performance gain my much more attractive GTP do NOT a top-tier performance car make.

It&#039;ll be funny to see what sort of premium Pontiac dealers is going to put on the GXP, especially when only my $150 intake edges my &quot;obsolete&quot; GTP above the GXP in performance, lol!

I may LOVE the G8, Camaro, Alpha platform, Aura XR, etc. But I will call a dud when I see a dud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blakkar:</p>
<p>As a G6 owner, trust me, I was keeping a close eye on the G6 GXP. It&#8217;s possibly the biggest disappointment I&#8217;ve seen from GM amongst a lot of AWESOME new models I&#8217;ve seen this past year or two. A factory-ricer kit and no performance gain my much more attractive GTP do NOT a top-tier performance car make.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be funny to see what sort of premium Pontiac dealers is going to put on the GXP, especially when only my $150 intake edges my &#8220;obsolete&#8221; GTP above the GXP in performance, lol!</p>
<p>I may LOVE the G8, Camaro, Alpha platform, Aura XR, etc. But I will call a dud when I see a dud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313778</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313778</guid>
		<description>Much in the way they manage social security? Or VA Hospitals? Or the Motor Vehicle Departments? Price fixing helps no one. How can anyone manage a business when they can&#039;t even manage their own prices? And what does &quot;white guy&quot; have to do with anything? A well off black guy or black woman or white woman would do any better than any white guy? I had no idea sex and race had anything to do with presidential decision making. Unreal. Agree to disagree everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much in the way they manage social security? Or VA Hospitals? Or the Motor Vehicle Departments? Price fixing helps no one. How can anyone manage a business when they can&#8217;t even manage their own prices? And what does &#8220;white guy&#8221; have to do with anything? A well off black guy or black woman or white woman would do any better than any white guy? I had no idea sex and race had anything to do with presidential decision making. Unreal. Agree to disagree everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313740</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313740</guid>
		<description>Random jerk -- you&#039;re right the electricity crisis in Califorina was a result of DE-regulation. 

I don&#039;t trust the &quot;free market&quot; to manage the supply of anything people NEED. I think only the gov&#039;t should keep credit-type info, and should issue credit scores. 

George W. is a well-off white guy, and he&#039;ll be replaced by
a well-off white guy.
And we&#039;ll be bent over by the oil companies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random jerk &#8212; you&#8217;re right the electricity crisis in Califorina was a result of DE-regulation. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust the &#8220;free market&#8221; to manage the supply of anything people NEED. I think only the gov&#8217;t should keep credit-type info, and should issue credit scores. </p>
<p>George W. is a well-off white guy, and he&#8217;ll be replaced by<br />
a well-off white guy.<br />
And we&#8217;ll be bent over by the oil companies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313717</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313717</guid>
		<description>i never would have known before the war that shiites and sunnis hated each other more than they hate the jews. the middle east will never be fixed, there is no unity they are stuck in the dark ages rite now with their inquisitions. sounds like where the christians were 5oo years ago in their dark ages. mabe once they find themselves again as a single religion the hate will end, but doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i never would have known before the war that shiites and sunnis hated each other more than they hate the jews. the middle east will never be fixed, there is no unity they are stuck in the dark ages rite now with their inquisitions. sounds like where the christians were 5oo years ago in their dark ages. mabe once they find themselves again as a single religion the hate will end, but doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deantj</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313652</link>
		<dc:creator>deantj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313652</guid>
		<description>Piablo is quietly slurping away on a thick meaty cock. When the load blows all over his face he&#039;ll wipe it off and come back to type more bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piablo is quietly slurping away on a thick meaty ****. When the load blows all over his face he&#8217;ll wipe it off and come back to type more bull****.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 400horseSS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313644</link>
		<dc:creator>400horseSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313644</guid>
		<description>piablo has left the building</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>piablo has left the building</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotusfire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313643</link>
		<dc:creator>lotusfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313643</guid>
		<description>Piablo - LOL, what &#039;why can&#039;t we all get along&#039; mentality? When I did I mention anything like that? I just posted facts. The fact is most of the world hates us and for good reason. I honestly wish the world was a better place but I don&#039;t want to get into world peace with you.  I was simply correcting your post, which sounded very ignorant. Just based on facts. 1.THE TERRORISTS WERE NOT FROM IRAQ. 2.WE ARE DOING DIDDLY SQUAT TO STABLIZE THE REGION. I never said Iraq was perfect. Fact of the matter is that Saddam held a delicate balance in place there. Because both sides didn&#039;t hate him. It&#039;s simple. He was a puppet, maybe he was and evil puppet, but a puppet that kept balance. If we could make Iraq a better place that&#039;d be nice...but take a look at what&#039;s happening. We&#039;re dying, they&#039;re dying, terrorism is growing. Terroism has increase EXPONENTIALLY since we invaded. There is just no way around that. I never said I watched CNN...Everything I&#039;ve said so far I&#039;ve heard from more than one source anyway. Otherwise I wouldn&#039;t post it...and I&#039;ve heard I lot more trust me. And whether I believe it or not I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to post it if I don&#039;t know for sure.

