Refresh Image Size
 
 
 
 

04/07/2008, 2:47 PM

Sedan

Subaru issues temporary stop sale on all vehicles equipped with 2.5L turbo engine

Subaru of America has issued a stop sale on all models equipped with the company’s 2.5L turbocharged four-cylinder engine. The stop sale — which affects Forester, Legacy and Impreza vehicles equipped with the engine built in January and February — is due to a potential engine wear issue.

According to the stop sale order issued to all U.S. Subaru dealers, in markets outside of the U.S., Subaru has received complaints of an engine knock in vehicles equipped with the 2.5L turbo engine. After investigating, Subaru determined that the engine noise was due to engine wear and has since discovered which batches of vehicles are at risk of being equipped with the faulty component.

No U.S. models have been reported to have the problem, but Subaru wants to ensure it’s not selling its customers faulty vehicles.

The defect is said not to impact vehicles with the naturally aspirated version of the 2.5L or any other displacement engines.

 
 

04/07, 3:03 PM

posted by:

jackjimturkey

a stop sale?
That toyota purchase is already showing dividends!

04/07, 3:09 PM

posted by:

bwilliams

Just like the Tundra recalls!! haha

04/07, 3:09 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

Nice JJT,but……….http://info.detnews.com/redesign/forums/autostalk/lettersindex.cfm?forum=autostalk&topic=s10%2C%20parma%2C%20oh%20—–%20toyota%20buy%20back

04/07, 3:15 PM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

Sounds to me like the “faulty component” is basically the engine.

04/07, 3:17 PM

posted by:

LaCaLover

But Ford didn’t make the engine?

04/07, 3:20 PM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

CaCaLover = 1115

04/07, 3:21 PM

posted by:

LaCaLover

?

04/07, 3:22 PM

posted by:

bwilliams

This is simply amazing that a Japanese car company is issuing a “stop sale”. I thought they had superior quality… I’m so confused!

04/07, 3:26 PM

posted by:

bwilliams

I found a solution, I’ll have to start buying Chinese. I don’t think they’ve had a “stop sale” yet… Maybe I can get a good deal on a gently used Chery, I’m just a little leery about their NHTSA crash rating.

04/07, 3:57 PM

posted by:

shaver

Props for handling it correctly. Or the bean counters figured this was cheaper then lawsuits.

04/07, 4:14 PM

posted by:

Commodore

Well that is what tends to happen once a carmaker like Subaru is bought by Toy. Now that Subaru is part of Toy, all kind of improvements in quality like these start to happen

04/07, 4:17 PM

posted by:

howsmydriving

This is further evidence to support my hypothesis that turbo’s are crap.

04/07, 4:20 PM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

Sorry CaCa, I thought I read that you said Ford made the engine, which would be a typical 1115 comment. Mia culpa.

04/07, 4:24 PM

posted by:

Htay9500

Commodore: toyota wants to make everything that it owns to be boring.

04/07, 4:32 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

I hope for their sake it is just a component and not the block itself. Either way it sounds expensive.

04/07, 4:35 PM

posted by:

Need more oil for GM

Only time when Subabru mattered was when they were under GM umbrella. Now they’ll just die like the rest of these imports ****boxes.

04/07, 5:20 PM

posted by:

400horseSS

^Yep.

04/07, 5:22 PM

posted by:

brocky

they should’ve stuck with the 2.0L. WE should’ve got the 2.0L. revving up to 6.5rpm ain’t fun….

04/07, 9:19 PM

posted by:

gilby7

Give me the upcoming Subaru diesel! $2000 more for 50 mpg?! You can’t beat that, and it’ll probably knock less than the 2.5 turbo. My wife has a 10-year old Outback (bought new) with the 2.6 engine and it’s always sounded like there was a bag of marbles in there rattling around; horrible sounding engine. But it has 243,000 miles on it and still gets 25 mpg and doesn’t burn a drop of oil. She’s getting the diesel as soon as it comes to the U.S.

04/07, 9:22 PM

posted by:

gilby7

Sorry, I meant 2.5 engine..

04/07, 9:28 PM

posted by:

autonut

This does not help me a bit. My Subaru was complete piece of crap. 2.5L was like diesel as far as NVH without any benefit of the diesel: mileage and torque. Brakes were horrible, and not only mine. Why they did not stop then? bastards!

04/07, 11:42 PM

posted by:

A4

maybe theyre trying to balance out sales with the tribeca.

04/08, 12:18 AM

posted by:

sharpie

There is no difference between GM’s Subaru and Toyota’s Subaru. Their cars have always been built in Japan and GM did diddly squat with Subaru, besides stealing the WRX and rebadging it a Saab 902X, pissing off both loyal Saab and Subie fans! Apart from the more conservative exterior (and Subaru was never about design anyway, it’s the AWD) the boxer engine has soldiered on since at least the 90s. Toyota has not messed with that formula yet. So stop the baseless and stupid claim that Subaru should die under Toyota and not under GM.

If anything, we should be happy that an automaker is taking some responsibility about its products. Unlike a recall, Subaru is doing it BEFORE they even sell the cars! Let go of your blind patriotism and recognize that a company is taking some appropriate action to ensure quality.

04/08, 12:53 AM

posted by:

bigp

well i was told that japs cars were better, now we can see they are not.

04/08, 8:48 AM

posted by:

Fletch

Some of you people making posts have got to be just looking for a rise out of others with your comments, wake up. Remember when the E46 M3 was spinning main bearings and required a recall, or when the Camaro / Firebird V8 had the oil consumption issues (400horseSS!), or when Toyota had the engine sludge issue on the 3.0l V6. Not a single automaker is immune to recalls and others issues. It’s as much about how you treat the customer when they happen, in addition to the corrective action.

04/08, 10:51 AM

posted by:

rsg

Subaru is being proactive to correct an issue with a limited amount of cars (no more than a few thousand, max, were built in Jan/ Feb), where any other (larger)manufacturer would wait until it became a legal entanglement and then recall thousands of vehicles.

04/08, 10:02 PM

posted by:

hateful83

It’s a matter of turbos being hard on engines. If the smallest thing’s off, it’ll go to ****.

04/13, 2:07 PM

posted by:

tripleonefive

THis car was under GM when that engine was built GM is a disease

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel