




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SsangYong C200 hits the Seoul stage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-449072</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-449072</guid>
		<description>potato</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>potato</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangecones</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-449022</link>
		<dc:creator>orangecones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-449022</guid>
		<description>Yes LL, they have fairly recently filed for bankruptcy . Now they are working on restructuring and reestablishing themselves as a player in the S.Korean market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes LL, they have fairly recently filed for bankruptcy . Now they are working on restructuring and reestablishing themselves as a player in the S.Korean market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafa LL</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448979</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa LL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448979</guid>
		<description>I see Q5 to. The front Grille is definitely Audi so are the lights and fog lights fenders. 
BTW wasn&#039;t SsangYong broke??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Q5 to. The front Grille is definitely Audi so are the lights and fog lights fenders.<br />
BTW wasn&#8217;t SsangYong broke??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoomzoomer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448939</link>
		<dc:creator>zoomzoomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448939</guid>
		<description>This looks to me like a mini-Rendezvous.. kind of like what a Buick version of the new Equinox/Terrain might look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks to me like a mini-Rendezvous.. kind of like what a Buick version of the new Equinox/Terrain might look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448879</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448879</guid>
		<description>Considering their past offerings this looks fairly good, but the interior is funky in a boring, ugly way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering their past offerings this looks fairly good, but the interior is funky in a boring, ugly way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448867</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448867</guid>
		<description>JakeK, I like it: SsangYong-Saturn. Or is that &#039;So long Saturn&#039;?

I see your guys are hanging on by a thread this morning for 8th. We clinched last night by the way... you know just in case you hadn&#039;t read that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JakeK, I like it: SsangYong-Saturn. Or is that &#8216;So long Saturn&#8217;?</p>
<p>I see your guys are hanging on by a thread this morning for 8th. We clinched last night by the way&#8230; you know just in case you hadn&#8217;t read that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448866</link>
		<dc:creator>Borat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448866</guid>
		<description>Since &quot;looks&quot; are subjective term, I don&#039;t see Q5 in this. This is a hatch, based on the slope of tailgate, Q5 is more of a wagon. The schnooze can be arguably inspired by Audi, but Mitsubishi cornered huge schnoze as well. In this world it&#039;s hard to say who inspired whom. I am sure 7 series did not copy cheap Hyundai, but the outline of the trunk was the same in Bangle trunk and Hyundai (Hyundai was released first).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since &#8220;looks&#8221; are subjective term, I don&#8217;t see Q5 in this. This is a hatch, based on the slope of tailgate, Q5 is more of a wagon. The schnooze can be arguably inspired by Audi, but Mitsubishi cornered huge schnoze as well. In this world it&#8217;s hard to say who inspired whom. I am sure 7 series did not copy cheap Hyundai, but the outline of the trunk was the same in Bangle trunk and Hyundai (Hyundai was released first).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangecones</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448826</link>
		<dc:creator>orangecones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448826</guid>
		<description>@Veda, check your facts. I believe the C200 was under development longer than the Q5. Of course since Q5 is simply a Q7 that lots a back seat and somewhat toned down, you can still argue the design is &quot;Q7 inspired&quot; ... but not in any shape or form &quot;a blatant Q5 rip&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Veda, check your facts. I believe the C200 was under development longer than the Q5. Of course since Q5 is simply a Q7 that lots a back seat and somewhat toned down, you can still argue the design is &#8220;Q7 inspired&#8221; &#8230; but not in any shape or form &#8220;a blatant Q5 rip&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448815</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448815</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &quot;not a bad looking vehicle&quot; because it&#039;s a blatant copy of the Audi Q5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;not a bad looking vehicle&#8221; because it&#8217;s a blatant copy of the Audi Q5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeK66</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448814</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeK66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448814</guid>
		<description>Nice to see the production version of the 2011 Saturn Vue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the production version of the 2011 Saturn Vue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448807</link>
		<dc:creator>Borat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448807</guid>
		<description>Except for color schema and big blind spot it is not a bad looking vehicle from my point of view (or taste or lack of taste). It looks better to me then current RC-V and actually better then RAV-4. We don&#039;t get it anyways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for color schema and big blind spot it is not a bad looking vehicle from my point of view (or taste or lack of taste). It looks better to me then current RC-V and actually better then RAV-4. We don&#8217;t get it anyways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F50</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ssangyong-c200.html#comment-448800</link>
		<dc:creator>F50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=16396#comment-448800</guid>
		<description>Are SsangYong&#039;s finally going from horribly ugly to just ugly? I hope they ditch their current styling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are SsangYong&#8217;s finally going from horribly ugly to just ugly? I hope they ditch their current styling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.026 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 287/288 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 11:58:32 -->
