




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2009 Lincoln MKS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/review-2009-lincoln-mks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/review-2009-lincoln-mks.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gizmo2</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/review-2009-lincoln-mks.html#comment-458920</link>
		<dc:creator>gizmo2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7640#comment-458920</guid>
		<description>Why does FWD put you in the sub luxury division LLN? Does that mean Audi is sub luxury, I think not. Just remember this, the majority of people who buy luxury car does not care and dont even know what FWD or RWD or AWD is. They care that the car looks nice and they can afford it and the average person can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does FWD put you in the sub luxury division LLN? Does that mean Audi is sub luxury, I think not. Just remember this, the majority of people who buy luxury car does not care and dont even know what FWD or RWD or AWD is. They care that the car looks nice and they can afford it and the average person can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.019 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 166/167 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 12:20:07 -->
