




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Chrysler LLC become Jeep Corp?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-421429</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-421429</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting for VW or BMW to grab up Jeep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for VW or BMW to grab up Jeep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got Handling?</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-420048</link>
		<dc:creator>Got Handling?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-420048</guid>
		<description>Should LLN report random insignificant facts as news in order to drum up readership?

A random study by an unheard-of agency based in the back end of nowhere today asked a bunch of hicks some questions on subjects which they didn&#039;t care about.  Thankfully this gave a sub-editor something to file because despite the tumultuous events in Detroit &amp; Washington and one of the US&#039;s biggest car shows, he couldn&#039;t find anything significant to write about today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should LLN report random insignificant facts as news in order to drum up readership?</p>
<p>A random study by an unheard-of agency based in the back end of nowhere today asked a bunch of hicks some questions on subjects which they didn&#8217;t care about.  Thankfully this gave a sub-editor something to file because despite the tumultuous events in Detroit &amp; Washington and one of the US&#8217;s biggest car shows, he couldn&#8217;t find anything significant to write about today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxcar</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419999</link>
		<dc:creator>maxcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419999</guid>
		<description>i guess that&#039;s one way to degrade the jeep name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess that&#8217;s one way to degrade the jeep name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMW M1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419695</link>
		<dc:creator>BMW M1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419695</guid>
		<description>@TomF: Hahaha, I presume Deanster fell for Jeeps Red Tag event</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TomF: Hahaha, I presume Deanster fell for Jeeps Red Tag event</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419630</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419630</guid>
		<description>If the first two were total crap, why&#039;d you buy a third?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the first two were total crap, why&#8217;d you buy a third?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeansterTJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419590</link>
		<dc:creator>DeansterTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419590</guid>
		<description>Jeep is total crap. I&#039;m on my third one, and they are unabashed shitboxes. &quot;Quality&quot; and &quot;Jeep&quot; are mutually exclusive terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeep is total crap. I&#8217;m on my third one, and they are unabashed shitboxes. &#8220;Quality&#8221; and &#8220;Jeep&#8221; are mutually exclusive terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutant@DCX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419581</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutant@DCX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419581</guid>
		<description>I think the American people are dumb enough to fall the badge switchero. Then... everything is good again at &#039;Jeep!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the American people are dumb enough to fall the badge switchero. Then&#8230; everything is good again at &#8216;Jeep!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419510</link>
		<dc:creator>Borat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419510</guid>
		<description>It all great idea. How many people bought Jeep last year? Before? Is there is a room for such a small company? I think that investors at Cerberus have better idea what to do with their property then wondering minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all great idea. How many people bought Jeep last year? Before? Is there is a room for such a small company? I think that investors at Cerberus have better idea what to do with their property then wondering minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419485</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419485</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not such a dumb idea if they can the entire Chrysler and Dodge product lines with the possible exception of the Ram pickup (the only other Chryco offering possibly eligible for rebadging as a Jeep) and the Compass. No more cars, no more minivans. Continue on as a Jeep company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not such a dumb idea if they can the entire Chrysler and Dodge product lines with the possible exception of the Ram pickup (the only other Chryco offering possibly eligible for rebadging as a Jeep) and the Compass. No more cars, no more minivans. Continue on as a Jeep company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beatusmongous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419473</link>
		<dc:creator>beatusmongous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419473</guid>
		<description>Rugged work truck?  Jeep J10 Pioneer.  That could work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rugged work truck?  Jeep J10 Pioneer.  That could work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarface03</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419470</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarface03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419470</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that Jeep has such high brand equity, because it remained a niche builder for so long.  If you knew what a Wrangler looked like a couple decades ago, you&#039;d still be able to spot a new one on the streets today.  It&#039;s kind of like the 911 in that regard.