Everyone has soldier buddies. I match your soldier buddies and raise you one secret service...tsk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piablo &#8211; LOL, what &#8216;why can&#8217;t we all get along&#8217; mentality? When I did I mention anything like that? I just posted facts. The fact is most of the world hates us and for good reason. I honestly wish the world was a better place but I don&#8217;t want to get into world peace with you.  I was simply correcting your post, which sounded very ignorant. Just based on facts. 1.THE TERRORISTS WERE NOT FROM IRAQ. 2.WE ARE DOING DIDDLY SQUAT TO STABLIZE THE REGION. I never said Iraq was perfect. Fact of the matter is that Saddam held a delicate balance in place there. Because both sides didn&#8217;t hate him. It&#8217;s simple. He was a puppet, maybe he was and evil puppet, but a puppet that kept balance. If we could make Iraq a better place that&#8217;d be nice&#8230;but take a look at what&#8217;s happening. We&#8217;re dying, they&#8217;re dying, terrorism is growing. Terroism has increase EXPONENTIALLY since we invaded. There is just no way around that. I never said I watched CNN&#8230;Everything I&#8217;ve said so far I&#8217;ve heard from more than one source anyway. Otherwise I wouldn&#8217;t post it&#8230;and I&#8217;ve heard I lot more trust me. And whether I believe it or not I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to post it if I don&#8217;t know for sure.</p>
<p>Everyone has soldier buddies. I match your soldier buddies and raise you one secret service&#8230;tsk&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313641</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313641</guid>
		<description>PrimeGTP,

Question are you actually looking at these cars are just running on to get a response? The G6 GXP looks great to me. Your tastes differ and I can respect that but the way you choose to expound that difference makes me wonder what it is you really consider good design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PrimeGTP,</p>
<p>Question are you actually looking at these cars are just running on to get a response? The G6 GXP looks great to me. Your tastes differ and I can respect that but the way you choose to expound that difference makes me wonder what it is you really consider good design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313623</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313623</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather have Holden&#039;s designs as Pontiac if the pile of the vomit that is the G6 GXP is representative of the at-home design studios here in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have Holden&#8217;s designs as Pontiac if the pile of the vomit that is the G6 GXP is representative of the at-home design studios here in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313615</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313615</guid>
		<description>I think .... I read .... above .... that Hillary Clinthong designed this car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8230;. I read &#8230;. above &#8230;. that Hillary Clinthong designed this car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piablo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313612</link>
		<dc:creator>Piablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313612</guid>
		<description>I see, I stand corrected. I appreciate the well thought out, intelligent, and relevant responses. With such remarkable insight, you folks could be well on your way to solving the worlds problems. The US should be proud to have great voters such as yourselves, an un-educated tard barely capable of typing a literate statement and a rusty tromboning boy who&#039;s every third word reinforces his single digit IQ. Now which one of you two will be the first to respond with another belligerent comment?

Random Jerk - What preceded the DE-regulation? What forced the power companies to immediately raise costs upon DE-regulation? What prevented the power companies from competitively building new power stations for decades? Right, unfair regulation, years of it. DE-regulation did not cause any problems period. The problems existed long before DE-regulation occured.

Lotusfire - The problem with libs such as youself is your feel good &#039;why can&#039;t we all just get along&#039; mentality. The world is not so simple. Attitudes such as yours and Jimmy Carter&#039;s, and Neville Chamberlin&#039;s breed wars. Listening to you, one might think Iraq was such a pleasent place void of all evil and attrocities... that is until &quot;we&quot; arrived. Religion never existed there until now? I can&#039;t help you. You keep watching CNN and Chris Mathews and the rest who claim civil war, I&#039;ll keep watching my varied sources of news who claim otherwise including my soldier buddies who&#039;ve been there. It&#039;s tough to accomplish anything with a gaggle of hippie libs crying failure across the news networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, I stand corrected. I appreciate the well thought out, intelligent, and relevant responses. With such remarkable insight, you folks could be well on your way to solving the worlds problems. The US should be proud to have great voters such as yourselves, an un-educated tard barely capable of typing a literate statement and a rusty tromboning boy who&#8217;s every third word reinforces his single digit IQ. Now which one of you two will be the first to respond with another belligerent comment?</p>
<p>Random Jerk &#8211; What preceded the DE-regulation? What forced the power companies to immediately raise costs upon DE-regulation? What prevented the power companies from competitively building new power stations for decades? Right, unfair regulation, years of it. DE-regulation did not cause any problems period. The problems existed long before DE-regulation occured.</p>
<p>Lotusfire &#8211; The problem with libs such as youself is your feel good &#8216;why can&#8217;t we all just get along&#8217; mentality. The world is not so simple. Attitudes such as yours and Jimmy Carter&#8217;s, and Neville Chamberlin&#8217;s breed wars. Listening to you, one might think Iraq was such a pleasent place void of all evil and attrocities&#8230; that is until &#8220;we&#8221; arrived. Religion never existed there until now? I can&#8217;t help you. You keep watching CNN and Chris Mathews and the rest who claim civil war, I&#8217;ll keep watching my varied sources of news who claim otherwise including my soldier buddies who&#8217;ve been there. It&#8217;s tough to accomplish anything with a gaggle of hippie libs crying failure across the news networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313604</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313604</guid>
		<description>Excellent news. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent news. <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313590</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313590</guid>
		<description>The real problem, I have and I think many do, is that GM just tacked on a Pontiac grill on the Holden Commodore and called it the G8. This is the kind of thing GM does not need and the majority of car fans do NOT want. Pontiac has a good design language going here and taking the blockier, chunkier, Holden styling and just sticking a new badge on the car is a bad move. 

As a Chevy it wouldn&#039;t as much of a stretch. But GM has an overall US language of more flow than block. Even their trucks are smoother than most, I think only Toyota is deliberately smoother. Dropping Holdens in as Pontiacs without a full redesign makes for cars that will look out of place next to the rest of the lineup which will further repel buyers regardless of the car&#039;s specs. 

If it doesn&#039;t look like a Pontiac, then Pontiac fans may be put off by it or worse write it off altogether on sight. 

I really like the look of current Pontiacs and would be sorely put off if Holdens with Pontiac badges shipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem, I have and I think many do, is that GM just tacked on a Pontiac grill on the Holden Commodore and called it the G8. This is the kind of thing GM does not need and the majority of car fans do NOT want. Pontiac has a good design language going here and taking the blockier, chunkier, Holden styling and just sticking a new badge on the car is a bad move. </p>
<p>As a Chevy it wouldn&#8217;t as much of a stretch. But GM has an overall US language of more flow than block. Even their trucks are smoother than most, I think only Toyota is deliberately smoother. Dropping Holdens in as Pontiacs without a full redesign makes for cars that will look out of place next to the rest of the lineup which will further repel buyers regardless of the car&#8217;s specs. </p>
<p>If it doesn&#8217;t look like a Pontiac, then Pontiac fans may be put off by it or worse write it off altogether on sight. </p>
<p>I really like the look of current Pontiacs and would be sorely put off if Holdens with Pontiac badges shipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313570</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313570</guid>
		<description>blakkar i see your point it can work if it is slightly altered, but it needs to not look cheap. the g8 dont but its a fine line, as long as it dont look like a grill from 1998.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blakkar i see your point it can work if it is slightly altered, but it needs to not look cheap. the g8 dont but its a fine line, as long as it dont look like a grill from 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313568</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313568</guid>
		<description>zo6ified, i agree, if they need to change their image (which they do) then they should ditch all of the old grand am styling cues, especially the grill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zo6ified, i agree, if they need to change their image (which they do) then they should ditch all of the old grand am styling cues, especially the grill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313567</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313567</guid>
		<description>Z06ified, 

