<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Land Rover planning crossover coupe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:30:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zhenya_Gatech</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289429</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhenya_Gatech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289429</guid>
		<description>vehicross anyone?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vehicross anyone?<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicross" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicross</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MM</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289384</link>
		<dc:creator>MM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289384</guid>
		<description>Seems like Land Rover is doing the same thing as Jeep did with the Compass. They&#039;re trying to enter new segments at the expense of hurting their image and losing customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Land Rover is doing the same thing as Jeep did with the Compass. They&#8217;re trying to enter new segments at the expense of hurting their image and losing customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British_Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289371</link>
		<dc:creator>British_Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289371</guid>
		<description>^^^

Incorrect the Land_e concept was released after terrain response was already in the Disco3/LR3/Range Rover Sport. The terrain response in the Land_e concept added an &quot;e&quot;-Mode for improved gas mileage. The Land_e concept also had bio-diesel capablity and mild hybrid capablity with an integragted electric rear axle. 

Look here if you don&#039;t belive me...

http://www.landrover.com/gb/en/Company/Innovation/Land_e.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^</p>
<p>Incorrect the Land_e concept was released after terrain response was already in the Disco3/LR3/Range Rover Sport. The terrain response in the Land_e concept added an &#8220;e&#8221;-Mode for improved gas mileage. The Land_e concept also had bio-diesel capablity and mild hybrid capablity with an integragted electric rear axle. </p>
<p>Look here if you don&#8217;t belive me&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.landrover.com/gb/en/Company/Innovation/Land_e.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.landrover.com/gb/en/Company/Innovation/Land_e.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289344</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289344</guid>
		<description>Land_e was only to test new technologies for future cars in LR...like terrain response (now in Disco and Range)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Land_e was only to test new technologies for future cars in LR&#8230;like terrain response (now in Disco and Range)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British_Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289299</link>
		<dc:creator>British_Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289299</guid>
		<description>Ehh not really new news... This is the Landy, Not Land_e that is a alternative fuel/hybrid concept, concept that has been floating around for a while. The idea is kind of a retro dune buggy like vehicle that would be sort of the Four wheel drive version of the MINI Cooper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehh not really new news&#8230; This is the Landy, Not Land_e that is a alternative fuel/hybrid concept, concept that has been floating around for a while. The idea is kind of a retro dune buggy like vehicle that would be sort of the Four wheel drive version of the MINI Cooper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289259</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Hole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289259</guid>
		<description>I am extremely sure that the X6 will have two doors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am extremely sure that the X6 will have two doors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truong</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289221</link>
		<dc:creator>truong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289221</guid>
		<description>crossover refers to any kind of vechile, usually SUV though, that is not a sedan or minivan or truck using a unibody structure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crossover refers to any kind of vechile, usually SUV though, that is not a sedan or minivan or truck using a unibody structure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asher</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289206</link>
		<dc:creator>Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289206</guid>
		<description>Personally, I will never think of BMW the same if they go ahead and make the X6 - to me, its actually uglier than the Aztek, which I previously didnt think was possible...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I will never think of BMW the same if they go ahead and make the X6 &#8211; to me, its actually uglier than the Aztek, which I previously didnt think was possible&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289197</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289197</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m liking very much the way thar LR is going...if only reliability could match the hype...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m liking very much the way thar LR is going&#8230;if only reliability could match the hype&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6ix</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289177</link>
		<dc:creator>6ix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289177</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t AMC make something like this way back in the day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t AMC make something like this way back in the day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe.html/comment-page-1#comment-289166</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/28/rumor-land-rover-planning-crossover-coupe/#comment-289166</guid>
		<description>I love these types of cars
the VW and the bimmer look awesome
I hope the LandRover can atleast come close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these types of cars<br />
the VW and the bimmer look awesome<br />
I hope the LandRover can atleast come close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
