<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The wimpiest cars of 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:43:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-175110</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-175110</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ha, ha ha, hahahahahahahahahahahaha ha ha ha... whew.&quot; That&#039;s for your comment, Anonymous. You brought out the full-fledged villain laugh.

Naturally, lists like these are of minimal value. But as far as subjective opinion goes, it&#039;s pretty accurate. The Sebring is most definitely a wimpy car--average or below in every possible respect. Anything it can do, another car in its class does better. There&#039;s a reason that platform inspired the &quot;I drive a Dodge Stratus!&quot; sketch.

Same goes for the X-type. It&#039;s really not slow in 3.0 manual form, and I personally like its looks, but it does nothing better than the leaders in its class (except get bagged on for its Ford roots).

The Malibu, Golf, and Tiburon, IMHO, don&#039;t belong on that list. They&#039;re not best-in-class, but they&#039;re certainly competitive, particularly the Malibu. 

My additions to the list? The Buick Rendezvous, Chevy Monte Carlo, Mercury Sable, Saturn ION, and Toyota Solara. To me, what makes a &quot;wimpy&quot; car is how far short it falls of its promises (for example, the Monte Carlo and Solara, sporty? Ha!).

PJ
motoralley.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ha, ha ha, hahahahahahahahahahahaha ha ha ha&#8230; whew.&#8221; That&#8217;s for your comment, Anonymous. You brought out the full-fledged villain laugh.</p>
<p>Naturally, lists like these are of minimal value. But as far as subjective opinion goes, it&#8217;s pretty accurate. The Sebring is most definitely a wimpy car&#8211;average or below in every possible respect. Anything it can do, another car in its class does better. There&#8217;s a reason that platform inspired the &#8220;I drive a Dodge Stratus!&#8221; sketch.</p>
<p>Same goes for the X-type. It&#8217;s really not slow in 3.0 manual form, and I personally like its looks, but it does nothing better than the leaders in its class (except get bagged on for its Ford roots).</p>
<p>The Malibu, Golf, and Tiburon, IMHO, don&#8217;t belong on that list. They&#8217;re not best-in-class, but they&#8217;re certainly competitive, particularly the Malibu. </p>
<p>My additions to the list? The Buick Rendezvous, Chevy Monte Carlo, Mercury Sable, Saturn ION, and Toyota Solara. To me, what makes a &#8220;wimpy&#8221; car is how far short it falls of its promises (for example, the Monte Carlo and Solara, sporty? Ha!).</p>
<p>PJ<br />
motoralley.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174948</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174948</guid>
		<description>Miata, Civic, Anything pre 2007 Saturn, rav4, element, scion, sunfire convertible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miata, Civic, Anything pre 2007 Saturn, rav4, element, scion, sunfire convertible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174878</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174878</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say if anything the Zephyr is the least wimpy of the Ford triplets.  And what about the F*$%ING Beetle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say if anything the Zephyr is the least wimpy of the Ford triplets.  And what about the F*$%ING Beetle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174832</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174832</guid>
		<description>Everything in the world is wimpy compared to General Motors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything in the world is wimpy compared to General Motors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wimpiest Cars of 2006 at Gargles</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174741</link>
		<dc:creator>Wimpiest Cars of 2006 at Gargles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174741</guid>
		<description>[...] via   Published June 19th, 2006 in Vehicles.   EMail This Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via   Published June 19th, 2006 in Vehicles.   EMail This Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyBlazE</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174720</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyBlazE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174720</guid>
		<description>Hold on, the X-Type is usually a AWD with great handling for what it is and it&#039;s engines aren&#039;t all that wimpy as the 3 litre v6es push out 231bhp to give a 0-60 of 6.6 seconds... not exactly AMG Merc material, but not THAT bad... Tops out at a fairly weak 146mph though.

But, then again the E320 CDI mercs perform just as well with better MPG hehe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on, the X-Type is usually a AWD with great handling for what it is and it&#8217;s engines aren&#8217;t all that wimpy as the 3 litre v6es push out 231bhp to give a 0-60 of 6.6 seconds&#8230; not exactly AMG Merc material, but not THAT bad&#8230; Tops out at a fairly weak 146mph though.</p>
<p>But, then again the E320 CDI mercs perform just as well with better MPG hehe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174698</link>
		<dc:creator>canut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174698</guid>
		<description>The true Wimpy cars are the X-type, Malibu, Terraza, and the ancient Ranger. The others are  OK I guess. I really don&#039;t know how they came up with this list because some of the cars and suvs listed are competitive. Maybe they don&#039;t know anything about cars, they should stick to their turf and go home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The true Wimpy cars are the X-type, Malibu, Terraza, and the ancient Ranger. The others are  OK I guess. I really don&#8217;t know how they came up with this list because some of the cars and suvs listed are competitive. Maybe they don&#8217;t know anything about cars, they should stick to their turf and go home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyBlazE</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174651</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyBlazE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174651</guid>
		<description>Except the Mondeos are nice for their price and market position - in fact watch out for the next one ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except the Mondeos are nice for their price and market position &#8211; in fact watch out for the next one <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174601</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174601</guid>
		<description>I had no idea they were even still making the Montero, but the Zephyr and Sebring are far from whimpy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea they were even still making the Montero, but the Zephyr and Sebring are far from whimpy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174595</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174595</guid>
		<description>#16 ............