The twin kidney grill is not likely to go much of anywhere. It&#039;s part of their design lexicon but they do have alternatives in the same lexicon. But the grill itself looks fine, even cool, when properly executed on a car that it works with. The G6 looks good with such a grill. But not every Pontiac looks completely right with it. The G8 being a good example.

That said, the designers at any automaker have more than just you to please. The G8 looks okay but not like a Pontiac... but a Chrysler 300 wanna-be. The smoother leaner lines of previous Pontiacs, I&#039;m thinking of the Bonneville (without the God-awful cladding) as the progenitor of the new look for Pontiac, lend a classier better aging look. The G6 takes that and makes it a bit younger looker The G6 GXP goes for flare that goes a long way to pointing Pontiac out for the performance focus division.

GM needs to back away for the cookie cutter look that hurt GM in the past. They have started to establish very good and distinct looks for each division, like it or lump it, and they should stick with it. 

Let Holden keep their look and let Pontiac keep their&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Z06ified, </p>
<p>The twin kidney grill is not likely to go much of anywhere. It&#8217;s part of their design lexicon but they do have alternatives in the same lexicon. But the grill itself looks fine, even cool, when properly executed on a car that it works with. The G6 looks good with such a grill. But not every Pontiac looks completely right with it. The G8 being a good example.</p>
<p>That said, the designers at any automaker have more than just you to please. The G8 looks okay but not like a Pontiac&#8230; but a Chrysler 300 wanna-be. The smoother leaner lines of previous Pontiacs, I&#8217;m thinking of the Bonneville (without the God-awful cladding) as the progenitor of the new look for Pontiac, lend a classier better aging look. The G6 takes that and makes it a bit younger looker The G6 GXP goes for flare that goes a long way to pointing Pontiac out for the performance focus division.</p>
<p>GM needs to back away for the cookie cutter look that hurt GM in the past. They have started to establish very good and distinct looks for each division, like it or lump it, and they should stick with it. </p>
<p>Let Holden keep their look and let Pontiac keep their&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 400horseSS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313561</link>
		<dc:creator>400horseSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313561</guid>
		<description>pia-blo-me ha ha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pia-blo-me ha ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z06ified</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313517</link>
		<dc:creator>Z06ified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313517</guid>
		<description>I just hope Pontiac ditches their signature twin kidney grill.  That grill kills the look of every Pontiac made, IMO, and turns an otherwise nice looking car into a 1986 Grand Am look-alike.  

The Holden concept photo shown looks great.  Put a Pontiac grill on it, and it will look like crap.  

GM:  kill that grill!!! It&#039;s done.  Cooked.  Finished.  Move on to new styling for the grill.  Pontiac shouldn&#039;t be defined by a cheesy looking grill, so let it go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope Pontiac ditches their signature twin kidney grill.  That grill kills the look of every Pontiac made, IMO, and turns an otherwise nice looking car into a 1986 Grand Am look-alike.  </p>
<p>The Holden concept photo shown looks great.  Put a Pontiac grill on it, and it will look like crap.  </p>
<p>GM:  kill that grill!!! It&#8217;s done.  Cooked.  Finished.  Move on to new styling for the grill.  Pontiac shouldn&#8217;t be defined by a cheesy looking grill, so let it go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313513</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313513</guid>
		<description>Who ever thinks that the american public should be annoyed when it becomes 5 dollars a gallon is in for a serious surprise. The way that all governments are turning green and apparently cutting down on the greenhouse emitting demon (the average driver), I wouldn&#039;t be very surprised to see your fuel prices go up to even 10 dollars a gallon. 

