RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Should F1 go green?

07/31/2006, 12:09 PM

By admin

Many automakers use their participation in motorsports to develop new technologies that eventually filter down to the consumer level. Generally, these innovations relate to improving performance, but FIA president Max Mosley would like to see an increased focus on fuel efficiency. F1 could be positioned at the cutting edge of fuel-efficiency research and development,” he said. “I realize it is more comfortable to continue in the old ways and hope everything will be all right. But that is a recipe for decline and failure.” F1 has seven engine providers – BMW, Ferrari, Honda, Mercedes, Renault, Toyota and Cosworth.

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

07/31, 12:19 PM

posted by:

Dav

no, F1 should not “Go Green”

07/31, 12:26 PM

posted by:

Adam

Why not. GT racing already has started with the R10 and going green doen’t need mean any lack in performance. F1 cars are already able to be over built for specs, I owuld imagin that any sacrfice would still keep the cars at the current level of performance considering all the rules currently in place. Hell, even if it did slow them down, the racing might be a bit more exciting. This would be a good way to promote it as a viable option, as we will need to do something about it at some point in the future.. I owuld be curious how they would go about going green. As they say, racing improves the breed.

07/31, 12:31 PM

posted by:

Wickedated

F1 Hydrogen cars! Fuel cell technology + performance!

07/31, 12:56 PM

posted by:

Dav

my main concern with going green for F1 is that such rules would undoubtedly have a deadline for completion that would precede testing finalization, thus adding more technical problems and misfortune for otherwise great drivers. i beleive that a race should be more about the driver than it is, and the way things are going now, adding some odd new technicality the mix will make F1 even more about the cars/manufacturers than about the skill level of drivers, German, Finnish or Spanish.

07/31, 1:14 PM

posted by:

Hank Hill

They should use pedal cars.

Hank Hill

07/31, 1:27 PM

posted by:

Renton

I second #1–Dave.

Do not go green.

07/31, 1:32 PM

posted by:

The Stig

Such a suggestion should naturally dovetail into Mosley’s plans for reducing the cost of competing as well as improving the spectacle of the sport.

07/31, 1:35 PM

posted by:

Anonymous

yes go green make some f1 electric motors that would kickass

07/31, 1:58 PM

posted by:

Tim_s

Yeah sure, let’s change the engine formula yet again! I love how Mad Max wants to cut costs, but changes the engine formula EVERY YEAR driving development costs through the roof. Someone needs to depose that moronic little nazi.

Whew! Now that that’s out of my system…

Using something like E85 wouldn’t be a bad idea. Just as long as they’re still using something that can be found at the pumps. It should be relavent to road cars in some way.

07/31, 2:01 PM

posted by:

ss

Worlds fastest hippies…

07/31, 2:14 PM

posted by:

2006300C

Cover the cars in freshly skinned mink; use leaded fuel and lubricate the engine with the blood of baby seals.

07/31, 2:16 PM

posted by:

z

Isn’t it obvious that they are trying to get smaller fuel consumption so they don’t have to pit as often and could use smaller fuel loads in races to gain an advantage?

They just don’t tell everyone.

07/31, 2:21 PM

posted by:

peter g

Go green, go go!

07/31, 2:25 PM

posted by:

Jae

My thoughts exactly Tim_s. You can’t push all of these regs to slow cars down and decrease costs then require regs to that exponentially increase development costs. Is he planning to get all of those manufacturers to agree on a green engine technology? Diesel? Or is Ferrari gonna propose one and the other teams have to follow suit? (V8 engine anyone?)

What he could do is give time penalties to cars doing more than 1 pit stop for fuel. It would make the cars more effecient but not “Green”.

07/31, 4:37 PM

posted by:

The Stig

#9: The current engine formula will exist until 2008. That seems pretty stable to me.

07/31, 6:53 PM

posted by:

al

Formula 1 + Hydrogen power + crash + oxygen = KAMBOOM!

07/31, 6:55 PM

posted by:

Tim_s

#15: Except Max would like them to start the engine freeze next year, because the freeze in ‘08 actually reverts back to how the engines are running right now. Does that make any sense to anyone outside of the asylum? Honestly, if I made suggestions like that where I work, I’d be fired.

And when has stability ever meant change every other year?

07/31, 9:56 PM

posted by:

sirtom123

I agree with keeping the 2.4 V8 formula for a little while longer, in order to keep development costs down. Go green in that way. Do not institute MPG requirements. The teams are already incented to get higher MPG currently, because higher MPG = less frequent pit stops. But forcing this upon teams would result in less competition on the track, and less excitement for the fans. Let the drivers race, and don’t focus so much on making the cars slower / more efficient. F1 has been getting safer and safer for over 12 years now.

-Someone who actually watches every F1 race, and goes to the USGP every year:

07/31, 10:24 PM

posted by:

manny

you can make f1 less exciting? it seems like its all pit strategy now…
but no, f1 shouldnt go green…

08/01, 12:24 AM

posted by:

mothernature

the world is getting colder becuz of global warming

08/01, 1:34 AM

posted by:

Goose

Thats it – Prius style F1.What a yawn factory that would be.Obsesssing about how much crap comes car exhausts is sooooo lame.Why not look at a half empty 747 flying from place to place…pumping out all that ****e.

08/01, 11:49 AM

posted by:

Tim_s

#22: Your using up oxygen my car could be using. ;-)

08/01, 8:07 PM

posted by:

Dav

if F1 keeps going downhill with these stringent requirments and rules and such, it’ll just become another boring money pit, and i’ve gona to the USGP and Deutsche GP several times, and its always exciting, but adding a hybrid, diesel, or ethenol requirment will produce a motorsport no more exciting than NASCAR, which is, beleive it or not, boring.

08/02, 12:09 AM

posted by:

1c3d0g

#23: what a constructive comment. :roll: Go kill yourself, asshole.

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?


Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel