




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rolls-Royce vs. Maybach: old money or new?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8897</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8897</guid>
		<description>Yes, the leather on the Phantom&#039;s sofa-like rear bench is unbelievably soft, even more so than the Maybach. But, as I&#039;m sure you can imagine, I couldn&#039;t really complain about the leather in the Maybach either. However, the Maybach&#039;s rear seats have some impressive reclining abilities. The Phantom&#039;s thick, plush carpets also beat the Maybach&#039;s, in my opinon. On top of that, the interior of the 57 S has no shortage of piano lacquer and carbon fiber, which is nice, but I prefer the classier look of the wood in the Phantom. The Phantom is just more elegant, while the Maybach is flashier (on the inside). I would venture to say the Phantom&#039;s exterior is more elegant, and perhaps flashier as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the leather on the Phantom&#8217;s sofa-like rear bench is unbelievably soft, even more so than the Maybach. But, as I&#8217;m sure you can imagine, I couldn&#8217;t really complain about the leather in the Maybach either. However, the Maybach&#8217;s rear seats have some impressive reclining abilities. The Phantom&#8217;s thick, plush carpets also beat the Maybach&#8217;s, in my opinon. On top of that, the interior of the 57 S has no shortage of piano lacquer and carbon fiber, which is nice, but I prefer the classier look of the wood in the Phantom. The Phantom is just more elegant, while the Maybach is flashier (on the inside). I would venture to say the Phantom&#8217;s exterior is more elegant, and perhaps flashier as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8827</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8827</guid>
		<description>dikke shit hoor.....holland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dikke shit hoor&#8230;..holland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8812</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8812</guid>
		<description>heard that the leather in the phantom is THE softest in the world in any given car... did u felt the difference between the 2, John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heard that the leather in the phantom is THE softest in the world in any given car&#8230; did u felt the difference between the 2, John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gern</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8810</link>
		<dc:creator>Gern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8810</guid>
		<description>Rolls&#039; power retractable hood ornament is just so freaking boss.

Compared to it, the Maybach has all the visceral appeal of a fitful case of herpes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolls&#8217; power retractable hood ornament is just so freaking boss.</p>
<p>Compared to it, the Maybach has all the visceral appeal of a fitful case of herpes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8805</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8805</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually been in both of these cars. I sat in the back of the Maybach at the Amelia Island Concours de Elegance, and I&#039;m friends with the owner of the Rolls-Royce dealer in Orlando. Both are VERY nice (duh). On the inside, I would say the Phantom is classier, while the Maybach is more modern. As far as exterior styling... I&#039;d say most would agree the Phantom owns this category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually been in both of these cars. I sat in the back of the Maybach at the Amelia Island Concours de Elegance, and I&#8217;m friends with the owner of the Rolls-Royce dealer in Orlando. Both are VERY nice (duh). On the inside, I would say the Phantom is classier, while the Maybach is more modern. As far as exterior styling&#8230; I&#8217;d say most would agree the Phantom owns this category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8797</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8797</guid>
		<description>Rolls Royce Phantom any day of the week. There&#039;s no comparison. The Maybach 57S is #2, and the Bentley Arnage T is #3 for sure. But damn, nothin like that Rolls. So classy. So beautifully sculpted in and out, and so powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolls Royce Phantom any day of the week. There&#8217;s no comparison. The Maybach 57S is #2, and the Bentley Arnage T is #3 for sure. But damn, nothin like that Rolls. So classy. So beautifully sculpted in and out, and so powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telmo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8674</link>
		<dc:creator>Telmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8674</guid>
		<description>The Maybach is a masked Mercedes, and I do not like Mercedes. The Phantom has much more class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Maybach is a masked Mercedes, and I do not like Mercedes. The Phantom has much more class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8651</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8651</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point of that comment, #9?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point of that comment, #9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8641</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8641</guid>
		<description>CNNMoney got a chance to compare the Rolls-Royce Phantom to the Maybach 57S.

This is bad English. You can not &quot;compare to&quot;, you can only &quot;compare with&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNNMoney got a chance to compare the Rolls-Royce Phantom to the Maybach 57S.</p>
<p>This is bad English. You can not &#8220;compare to&#8221;, you can only &#8220;compare with&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8625</link>
		<dc:creator>manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8625</guid>
		<description>well, not being well known is part of maybachs appeal... its called &#039;exclusivity&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, not being well known is part of maybachs appeal&#8230; its called &#8216;exclusivity&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8622</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8622</guid>
		<description>Eff, the articles says it lacks the WELL-KNOWN HISTORY that Rolls-Royce has... and that statement is totally accurate, because, despite whatever dubious history the Maybach name has, it&#039;s certainly is NOT well-known.

As far as the Maybach having more class than any Rolls could manage... I think I just snorted Red Bull through my nose and all over my keyboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eff, the articles says it lacks the WELL-KNOWN HISTORY that Rolls-Royce has&#8230; and that statement is totally accurate, because, despite whatever dubious history the Maybach name has, it&#8217;s certainly is NOT well-known.</p>
<p>As far as the Maybach having more class than any Rolls could manage&#8230; I think I just snorted Red Bull through my nose and all over my keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8619</link>
		<dc:creator>manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8619</guid>
		<description>yes, because when i think about whos the authority on ultralux cars, i think cnnmoney...
though i have to agree, you dont drive the phantom. you pay someone to drive you around in it. the 57, epecially the s version, is more driver-oriented... since they serve different purposes and are both cool as hell, i choose both... 
excuse me, i guess i have a bank to rob :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, because when i think about whos the authority on ultralux cars, i think cnnmoney&#8230;<br />
though i have to agree, you dont drive the phantom. you pay someone to drive you around in it. the 57, epecially the s version, is more driver-oriented&#8230; since they serve different purposes and are both cool as hell, i choose both&#8230;<br />
excuse me, i guess i have a bank to rob <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asher</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8611</link>
		<dc:creator>Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8611</guid>
		<description>The Maybach name is just that, a name - used by Merc for marketing purposes solely to get another few hundred grand out of a fine, enlarged and not too beautiful exterior Merc S-class based-car.  I think its its nice but simply way overpriced, just like the SLR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Maybach name is just that, a name &#8211; used by Merc for marketing purposes solely to get another few hundred grand out of a fine, enlarged and not too beautiful exterior Merc S-class based-car.  I think its its nice but simply way overpriced, just like the SLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eff</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8603</link>
		<dc:creator>eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8603</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;... Maybach lacks the well-known history ...&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Uhm, Rolls Royce the company is exactly 15 years older than Maybach (1906 vs. 1921). Maybach may lack the brand image since Maybach hadn&#039;t built vehicles for more than six decades, but it certainly doesn&#039;t lack history. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;&#8230; Maybach lacks the well-known history &#8230;&#8221;</i> Uhm, Rolls Royce the company is exactly 15 years older than Maybach (1906 vs. 1921). Maybach may lack the brand image since Maybach hadn&#8217;t built vehicles for more than six decades, but it certainly doesn&#8217;t lack history. <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spelling police</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8593</link>
		<dc:creator>spelling police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8593</guid>
		<description>thing2 &quot;caugh&quot; is spelled cough. And the Maybach has more class than any Rolls could even dream of having.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thing2 &#8220;caugh&#8221; is spelled cough. And the Maybach has more class than any Rolls could even dream of having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8592</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8592</guid>
		<description>Agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thing2</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money.html#comment-8584</link>
		<dc:creator>Thing2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/24/rolls-royce-vs-maybach-old-money-or-new-money/#comment-8584</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d take the Phantom over the Maybach caugh Mercedes caugh anyday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d take the Phantom over the Maybach caugh Mercedes caugh anyday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 350/351 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 19:45:50 -->