This car on the other hand looks like something which has no design flair and just designed to fill a gap rather then actually compete on the design front against the Alfa romeo and Audi&#039;s. GM has lost its marble because why anyone would want a mid size RWD is beyond me. For this sector it will be heavy and less fuel efficient then the Opel vectra etc... Personally I would have used the epsilom 2 platform with four wheel drive saving a load of cash on design and development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who ever thinks that the american public should be annoyed when it becomes 5 dollars a gallon is in for a serious surprise. The way that all governments are turning green and apparently cutting down on the greenhouse emitting demon (the average driver), I wouldn&#8217;t be very surprised to see your fuel prices go up to even 10 dollars a gallon. </p>
<p>This car on the other hand looks like something which has no design flair and just designed to fill a gap rather then actually compete on the design front against the Alfa romeo and Audi&#8217;s. GM has lost its marble because why anyone would want a mid size RWD is beyond me. For this sector it will be heavy and less fuel efficient then the Opel vectra etc&#8230; Personally I would have used the epsilom 2 platform with four wheel drive saving a load of cash on design and development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squeakin182</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313510</link>
		<dc:creator>Squeakin182</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313510</guid>
		<description>could they have picked an uglier color if this is the color they debut with they can forget the male market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could they have picked an uglier color if this is the color they debut with they can forget the male market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meekin111</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313506</link>
		<dc:creator>meekin111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313506</guid>
		<description>a turbo 4 adn a small v6 will do well in this, and give good fuel figures
you could have a twin turbo V6 range topper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a turbo 4 adn a small v6 will do well in this, and give good fuel figures<br />
you could have a twin turbo V6 range topper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotusfire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313500</link>
		<dc:creator>lotusfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313500</guid>
		<description>Just a little something to add to the whole oil company gouging thing. Gas Companies are making more money than ever before, astronomical amounts. I don&#039;t won&#039;t get into whether it&#039;s from gouging or not...but the point is, they won&#039;t starve if they lower the gas prices, supply and demand or not. That said, I think weening America off using so much fuel is a better idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little something to add to the whole oil company gouging thing. Gas Companies are making more money than ever before, astronomical amounts. I don&#8217;t won&#8217;t get into whether it&#8217;s from gouging or not&#8230;but the point is, they won&#8217;t starve if they lower the gas prices, supply and demand or not. That said, I think weening America off using so much fuel is a better idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313498</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313498</guid>
		<description>Uhm... Sorry. Guess not.... Sorry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm&#8230; Sorry. Guess not&#8230;. Sorry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313497</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313497</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t this supposed to be about a very exciting car? The election is still a year away.

F/econ: Power loss has very little to do with transfer between the transmission and the diff. However, the same bracing used for performance cars corrects that. a simple brace between the Tranny and diff, very common on modern performance cars... with IRS (obviously the MUSTANG does not have this can&#039;t and use it). This isolates the tranny and diff making them react as one system, much like the outdrives from the diff to the driven wheels. The power loss is negated and performance is improved.  

Going further the biggest problem will always be the tranny itself. The mere fact that it is there will always be the biggest hurdle to good f/econ. the most efficient engine will be done in by poor shifting and over stiff transmissions. This is one reason why electric motors are so appealing. Ultimately they don&#039;t need a tranny to do their job. But until on-board power storage and/or generation improves adequately, that is still a ways off. Given that, most modern trannies even those made for or by Detroit are more than up to the tasks of performance and efficiency. 

This will be a great car with a range of useful and efficient engine and transmission options. But the pictured car above is a Holden, I think the new Commodore, and NOT a rendering of an Alpha-platform car. I could be wrong though and it is an Alpha-plat prototype rendering.

