Rollover ratings for 2006 model sport utility vehicles show a big improvement over 2005, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said yesterday. For the 2006 model year, 39 SUVs (42 percent of those rated) earned four stars in NHTSA’s rollover rating program, which assess the likelihood of a rollover. In 2005, 34 percent received four stars. For the 2006 model year, 57 SUVs (69 percent of all SUV models) offer stability control as standard equipment, up from 43 percent in 2005.
Earlier research by NHTSA documented the potential benefits of ESC, reducing single vehicle crashes by 63 percent for SUVs and 30 percent for passenger cars.
“We have worked hard to encourage automakers to install the kind of safety technology needed to make cars safer, prevent crashes and save lives,� said Acting NHTSA Administrator, Jacqueline Glassman.
Since 2004, NHTSA has encouraged manufacturers to voluntarily install ESC because of its life-saving potential. As a result, nearly all automakers now offer ESC on a total of 57 SUV models as standard equipment, and on six SUVs as an available option, up from 20 standard and 14 optional in 2003.
NHTSA uses a five-star rating system, which ranks the likelihood of a rollover in a single vehicle crash. The top score is five stars, representing a rollover risk of less than 10 percent.
For new 2006 model year vehicles, the highest rated SUV was the Chevrolet HHR, earning four stars and a 14 percent chance of rollover if involved in a single-vehicle crash. The 2006 Chrysler Pacifica and Ford Freestyle, both carryover vehicles previously tested in earlier model years, remain the agency’s highest rated SUVs overall with four stars and a 13 percent chance of rollover.
Of the 2006 model year tested vehicles, the lowest rated SUV was the Nissan Xterra 4×4, receiving three stars, representing a 25 percent chance of rollover.
For pickups, the highest rated vehicle was the Honda Ridgeline 4×4 and the Toyota Tacoma 4×2 – each earning four stars or a 14 percent chance of rollover. The lowest rated pickups were the Toyota Tundra 4×2, the Nissan Titan 4×4, and the Nissan Frontier 4×2, each receiving three stars, a 21 percent chance of rollover.
For vans, the highest rated vehicle was the Kia Sedona, earning four stars and a 13 percent chance of rollover if involved in a single-vehicle crash. The lowest rated van was the Ford E350, receiving two stars, a 30 percent chance of rollover.
For passenger cars, the highest rated vehicle was the Pontiac G6, earning five stars and a 9 percent chance of rollover if involved in a single-vehicle crash. The lowest rated passenger car was the Scion xB, receiving four stars and an 18 percent chance of rollover.
The complete list of 2006 vehicles rollover results, including carryover results from previous model years, can be found here.



05/31, 9:12 AM
posted by:
tino
WHYYY COULDENT the spiffiness come in 2005….
05/31, 10:04 AM
posted by:
TitSlinger
Shock Horror, SUVs are more prone to rollovers in an accident than passenger cars. Whatever next?
05/31, 10:48 AM
posted by:
Mike
Next they will tell us that SUV’s use more gas too.
Then they will tell us that SUV’s are a more dangerous weapon than a Gun.
Then guns are more dangerous than knives… wait, that came from a post about a Testarossa/512TR crash.
05/31, 2:13 PM
posted by:
felter…z06
At my dealership we can not keep the new 2007 Tahoe on the lot 2 weeks ago we had nine of them last night we sold one, we have got only two left. the HHR’s are doing great also.
05/31, 3:52 PM
posted by:
Mike
I can understand the Tahoe performing great… have my doubts about the HHR though. The excecution just doesn’t compare to the PT in my opinion. the HHR is larger in every exterior dimension, but smaller in every interior dimension…
06/01, 5:11 AM
posted by:
Anonymous
Am I not the only one who sees American SUVs whipping Japan’s ass AGAIN?
06/01, 5:12 AM
posted by:
Derek klein
Funny, the Japanese pickups are somehow higher-rated in rollover tests, yet REAL pickup drivers buy Ford, Dodge, and Chevy. Fancy that…