Less than 18 months ago, Toshiba unveiled a new lithium-ion battery called SCiB, capable of charging in minutes and lasting far longer than regular lithium batteries. There was only one problem: the batteries had a limited energy capacity compared to traditional lithium units. But a new version of SCiB promises twice the capacity, charing in as little as 90 seconds, and a 10,000-cycle lifespan — potentially making them ideal for electric cars.
The SCiB series is based on the lithium-titanate chemistry, which is also used by California startup AltairNano in its NanoSafe cells. Altair’s cells have a specific energy density (capacity per weight) of about 75wh/kg. Comparatively, the original SCiB cells promised just 50wh/kg. Altair’s batteries are considered to be on the threshold of what’s acceptable for EVs, making the first-generation SCiB inadequate for anything but limited-range city cars.
But the new SCiB cells have double the density of their predecessors. That means 100wh/kg, which puts the batteries much closer in capacity to the lithium-cobalt chemistry used in most cell phones, laptops, and cars like the Tesla Roadster. Although some lithium-cobalt cells have fairly high claimed energy density, they often require thermal management technology, which adds to the overall weight and therefore reduces the effective capacity. Moreover, consumers might be willing to accept slightly reduced range as a tradeoff for rapid charge capability and, critically, a much longer lifespan.
Another important benefit of the SCiB’s excellent deep cycle lifespan is that a greater portion of the battery’s capacity can be charged and discharged on a regular basis. Take the Chevrolet Volt’s LG Chem battery as an example. Although it has a 16 kWh capacity, only half of that, 8 kWh, is actually accessible to the consumer. This is because allowing the battery to be fully drained and recharged can drastically reduce its life.
The new SCiB cells are said have a deep cycle life between 5,000 and 10,000 cycles. Compare that to the batteries used by the Tesla Roadster or Chevy Volt, which are said to be good for 1,000 deep cycles. Deep cycle lifespan is considered to end when a battery has 80 percent of its original advertised capacity left. By this metric, it means an electric car with a 200 mile range using SCiB batteries would be able to travel 1 to 2 million miles before possibly needing a new battery.
Also critically important is SCiB’s rapid-charge capacity, which Toshiba says allows its electric car battery pack to charge fully in 90 seconds from a high-output charging station. Altair’s batteries, in comparison, can be charged in as little as 10 minutes. A competing technology from A123 Systems can charge in 15 minutes. Tesla’s battery pack takes a minimum of 45 minutes to charge via an industrial hookup.
Safety is another major benefit of the SCiB design. Thermal runaway, which can lead to fire or explosion, is not a concern with the batteries. As a result, cooling systems are not required. Another benefit of Toshiba’s new SCiB is improved power output. Toshiba says it has quadrupled the output density to 3,900 watts, making it one of the most powerful batteries in the world.
Toshiba’s says it intends to mass produce the new batteries with a new factory in Niigata Prefecture set to open this fall. That will increase production from the current 150,000 SCiBs per month to over 2 million. Toshiba’s mass production ability already gives it a significant price advantage over companies like Altair and A123. Ramping up production will serve to drive costs down even more. Toshiba says it expects monthly output to reach 10 million units per month by 2015, for everything from cell phones to electric cars.



04/16, 3:38 PM
posted by:
maxcar
W=AxV what sort of amperage will it take to charge a battery this fast, assuming a 240V circuit? Most older homes have 100A service, while the typical modern home has 200A. looks like edison will be installing a squillion ev meters in the next few years. better get started.
04/16, 4:05 PM
posted by:
Nick Aziz
This type of rapid charging is only going to be possible via charging stations. If you take Tesla’s pack as an example, the 3.5-hour charge is possible via a 220V/70A setup. For a house to do that, you need 200A service unless you want a brown-out in your home. Anything better than a 3.5-hour charge is not gonna happen in a regular home if you’re talking about a large battery pack.
04/16, 5:01 PM
posted by:
leftwingagenda
charging logistics aside, this battery sounds awesome…i hope it’s not all hype and the numbers are realistic…
04/16, 6:53 PM
posted by:
Madcapp
Here’s hoping it works out better than HDDVD.
04/16, 8:21 PM
posted by:
Blakkarr
Same, Madcapp,
I’m not sure Toshiba will stick it out if things are not a rosy as they would like. But We will see, especially if they sign on partners to share the load of producing and developing further a clearly desirable product.
04/16, 9:44 PM
posted by:
Borat
I still having bad vibes after my laptop caught fire from crummy battery. Lets hope does not happens to cars.
04/16, 11:37 PM
posted by:
928dreamer
This is fantastic news for EV manufacturers. This actually shows that EVs are viable as a future transportation option. If you can “refuel” your EV in 90 sec at your local refueling station, this would be no different than driving a 20MPG car with a 10 gal tank. Not ideal, but not unmanageable. In a few years when the range is up to 300 miles then it will be on par with current fossil fueled vehicles.
I really don’t think that the infrastructure will be that hard to incorporate into current gas stations. You can have diesel pumps, unleaded pumps, and an area to charge your EV. Things are looking up for EVs.
04/17, 12:19 AM
posted by:
jdasch1
Borat- gasoline powered cars have been catching fire for over a hundred years now. So saying an electric car won;t catch fire sometime is not realistic. This battery sounds awesome. 5 to 10000 cycles of discharge and recharge….get out of here!!!! Thats unheard of technology. BUY THEIR STOCK if its true. And yes, some people like myself have 800 amp service at my home, so bring on the rapid charge option!! My current Electric truck takes only a 40 amp service and charged just fine overnight…but 30 minutes for a full charge would be totally awesome.
04/17, 12:36 PM
posted by:
Payton Byrd
It takes 30 times as long to charge the Tesla Roadster with it’s current battery compared to this new battery. Think about what this means for parallel hybrids. Given the same battery footprint as currently allocated in the Volt, it would mean that you could go much further on a full charge from the deep cycle gains as well as how much more rapidly the batteries will charge under regenerative braking and when the engine runs the generator.
04/17, 1:40 PM
posted by:
Patriot
jdasch1, it’s called A123 systems. They’ve had this technology in the works for some time. They just dont have toshiba’s muscle to push R&D faster.
04/19, 9:01 AM
posted by:
jayjc08
I guess the general goal would be to charge your batteries in less than five minutes.
If you could charge up in less than three minutes, and have a range of about 200 miles, then battery technology is feasible in the future over hydrogen and other fuels. Electric cars still make the best sense, just the batteries that are holding them back…