Anyway I&#039;m looking forward to it. I like smaller cars, I think. They&#039;re just more fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t this supposed to be about a very exciting car? The election is still a year away.</p>
<p>F/econ: Power loss has very little to do with transfer between the transmission and the diff. However, the same bracing used for performance cars corrects that. a simple brace between the Tranny and diff, very common on modern performance cars&#8230; with IRS (obviously the MUSTANG does not have this can&#8217;t and use it). This isolates the tranny and diff making them react as one system, much like the outdrives from the diff to the driven wheels. The power loss is negated and performance is improved.  </p>
<p>Going further the biggest problem will always be the tranny itself. The mere fact that it is there will always be the biggest hurdle to good f/econ. the most efficient engine will be done in by poor shifting and over stiff transmissions. This is one reason why electric motors are so appealing. Ultimately they don&#8217;t need a tranny to do their job. But until on-board power storage and/or generation improves adequately, that is still a ways off. Given that, most modern trannies even those made for or by Detroit are more than up to the tasks of performance and efficiency. </p>
<p>This will be a great car with a range of useful and efficient engine and transmission options. But the pictured car above is a Holden, I think the new Commodore, and NOT a rendering of an Alpha-platform car. I could be wrong though and it is an Alpha-plat prototype rendering.</p>
<p>Anyway I&#8217;m looking forward to it. I like smaller cars, I think. They&#8217;re just more fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313495</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313495</guid>
		<description>&quot;GM is believed to have previewed its Alpha platform with the Holden Torana concept (pictured) in 2004&quot;

Does anyone here actually READ the articles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;GM is believed to have previewed its Alpha platform with the Holden Torana concept (pictured) in 2004&#8243;</p>
<p>Does anyone here actually READ the articles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motorcitymatt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313494</link>
		<dc:creator>motorcitymatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313494</guid>
		<description>Uhh, why do most people here think the picture shown with the article is the new G6. I hope that if you like this car you like the Mercury Milan cause that is what it reminds me of. That and the logo on the front of the car doesn&#039;t look pontiac!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh, why do most people here think the picture shown with the article is the new G6. I hope that if you like this car you like the Mercury Milan cause that is what it reminds me of. That and the logo on the front of the car doesn&#8217;t look pontiac!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-2#comment-313490</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313490</guid>
		<description>Autonutt&#039;s post describes my exact feelings on this. One thing that drives me nuts about GM is that they apparently feel that every single new product they have needs to be copied across their myriad of brands. Each brand should have a dedicated purpose, with only Chevrolet being a something-for-everyone because of its brand equity. Giving Saturn a RWD car other than their get-attention Sky roadster completely undermines the goal of making GM&#039;s line-up make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autonutt&#8217;s post describes my exact feelings on this. One thing that drives me nuts about GM is that they apparently feel that every single new product they have needs to be copied across their myriad of brands. Each brand should have a dedicated purpose, with only Chevrolet being a something-for-everyone because of its brand equity. Giving Saturn a RWD car other than their get-attention Sky roadster completely undermines the goal of making GM&#8217;s line-up make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-313489</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313489</guid>
		<description>Using the Alpha platform for a G6 and BLS successor stateside, and Opel/Holden/Vauxhall vehicles worldwide makes sense.  The decision to add it to the Saturn lineup alongside the Aura is a perfect example of GM undermining its own brand differentiation.. isn&#039;t RWD supposed to be Pontiac&#039;s sole purpose going forward?  Keep Malibu/Aura/9-3 on the FWD Vectra platform and let Pontiac and Cadillac have something to themselves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the Alpha platform for a G6 and BLS successor stateside, and Opel/Holden/Vauxhall vehicles worldwide makes sense.  The decision to add it to the Saturn lineup alongside the Aura is a perfect example of GM undermining its own brand differentiation.. isn&#8217;t RWD supposed to be Pontiac&#8217;s sole purpose going forward?  Keep Malibu/Aura/9-3 on the FWD Vectra platform and let Pontiac and Cadillac have something to themselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 400horseSS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-313486</link>
		<dc:creator>400horseSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-rear-wheel-drive-pontiac-g6-due-in-2010.html#comment-313486</guid>
		<description>Its Amazing How Much Gtp And Piabo Know About Everything And As Far As I Know The Union Hasnt Said Anything About Gas To Us But You Two Clowns Would Be The First To Know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its Amazing How Much Gtp And Piabo Know About Everything And As Far As I Know The Union Hasnt Said Anything About Gas To Us But You Two Clowns Would Be The First To Know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