But if you fold all sorts of vehicles and body types into the Jeep brand, I think you lose that equity.  I want something rugged to go muddin&#039; in, I buy a Jeep Wrangler, but if I want a heavy duty work truck, I also buy a Jeep?... Naw, I don&#039;t see it.  

This is a dumb idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Jeep has such high brand equity, because it remained a niche builder for so long.  If you knew what a Wrangler looked like a couple decades ago, you&#8217;d still be able to spot a new one on the streets today.  It&#8217;s kind of like the 911 in that regard.</p>
<p>But if you fold all sorts of vehicles and body types into the Jeep brand, I think you lose that equity.  I want something rugged to go muddin&#8217; in, I buy a Jeep Wrangler, but if I want a heavy duty work truck, I also buy a Jeep?&#8230; Naw, I don&#8217;t see it.  </p>
<p>This is a dumb idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yarddog82abn</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419464</link>
		<dc:creator>yarddog82abn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419464</guid>
		<description>Did some one pay CNW Marketing Research  for this, or is it there wishful thanking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did some one pay CNW Marketing Research  for this, or is it there wishful thanking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsmydriving</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419463</link>
		<dc:creator>howsmydriving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419463</guid>
		<description>Hey, I like that Jeep speedster concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I like that Jeep speedster concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Neves</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419460</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Neves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419460</guid>
		<description>CNW Marketing Research,

That is the dumbest thing I read today.

Minivans sold to GM?  What for?  There is no demand for them.  It was Chryseler&#039;s mistake for even continuing their production. And now they&#039;re taking a beating for it.

More SUVs badged as Jeeps?  Hello! Why do you think Jeep just cut back on come models recently?  There&#039;s too many models that don&#039;t make sense.  Adding more would make even less.

&quot;So what’s the basis for all of this? Well, according to CNW, the Jeep brand is nearly twice as “acceptable” to consumers as Chrysler.&quot; -LLN

What do you think Jeep is, a garbage can for all unwanted vehicles?

Then again, this is coming from a research company who claimed H2s &amp; H3s were more fuel efficient than Toyota&#039;s Prius. HaHa

&quot;CNWMR&#039;s publication &quot;From Dust to Dust&quot; [1] claims that for the 2005 model year a Hummer H2 or H3 (but not the H1) is more efficient than a Prius, despite the fact that a Prius is one-third the weight of a Hummer and gets between four and six times better mileage. CNWMR claims that their efficiencies are based on Priuses lasting only 109,000 miles whilst Hummers run for more than 300,000. Arguments against the claim call the methods of analysis that produced these figures questionable&quot;  -Wikipedia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNW Marketing Research,</p>
<p>That is the dumbest thing I read today.</p>
<p>Minivans sold to GM?  What for?  There is no demand for them.  It was Chryseler&#8217;s mistake for even continuing their production. And now they&#8217;re taking a beating for it.</p>
<p>More SUVs badged as Jeeps?  Hello! Why do you think Jeep just cut back on come models recently?  There&#8217;s too many models that don&#8217;t make sense.  Adding more would make even less.</p>
<p>&#8220;So what’s the basis for all of this? Well, according to CNW, the Jeep brand is nearly twice as “acceptable” to consumers as Chrysler.&#8221; -LLN</p>
<p>What do you think Jeep is, a garbage can for all unwanted vehicles?</p>
<p>Then again, this is coming from a research company who claimed H2s &amp; H3s were more fuel efficient than Toyota&#8217;s Prius. HaHa</p>
<p>&#8220;CNWMR&#8217;s publication &#8220;From Dust to Dust&#8221; [1] claims that for the 2005 model year a Hummer H2 or H3 (but not the H1) is more efficient than a Prius, despite the fact that a Prius is one-third the weight of a Hummer and gets between four and six times better mileage. CNWMR claims that their efficiencies are based on Priuses lasting only 109,000 miles whilst Hummers run for more than 300,000. Arguments against the claim call the methods of analysis that produced these figures questionable&#8221;  -Wikipedia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davebo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419459</link>
		<dc:creator>davebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419459</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m honestly surprised they think Jeep has such a great reputation considering how everyone finally turned their backs on SUV&#039;s once gas hit $4 a gallon.  Now that it&#039;s back to $2 has everyone forgotten their lesson or is the mere fact that Jeep is more recognizable considered a great marketing tool, despite the fact that what they&#039;re recognized for isn&#039;t what&#039;s trendy anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly surprised they think Jeep has such a great reputation considering how everyone finally turned their backs on SUV&#8217;s once gas hit $4 a gallon.  Now that it&#8217;s back to $2 has everyone forgotten their lesson or is the mere fact that Jeep is more recognizable considered a great marketing tool, despite the fact that what they&#8217;re recognized for isn&#8217;t what&#8217;s trendy anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inline6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419458</link>
		<dc:creator>inline6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419458</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be up for Chrysler rebranding themselves as Jeep Corp or AMC, shooting the Dodge trucks and SUVs to Jeep (and canning the ones with overlap), and merging the Dodge and Chrysler car lines under a brand called either &quot;AMC&quot; or &quot;Eagle&quot;.

AMC/Eagle
Their subcompact could be called Metropolitan, Gremlin, or Pacer
Their compact could be called American or Summit
Their midsize could be called Concord, Statesman, or Matador
Their Charger/300 could become the Ambassador
The Challenger could become the Javelin

Jeep
The Patriot stays (Compass goes away)
The Wrangler stays
The Liberty stays (though a name change back to Cherokee would be better)
The Journey becomes the Commando
The Dakota gets restyled and becomes Comanche
The Grand Cherokee stays (Commander goes away)
The Ram becomes the Gladiator after a restyle
The Durango becomes the Wagoneer after a restyle

In the words of Frederick Frankentein, It...could...work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be up for Chrysler rebranding themselves as Jeep Corp or AMC, shooting the Dodge trucks and SUVs to Jeep (and canning the ones with overlap), and merging the Dodge and Chrysler car lines under a brand called either &#8220;AMC&#8221; or &#8220;Eagle&#8221;.</p>
<p>AMC/Eagle<br />
Their subcompact could be called Metropolitan, Gremlin, or Pacer<br />
Their compact could be called American or Summit<br />
Their midsize could be called Concord, Statesman, or Matador<br />
Their Charger/300 could become the Ambassador<br />
The Challenger could become the Javelin</p>
<p>Jeep<br />
The Patriot stays (Compass goes away)<br />
The Wrangler stays<br />
The Liberty stays (though a name change back to Cherokee would be better)<br />
The Journey becomes the Commando<br />
The Dakota gets restyled and becomes Comanche<br />
The Grand Cherokee stays (Commander goes away)<br />
The Ram becomes the Gladiator after a restyle<br />
The Durango becomes the Wagoneer after a restyle</p>
<p>In the words of Frederick Frankentein, It&#8230;could&#8230;work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MercMark</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419454</link>
		<dc:creator>MercMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419454</guid>
		<description>Naaaa, go really old school and call it American Motors Corporation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naaaa, go really old school and call it American Motors Corporation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419449</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419449</guid>
		<description>No, it should become Challenger Corp. SUVs are for stupid people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it should become Challenger Corp. SUVs are for stupid people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/should-chrysler-llc-become-jeep-corp.html#comment-419448</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=11546#comment-419448</guid>
		<description>Should Laura tell Jake that he&#039;s not really the father of their baby? And how far will Jennifer go to get back at Dennis after catching him in bed with her sister Glenda? Tune in for the answers to these and other questions on the next episode of One Day Closer to Death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Laura tell Jake that he&#8217;s not really the father of their baby? And how far will Jennifer go to get back at Dennis after catching him in bed with her sister Glenda? Tune in for the answers to these and other questions on the next episode of One Day Closer to Death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 364/365 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 16:32:48 -->