#17  could not have said any better.   Jags have become pretty corporate and very wimpy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#16 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>#17  could not have said any better.   Jags have become pretty corporate and very wimpy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: think!</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174561</link>
		<dc:creator>think!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174561</guid>
		<description>a jaguar is &quot;wimpy&quot; when it is based on a ford contour, sorry, i mean ford mondeo and is basically FWD... tacking on a useless AWD unit doesnt make a jaguar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a jaguar is &#8220;wimpy&#8221; when it is based on a ford contour, sorry, i mean ford mondeo and is basically FWD&#8230; tacking on a useless AWD unit doesnt make a jaguar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174548</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174548</guid>
		<description>since when is a jaguar &quot;wimpy&quot;!?!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since when is a jaguar &#8220;wimpy&#8221;!?!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174539</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174539</guid>
		<description>this isn&#039;t news. this is opinion. wouldn&#039;t hold up in court:) i&#039;m glad that the leftlanenews has something decent to write about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this isn&#8217;t news. this is opinion. wouldn&#8217;t hold up in court:) i&#8217;m glad that the leftlanenews has something decent to write about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174512</link>
		<dc:creator>manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174512</guid>
		<description>sadly, mitsubishi doesnt know well enough to sell that version of the montero... or anything based on it... hell, anything that looks like it...
where are the civics and camries on this list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadly, mitsubishi doesnt know well enough to sell that version of the montero&#8230; or anything based on it&#8230; hell, anything that looks like it&#8230;<br />
where are the civics and camries on this list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe shmoe</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174495</link>
		<dc:creator>joe shmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174495</guid>
		<description>WTF!? montero? i thought that thing won dakar like a million times in a row, if dakar is wimpy, than just about every other racing series is just flat out gay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF!? montero? i thought that thing won dakar like a million times in a row, if dakar is wimpy, than just about every other racing series is just flat out gay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174492</guid>
		<description>I DRIVE A DODGE STRATUS !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I DRIVE A DODGE STRATUS !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIBBA</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174460</link>
		<dc:creator>JIBBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174460</guid>
		<description>I dunno how Tiburon and Montero can beat out pu$$y looking cars like the scion xA, the Aveo and all the Kias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno how Tiburon and Montero can beat out pu$$y looking cars like the scion xA, the Aveo and all the Kias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174448</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174448</guid>
		<description>So this is a &quot;10 cars that the author of this article doesn&#039;t like&quot; list? 

I could come up with one of those and it&#039;d be just as useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is a &#8220;10 cars that the author of this article doesn&#8217;t like&#8221; list? </p>
<p>I could come up with one of those and it&#8217;d be just as useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174403</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174403</guid>
		<description>The Malibu should be joined by the Pontiac G6, Buick Lacrosse, Chevy Aveo, and Saturn ION...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Malibu should be joined by the Pontiac G6, Buick Lacrosse, Chevy Aveo, and Saturn ION&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174346</guid>
		<description>According to the list, the GTI has 180 bhp. This is incorrect; it has 200 bhp. You would think that they would double-check their facts. 

Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the list, the GTI has 180 bhp. This is incorrect; it has 200 bhp. You would think that they would double-check their facts. </p>
<p>Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W1ck3d / Dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174345</link>
		<dc:creator>W1ck3d / Dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174345</guid>
		<description>Golf might be wimpy, but that is because their is a market for it. If you want to un-wimp it, buy a Golf GTI R32 and you know why that one is highly recommended by the automotive reviewers.
I agree that the regular Golf however is a little wimpy because it looks are too fluffy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golf might be wimpy, but that is because their is a market for it. If you want to un-wimp it, buy a Golf GTI R32 and you know why that one is highly recommended by the automotive reviewers.<br />
I agree that the regular Golf however is a little wimpy because it looks are too fluffy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174341</guid>
		<description>alllllrighty.  a nice, purely subjective article.

At least they could have compiled power to weight ratios or looked at performance, but nope.  100% subjectivity on display here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alllllrighty.  a nice, purely subjective article.</p>
<p>At least they could have compiled power to weight ratios or looked at performance, but nope.  100% subjectivity on display here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tino</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-174338</link>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/19/the-wimpiest-cars-of-2006/#comment-174338</guid>
		<description>a chrysler sebring is very spiffy, not wimpy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a chrysler sebring is very spiffy, not wimpy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
