




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safety gizmos that aren&#8217;t worth the cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-4099</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-4099</guid>
		<description>It`s worth it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It`s worth it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris G</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-3957</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-3957</guid>
		<description>Sorry, that was stupid. The BMW 7 Series and 2007 S Class both employ infrared imaging cameras, not radar. I was confusing the night vision with adaptive cruise control (which, btw, is also worth the cost, given the fact that people don&#039;t signal anymore). Infrared can still see farther than bi-xenons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that was stupid. The BMW 7 Series and 2007 S Class both employ infrared imaging cameras, not radar. I was confusing the night vision with adaptive cruise control (which, btw, is also worth the cost, given the fact that people don&#8217;t signal anymore). Infrared can still see farther than bi-xenons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris G</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know...having a &quot;distracting&quot; night vision screen warning me of a stopped motorist changing a flat...or staring into a black void. Which to choose? And by the way, Ulrich, radar can see further than xenons. That&#039;s why we don&#039;t see bright pulses of bluish-white light coming from the tops of air traffic control towers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;having a &#8220;distracting&#8221; night vision screen warning me of a stopped motorist changing a flat&#8230;or staring into a black void. Which to choose? And by the way, Ulrich, radar can see further than xenons. That&#8217;s why we don&#8217;t see bright pulses of bluish-white light coming from the tops of air traffic control towers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>jim sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>Like all high tech items, I think Reading The F- Manual is required.  A user of the system needs to know what the system does, when is it useful, and when is it not.

The columnist&#039;s comments sound like an ignorant user who is finding out about deficiencies in the system while in action, instead of being briefed beforehand.

On the other hand, systems should automatically warn the user when they are unable to perform their duty, or when the system has reduced capabilities.  That is a programming defect by the manufacturer.

As such, these system are unsuitable for drivers who did not advance to the computer age...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like all high tech items, I think Reading The F- Manual is required.  A user of the system needs to know what the system does, when is it useful, and when is it not.</p>
<p>The columnist&#8217;s comments sound like an ignorant user who is finding out about deficiencies in the system while in action, instead of being briefed beforehand.</p>
<p>On the other hand, systems should automatically warn the user when they are unable to perform their duty, or when the system has reduced capabilities.  That is a programming defect by the manufacturer.</p>
<p>As such, these system are unsuitable for drivers who did not advance to the computer age&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thesandman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>Thesandman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>Night vision should be HUD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night vision should be HUD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longhorn</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-3891</link>
		<dc:creator>Longhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-3891</guid>
		<description>I disagree with his comments on adaptive lighting....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with his comments on adaptive lighting&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikivee</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost.html#comment-3864</link>
		<dc:creator>nikivee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/02/16/safety-gizmos-that-arent-worth-the-cost/#comment-3864</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been saying that for years. Lots of useless crap that adds undue expense to a car and it all it does is make a driver less attentive to the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying that for years. Lots of useless crap that adds undue expense to a car and it all it does is make a driver less attentive to the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 232/233 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 16:59:22 -->
